Central effects of opioidergic system on food intake in birds and mammals: a review

The role of central neurotransmitters in appetite regulation of broilers and layers: similarities and differences

The importance of feeding as a vital physiological function, on the one hand, and the spread of complications induced by its disorder in humans and animals, on the other hand, have led to extensive research on its regulatory factors. Unfortunately, despite many studies focused on appetite, only limited experiments have been conducted on avian, and our knowledge of this species is scant. Considering this, the purpose of this review article is to examine the role of central neurotransmitters in regulating food consumption in broilers and layers and highlight the similarities and differences between these two strains. The methodology of this review study includes a comprehensive search of relevant literature on the topic using appropriate keywords in reliable electronic databases. Based on the findings, the central effect of most neurotransmitters on the feeding of broilers and laying chickens was similar, but in some cases, such as dopamine, ghrelin, nitric oxide, and agouti-related peptide, differences were observed. Also, the lack of conducting a study on the role of some neurotransmitters in one of the bird strains made it impossible to make an exact comparison. Finally, it seems that although there are general similarities in appetite regulatory mechanisms in meat and egg-type chickens, the long-term genetic selection appropriate to breeding goals (meat or egg production) has caused differences in the effect of some neurotransmitters. Undoubtedly, conducting future studies while completing the missing links can lead to a comprehensive understanding of this process and its manipulation according to the breeding purposes of chickens.

Update on Feeding Regulation by Ghrelin in Birds: Focused on Brain Network

Ghrelin is known to be a feeding stimulatory hormone in mammals, but in birds, in contrast to mammals, the feeding behavior is regulated in inhibitory manners. This is because the neuropeptides associated with the regulation in the brain are different from those in mammals, i.e., it has been shown that, in chickens, a corticotropin-releasing hormone family peptide, urocortin, which is a feeding-inhibitory peptide, is mainly involved in the inhibitory mechanism. However, feeding is also regulated by various neurotransmitters in the brain, and recently, their interaction with the mechanisms underlying feeding inhibition by ghrelin in birds has been intensively studied and clarified. This review summarizes these findings.

Central effects of the serotoninergic, GABAergic, and cholecystokinin systems on neuropeptide VF (NPVF)-induced hypophagia and feeding behavior in neonatal broiler chicken

The study was performed to evaluate the role of central serotoninergic, GABAergic, and cholecystokinin systems in neuropeptide VF (NPVF)-induced hypophagia in broiler chickens. In this study, 9 experiments were designed, each with one control and three treatment groups (n = 44 in each experiment). Control chicks of all groups were subjected to normal saline + Evans blue 0.1 % Intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection. In the first experiment, 3 groups of chicks received NPVF (4, 8, and 16 nmol). In experiment 2-9, one group of chicks received NPVF (16 nmol), another received 10 µg fluoxetine (serotonin reuptake inhibitor) (experiment 2), 1.25 µg PCPA (serotonin synthesis inhibitor) (experiment 3), 1.5 µg SB-242,084 (5-HT2C receptor antagonist) (experiment 4), 15.25 nmol 8-OH-DPAT (5-HT1A receptor antagonist) (experiment 5), 0.5 µg picrotoxin (GABAA receptor antagonist) (experiment 6), 20 ng CGP54626 (GABAB receptor antagonist) (experiment 7), 1 nmol devazepide (CCKA receptor antagonist) (experiment 8), and 1 nmol/L-365(-|-),260 (CCKB receptor antagonist) (experiment 9), and another final group received combination of specific neurotransmitter + NPVF Then, the cumulative food intake was measured until 120 min post-injection. ICV injection of NPVF (8 and 16 nmol) significantly decreased food intake (P < 0.05). Simultaneous injection of fluoxetine + NPVF and also picrotoxin + NPVF significantly increased hypophagia caused by NPVF (P < 0.05). However, co-administration of PCPA + NPVF and also SB242084 + NPVF significantly decreased NPVF-induced hypophagia (P < 0.05). Finally, 8-OH-DPAT, CGP54626, devazepide, and L-365,260 had no effect on the hypophagia brought on by NPVF (P > 0.05). Count-type behaviors were dose-dependent and decreased in groups that received NPVF compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Our finding recommended an interconnection between central NPVF and serotoninergic, GABAergic, and cholecystokinin systems in neonatal chickens.

The effects of neuropeptide W on food consumption and feeding behavior in neonatal meat-type chicks: Role of CRF1/CRF2 and NPY1 receptors

In several studies, the regulatory role of the neuropeptide W (NPW) system in food intake has been demonstrated. Considering the lack of avian studies in this field, the current research was conducted to evaluate the effects of intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusion of NPW and its interferences with corticotropin, melanocortin, and neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptors on meal consumption and feeding behaviors of broilers. In the first experiment, birds were injected with NPW (0.75, 1.5, and 3 nmol) in addition to saline. In the second experiment, saline, CRF1 receptor antagonist (NBI35965, 30 μg), NPW (3 nmol), and simultaneous injections of NBI35965 and NPW were performed. Experiments 3-8 were identical to experiment 2, except that CRF2 receptor antagonist (K41498, 30 μg), MC3/MC4 receptor antagonist (SHU9119, 0.5 nmol), MC4 receptor antagonist (HS024, 0.5 nmol), NPY1 receptor antagonist (BMS193885, 1.25 nmol), NPY2 receptor antagonist (CYM9484, 1.25 nmol), and NPY5 receptor (antagonist L-152,804, 1.25 nmol) were administrated instead of NBI35965. After that, cumulative feed intake and feeding behavior were monitored for 2 h and 30 min after injections, respectively. Following the infusion of NPW (1.5 and 3 nmol), there was a significant stimulation of meal consumption in chickens (P < 0.05). Concomitant injection of NBI35965 and K41498 with NPW enhanced the appetite-increasing effect of NPW (P < 0.05); while BMS193885 suppressed this effect of NPW (P < 0.05). Injection of SHU9119, HS024, CYM9484, and L-152804 with NPW at the same time, had no significant effect on NPW-induced hyperphagia (P > 0.05). NPW also significantly decreased the standing period and the number of jumps, steps, and exploratory pecks, and led to an increase in sitting period and feeding pecks (P < 0.05). Based on the observations, it seems that NPW-induced hyperphagia could be mediated through CRF1, CRF2, and NPY1 receptors in neonatal broilers.

Hypophagia induced by intracerebroventricular injection of apelin-13 is mediated via CRF1/CRF2 and MC3/MC4 receptors in neonatal broiler chicken

Previous studies have shown the role of apelin and its receptors in the regulation of food intake. In the present study, we investigate the mediating role of melanocortin, corticotropin, and neuropeptide Y systems in apelin-13- induced food intake in broilers. Eight trials were run in the current investigation to ascertain the relationships between the aforementioned systems and apelin-13 on food intake and behavioral changes after apelin-13 administration. In experiment 1, hens were given an intracerebroventricular administration of a solution for control in addition to apelin-13 (0.25, 0.5, and 1 µg). Astressin-B (a CRF1/CRF2 receptor antagonist, 30 µg), apelin-13 (1 µg), and administration of astressin-B and apelin-13 concurrently, were all injected into the birds in experiment 2. Experiments 3 through 8 were quite similar to experiment 2, with the exception of astressin2-B (CRF2 receptor antagonist, 30 µg), SHU9119 (MC3/MC4 receptor antagonist, 0.5 nmol), MCL0020 (MC4 receptor antagonist, 0.5 nmol), BIBP-3226 (NPY1 receptor antagonist, 1.25 nmol), BIIE 0246 (NPY2 receptor antagonist, 1.25 nmol), and CGP71683A (NPY5 receptor antagonist, 1.25 nmol) were injected instead of astressin-B. After then, total food consumption was monitored for 6 h. Apelin-13 injections of 0.5 and 1 µg decreased feeding (P < 0.05). The hypophagic effects of apelin were attenuated following the simultaneous administration of Astressin-B and Astressin2-B with apelin-13 (P > 0.05). Co-infusion of SHU9119 and apelin-13 reduced the appetite-decreasing effects of apelin-13 (P > 0.05). When MCL0020 and apelin-13 were injected at the same time, the hypophagia that apelin-13 induced was eliminated (P > 0.05). BIBP-3226, BIIE 0246, and CGP71683A had no effect on the hypophagia brought on by apelin-13 (P > 0.05). Also, apelin-13 significantly increased number of steps, jumps, exploratory food, pecks and standing time while decreased siting time (P < 0.05). These findings suggest that apelin-13-induced hypophagia in hens may involve the CRF1/CRF2 and MC3/MC4 receptors.