Vascular access registry of Serbia: a 4-year experience

Use of vascular access methods for hemodialysis in Serbia: Results from SerbVasc registry

INTRODUCTION

In many countries, hemodialysis is still the most common method of renal replacement. Significant regional variations exist in creating and maintaining vascular access for hemodialysis. Therefore, analyzing national registries with vascular access data is essential for developing effective national treatment strategies. The Serbian national vascular surgery registry was established as part of the VascuNet collaboration network in 2019. The registry comprehensively records vascular procedures across Serbia, including those related to vascular access for hemodialysis.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of different vascular access methods for hemodialysis in Serbia, focusing on both new and prevalent patients and examining demographic differences and risk factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The data were collected from the vascular accesses section of the SerbVasc registry over a 3-year observational period, focusing on the following aspects: number of incident and prevalent patients with types of vascular access, as well as comparison of patients with arteriovenous fistulas (AVF), arteriovenous grafts (AVG), central venous catheters (CVC), and tCVC based on age, gender, smoking, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

There were total of 1024 incident hemodialysis patients. AVF was created in 219 patients (21.4%), AVG in 5 patients (0.5%), and tCVC in 150 patients (14.6%), while hemodialysis via CVC was initiated in 650 (63.5%) patients. The total number of permanent vascular accesses for HD was 1402, comprising 686 (48.9%) distal AFVs, 220 (15.7%) proximal AVFs, 91 (6.4%) AVGs, and 405 (28.8%) tCVCs. The prevalence of current smoking was highest in the tCVC (48.3%) and lowest in the dAVF group (18.40%).

CONCLUSION

The percentage of patients starting hemodialysis with AVF remains suboptimal. tCVC is used substantially as first and permanent access, particularly among older patients.

Mapping progress in intravascular catheter quality surveillance: An Australian case study of electronic medical record data linkage

Background and significance

Intravascular (IV) catheters are the most invasive medical device in healthcare. Localized priority-setting related to IV catheter quality surveillance is a key objective of recent healthcare reform in Australia. We sought to determine the plausibility of using electronic health record (EHR) data for catheter surveillance by mapping currently available data across state-wide platforms. This work has identified barriers and facilitators to a state-wide EHR surveillance initiative.

Materials and methods

Data variables were generated and mapped from routinely used EHR sources across Queensland, Australia through a systematic search of gray literature and expert consultation with clinical information specialists. EHR systems were eligible for inclusion if they collected data related to IV catheter insertion, care, or outcomes of hospitalized patients. Generated variables were mapped against international recommendations for IV catheter surveillance, with data linkage and data export capacity narratively summarized.

Results

We identified five EHR systems, namely, iEMR, MetaVision ICU®, Multiprac, RiskMan, and the Nephrology Registry. Systems were used across jurisdictions and hospital wards. Data linkage was not evident across systems. Extraction processes for catheter data were not standardized, lacking clear and reliable extraction techniques. In combination, EHR systems collected 43/50 international variables recommended for catheter surveillance, however, individual systems collected a median of 24/50 (IQR 22, 30) variables. We did not identify integrated clinical analytic systems (incorporating machine learning) to support clinical decision making or for risk stratification (e.g., catheter-related infection).

Conclusion

Current data linkage across EHR systems limits the development of an IV catheter quality surveillance system to provide timely data related to catheter complications and harm. To facilitate reliable and timely surveillance of catheter outcomes using clinical informatics, substantial work is needed to overcome existing barriers and transform health surveillance.

International recommendations for a vascular access minimum dataset: a Delphi consensus-building study

BACKGROUND

Data regarding vascular access device use and outcomes are limited. In part, this gap reflects the absence of guidance on what variables should be collected to assess patient outcomes. We sought to derive international consensus on a vascular access minimum dataset.

METHODS

A modified Delphi study with three rounds (two electronic surveys and a face-to-face consensus panel) was conducted involving international vascular access specialists. In Rounds 1 and 2, electronic surveys were distributed to healthcare professionals specialising in vascular access. Survey respondents were asked to rate the importance of variables, feasibility of data collection and acceptability of items, definitions and response options. In Round 3, a purposive expert panel met to review Round 1 and 2 ratings and reach consensus (defined as ≥70% agreement) on the final items to be included in a minimum dataset for vascular access devices.

RESULTS

A total of 64 of 225 interdisciplinary healthcare professionals from 11 countries responded to Round 1 and 2 surveys (response rate of 34% and 29%, respectively). From the original 52 items, 50 items across five domains emerged from the Delphi procedure.Items related to demographic and clinical characteristics (n=5; eg, age), device characteristics (n=5; eg, device type), insertion (n=16; eg, indication), management (n=9; eg, dressing and securement), and complication and removal (n=15, eg, occlusion) were identified as requirements for a minimum dataset to track and evaluate vascular access device use and outcomes.

CONCLUSION

We developed and internally validated a minimum dataset for vascular access device research. This study generated new knowledge to enable healthcare systems to collect relevant, useful and meaningful vascular access data. Use of this standardised approach can help benchmark clinical practice and target improvements worldwide.

Building a Global, Pediatric Vascular Access Registry: A Scoping Review of Trial Outcomes and Quality Indicators to Inform Evidence-Based Practice

BACKGROUND

Internationally, there is a lack of comparative vascular access (VA) data for pediatric clinicians and organizations to benchmark outcomes, evaluate quality initiatives, and improve practice. A VA registry is needed to address these knowledge and data capture gaps.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the range and heterogeneity of VA outcome measures or quality indicators reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical registries, to inform development of a homogeneous, reliable, minimum dataset for a pediatric VA registry.

METHODS

Scoping review framework. A systematic search for RCTs reporting VA outcomes in pediatrics and neonates was undertaken in the Cochrane library, EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed, MEDLINE, and EBSCO using a medical subject headings and key words related to VA and pediatrics. We included RCTs of children (0-18 years) reporting any VA outcome. We identified clinical registries reporting VA data in children (0-18) through web-based searches using key words related to VA and clinical or quality registries. Additional registries were identified through peer consultation. The frequency and scope of outcome measures and quality indicators were extracted from trials and registries and evaluated.

RESULTS

From 93 RCTs included, 214 different VA measures were reported, reflecting 14 outcome domains. The most commonly reported outcome domains were insertion (44 RCTs; 47%), noninfectious complications (33 RCTs; 35%), and infectious complications (30 RCTs; 32%). Of the 22 registries identified, VA-associated infection was the main quality indicator routinely collected (12 registries; 55%). Outcomes such as mechanical complications and patient-reported outcomes were infrequently collected.

LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION

Vascular access outcomes reported in pediatric and neonatal RCTs are highly heterogeneous. Internationally, clinical registries currently collect minimal VA data with the exception of infection outcomes. A core dataset of reliable, relevant measures to children and clinicians for VA device quality is needed. This will enable a VA registry that facilitates inter-institutional and international benchmarking.

Thigh arteriovenous grafts. Quantitative comparison with alternative options: A meta-analysis

Thigh arteriovenous grafts are required in a number of patients with exhausted upper extremity veins and comprise 1%-5% of the total access procedures performed. Alternative autogenous lower extremity options are the rarely used sapheno-tibial arteriovenous fistulae, the saphenous vein transpositions, and the femoral vein transpositions. The latter have proven to be the most durable lower limb access procedures, with low infection rates and their primary patency rates ranged from 74% up to 87% at 2 years. Synthetic thigh grafts are suitable for patients who are not good candidates for any upper limb or any autogenous lower limb access and their secondary patency rates ranged from 54% up to 83% at 2 years. Thigh grafts often get infected and their average weighed infection rate in 920 such grafts included in eight large series was 22.9%. A literature search was performed to evaluate thigh grafts compared with alternative options using meta-analysis. Lower limb accesses were found superior compared to HeRO^® device regarding 1-year primary failure rate (odds ratio = 0.28, confidence interval = 0.09-0.88, p = 0.03) and additionally autogenous lower limb accesses were found superior compared to thigh grafts regarding the 1-year primary failure rate (odds ratio = 6.54, confidence interval = 2.29-18.72, p = 0.0005).