Dalteparin-associated catastrophic retroperitoneal hematoma successfully treated with recombinant factor VIIa

A Historical Perspective on the Reversal of Anticoagulants

There has been a landmark shift in the last several decades in the management and prevention of thromboembolic events. From the discovery of parenteral and oral agents requiring frequent monitoring as early as 1914, to the development of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) that do not require monitoring or dose adjustment in the late 20th century, great advances have been achieved. Despite the advent of these newer agents, bleeding continues to be a key complication, affecting 2 to 4% of DOAC-treated patients per year. Bleeding is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Although specific reversal agents for DOACs have lagged the release of these agents, idarucizumab and andexanet alfa are now available as antagonists. However, the efficacy of these reversal agents is uncertain, and complications, including thrombosis, have not been adequately explored. As such, guidelines continue to advise the use of nonspecific prohemostatic agents for patients requiring reversal of the anticoagulant effect of these drugs. As the indications for DOACs and the overall prevalence of their use expand, there is an unmet need for further studies to determine the efficacy of specific compared with nonspecific pro-hemostatic reversal agents. In this review, we will discuss the evidence behind specific and nonspecific reversal agents for both parenteral and oral anticoagulants.

Treatment of bleeding complications in patients on anticoagulant therapy

Anticoagulant therapy is often refrained from out of fear of hemorrhagic complications. The most frequent type of major bleeding is gastrointestinal, but intracranial hemorrhage has the worst prognosis. Management of these complications in patients on anticoagulants should follow the same routines as for nonanticoagulated patients, as described here with the previously mentioned bleeds as examples. In addition, for life-threatening or massive hemorrhages, reversal of the anticoagulant effect is also crucial. Adequate reversal requires information on which anticoagulant the patient has taken and when the last dose was ingested. Laboratory data can be of some help, but not for all anticoagulants in the emergency setting. This is reviewed here for the different types of anticoagulants: vitamin K antagonists, heparins, fondaparinux, thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors. Specific antidotes for the latter are becoming available, but supportive care and nonspecific support for hemostasis with antifibrinolytic agents or prothrombin complex concentrates, which are widely available, should be kept in mind.

Major publications in the critical care pharmacotherapy literature: January-December 2016

PURPOSE

To summarize select critical care pharmacotherapy guidelines and studies published in 2016.

SUMMARY

The Critical Care Pharmacotherapy Literature Update (CCPLU) Group screened 31 journals monthly for relevant pharmacotherapy articles and selected 107 articles for review over the course of 2016. Of those included in the monthly CCPLU, three guidelines and seven primary literature studies are reviewed here. The guideline updates included are as follows: hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia management, sustained neuromuscular blocking agent use, and reversal of antithrombotics in intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). The primary literature summaries evaluate the following: dexmedetomidine for delirium prevention in post-cardiac surgery, dexmedetomidine for delirium management in mechanically ventilated patients, high-dose epoetin alfa after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, ideal blood pressure targets in ICH, hydrocortisone in severe sepsis, procalcitonin-guided antibiotic de-escalation, and empiric micafungin therapy.

CONCLUSION

The review provides a synopsis of select pharmacotherapy publications in 2016 applicable to clinical practice.

Intentional overdose with tinzaparin: management dilemmas

BACKGROUND

Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is increasingly being prescribed for prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic diseases. Despite the fact that its therapeutic use is considered to be safe, it can be complicated by major hemorrhage and, in contrast to unfractionated heparin, it can only partially be neutralized by protamine. Recent reports of LMWH overdose illustrate the need for a consensus on its management.

OBJECTIVES

To describe a case of self-poisoning with a very large dose of tinzaparin and discuss management options in patients with LMWH overdose.

CASE REPORT

A 69-year-old woman was brought to the Emergency Department 2 h after injecting herself with 280,000 IU of tinzaparin subcutaneously in an attempt to commit suicide. Despite an unrecordable activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT > 180 s) and prolonged prothrombin time, there was no evidence of active bleeding. She was given an intravenous infusion of 100 mg protamine sulfate and was admitted to the intensive care unit, where further infusions of protamine were administered. Normalization of the APTT occurred 40-50 h post admission, reflecting normal tinzaparin clearance rather than neutralization by protamine. No hemorrhagic complications occurred during her hospitalization except for prolonged bleeding from venipuncture sites.

CONCLUSION

In this case of massive tinzaparin overdose, conventional doses of protamine failed to rapidly normalize the deranged coagulation parameters. The favorable clinical outcome suggests that, regardless of the LMWH amount injected, no active treatment is needed in the absence of hemorrhage. This is in accordance with the limited published data concerning cases of overdose with other LMWHs.