Comparison of estimated GFR and measured GFR in prospective living kidney donors

Retaining Race in Chronic Kidney Disease Diagnosis and Treatment

The best overall measure of kidney function is glomerular filtration rate (GFR) as commonly estimated from serum creatinine concentrations (eGFRcr) using formulas that correct for the higher average creatinine concentrations in Blacks. After two decades of use, these formulas have come under scrutiny for estimating GFR differently in Blacks and non-Blacks. Discussions of whether to include race (Black vs. non-Black) in the calculation of eGFRcr fail to acknowledge that the original race-based eGFRcr provided the same CKD treatment recommendations for Blacks and non-Blacks based on directly (exogenously) measured GFR. Nevertheless, the National Kidney Foundation and the American Society of Nephrology Task Force on Reassessing the Inclusion of Race in Diagnosing Kidney Disease removed race in CKD treatment guidelines and pushed for the immediate adoption of a race-free eGFRcr formula by physicians and clinical laboratories. This formula is projected to negate CKD in 5.51 million White and other non-Black adults and reclassify CKD to less severe stages in another 4.59 million non-Blacks, in order to expand treatment eligibility to 434,000 Blacks not previously diagnosed and to 584,000 Blacks previously diagnosed with less severe CKD. This review examines: 1) the validity of the arguments for removing the original race correction, and 2) the performance of the proposed replacement formula. Excluding race in the derivation of eGFRcr changed the statistical bias from +3.7 to -3.6 ml/min/1.73m2 in Blacks and from +0.5 to +3.9 in non-Blacks, i.e., promoting CKD diagnosis in Blacks at the cost of restricting diagnosis in non-Blacks. By doing so, the revised eGFRcr greatly exaggerates the purported racial disparity in CKD burden. Claims that the revised formulas identify heretofore undiagnosed CKD in Blacks are not supported when studies that used kidney failure replacement therapy and mortality are interpreted as proxies for baseline CKD. Alternatively, a race-stratified eGFRcr (i.e., separate equations for Blacks and non-Blacks) would provide the least biased eGFRcr for both Blacks and non-Blacks and the best medical treatment for all patients.

Comparison of Three Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimating Equations with 24-Hour Urine Creatinine Clearance Measurement in Potential Living Kidney Donors

Background

The accuracy of the measurement of renal function in potential living kidney donors (PLKD) is essential. The direct measurement of glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) has been considered the "gold standard." The estimated GFR (eGFR) with 24-hour urinary creatinine clearance (CrCl) is frequently used because of its availability. We aim to evaluate the correlation and agreement of eGFR using serum-based creatinine formulas (Cockcroft-Gault, MDRD, and CKD-EPI) and the eGFR based on 24-hour urinary CrCl to evaluate kidney function in PLKD.

Methods

We evaluated the kidney function in 799 PLKD using 24-hour urinary CrCl method and compared the correlation and agreement with the eGFR based on creatinine formulas (Cockcroft-Gault, MDRD, and CKD-EPI). We calculated the mean bias (difference), precision (SD of this difference), accuracy, and performed Bland-Altman plots.

Results

A total of 799 PLKD were analyzed. The age of the PLKD ranged from 18 to 73 years. Weak to mild correlation was observed between 24-hour urinary CrCl and all formulas (ranged from 0.31 to 0.49). The three equations underestimated the GFR. Using the Bland-Altman graphic, we observed that the CKD-EPI was the least scattered and most precise; however, mean bias and the interval range (limits of agreement) of all formulas were too big to assume equivalence between 24-hour urinary CrCl method and eGFR based on creatinine. Results of mean bias were similar when comparing the three equations in patients with CrCl GFR <60. However, the accuracy of all formulas was better for the female group and the youngest individuals (≤40 years old).

Conclusion

In this PLKD cohort, of all the three equations, the CKD-EPI was the least scattered and most precise. However, the correlation and the level of agreement between the three equations and 24-hour urinary CrCl were too low to assume the equivalence.

Assessing Renal Function for Kidney Donation. How Low Is Too Low?

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) with decreased morbi-mortality, improved life quality, and reduced cost. However, the shortage of organs from deceased donors led to an increase in KT from living donors. Some stipulate that living donors have a higher risk of ESKD after donation compared with healthy non-donors. The reason for this is not clear. It is possible that ESKD is due to the nephrectomy-related reduction in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), followed by an age-related decline that may be more rapid in related donors. It is essential to assess donors properly to avoid rejecting suitable ones and not accepting those with a higher risk of ESKD. GFR is a central aspect of the evaluation of potential donors since there is an association between low GFR and ESKD. The methods for assessing GFR are in continuous debate, and the kidney function thresholds for accepting a donor may vary according to the guidelines. While direct measurements of GFR (mGFR) provide the most accurate evaluation of kidney function, guidelines do not systematically use this measurement as a reference. Also, some studies have shown that the GFR decreases with age and may vary with gender and race, therefore, the lower limit of GFR in patients eligible to donate may vary based on these demographic factors. Finally, it is known that CrCl overestimates mGFR while eGFR underestimates it, therefore, another way to have a reliable GFR could be the combination of two measurement methods.

Limited Evidence for Use of a Black Race Modifier in eGFR Calculations: A Systematic Review

Background

Commonly used estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations include a Black race modifier (BRM) that was incorporated during equation derivation. Race is a social construct, and a poorly characterized variable that is applied inconsistently in clinical settings. The BRM results in higher eGFR for any creatinine concentration, implying fundamental differences in creatinine production or excretion in Black individuals compared to other populations. Equations without inclusion of the BRM have the potential to detect kidney disease earlier in patients at the greatest risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD), but also has the potential to over-diagnose CKD or impact downstream clinical interventions. The purpose of this study was to use an evidence- based approach to systematically evaluate the literature relevant to the performance of the eGFR equations with and without the BRM and to examine the clinical impact of the use or removal.

Content

PubMed and Embase databases were searched for studies comparing measured GFR to eGFR in racially diverse adult populations using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease or the 2009-Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration-creatinine equations based on standardized creatinine measurements. Additionally, we searched for studies comparing clinical use of eGFR calculated with and without the BRM. 8,632 unique publications were identified; an additional 3 studies were added post-hoc. In total, 96 studies were subjected to further analysis and 44 studies were used to make a final assessment.

Summary

There is limited published evidence to support the use of a BRM in eGFR equations.

Evaluating the Impact and Rationale of Race-Specific Estimations of Kidney Function: Estimations from U.S. NHANES, 2015-2018

BACKGROUND

Standard equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) employ race multipliers, systematically inflating eGFR for Black patients. Such inflation is clinically significant because eGFR thresholds of 60, 30, and 20 ml/min/1.73m2 guide kidney disease management. Racialized adjustment of eGFR in Black Americans may thereby affect their clinical care. In this study, we analyze and extrapolate national data to assess potential impacts of the eGFR race adjustment on qualification for kidney disease diagnosis, nephrologist referral, and transplantation listing.

METHODS

Using population-representative cross-sectional data from the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2015-2018, eGFR values for Black Americans were calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation with and without the 1.21 race-specific coefficient using cohort data on age, sex, race, and serum creatinine.

FINDINGS

Without the MDRD eGFR race adjustment, 3.3 million (10.4%) more Black Americans would reach a diagnostic threshold for Stage 3 Chronic Kidney Disease, 300,000 (0.7%) more would qualify for beneficial nephrologist referral, and 31,000 (0.1%) more would become eligible for transplant evaluation and waitlist inclusion.

INTERPRETATION

These findings suggest eGFR race coefficients may contribute to racial differences in the management of kidney. We provide recommendations for addressing this issue at institutional and individual levels.

FUNDING

No external funding was received for this study.

The « race » correction in estimating glomerular filtration rate: an European point of view

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is currently a heated debate ongoing whether or not to use the race coefficient for black people in the Modification of Diet in Renal Diseases and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology-equation. The use of the race coefficient is thought by several American authors as a source of discrimination.

RECENT FINDINGS

It has recently been shown that the race coefficient is inaccurate in European and African black people. Therefore, it seems that the race correction is more a correction for black Americans, rather than for black in general. This 'correction' at the glomerular filtration rate (GFR)-level has been criticized, as it is misleading, and should be abandoned, as it has not been shown that GFR is different between black and white people. However, as differences in creatinine generation between black and white people might exist, a correction or adjustment, different for black and white people, at the creatinine level might be required, very similar to the different scaling of creatinine for males and females.

SUMMARY

The current debate on the race coefficient is particularly difficult because of the absence of good scientific data in black subjects and there lies the real discrimination in our opinion. We therefore call for future dedicated studies, both in Europe and USA.

Repeatability of glomerular filtration rate studies performed using 99mTc-DTPA in a population including cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurement remains an integral investigation in clinical practice and is particularly important in the prediction and follow-up of renal side-effects of nephrotoxic chemotherapy in cancer patients. Knowing the coefficient of variation (CV) of a test is vital for the correct interpretation of serial studies. Recent difficulties with 51Cr-EDTA availability have renewed interest in 99mTc-DTPA, but there is a paucity of data on the test-retest variability of this radiopharmaceutical. Furthermore, the authors are unaware of published repeatability data in cancer patients. The aim of this study was to determine the CV of repeat 99mTc-DTPA GFR measurements in a clinical patient population that included cancer patients.

METHODS

Patients who had undergone ≥2 GFR studies at our department between January 2009 and December 2019 were retrospectively identified. Patients with chronic kidney disease and those who had received chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery between measurements were excluded. The CV for each patient was calculated and the mean CVs of cancer and prospective renal donor groups were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were included in the final analysis. The mean CV in the cancer group (38 patients) was 8.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.9-10.2%] and in the renal donor group (16 patients) 7.1% (95% CI 4.2-10.1%). These figures did not differ significantly (P = 0.37). The groups were combined to calculate the final overall mean CV of 8.1% (95% CI 6.7-9.6%).

CONCLUSION

In both non-cancer and cancer patients the CV of GFR studies performed with 99mTc-DTPA was comparable with mostly 51Cr-EDTA figures presented in literature.

Post-kidney donation glomerular filtration rate measurement and estimation

BACKGROUND

Long-term consequences associated with kidney donation are controversial. Pre- and post-donation glomerular filtration rates (GFRs) are determinants of renal and cardiovascular risk weighting. In Latin America, there is limited experience in evaluating kidney function using GFR measurement techniques in kidney donors. The MDRD 4-variable and CKD-EPI equations are considered reasonable options. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the MDRD and CKD-EPI equations in post-nephrectomy GFR dynamics in kidney donors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective cohort study with GFR measurement and estimation in 189 kidney donors who underwent nephrectomy between 2007 and 2016 at the Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba [Private University Hospital of Córdoba] in Córdoba, Argentina. GFRs were evaluated before and after nephrectomy by iothalamate clearance determined by HPLC and by the MDRD and CKD-EPI equations for estimating GFR. Two groups were formed for this study: Group 1 (n=107), with an evaluation time subsequent to GFR stabilization (3 months) of up to 5 years, and Group 2 (n=82), with an evaluation time of 5-10 years following donation. Measured GFR (mGFR) was assessed by iothalamate clearance determined by HPLC.

RESULTS

Renal compensation values were 61.9% (52.0%-71.1%) and 75.6% (64.9%-84.4%) for Group 1 (n=107) and Group 2 (n=82), respectively. MDRD underestimated the GFR in 3.2% (90ml/min/1.73m²) and 38.6% (60ml/min/1.73m²) compared to the mGFR, and CKD-EPI underestimated the GFR in 2.6% (90ml/min/1.73m²) and 13.8% (60ml/min/1.73m²). Diagnostic performance was evaluated with a ROC curve (mGFR<60ml/min/1.73m²) for MDRD (ABC=0.66; CI: 0.59-0.73; sensitivity: 98.7%; specificity: 63.3%) and for CKD-EPI (ABC=0.79 CI: 0.73-0.85; sensitivity: 96.9%; specificity: 76.4%. Estimated GFR (eGFR) showed poor performance for estimating the glomerular filtration rate in the post-nephrectomy follow-up of donors over 50 years of age.

CONCLUSIONS

Equations for estimating GFRs showed poor performance for long-term follow-up of post-nephrectomy GFRs. Measuring GFRs to determine kidney function is recommended in the screening and follow-up of some donors under the current selection criteria.

Computed Tomography Parameters and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Formulas for Peridonation Living Kidney Donor Assessment

BACKGROUND

Renal function is usually described by the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The standard method used for living kidney donor evaluation in our center is the 24-hour urine creatinine clearance (CrCl) and kidney morphology assessment with computed tomography (CT). The aim of the study was the analysis of the correlation of CrCl with 15 published eGFR formulas and morphologic CT parameters to choose the most accurate kidney function estimation method before and after donation.

METHODS

The study included 39 living donors (18 male and 21 female, aged 32-69 years; mean age, 51.4 [SD, 9.7] years). The eGFR was estimated using Cockcroft-Gault, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease 7, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease 4, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration, Mayo Clinic, Nankivell, Bjornsson, Davis-Chandler, Edward-Whyte, Walser, Gates, Hull, Jelliffe-1, Jelliffe-2, or Mawer formulas and correlated with CrCl. CT parameters (kidney dimensions, volume, vascularization) were compared with eGFR formulas.

RESULTS

The 25% to 34% (mean, 28.5% [SD, 2.3%]) decrease in eGFR after donation and its 1.5% to 5.0% (mean, 3.2% [SD, 1.0%]) increase over a year were observed. Cockcroft-Gault, Bjornsson, Hull, and Mawer equations (all including serum creatinine, age, sex, and body mass) correlated with predonation CrCl (r = 0.54, 0.53, 0.53, and 0.56, respectively; P < .001). From CT parameters, renal cortex volume correlated with CrCl (r = 0.48, P = .002) as well as the 4 abovementioned equations before donation (r = 0.65, 0.61, 0.64, and 0.74, respectively; P < .001) and during the postdonation period (12-month r = 0.59, 0.54, 0.57, and 0.70 respectively; P < .002).

CONCLUSIONS

The eGFR calculated with equations combining serum creatinine, age, sex, and body mass as well as renal cortex volume are predictive of pre- and postdonation kidney function.

Increased Glomerular Filtration Rate in Early Stage of Balkan Endemic Nephropathy

Background: A previous study indicated that Balkan endemic nephropathy (BEN) patients in the early stage of the disease had significantly higher creatinine clearance (Ccr) than healthy persons. The aim of the study was to assess whether tubular creatinine secretion affects Ccr in early stages of BEN and to check the applicability of serum creatinine-based glomerular filtration rate (GFR) equations in these patients. Methods: The study involved 21 BEN patients with estimated GFR (eGFR) above 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, excluding any conditions that could affect GFR or tubular creatinine secretion, and 15 healthy controls. In all participants Ccr with and without cimetidine and iohexol clearance (mGFR) were measured and eGFR calculated using Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study (MDRD) equations. Glomerular hyperfiltration cutoff (GFR-HF) was calculated. Results: There was no significant difference between the groups in Ccr before and after cimetidine or for eGFR, but mGFR was significantly higher in BEN patients than in controls (122.02 ± 28.03 mL/min/1.73 m2 vs. 101.15 ± 27.32 mL/min/1.73 m2; p = 0.032). Cimetidine administration reduced Ccr by 10% in both groups. The ratio of Ccr to mGFR was significantly above one in seven BEN patients and five controls and their mGFR values were similar. Seven other patients and eight controls had this ratio equal to one, while values below one were recorded for seven more patients and two controls. mGFR of all these 14 patients was significantly higher than that of healthy controls (129.88 ± 27.52 mL/min/1.73 m2 vs. 107.43 ± 19.51 mL/min/1.73 m2; p = 0.009). Mean GFR-HF was significantly higher than mGFR in controls, but these two values were similar in BEN patients. eGFR underestimated mGFR in both BEN patients and controls. Conclusion: The ratio of Ccr to mGFR and mGFR to GFR-HF indicated that elevated mGFR in early stages of BEN could be explained by increased glomerular filtration, but tubular creatinine secretion augmented Ccr in a smaller proportion of patients, who did not differ from healthy subjects.

Baseline living-donor kidney volume and function associate with 1-year post-nephrectomy kidney function

Living donors may develop kidney dysfunction more often than equally healthy populations. The purpose of this study was to determine whether computed tomography-assessed remaining kidney volume indexed to body surface area (RKV/BSA) was associated with 1-year post-nephrectomy renal function independent of baseline renal function. Using multivariable regression, we modeled 1-year estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and eGFR <60 mL /min/1.73 m2 and considered pre-determined baseline eGFR subgroups in 151 consecutive donors. Mean ± SD baseline age, eGFR, RKV, BSA, and RKV/BSA were 38 ± 11 years, 97 ± 16 mL/min/1.73 m2 , 153 ± 29 mL, 1.9 ± 0.2 m2 , and 80.0 ± 12.8 ml/m2 , respectively; 50% were female and 94% were white. Mean baseline eGFR was greater with increasing RKV/BSA tertiles (92 ± 14, 97 ± 16, 107 ± 16 mL/min/1.73 m2 ; P < 0.001). Post-nephrectomy eGFR remained separated by RKV/BSA tertiles. At baseline, each SD greater RKV/BSA and eGFR was independently associated with higher adjusted 1-year eGFR by 2.4 and 9.2 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Each SD greater age associated with 2.2 mL/min/1.73 m2 lower adjusted 1-year eGFR. Adjusted odds of 1-year eGFR <60 increased significantly for donors with RKV/BSA <80 mL/m2 . With baseline eGFR <90, probability of 1-year eGFR <60 increased to >80% with decreasing RKV/BSA values below 80 mL/m2 . Those with baseline eGFR >100 rarely developed 1-year eGFR <60 if RKV/BSA remained >60 mL/m2 . RKV/BSA independently associated with 1-year eGFR <60, especially with lower baseline eGFRs. Additional studies should evaluate the predictive utility of this measure and its potential role in donor evaluations and informed consent.

Systematic Review and Metaanalysis Comparing the Bias and Accuracy of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration Equations in Community-Based Populations

BACKGROUND

The majority of patients with chronic kidney disease are diagnosed and monitored in primary care. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a key marker of renal function, but direct measurement is invasive; in routine practice, equations are used for estimated GFR (eGFR) from serum creatinine. We systematically assessed bias and accuracy of commonly used eGFR equations in populations relevant to primary care.

CONTENT

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing measured GFR (mGFR) with eGFR in adult populations comparable to primary care and reporting both the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations based on standardized creatinine measurements. We pooled data on mean bias (difference between eGFR and mGFR) and on mean accuracy (proportion of eGFR within 30% of mGFR) using a random-effects inverse-variance weighted metaanalysis. We included 48 studies of 26875 patients that reported data on bias and/or accuracy. Metaanalysis of within-study comparisons in which both formulae were tested on the same patient cohorts using isotope dilution-mass spectrometry-traceable creatinine showed a lower mean bias in eGFR using CKD-EPI of 2.2 mL/min/1.73 m² (95% CI, 1.1-3.2; 30 studies; I² = 74.4%) and a higher mean accuracy of CKD-EPI of 2.7% (1.6-3.8; 47 studies; I² = 55.5%). Metaregression showed that in both equations bias and accuracy favored the CKD-EPI equation at higher mGFR values.

SUMMARY

Both equations underestimated mGFR, but CKD-EPI gave more accurate estimates of GFR.

Estimated GFR for Living Kidney Donor Evaluation

All living kidney donor candidates undergo evaluation of GFR. Guidelines recommend measured GFR (mGFR), using either an endogenous filtration marker or creatinine clearance, rather than estimated GFR (eGFR), but measurement methods are difficult, time consuming and costly. We investigated whether GFR estimated from serum creatinine (eGFRcr) with or without sequential cystatin C is sufficiently accurate to identify donor candidates with high probability that mGFR is above or below thresholds for clinical decision making. We combined the pretest probability for mGFR thresholds <60, <70, ≥80, and ≥90 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) based on demographic characteristics (from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) with test performance of eGFR (categorical likelihood ratios from the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) to compute posttest probabilities. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, 53% of recent living donors had predonation eGFRcr high enough to ensure ≥95% probability that predonation mGFR was ≥90 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) , suggesting that mGFR may not be necessary in a large proportion of donor candidates. We developed a Web-based application to compute the probability, based on eGFR, that mGFR for a donor candidate is above or below a range of thresholds useful in living donor evaluation and selection.