A propensity score-matched comparison of surgical precision obtained by using volumetric analysis between robot-assisted laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy for T1 renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective non-randomized observational study of initial outcomes

Meta-analysis of clinical outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and classical open partial nephrectomy

BACKGROUND

Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has emerged as a promising alternative to classical partial nephrectomy (CPN).

AIM

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of RAPN and CPN for treating localized renal tumors through a meta-analysis of available literature.

METHODS

Chinese databases, such as CNKI, Chinese Science and Technology Periodicals Database (VIP), and Wanfang Full-text Database, were searched using Chinese search terms, and all published articles on PubMed and Web of Science were searched using English search terms. Articles on Localized Renal Tumors were included. RevMan5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. The funnel plots were drawn using Stata software to assess publication bias.

OUTCOMES

This study aimed to identify the differences between robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy and classic partial nephrectomy in patients with localized renal tumors.

RESULTS

In total, 67 articles with 17 677 patients were included. The results demonstrate the advantages of RAPN over CPN for localized renal tumors. Compared to CPN and RAPN had significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay duration, incidence of perioperative complications, and proportion of patients requiring blood transfusion. Regarding surgical outcomes, RAPN showed more favorable results regarding the incidence of positive resection margins, postoperative decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), postoperative local recurrence rate, and proportion of Trifecta achieved. However, there was no significant difference between RAPN and CPN regarding 5-year tumor-specific survival rates.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The study suggests that robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy is a viable alternative to classic surgery for renal tumors.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

The strengths of this study are the use of a comprehensive search strategy and the inclusion of studies published in both English and Chinese. The limitations of this study are the small sample size and the need for long-term follow-up data.

CONCLUSION

RAPN and CPN have similar overall survival outcomes for treating localized renal tumors. However, RAPN may offer advantages in terms of perioperative outcomes and preservation of renal function. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and to identify the optimal surgical approach for individual patients.

Comparing robotic and open partial nephrectomy under the prism of surgical precision: a meta-analysis of the average blood loss rate as a novel variable

Exploration of surgical precision in robotic procedures is extensive, yet lacks a unified framework for comparability. This study examines tissue handling precision by comparing the per-minute blood loss rate between robotic and open partial nephrectomy. A literature search from August 2022 to June 2024 identified 43 relevant studies providing data on estimated blood loss and procedure duration. The expected values and standard errors of these variables were used to compute the per-minute blood loss rate (Q). Meta-analytical methods estimated pooled and subgroup-level mean differences, favoring robotic surgery (MDQ = - 1.043 ml/min, CI95% = [- 1.338; - 0.747]). Subgroup analyses by publication year, patient matching, referral center count, and ROBINS-I status consistently supported this advantage. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the above benefit in studies with increased accuracy in reported results (MDQ = - 0.957 ml/min, CI95% = [- 1.269; - 0.646]), low risk of bias involving matched comparisons (MDQ = - 0.563 ml/min, CI95% = [- 0.716; - 0.410]), large sample sizes and increased statistical power (MDQ = - 0.780 ml/min, CI95% = [- 1.134; - 0.425]), and multicenter analyses with patient matching (MDQ = - 0.481 ml/min, CI95% = [- 0.698; - 0.263]). The subsequent analysis of correlation between the original variables suggested a slight reduction in the robotic advantage when the latter were proportionally related. Multilevel meta-regression at both temporal and qualitative scales consistently indicated a comparative benefit of the robotic approach. Potentially, lower per-minute blood loss compared to open surgery suggests that robotic partial nephrectomy demonstrates enhanced precision in tissue handling.

Surgical and functional outcomes of repeat robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy compared with repeat open partial nephrectomy

OBJECTIVES

To examine the surgical and functional outcomes of patients who have undergone repeat open partial nephrectomy (reOPN) or robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (reRAPN).

METHODS

Until May 2022, 3310 patients with renal tumors underwent nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) at affiliated institutions. Of these, 22 and 17 patients who underwent reOPN and reRAPN, respectively, were included in this study.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of sex, age, comorbidities, recurrent tumor size at repeat NSS, interval from recurrence to initial NSS, and nephrometry score. ReRAPN had a shorter operative time (median: 138.0 vs. 214.0 min; p = 0.0023) and less estimated blood loss (median: 50.0 vs. 255.0 mL; p = 0.0261) than reOPN. The incidence of complications with Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2 was higher in the reOPN group than in the reRAPN group (31.8 vs. 5.9%; p = 0.0467). The mean decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate at 3 months postoperatively was not significantly different between the groups. The trifecta achievement rates in the reRAPN (64.7%) and reOPN (27.3%) groups were significantly different (p = 0.0194). On multivariate analysis, age and surgical method were significant predictors of trifecta achievement after partial nephrectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences in postoperative renal functional outcomes between reOPN and reRAPN. ReRAPN is superior to reOPN in terms of surgical burden. Therefore, ReRAPN is an important minimally invasive surgery for recurrent renal cell carcinoma.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma in patients with severe chronic kidney disease

OBJECTIVES

To compare surgical and functional outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and open partial nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma with stage 4 chronic kidney disease.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of 60 patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate 15-30 ml/min/1.73 m2 ) who underwent partial nephrectomy for T1 renal cell carcinoma between April 2004 and April 2020. We compared perioperative outcomes according to the surgical approach. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify predictive factors for end-stage renal disease.

RESULTS

Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and open partial nephrectomy were performed in 31 and 29 patients, respectively. The median age was 68 years and 17% of all patients were women. Patient and tumor characteristics did not differ between groups. The operative time (155.2 vs. 221.0 min, p < 0.0001) and the postoperative length of hospital stay (5.2 vs. 10.6 days, p = 0.0083) were significantly shorter, and the estimated blood loss was lower (53.4 vs. 363.2 ml, p = 0.0003) in the robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy group than in the open partial nephrectomy group. Preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate was the only significant predictor of end-stage renal disease after partial nephrectomy on multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Both procedures preserved renal function in this patient cohort, delaying the requirement for postoperative dialysis. Furthermore, robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy was associated with shorter operative time and postoperative length of hospital stay, as well as lesser estimated blood loss than open partial nephrectomy.

Improving accuracy, reliability, and efficiency of the RENAL nephrometry score with 3D reconstructed virtual imaging

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the diagnostic performance of the three-dimensional reconstructed virtual image (3D-RVI) in evaluating RENAL nephrometry score (RENAL-NS).

METHODS

This study included 130 patients who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) followed by partial nephrectomy for renal tumors suggestive of renal cell carcinoma. RENAL-NS was calculated prior to the surgery, and tumor resection was performed referring to the score. We retrospectively reviewed preoperative CECT images. We calculated the inter-observer variability of RENAL-NS using 3D-RVI versus two-dimensional (2D) imaging and compared the ability of RENAL-NS using 3D-RVI versus 2D imaging to predict the risk of opening of the urinary collecting system. We also compared the two modalities for the time required to evaluate RENAL-NS.

RESULTS

RENAL-NS evaluated using 3D-RVI showed a higher inter-observer agreement compared to 2D-imaging (r_s = 0.85 vs. r_s = 0.65). The "nearness to sinus" score was more strongly associated with the opening of the urinary collecting system when evaluated using 3D-RVI than 2D-imaging (AUC = 0.71 vs AUC = 0.57, p = 0.016). RENAL-NS using 2D-imaging required a significantly longer time compared to 3D-RVI (p = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

Using 3D-RVI improves the accuracy, reliability and efficiency of RENAL-NS evaluation in preoperative assessment and can play an important role in preoperative assessment and intraoperative navigation.

Comparison of parenchymal volume loss assessed by three-dimensional computed tomography volumetry and renal functional recovery between conventional and robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

OBJECTIVES

We retrospectively investigated if robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) contributes to a decrease in resected parenchymal volume (RPV), an increase in postoperative parenchymal volume (PPV), and an improvement of postoperative renal function when compared with conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) using a three-dimensional image analysis system.

METHODS

Patients who underwent LPN (n = 37) and RAPN (n = 66) from November 2013 to November 2018 were included in this study. All patients had a tumor diameter of 4 cm or less. Patients with an anatomical or functional single kidney were excluded. RPV and PPV were measured using SYNAPSE VINCENT®. The surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Warm ischemic time in the RAPN group was significantly shorter than that in the LPN group (p < 0.001). The ratio of RPV to tumor volume (RPV/TV) in the RAPN group was significantly lower than that in the LPN group (p = 0.016). PPV in the RAPN group was significantly higher than that in the LPN group (p = 0.049). The decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate in the RAPN group was significantly lower than that in the LPN group on days 1, 7, 30, 90, and 180 after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative renal function in the RAPN group was significantly better than that in the LPN group in both the short and long term. In addition to a short warm ischemia time, the decreased RPV/TV and increased PPV may have contributed to the improvement of postoperative renal function.

Open versus robotic partial nephrectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis of contemporary studies

OBJECTIVES

To compare perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RaPN) with open partial nephrectomy (OPN).

METHODS

Systematically search through PubMed, Embase, ClinicalKey, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for eligible studies was performed to April 11, 2018. A meta-analysis was conducted for studies comparing RaPN and OPN. Confounding variables were assessed by meta-regression or subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

This study included 34 studies with 60 808 patients. Meta-analysis revealed less blood loss, less transfusion, longer operative time, less postoperative complications, lower readmission rate, shorter length of stay, and less estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline in RaPN groups. The superiority of RaPN in blood loss was attenuated with highly complex renal masses. The superiority of RaPN in intraoperative complications was strengthened with renal hilar control. The advantage of RaPN in surgical margin was increased in patient with body mass index (BMI) < 28.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with OPN, RaPN provided lower morbidities and better renal function preservation.

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: systematic review of functional results

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Various ischemia type during partial nephrectomy for renal cell cancer (RCC) resulted in different postoperative functional outcomes. Our objective was to systematically review the contemporary literature on robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) and investigate the association of ischemia type and tumor complexity with postoperative functional outcomes of the operated kidney and overall.

RECENT FINDINGS

Forty-five of the 99 reports identified were selected for qualitative analysis. All included studies were observational and nonrandomized. Overall, we found that patients undergoing RPN with zero ischemia and selective artery clamping had a lower decrease in glomerular filtration rates of the operated kidney in comparison to both warm and cold ischemia. This association seems also to play a role in patients with bilateral kidneys harboring complex tumors.

SUMMARY

Zero ischemia and selective artery clamping provide the best functional outcomes following robotic partial nephrectomy. This seems to be of particular relevance in patients with single kidney or tumors of high complexity. Whether these changes are statistically or clinically significant cannot be determined within this systematic review.