1
|
Tang X, Liu Z, Liu H, Zhang H, Tian Y, Xia S, Sun Z, Luo G. Construction of lncRNA- and circRNA-associated ceRNA networks in the prostatic urethra of rats after simulating transurethral laser prostatectomy (TULP). Mol Cell Biochem 2024; 479:1363-1377. [PMID: 37410211 PMCID: PMC11224087 DOI: 10.1007/s11010-023-04804-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
Non-coding RNA appears to be involved in wound repair. Competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) appears to be an important post-transcriptional mechanism, it means that long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) or circular RNA (circRNA) acts as a microRNA (miRNA) sponge to further regulate mRNA. However, ceRNA network related to wound repair after prostatectomy has yet been constructed. TULP is the main surgical method of prostatectomy, but there have been no reports of TULP rat models in the past. We simulated TULP on rats, and observed the whole process of wound injury and repair after operation through pathological examination of wound tissue. Next, we discovered 732 differentially expressed lncRNAs (DElncRNAs), 47 differentially expressed circRNAs (DEcircRNAs), 17 differentially expressed miRNAs (DEmiRNAs), and 1892 differentially expressed mRNAs (DEmRNAs) related to wound repair after TULP through full transcriptome microarray and bioinformatics methods, and confirmed the reliability of transcriptome data by quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR (qRT-PCR), and immunohistochemistry. Then, we constructed the lncRNA- and circRNA-associated ceRNA regulatory networks related to wound repair after TULP in rats. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses showed that molecules in these networks were mainly involved in inflammatory infiltration, cell differentiation, and intercellular interactions and involved signal pathways such as the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway. Thus, this study successfully established the TULP model in rats, revealed potentially important biomarkers and ceRNA networks after prostatectomy in rats, and provided theoretical support for the repair of post-prostatectomy wound.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- XiaoHu Tang
- Medical College, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou Province, China
- Department of Urology Surgery, Guizhou Province People's Hospital, Guiyang, 550002, Guizhou Province, China
| | - ZhiYan Liu
- School of Clinical Medicine, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou Province, China
| | - Hao Liu
- Department of Urology Surgery, Guizhou Province People's Hospital, Guiyang, 550002, Guizhou Province, China
| | - Heng Zhang
- Department of Urology Surgery, Guizhou Province People's Hospital, Guiyang, 550002, Guizhou Province, China
| | - Ye Tian
- Department of Urology Surgery, Guizhou Province People's Hospital, Guiyang, 550002, Guizhou Province, China
| | - ShuJie Xia
- Department of Urology Surgery, Shanghai First People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 201620, China
| | - ZhaoLin Sun
- Medical College, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou Province, China
| | - GuangHeng Luo
- Department of Urology Surgery, Guizhou Province People's Hospital, Guiyang, 550002, Guizhou Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xiao K, Ma Y, Luo Z, Li H, Jin T. Network meta-analysis of the treatment safety and efficacy of different energy systems in prostate vaporization. Lasers Med Sci 2023; 38:150. [PMID: 37378687 DOI: 10.1007/s10103-023-03781-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
Many clinical trials and meta-analyses have examined vaporization with different energy instruments has been recognized by the American Urological Association (AUA) and the European Association of Urology (EAU) as a promising treatment for benign prostate hyperplasia. However, there is still a lack of evidence for a network comparison between different vaporization devices. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of different energy systems for prostate vaporization. Pairwise and network meta-analyses (NMA) were performed to analyze the outcome regarding surgery time, complications, short-term maximum urine flow rate (Qmax), and long-term Qmax. The Stata software was used for paired meta-analysis. A Bayesian NMA model with ADDIS software was applied to achieve the indirect comparison of different energy systems. Node-splitting analysis and inconsistency factors were used to test inconsistency for closed-loop indirect comparison. Fifteen studies were included in this study, involving three types of energy systems used in prostate vaporization: diode laser (wavelength: 980 nm, power: 200-300 W, mode: continuous), green-light laser (wavelength: 532 nm, power: 80-180 W, mode: continuous), and bipolar plasma vaporization (bipolar electrode, power: 270-280 W, mode: pulsed). In the conventional paired meta-analysis, significantly better short-term efficacy was found in green light laser vaporization, while no significant difference was detected in other parameters. According to the results of the NMA, a greenlight laser is recommended for prostate vaporization rather than the other two systems. When considering operation time, overall complications, short-term Qmax, and long-term Qmax, there were no significant differences among green-light laser vaporization, diode laser vaporization, and bipolar vaporization in BPH treatment. However, according to the probability ranking and benefit-risk analysis results, the green-light laser might be the best energy system for prostate vaporization in BPH treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaiwen Xiao
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology (Laboratory of Reconstructive Urology), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Yucheng Ma
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology (Laboratory of Reconstructive Urology), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhumei Luo
- Chengdu Third People's Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Hong Li
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology (Laboratory of Reconstructive Urology), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Tao Jin
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology (Laboratory of Reconstructive Urology), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Urethral stricture following endoscopic prostate surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective, randomized trials. World J Urol 2022; 40:1391-1411. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-03946-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
|
4
|
Cheng X, Qin C, Xu P, Li Y, Peng M, Wu S, Ren D, Zhou L, Wang Y. Comparison of bipolar plasmakinetic resection of prostate versus photoselective vaporization of prostate by a three year retrospective observational study. Sci Rep 2021; 11:10142. [PMID: 33980942 PMCID: PMC8115102 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89623-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Comprehensive evaluation of photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) versus plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP) in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is inadequate. This single-centre, retrospective observational study was designed to compare their efficacy, complications and sexual function. A total of 215 patients under PVP or PKRP were included in the study, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to match the baseline characteristics of the two groups, and perioperative and three-year follow-up data were compared between them. Finally, 120 patients (60 for PVP and 60 for PKRP) were matched after PSM. Compared with the PKRP group, the intraoperative haemoglobin loss was lower (9.08 vs 13.75 g/L, P < 0.001) and the duration of catheterization and postoperative hospital stay were shorter (2.97 vs 4.10 day, P < 0.001; 3.95 vs 5.13 day, P < 0.001, respectively), but the operation time was longer (56.72 vs 49, 90 min, P < 0.001) in the PVP group. Urination measurements were improved for both groups after surgery, although no significant differences were found between them during follow-up. Sexual function after surgery was partly increased; however, frequent retrograde and discomfortable ejaculation occurred in both groups. In addition, dysuria incidence and retreatment were higher in the PVP group at 12 months. In conclusion, PVP is safe and effective in relieving BPH-related lower urinary tract symptoms with less perioperative blood loss and earlier recovery without inferior sexual function effects. However, the study is potentially affected by residual unmeasured confounding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xu Cheng
- Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Renmin Middle Road 139, Changsha, 410011, China
| | - Chuying Qin
- Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Renmin Middle Road 139, Changsha, 410011, China
| | - Peng Xu
- Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Renmin Middle Road 139, Changsha, 410011, China
| | - Yijian Li
- Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Renmin Middle Road 139, Changsha, 410011, China
| | - Mou Peng
- Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Renmin Middle Road 139, Changsha, 410011, China
| | - Shuiqing Wu
- Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Renmin Middle Road 139, Changsha, 410011, China
| | - Da Ren
- Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Renmin Middle Road 139, Changsha, 410011, China
| | - Lizhi Zhou
- Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Renmin Middle Road 139, Changsha, 410011, China
| | - Yinhuai Wang
- Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Renmin Middle Road 139, Changsha, 410011, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bladder neck stenosis after transurethral prostate surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol 2021; 39:4073-4083. [PMID: 33974100 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03718-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Bladder neck stenosis (BNS) is a long-term complication of surgical procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). We performed a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis of the incidence of BNS after transurethral procedures for BPH. METHODS We performed a systemic literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Controlled Register of Trials. We accepted only randomized trials comparing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) vs. other transurethral surgery for BPH that were grouped in Ablation vs. Enucleation modalities. The incidences of BNS were pooled using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Method with the random effect model and expressed as Risk Ratios, 95% Confidence Intervals, and p values. Study heterogeneity was assessed utilizing the I2 value. RESULTS 72 studies were identified for meta-analysis, 46 comparing TURP vs. Ablation and 26 TURP vs. Enucleation. The pooled incidence of BNS was 1.3% after TURP, 0.66% after enucleation and 1.2% after Ablation. The incidence of BNS was higher after TURP than after Enucleation but the difference was not statistically significant (RR 1.75 95% CI 0.81-3.79, p = 0.16). There was no significant heterogeneity among the studies (I2 0%, Chi2 4.11, p = 0.90). The incidence of BNS was higher after TURP than after Ablation, but the difference was not statistically significant (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.82-2.11, p = 0.26) with no significant heterogeneity (I2 0%, Chi2 21.1, p = 0.51). CONCLUSION Our study showed no difference in the rate of BNS incidence among randomized trials comparing TURP vs. Ablation vs. Enucleation and can be used as a reference to counsel patients undergoing BPH surgery.
Collapse
|
6
|
Lebdai S, Chevrot A, Doizi S, Pradère B, Barry Delongchamps N, Baumert H, Benchikh A, Della Negra E, Fourmarier M, Gas J, Misraï V, Rouscoff Y, Theveniaud PE, Vincendeau S, Wilisch J, Descazeaud A, Robert G. [Surgical and interventional management of benign prostatic obstruction: Guidelines from the Committee for Male Voiding Disorders of the French Urology Association]. Prog Urol 2021; 31:249-265. [PMID: 33478868 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2020.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Revised: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Committee (CTMH) of the French Urology Association was to propose an update of the guidelines for surgical and interventional management of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). METHODS All available data published on PubMed® between 2018 and 2020 were systematically searched and reviewed. All papers assessing surgical and interventional management of adult patients with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) were included for analysis. After studies critical analysis, conclusions with level of evidence and French guidelines were elaborated in order to answer the predefined clinical questions. RESULTS/GUIDELINES Offer a trans-uretral incision of the prostate to treat patients with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) with a prostate volume<30cm3, without a middle lobe. TUIP increases the chances of preserving ejaculation. Propose mono- or bipolar trans-urethral resection of the prostate (TURP) to treat patients with moderate to severe LUTS with a prostate volume between 30 and 80cm3. Vaporization by Greenlight™ or by bipolar energy can be offered as an alternative to TURP. Offer a Greenlight™ laser vaporization to patients at risk of bleeding. Offer endoscopic prostate enucleation to surgically treat patients with moderate to severe LUTS as an alternative to TURP and open prostatectomy (OP). Minimally invasive prostatectomy is an alternative to OP in centers without access to adequate endoscopic procedures. Embolization of the prostatic arteries may be offered in the event of a contraindication or refusal of surgery for prostates with a volume>80cm3. Prostatic uretral lift is an alternative in patients interested in preserving their ejaculatory function and with a prostate volume<70cm3 without a middle lobe. Aquablation and Rezum™ are under evaluation and should be offered in research protocols. CONCLUSION Major changes in surgical management of BPO have occurred and aim at reducing morbidity and improving quality of life of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Lebdai
- Service d'urologie, CHU d'Angers, Angers, France.
| | - A Chevrot
- Service d'urologie, CHU de Nîmes, Nîmes, France
| | - S Doizi
- Service d'urologie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - B Pradère
- Service d'urologie, CHU de Tours, Tours, France
| | | | - H Baumert
- Service d'urologie, hôpital Ambroise-Paré, Paris, France
| | - A Benchikh
- Service d'urologie, Clinique les Martinets, Versailles, France
| | - E Della Negra
- Service d'urologie, hôpital des Côtes d'Armor, Saint-Brieuc, France
| | - M Fourmarier
- Service d'urologie, hôpital Aix-en-Provence, Aix-en-Provence, France
| | - J Gas
- Service d'urologie, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - V Misraï
- Service d'urologie, clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| | - Y Rouscoff
- Service d'urologie, polyclinique Saint-Georges, Nice, France
| | - P E Theveniaud
- Service d'urologie, CHR de Metz Thionville, Metz, France
| | - S Vincendeau
- Service d'urologie, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - J Wilisch
- Service d'urologie, hôpital privé Natecia, Lyon, France
| | - A Descazeaud
- Service d'urologie, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - G Robert
- Service d'urologie, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | | |
Collapse
|