Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumours >4 cm compared with smaller tumours: perioperative results

Renal parenchymal histopathology predicts life-threatening chronic kidney disease as a result of radical nephrectomy

The preoperative prediction of post-radical nephrectomy renal insufficiency plays an important role in the decision-making process regarding renal surgery options. Furthermore, the prediction of both postoperative renal insufficiency and postoperative cardiovascular disease occurrence, which is suggested to be an adverse consequence caused by renal insufficiency, contributes to the preoperative policy decision as well as the precise informed consent for a renal cell carcinoma patient. Preoperative nomograms for the prediction of post-radical nephrectomy renal insufficiency, calculated using patient backgrounds, are advocated. The use of these nomograms together with other types of nomograms predicting oncological outcome is beneficial. Post-radical nephrectomy attending physicians can predict renal insufficiency based on the normal renal parenchymal pathology in addition to preoperative patient characteristics. It is suggested that a high level of global glomerulosclerosis in nephrectomized normal renal parenchyma is closely associated with severe renal insufficiency. Some studies showed that post-radical nephrectomy severe renal insufficiency might have an association with increased mortality as a result of cardiovascular disease. Therefore, such pathophysiology should be recognized as life-threatening, surgically-related chronic kidney disease. On the contrary, the investigation of the prediction of mild post-radical nephrectomy renal insufficiency, which is not related to adverse consequences in the postoperative long-term period, is also promising because the prediction of mild renal insufficiency might be the basis for the substitution of radical nephrectomy for nephron-sparing surgery in technically difficult or compromised cases. The deterioration of quality of life caused by post-radical nephrectomy renal insufficiency should be investigated in conjunction with life-threatening matters.

Treatment outcomes of partial nephrectomy for T1b tumours

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Nephron-sparing surgery is the standard of care for the treatment of localized renal tumours and is increasingly performed for larger and more challenging lesions. Aim of this review is to analyse the outcomes of partial nephrectomy for the treatment of T1b renal tumours greater than 4 cm in size.

RECENT FINDINGS

No randomized trial has compared the outcomes of partial nephrectomy compared to radical nephrectomy for T1b renal tumours. However, several single, multi-institutional and population-based studies consistently showed similar cancer-specific survival rates for open partial nephrectomy (OPN) and radical nephrectomy for tumours greater than 4 cm in size. A decreased loss in renal function was observed with partial nephrectomy compared to radical nephrectomy for T1b tumours. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for tumours greater than 4 cm in size was shown to obtain similar short-to-intermediate-term oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and OPN in experienced centres, but is associated with longer warm ischaemia time and higher complication rates. The initial series of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy show similar perioperative results and decreased warm ischaemia time compared to LPN, whereas the oncological outcomes are still immature.

SUMMARY

Partial nephrectomy for T1b renal tumours achieves comparable oncological outcomes and better preservation of renal function compared to radical nephrectomy and should be performed whenever technically possible. OPN remains at present the gold standard technique. LPN represents an alternative to OPN in centres with advanced laparoscopic expertise. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy has the potential to overcome the drawbacks of pure laparoscopic surgery, but larger series and longer follow-up are needed to further define its role in the management of T1b tumours.

Predictive preoperative factors for renal insufficiency in patients followed for more than 5 years after radical nephrectomy

Purpose

We assessed the predictive factors for renal insufficiency in patients followed for more than 5 years after radical nephrectomy.

Materials and Methods

Age, gender, history of diabetes, history of hypertension, body mass index, preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), serum uric acid, urine albumin, normal renal parenchymal volume, tumor size, and ratio of normal parenchymal volume of the removed kidney to that of the remaining kidney were evaluated retrospectively in 89 patients who underwent radical nephrectomy from January 2001 to December 2005. Patients were included whose renal parenchymal volume was measurable by use of perioperative imaging (computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging), whose preoperative eGFR was greater than 60 mL/min/1.73 m², and who were followed for more than 5 years. To measure renal parenchymal volume from imaging, we integrated the extent of the normal renal parenchyma from axial slides of images.

Results

In univariate and multivariate binary regression analysis, the parenchymal volume of the remnant kidney (p=0.001), a history of diabetes (p=0.035), and preoperative eGFR (p=0.011) were independent factors for renal insufficiency. By use of a receiver operating characteristic curve, a volume of 170 mL was determined to be an appropriate cutoff value, with sensitivity of 58.7% and specificity of 74.4% for the parenchymal volume of the remnant kidney for predicting eGFR less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m² (area under the curve, 0.678). The parenchymal volume of the remnant kidney was also an independent factor for the downgrading of the chronic kidney disease category in the multivariate linear regression analysis (p=0.021).

Conclusions

Preoperative eGFR, a history of diabetes, and the radiologic volume of the remaining kidney parenchyma could be useful factors for predicting postoperative renal function. Patients with parenchymal volumes of less than 170 mL have a higher risk of postoperative renal insufficiency, which should be considered carefully when choosing a treatment modality.

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: current status, techniques, and future directions

Open partial nephrectomy for the treatment of small renal masses (SRMs) concerning for renal cell carcinoma has been increasingly utilized with the increased incidental detection of SRMs and the growing recognition of the benefits of renal preservation. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) is a minimally invasive technique that achieves comparable oncologic and improved morbidity outcomes when compared to the open procedure. However, LPN is a technically demanding procedure resulting in a long learning curve and a lack of widespread adoption. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) overcomes many of the technical hurdles of the LPN and is now coming to the forefront for the minimally invasive surgical management of SRMs. To date, the short-term oncologic outcomes of RAPN have been comparable to the open operation while providing the improved morbidity outcomes of LPN. Although encouraging, we await the long-term oncologic results of this new and promising procedure. The current bottleneck is an issue of cost and reliance on a patient-side surgeon. Future developments in instrumentation, newer robots, cost reduction, more streamlined training, increased robotic experience, and adoption by more centers will lead to greater benefit for patients with SRMs requiring nephron-sparing surgery. This review will discuss techniques for RAPN and then delve into the current status of RAPN using parameters such as warm ischemia time, blood loss, hospital stay, oncological outcomes, complications, learning curve, and quality of life. There will be an exploration of potential disadvantages associated with RAPN followed by a look at evolving techniques in regard to this groundbreaking procedure.