1
|
Raina R, Jothi S, Haffner D, Somers M, Filler G, Vasistha P, Chakraborty R, Shapiro R, Randhawa PS, Parekh R, Licht C, Bunchman T, Sethi S, Mangat G, Zaritsky J, Schaefer F, Warady B, Bartosh S, McCulloch M, Alhasan K, Swiatecka-Urban A, Smoyer WE, Chandraker A, Yap HK, Jha V, Bagga A, Radhakrishnan J. Post-transplant recurrence of focal segmental glomerular sclerosis: consensus statements. Kidney Int 2024; 105:450-463. [PMID: 38142038 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2023.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
Focal segmental glomerular sclerosis (FSGS) is 1 of the primary causes of nephrotic syndrome in both pediatric and adult patients, which can lead to end-stage kidney disease. Recurrence of FSGS after kidney transplantation significantly increases allograft loss, leading to morbidity and mortality. Currently, there are no consensus guidelines for identifying those patients who are at risk for recurrence or for the management of recurrent FSGS. Our work group performed a literature search on PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane, and recommendations were proposed and graded for strength of evidence. Of the 614 initially identified studies, 221 were found suitable to formulate consensus guidelines for recurrent FSGS. These guidelines focus on the definition, epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis, and management of recurrent FSGS. We conclude that additional studies are required to strengthen the recommendations proposed in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupesh Raina
- Department of Nephrology, Akron Nephrology Associates/Cleveland Clinic Akron General Medical Center, Akron, Ohio, USA; Department of Nephrology, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, Ohio, USA
| | - Swathi Jothi
- Department of Nephrology, Akron Nephrology Associates/Cleveland Clinic Akron General Medical Center, Akron, Ohio, USA
| | - Dieter Haffner
- Department of Pediatric Kidney, Liver and Metabolic Diseases, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Michael Somers
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Guido Filler
- Department of Pediatrics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Prabhav Vasistha
- Department of Nephrology, Akron Nephrology Associates/Cleveland Clinic Akron General Medical Center, Akron, Ohio, USA
| | - Ronith Chakraborty
- Department of Nephrology, Akron Nephrology Associates/Cleveland Clinic Akron General Medical Center, Akron, Ohio, USA; Department of Nephrology, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, Ohio, USA
| | - Ron Shapiro
- Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, The Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Parmjeet S Randhawa
- Department of Pathology, Thomas E Starzl Transplant Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rulan Parekh
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Christopher Licht
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Timothy Bunchman
- Pediatric Nephrology and Transplantation, Children's Hospital of Richmond at Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU), Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Sidharth Sethi
- Pediatric Nephrology, Kidney Institute, Medanta, The Medicity Hospital, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Guneive Mangat
- Department of Nephrology, Akron Nephrology Associates/Cleveland Clinic Akron General Medical Center, Akron, Ohio, USA
| | - Joshua Zaritsky
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Nemours, A.I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, Delaware, USA
| | - Franz Schaefer
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bradley Warady
- Division of Nephrology, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Children's Mercy, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Sharon Bartosh
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Mignon McCulloch
- Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Khalid Alhasan
- Nephrology Unit, Pediatrics Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Pediatric Kidney Transplant Division, Organ Transplant Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Agnieszka Swiatecka-Urban
- University of Virginia Children's Hospital, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - William E Smoyer
- Center for Clinical and Translational Research and Division of Nephrology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Anil Chandraker
- Transplantation Research Center, Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hui Kim Yap
- Department of Pediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; Khoo Teck Puat-National University Children's Medical Institute, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Vivekanand Jha
- George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW), New Delhi, India; School of Public Health, Imperial College, London, UK; Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| | - Arvind Bagga
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Jai Radhakrishnan
- Department of Medicine (Nephrology), Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bai J, Yin X, Li J, Li JQ, Niu Y, Li Z, Li J, Zhou Y. Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in pediatric kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e15119. [PMID: 37725070 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis is the most prevalent acquired kidney disease leading to end-stage renal disease in children and has a propensity for recurring in the transplanted kidney. The recurrence of FSGS after kidney transplantation in children varies greatly. In addition, the risk factors and outcomes of recurrence of FSGS remain controversial. This study evaluated the recurrence rate, risk factors, and prognosis of FSGS after kidney transplantation in order to provide advice and assistance in clinical decision-making for pediatric kidney transplantation. METHODS PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, and other databases were searched from the establishment of the repository to March 2022. We extracted data on incidence, risk factors, and outcomes. RESULTS The results showed that the recurrence rate of primary FSGS in children after renal transplantation was 48% (95% CI 36%-59%) and the recurrence rate of FSGS (all forms) was 35% (95% CI 17%-52%). The graft loss rate of primary FSGS in children after kidney transplantation was 29% (95% CI 17%-42%) and the graft loss rate of FSGS (all forms) was 29% (95% CI 4%-62%). 57% (95% CI 42%-73%) of pediatric patients with recurrent primary FSGS showed complete remission. Risk factor analyses showed that age of onset (SMD .69, 95% CI .20-1.19, p = .006) was related to the recurrence of primary FSGS, whereas the living related donor was not a risk factor for recurrent primary FSGS in pediatrics after kidney transplantation (OR 1.22, 95% CI .48-3.10, p = .674). CONCLUSIONS The recurrence rate and graft loss rate of FSGS in children after kidney transplantation were relatively high. Age at onset was associated with a risk for recurrent primary FSGS, whereas the living related donor was not a risk factor for recurrent FSGS in pediatric kidney recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiang Bai
- Department of Nephrology, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital (Fifth Hospital) of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Xinyu Yin
- Second Clinical Medical College, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Jiaqi Li
- Second Clinical Medical College, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Jia-Qi Li
- Second Clinical Medical College, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Yanna Niu
- Second Clinical Medical College, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Zhenhua Li
- Second Clinical Medical College, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Jing Li
- Second Clinical Medical College, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Yun Zhou
- Department of Nephrology, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital (Fifth Hospital) of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sa R, Guo Z, Zhao G, Zhao D, Guo H, Chen G, Zhu L. Can Kunxian Capsule, a Novel Tripterygium Preparation be Used as an Adjuvant Treatment of Early Recurrent Focal Segmental Glomerular Sclerosis After Renal Transplantation? A Case Report. Transplant Proc 2023; 55:649-653. [PMID: 36948963 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
Focal segmental glomerular sclerosis (FSGS) tends to recur after kidney transplantation, particularly when genetic testing is negative. Once the recurrence happens, the renal graft function can rapidly become impaired, following a massive urine protein loss. Despite intensive plasmapheresis and high-dose rituximab treatment, the complete remission rate remains below 50%. The Kunxian capsule, representing a new generation of tripterygium preparation, has shown promising results in controlling proteinuria in patients with IgA nephropathy. It is unclear whether Kunxian capsule treatment would also produce a favorable response in cases of FSGS recurrence. Here we report favorable results with this approach in a patient with early recurrent FSGS after kidney transplantation; we treated this patient successfully with a Kunxian capsule, a low dose of rituximab (200 mg), and reduced sessions of plasmapheresis. Complete remission, with a 90% reduction in total urine protein (0.81 g/24 h vs 8.3 g/24 h), was achieved within 2 weeks post-treatment. Of interest, the complete remission state in this patient has been maintained over 20 months with continuous administration of Kunxian capsules after the cessation of plasmapheresis. The potential mechanisms involved here include direct podocyte protection and the anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive properties of triptolide in the Kunxian capsule. Our case may offer a new reference option for treating recurrent FSGS in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rula Sa
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhiliang Guo
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Guangyuan Zhao
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Daqiang Zhao
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Hui Guo
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Gang Chen
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Lan Zhu
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Al Shamsi HR, Shaheen I, Aziz D. Management of recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) post renal transplantation. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2021; 36:100675. [PMID: 34952298 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2021.100675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2021] [Revised: 12/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND One of the common GN causing ESKD is focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). Recurrence of FSGS post-transplantation can lead to graft loss. Data on management either prophylactically or once recurrence occurs are limited. This review article aims to assess the effective management of patients with FSGS recurrence post-transplantation, looking mainly at recurrence post prophylactic treatment and remission in case of treatment post recurrence. METHODS Twenty-three studies were included using the search MeSH terms "FSGS" "recurrence" "adults" "transplantation" "treatment". Search engines used were Pubmed, clinical key, Scopus and Cochrane library. Inclusion criteria were articles covered adult patients with recurrent FSGS post renal transplantation, treatment with rituximab and plasmapheresis, and articles published from 2000 tt2021. Excluded articles were paediatric population, studies with no reported outcomes of the treatment of FSGS, and Patients who received stem cell transplantation or galactose therapy. RESULTS Prophylactic PP did not show a reduction in recurrence of FSGS in 2/3 studies. Prophylactic rituximab was shown to reduce recurrence of FSGS in one-study and case reports. Treatment of recurrent FSGS with PP showed responses ranging from 41% to 100%. Only one study did not show improvement with PP use as treatment having a 27% remission. Treatment with rituximab showed variable results, with reports showing remission ranging from 57% to 100%. Whereas other reports showing no response at all. PP prescription reporting was variable. One study suggested intensified PP regimen while in most other studies PP was guided by the response reflected by the reduction of proteinuria. DISCUSSION Reviewing the treatment of recurrent FSGS is crucial, as there no consensus on treating FSGS as the disease is not very common in the adult population. The evidence of different modalities is based on small cohort studies. This paper supports the use of PP and RTX as treatment of recurrent FSGS. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, PP and RTX are the main modalities to treat recurrent FSGS with varying response rates. Prophylactic PP does not play a role in preventing recurrent FSGS. Prophylactic rituximab might play a role in preventing FSGS post-transplantation. PP and RTX, when used as a treatment, show variable response rates. Larger RCTs are needed to have a strong level of evidence to base our clinical management on.
Collapse
|
5
|
Dashti-Khavidaki S, Saidi R, Lu H. Current status of glucocorticoid usage in solid organ transplantation. World J Transplant 2021; 11:443-465. [PMID: 34868896 PMCID: PMC8603633 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v11.i11.443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Glucocorticoids (GCs) have been the mainstay of immunosuppressive therapy in solid organ transplantation (SOT) for decades, due to their potent effects on innate immunity and tissue protective effects. However, some SOT centers are reluctant to administer GCs long-term because of the various related side effects. This review summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of GCs in SOT. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched from 2011 to April 2021 using search syntaxes covering “transplantation” and “glucocorticoids”. GCs are used in transplant recipients, transplant donors, and organ perfusate solution to improve transplant outcomes. In SOT recipients, GCs are administered as induction and maintenance immunosuppressive therapy. GCs are also the cornerstone to treat acute antibody- and T-cell-mediated rejections. Addition of GCs to organ perfusate solution and pretreatment of transplant donors with GCs are recommended by some guidelines and protocols, to reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury peri-transplant. GCs with low bioavailability and high potency for GC receptors, such as budesonide, nanoparticle-mediated targeted delivery of GCs to specific organs, and combination use of dexamethasone with inducers of immune-regulatory cells, are new methods of GC application in SOT patients to reduce side effects or induce immune-tolerance instead of immunosuppression. Various side effects involving different non-targeted organs/tissues, such as bone, cardiovascular, neuromuscular, skin and gastrointestinal tract, have been noted for GCs. There are also potential drug-drug interactions for GCs in SOT patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simin Dashti-Khavidaki
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 14155, Iran
| | - Reza Saidi
- Department of Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States
| | - Hong Lu
- Department of Pharmacology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Boonpheng B, Hansrivijit P, Thongprayoon C, Mao SA, Vaitla PK, Bathini T, Choudhury A, Kaewput W, Mao MA, Cheungpasitporn W. Rituximab or plasmapheresis for prevention of recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis after kidney transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Transplant 2021; 11:303-319. [PMID: 34316454 PMCID: PMC8291000 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v11.i7.303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is one of the most common glomerular diseases leading to renal failure. FSGS has a high risk of recurrence after kidney transplantation. Prevention of recurrent FSGS using rituximab and/or plasmapheresis has been evaluated in multiple small studies with conflicting results.
AIM To assess the risk of recurrence of FSGS after transplantation using prophylactic rituximab with or without plasmapheresis, and plasmapheresis alone compared to the standard treatment group without preventive therapy.
METHODS This meta-analysis and systematic review were performed by first conducting a literature search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases, from inception through March 2021; search terms included ‘FSGS,’ ’steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome’, ‘rituximab,’ and ‘plasmapheresis,’. We identified studies that assessed the risk of post-transplant FSGS after use of rituximab with or without plasmapheresis, or plasmapheresis alone. Inclusion criteria were: Original, published, randomized controlled trials or cohort studies (either prospective or retrospective), case–control, or cross-sectional studies; inclusion of odds ratio, relative risk, and standardized incidence ratio with 95% confidence intervals (CI), or sufficient raw data to calculate these ratios; and subjects without interventions (controls) being used as comparators in cohort and cross-sectional studies. Effect estimates from individual studies were extracted and combined using a random effects model.
RESULTS Eleven studies, with a total of 399 kidney transplant recipients with FSGS, evaluated the use of rituximab with or without plasmapheresis; thirteen studies, with a total of 571 kidney transplant recipients with FSGS, evaluated plasmapheresis alone. Post-transplant FSGS recurred relatively early. There was no significant difference in recurrence between the group that received rituximab (with or without plasmapheresis) and the standard treatment group, with a pooled risk ratio of 0.82 (95%CI: 0.47-1.45, I2 = 65%). Similarly, plasmapheresis alone was not associated with any significant difference in FSGS recurrence when compared with no plasmapheresis; the pooled risk ratio was 0.85 (95%CI: 0.60-1.21, I2 = 23%). Subgroup analyses in the pediatric and adult groups did not yield a significant difference in recurrence risk. We also reviewed and analyzed post-transplant outcomes including timing of recurrence and graft survival.
CONCLUSION Overall, the use of rituximab with or without plasmapheresis, or plasmapheresis alone, is not associated with a lower risk of FSGS recurrence after kidney transplantation. Future studies are required to assess the effectiveness of rituximab with or without plasmapheresis among specific patient subgroups with high-risk for FSGS recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boonphiphop Boonpheng
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States
| | - Panupong Hansrivijit
- Department of Internal Medicine, UPMC Pinnacle, Harrisburg, PA 17104, United States
| | | | - Shennen A Mao
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, United States
| | - Pradeep K Vaitla
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, United States
| | - Tarun Bathini
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, United States
| | - Avishek Choudhury
- School of Systems and Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, United States
| | - Wisit Kaewput
- Department of Military and Community Medicine, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
| | - Michael A Mao
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, United States
| | - Wisit Cheungpasitporn
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Al-Jehani MH, Al-Husayni F, Aljabri A, AlMaghraby HQ, Banamah TA. Cyclophosphamide as a Treatment for Focal Segmental Glomerular Sclerosis Recurrence in a Kidney Transplant Patient. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CASE REPORTS 2021; 22:e929097. [PMID: 33539328 PMCID: PMC7871296 DOI: 10.12659/ajcr.929097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Patient: Female, 24-year-old Final Diagnosis: Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis Symptoms: Facia • lower extremity edema Medication: — Clinical Procedure: — Specialty: Nephrology
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariann H Al-Jehani
- College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Faisal Al-Husayni
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Guard Hospital, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.,Department of Internal Medicine, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah Aljabri
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Guard Hospital, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.,Department of Internal Medicine, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hatim Qasim AlMaghraby
- College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.,Department of Pathology, National Guard Hospital, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.,Department of Pathology, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Turki A Banamah
- College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.,Department of Nephrology, National Guard Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.,Department of Nephrology, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
|