1
|
Liang C, Wang J, Hai B, Xu Y, Zeng J, Chai S, Chen J, Zhang H, Gao X, Cheng G, Yang X, Hou T, Li W, Xiao X, Li B. Lingual Mucosal Graft Ureteroplasty for Long Proximal Ureteral Stricture: 6 Years of Experience with 41 Cases. Eur Urol 2022; 82:193-200. [PMID: 35618522 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Revised: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of a long proximal ureteral stricture is challenging. Lingual mucosal graft ureteroplasty (LMGU) is a novel minimally invasive technique for ureteral reconstruction that avoids the morbidity of bowel interposition or autotransplantation. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the long-term effectiveness of LMGU for managing long, complex proximal ureteral strictures in a multi-institutional cohort of patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective study involved data for 41 patients treated with LMGU at three centers between June 2015 and January 2021. SURGICAL PROCEDURE LMGU was performed using either an onlay ureteroplasty in which the diseased ureter was incised ventrally and repaired with a lingual mucosal graft (LMG) to widen the ureteral lumen, or an augmented anastomotic technique in which the obliterated segment of the ureter was excised and reanastomosed primarily on dorsal side, and an LMG was placed on the ventral side. MEASUREMENTS Pre-, intra-, and postoperative variables and outcomes were assessed. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Of 41patients, 40 were operated with laparoscopic procedures and one with a robot. Twenty-four (59%) patients underwent an onlay ureteroplasty, and 17 (41%) underwent an augmented anastomotic ureteroplasty. The reconstructed ureter was wrapped with omentum in 90% of cases. The median (range) stricture length was 4.8 cm (2.0-8.0), operative time was 166 min (98-306), and estimated blood loss was 65 ml (15-220). No open conversions and intraoperative complications occurred. At a median follow-up of 35 mo (range 13-80), the overall success rate was 97.6% (40/41). CONCLUSIONS LMGU is a safe, feasible, and effective long-term technique for managing long, complex proximal ureteral strictures. PATIENT SUMMARY We reported a novel technique for long proximal complex ureteral strictures using an onlay lingual mucosal graft (LMG). Our 6-yr outcomes demonstrate that onlay LMG ureteroplasty is a safe, feasible, and effective long-term procedure for ureteral reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaoqi Liang
- Department of Urology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Institute of Urology, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Jianli Wang
- Department of Urology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Institute of Urology, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Bo Hai
- Department of Urology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Institute of Urology, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yujie Xu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China
| | - Jinmin Zeng
- Department of Urology, Jingzhou Central Hospital, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China
| | - Shuaishuai Chai
- Department of Urology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Institute of Urology, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jiawei Chen
- Department of Urology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Institute of Urology, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Hao Zhang
- Department of Urology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Institute of Urology, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xincheng Gao
- Department of Urology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Institute of Urology, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Gong Cheng
- Department of Urology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Institute of Urology, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiong Yang
- Department of Urology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Institute of Urology, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Teng Hou
- Department of Urology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Institute of Urology, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Wencheng Li
- Department of Urology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Institute of Urology, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xingyuan Xiao
- Department of Urology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Institute of Urology, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
| | - Bing Li
- Department of Urology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Institute of Urology, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
| |
Collapse
|