1
|
Zhang D, Li R, He J, Peng Y, Liu H, Liu X, Lu F. The "Half-Perc" technique using a simple modified metal trocar for peritoneal dialysis catheter placement: results of a 3-year follow-up of 280 patients and a literature review. Int Urol Nephrol 2021; 54:1741-1749. [PMID: 34813024 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-021-03028-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE There is an ongoing debate about the ideal technique for peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). A half-percutaneous ("Half-Perc") technique shares some of the advantages of both percutaneous technique and traditional open surgery. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the clinical feasibility, safety, and effects of the "Half-Perc" technique for PD catheter placement, and to compare the clinical outcomes of the "Half-Perc" technique with various imaging-assisted percutaneous techniques from the current literature. METHODS We included 280 consecutive patients with ESRD who underwent the "Half-Perc" insertion of the first PD catheter between September 2016 and September 2019. We recorded baseline characteristics, operative parameters, catheter-related complications, catheter survival, and the reason behind PD cessation. RESULTS We included 174 men and 106 women, with a mean age of 50.4 years (range, 11-85 years). The mean operative time was 28.8 min (range, 15-38 min) and technical success rate was observed in 278 patients (99.3%). There were 28 episodes (10%) of mechanical complications with initial catheters occurring during the follow-up. Catheter malfunctions were the most common mechanical complication and were observed in 15 patients. Peritonitis was the most frequent catheter-related complication, with 32 episodes of peritonitis observed in 29 (10.4%) patients. After a mean follow-up period of 15.4 months (range, 2-36 months), 235 patients (83.9%) survived with their initial PD catheter by the end of the study. Of the 280 patients analyzed, 35 patients (12.5%) ceased PD at some stage during follow-up. The most common reason for PD cessation was kidney transplantation (18 patients (6.4%)), followed by death (9 patients (3.2%)) and switch to hemodialysis (HD) (7 patients (2.5%)), and recovery of renal failure (1 patient (0.4%)). CONCLUSION The "Half-Perc" technique, including a modified metal trocar, is a simple, safe, and effective method for PD catheter placement that can be used for patients with ESRD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Difei Zhang
- The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510405, China.,Department of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, No. 111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, China
| | - Rongrong Li
- The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510405, China
| | - Jingwen He
- The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510405, China
| | - Yu Peng
- Department of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, No. 111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
| | - Hui Liu
- Department of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, No. 111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, China
| | - Xusheng Liu
- Department of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, No. 111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, China
| | - Fuhua Lu
- The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510405, China. .,Department of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, No. 111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ma Y, Liu S, Yang M, Zou Y, Xue D, Wang Y, Xie X, Chen H, Liu Y. Establishment of a prediction model for early and mid-term complications for patients undergoing catheter insertion for peritoneal dialysis. J Int Med Res 2021; 49:3000605211004524. [PMID: 33853434 PMCID: PMC8059045 DOI: 10.1177/03000605211004524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate the factors involved in early and mid-term complications after catheter insertion for peritoneal dialysis and to establish prediction models. Methods A total of 158 patients with peritoneal dialysis in the Department of Nephrology of our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. General information, laboratory indices, early complications (within 1 month after the operation), mid-term complications (1–6 months after the operation), and other relevant data were recorded. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to establish a prediction model of complications and generate a nomogram. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the efficacy of the model. Results Among the patients, 48 (30.8%) had early complications, which were mainly catheter-related complications, and 29 (18.4%) had mid-term complications, which were mainly abdominal infection and catheter migration. We constructed a prediction model for early complications (area under the curve = 0.697, 95% confidence interval: 0.609–0.785) and mid-term complications (area under the curve = 0.730, 95% confidence interval: 0.622–0.839). The sensitivity was 0.750 and 0.607, and the specificity was 0.589 and 0.765, respectively. Conclusions Our prediction model has clinical significance for risk assessment of early and mid-term complications and prevention of complications after catheterization for peritoneal dialysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yibo Ma
- Department of Ultrasound, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China
| | - Shuiqing Liu
- Department of Ultrasound, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China
| | - Min Yang
- Department of Nephrology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China
| | - Yun Zou
- Department of Nephrology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China
| | - Dong Xue
- Department of Urology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China
| | - Yufeng Wang
- Department of Ultrasound, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China
| | - Xiao Xie
- Department of Ultrasound, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China
| | - Hui Chen
- Department of Ultrasound, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China
| | - Yanping Liu
- Department of Ultrasound, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ma Y, Liu S, Yang M, Zou Y, Xue D, Liu Y, Wang Y, Xie X, Chen H. Association between different peritoneal dialysis catheter placement methods and short-term postoperative complications. BMC Nephrol 2021; 22:151. [PMID: 33902497 PMCID: PMC8074448 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-021-02340-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Considering that current peritoneal dialysis has its own shortcomings, In this study, the Seldinger technique was modified to explore the relationship between different catheter placement methods of peritoneal dialysis and short-term postoperative complications. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data of 157 patients who received peritoneal dialysis in the Department of Nephrology of our hospital from January 2017 to December 2019. According to different catheter placement methods, the patients were divided into three groups: 111 cases of open surgery technique, 23 cases of Seldinger technique, and 23 cases of modified Seldinger technique (ultrasound-guided Veress needle puncture). The general data, laboratory indexes, and abdominal infection and catheter-related complications within one month postoperatively were collected. Results There were 48 (31.0 %) cases of complications in 157 patients within one month postoperatively, which were mainly catheter-related complications (45 cases, 29.0 %). The incidence of catheter tip peritoneal drift (catheter migration) in the three groups was 27.3 %, 39.1 %, and 9.1 %, respectively, with no significant difference between groups (P = 0.069). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that the systolic blood pressure, history of abdominal and pelvic surgery, creatinine, and modified Seldinger technique were possible impact factors of catheter migration (P < 0.10). After fully adjusting for confounding factors, Compared with the open surgery group, the modified Seldinger method group significantly reduced the risk of catheter migration with an OR of 0.161 (95 % confidence interval: 0.027–0.961, P = 0.045); However, the difference between the Seldinger method group and the open surgery group was not significant, with an OR of 1.061 (95 % confidence interval: 0.308–3.649, P = 0.926). Curve fitting showed that the average incidence of catheter migration in the three groups was 27.3 % (95% CI: 15.9-42.7 %), 28.5 % (95% CI: 10.7-56.9 %), and 5.7 % (95% CI: 1.0-27.0 %); the modified Seldinger method has the lowest average incidence of catheter migration. Conclusions Modified Seldinger technique can significantly reduce catheter-related short-term complications after peritoneal dialysis, and it is especially effective in reducing the incidence of catheter migration. Modified Seldinger technique is a safe and feasible method for the placement of a peritoneal dialysis catheter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yibo Ma
- Department of Ultrasound, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 213003, Changzhou, China
| | - Shuiqing Liu
- Department of Ultrasound, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 213003, Changzhou, China
| | - Min Yang
- Department of Nephrology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 213003, Changzhou, China
| | - Yun Zou
- Department of Nephrology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 213003, Changzhou, China
| | - Dong Xue
- Department of Urology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 213003, Changzhou, China
| | - Yanping Liu
- Department of Ultrasound, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 213003, Changzhou, China
| | - Yufeng Wang
- Department of Ultrasound, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 213003, Changzhou, China
| | - Xiao Xie
- Department of Ultrasound, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 213003, Changzhou, China.
| | - Hui Chen
- Department of Ultrasound, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 213003, Changzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang D, Peng Y, Zheng T, Liu H, Wu J, Li Z, Su J, Xu Y, Hu X, Chen G, Hou H, Zhang L, Wu L, Liu X, Lu F. An analysis of the "Half-Perc" versus open surgical placement method for a peritoneal dialysis catheter: a non-inferiority cohort study. BMC Nephrol 2020; 21:288. [PMID: 32689969 PMCID: PMC7370485 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-020-01936-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Most end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients undergo open surgical techniques for peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter placement. An alternative method to PD catheter implantation is the half-percutaneous (“Half-Perc”) technique based on a modified trocar that is performed by a nephrologist. The single-center, retrospective, observational, cohort study presented here aimed to compare the effects of the “Half-Perc” technique with the traditional open surgery on peritoneal catheter insertion. Methods From January 2015 to January 2018, 240 ESRD patients who received initial PD catheter placement were divided into two groups based on the “Half-Perc” technique or open surgery. All patients were followed up for 365 days or until loss of initial PD catheter or death. Prism 5 software was used to analyze baseline characteristics, operation-related parameters, mechanical complications and clinical outcomes. Results The “Half-Perc” technique showed shorter operation time, shorter incision length, lower postoperative pain scores and quick initiation of the PD program compared to the open surgery. After the 365-day follow-up, the “Half-Perc” group showed a higher rate of catheter dysfunction (4% versus 0.9%) that was corrected by conservative treatment in most patients and a lower rate of peritonitis (4% versus 9.6%) but mechanical complications and clinical outcomes did not differ between the two groups. There was also no significant difference based on overall patient mortality or catheter removal. One-year initial catheter survival and true catheter survival were not statistically different between the groups. Conclusion The “Half-Perc” placement of the PD catheter using a modified metal trocar appears to be a non-inferior alternative method and carries minimal invasiveness and risk compared to open surgical placement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Difei Zhang
- The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No.111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510405, China.,Department of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, No.111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, China
| | - Yu Peng
- The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No.111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510405, China.,Department of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, No.111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, China
| | - Tingting Zheng
- The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No.111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510405, China.,Department of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, No.111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, China
| | - Hui Liu
- The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No.111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510405, China.,Department of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, No.111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, China
| | - Jianfeng Wu
- The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No.111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510405, China.,Department of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, No.111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, China
| | - Zewen Li
- The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No.111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510405, China.,Department of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, No.111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, China
| | - Jingxu Su
- The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No.111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510405, China.,Department of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, No.111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, China
| | - Yuan Xu
- The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No.111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510405, China.,Department of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, No.111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, China
| | - Xiaoxuan Hu
- The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No.111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510405, China.,Department of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, No.111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, China
| | - Guowei Chen
- The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No.111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510405, China.,Department of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, No.111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, China
| | - Haijing Hou
- The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No.111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510405, China.,Department of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, No.111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, China
| | - La Zhang
- The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No.111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510405, China.,Department of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, No.111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, China
| | - Liwen Wu
- The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No.111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510405, China.,Department of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, No.111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, China
| | - Xusheng Liu
- The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No.111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510405, China.,Department of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, No.111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, China
| | - Fuhua Lu
- The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No.111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510405, China. .,Department of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, No.111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
| |
Collapse
|