Overexpression of m6A-factors METTL3, ALKBH5, and YTHDC1 alters HPV16 mRNA splicing

Fat Mass- and Obesity-Associated Protein (FTO) Promotes the Proliferation of Goat Skeletal Muscle Satellite Cells by Stabilizing DAG1 mRNA in an IGF2BP1-Related m6A Manner

Skeletal muscle development is spotlighted in mammals since it closely relates to animal health and economic benefits to the breeding industry. Researchers have successfully unveiled many regulatory factors and mechanisms involving myogenesis. However, the effect of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification, especially demethylase and its regulated genes, on muscle development remains to be further explored. Here, we found that the typical demethylase FTO (fat mass- and obesity-associated protein) was highly enriched in goats' longissimus dorsi (LD) muscles. In addition, the level of m6A modification on transcripts was negatively regulated by FTO during the proliferation of goat skeletal muscle satellite cells (MuSCs). Moreover, a deficiency of FTO in MuSCs significantly retarded their proliferation and promoted the expression of dystrophin-associated protein 1 (DAG1). m6A modifications of DAG1 mRNA were efficiently altered by FTO. Intriguingly, the results of DAG1 levels and its m6A enrichment from FB23-2 (FTO demethylase inhibitor)-treated cells were consistent with those of the FTO knockdown, indicating that the regulation of FTO on DAG1 depended on m6A modification. Further experiments showed that interfering FTO improved m6A modification at site DAG1-122, recognized by Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 1 (IGF2BP1) and consequently stabilized DAG1 transcripts. Our study suggests that FTO promotes the proliferation of MuSCs by regulating the expression of DAG1 through m6A modification. This will extend our knowledge of the m6A-related mechanism of skeletal muscle development in animals.

RNA elements that control human papillomavirus mRNA splicing-targets for therapy?

Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) cause more than 4.5% of all cancer in the world and more than half of these cases are attributed to human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16). Prophylactic vaccines are available but antiviral drugs are not. Novel targets for therapy are urgently needed. Alternative RNA splicing is extensively used by HPVs to express all their genes and HPV16 is no exception. This process must function to perfection since mis-splicing could perturb the HPV gene expression program by altering mRNA levels or by generating dysfunctional mRNAs. Cis-acting RNA elements on the viral mRNAs and their cognate cellular trans-acting factors control papillomavirus RNA splicing. The precise but delicate nature of the splicing process renders splicing sensitive to interference. As such, papillomavirus RNA splicing is a potential target for therapy. Here we summarize our current understanding of cis-acting HPV16 RNA elements that control HPV16 mRNA splicing via cellular proteins and discuss how they may be exploited as targets for therapy to papillomavirus infections and cancer.

Emerging roles of biological m6A proteins in regulating virus infection: A review

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most prevalent chemical modifications of intracellular RNA, which recently emerging as a multifaceted effector of viral genomic RNA. As a dynamic process, three groups of biological proteins control the levels of m6A modification in eukaryocyte, designed as m6A writers, erasers, and readers. The m6A writers comprising of methyltransferases complex initiate the modification process. On the contrary, the m6A erasers ALKBH5 or FTO abolish the modification through three-step demethylation: m6A to N6-hydroxymethyl adenosine (hm6A), then hm6A to N6-methyladenosine (f6A), and finally f6A to adenosine. The known m6A readers include the YTH family and the hnRNP family. As m6A modification regulates RNA nuclear exportation, stability, and translation, m6A proteins commonly participate in virus infection by regulating viral genomic RNA synthesis. Moreover, m6A proteins establish molecular linkages between virus genome/viral encode proteins and host cells proteins via their multifunctional roles in cellular RNA metabolism. The m6A writers and erasers directly impact interferon expression and macrophage innate immune responses, facilitating them to act as anti-/pro-viral factors. The m6A readers enable to alter cell metabolism and stress granules (SGs) production to regulate virus-host interactions. Here, the latest progress of m6A proteins in regulating viral infection is reviewed. Demonstrating the roles of m6A proteins will enhance the understanding of epigenetic regulation of virus infection and stimulate the development of novel antiviral strategies.

Insights into the regulatory role of RNA methylation modifications in glioma

Epitranscriptomic abnormalities, which are highly prevalent in primary central nervous system malignancies, have been identified as crucial contributors to the development and progression of gliomas. RNA epitranscriptomic modifications, particularly the reversible modification methylation, have been observed throughout the RNA cycle. Epitranscriptomic modifications, which regulate RNA transcription and translation, have profound biological implications. These modifications are associated with the development of several cancer types. Notably, three main protein types-writers, erasers, and readers, in conjunction with other related proteins, mediate these epitranscriptomic changes. This review primarily focuses on the role of recently identified RNA methylation modifications in gliomas, such as N6-methyladenosine (m6A), 5-methylcytosine (m5C), N7-methylguanosine (m7G), and N1-methyladenosine (m1A). We delved into their corresponding writers, erasers, readers, and related binding proteins to propose new approaches and prognostic indicators for patients with glioma.

Crosstalk between m6A modification and alternative splicing during cancer progression

Background N6-methyladenosine (m6A), the most prevalent internal mRNA modification in eukaryotes, is added by m6A methyltransferases, removed by m6A demethylases and recognised by m6A-binding proteins. This modification significantly influences carious facets of RNA metabolism and plays a pivotal role in cellular and physiological processes. Main body Pre-mRNA alternative splicing, a process that generates multiple splice isoforms from multi-exon genes, contributes significantly to the protein diversity in mammals. Moreover, the presence of crosstalk between m6A modification and alternative splicing, with m6A modifications on pre-mRNAs exerting regulatory control, has been established. The m6A modification modulates alternative splicing patterns by recruiting specific RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) that regulate alternative splicing or by directly influencing the interaction between RBPs and their target RNAs. Conversely, alternative splicing can impact the deposition or recognition of m6A modification on mRNAs. The integration of m6A modifications has expanded the scope of therapeutic strategies for cancer treatment, while alternative splicing offers novel insights into the mechanistic role of m6A methylation in cancer initiation and progression. Conclusion This review aims to highlight the biological functions of alternative splicing of m6A modification machinery and its implications in tumourigenesis. Furthermore, we discuss the clinical relevance of understanding m6A-dependent alternative splicing in tumour therapies.

Ghost authors revealed: The structure and function of human N6 -methyladenosine RNA methyltransferases

Despite the discovery of modified nucleic acids nearly 75 years ago, their biological functions are still being elucidated. N6 -methyladenosine (m6 A) is the most abundant modification in eukaryotic messenger RNA (mRNA) and has also been detected in non-coding RNAs, including long non-coding RNA, ribosomal RNA, and small nuclear RNA. In general, m6 A marks can alter RNA secondary structure and initiate unique RNA-protein interactions that can alter splicing, mRNA turnover, and translation, just to name a few. Although m6 A marks in human RNAs have been known to exist since 1974, the structures and functions of methyltransferases responsible for writing m6 A marks have been established only recently. Thus far, there are four confirmed human methyltransferases that catalyze the transfer of a methyl group from S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to the N6 position of adenosine, producing m6 A: methyltransferase-like protein (METTL) 3/METTL14 complex, METTL16, METTL5, and zinc-finger CCHC-domain-containing protein 4. Though the methyltransferases have unique RNA targets, all human m6 A RNA methyltransferases contain a Rossmann fold with a conserved SAM-binding pocket, suggesting that they utilize a similar catalytic mechanism for methyl transfer. For each of the human m6 A RNA methyltransferases, we present the biological functions and links to human disease, RNA targets, catalytic and kinetic mechanisms, and macromolecular structures. We also discuss m6 A marks in human viruses and parasites, assigning m6 A marks in the transcriptome to specific methyltransferases, small molecules targeting m6 A methyltransferases, and the enzymes responsible for hypermodified m6 A marks and their biological functions in humans. Understanding m6 A methyltransferases is a critical steppingstone toward establishing the m6 A epitranscriptome and more broadly the RNome. This article is categorized under: RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > Protein-RNA Recognition RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > RNA-Protein Complexes RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > Protein-RNA Interactions: Functional Implications.

Splice site m6A methylation prevents binding of DGCR8 to suppress KRT4 pre-mRNA splicing in oral squamous cell carcinoma

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the 11th most prevalent tumor worldwide. Despite advantages of therapeutic approaches, the 5-year survival rate of patients with OSCC is less than 50%. It is urgent to elucidate mechanisms underlying OSCC progression for developing novel treatment strategies. Our recent study has revealed that Keratin 4 (KRT4) suppresses OSCC development, which is downregulated in OSCC. Nevertheless, the mechanism downregulating KRT4 in OSCC remains unknown. In this study, touchdown PCR was utilized to detect KRT4 pre-mRNA splicing, while m⁶A RNA methylation was identified by methylated RNA immunoprecipitation (MeRIP). Besides, RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) was used to determine RNA-protein interaction. Herein, this study indicated that intron splicing of KRT4 pre-mRNA was suppressed in OSCC. Mechanistically, m⁶A methylation of exon-intron boundaries prevented intron splicing of KRT4 pre-mRNA in OSCC. Besides, m⁶A methylation suppressed the binding of splice factor DGCR8 microprocessor complex subunit (DGCR8) to exon-intron boundaries in KRT4 pre-mRNA to prohibit intron splicing of KRT4 pre-mRNA in OSCC. These findings revealed the mechanism downregulating KRT4 in OSCC and provided potential therapeutic targets for OSCC.

The potential role of m6A reader YTHDF1 as diagnostic biomarker and the signaling pathways in tumorigenesis and metastasis in pan-cancer

m6A is an important RNA methylation in progression of various human cancers. As the m6A reader protein, YTHDF1 is reported to accelerate m6A-modified mRNAs translation in cytoplasm. It is highly expressed in various human cancers and contributes to the progression and metastasis of cancers. YTHDF1 was closely associated with poor prognosis and also used as a molecular marker for clinical diagnosis or therapy in human cancers. It has been reported to promote chemoresistance to Adriamycin, Cisplatin and Olaparib by increasing mRNA stability of its target molecule. Moreover, it contributes to CSC-like characteristic of tumor cells and inducing the antitumor immune microenvironment. Here, we reviewed the clinical diagnostic and prognostic values of YTHDF1, as well as the molecular mechanisms of YTHDF1 in progression and metastasis of human cancers.

N6-methyladenosine modification of viral RNA and its role during the recognition process of RIG-I-like receptors

N⁶-methyladenosine (m⁶A) is the most abundant RNA chemical modification in eukaryotes and is also found in the RNAs of many viruses. In recent years, m⁶A RNA modification has been reported to have a role not only in the replication of numerous viruses but also in the innate immune escape process. In this review, we describe the viruses that contain m⁶A in their genomes or messenger RNAs (mRNAs), and summarize the effects of m⁶A on the replication of different viruses. We also discuss how m⁶A modification helps viral RNAs escape recognition by exogenous RNA sensors, such as retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I)-like receptors (RLRs), during viral invasion. Overall, the goal of our review is to summarize how m⁶A regulates viral replication and facilitates innate immune escape. Furthermore, we elaborate on the potential of m⁶A as a novel antiviral target.

Comprehensive analysis of pre-mRNA alternative splicing regulated by m6A methylation in pig oxidative and glycolytic skeletal muscles

BACKGROUND

Different types of skeletal myofibers exhibit distinct physiological and metabolic properties that are associated with meat quality traits in livestock. Alternative splicing (AS) of pre-mRNA can generate multiple transcripts from an individual gene by differential selection of splice sites. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most abundant modification in mRNAs, but its regulation for AS in different muscles remains unknown.  RESULTS: We characterized AS events and m6A methylation pattern in pig oxidative and glycolytic muscles. A tota1 of 1294 differential AS events were identified, and differentially spliced genes were significantly enriched in processes related to different phenotypes between oxidative and glycolytic muscles. We constructed the regulatory network between splicing factors and corresponding differential AS events and identified NOVA1 and KHDRBS2 as key splicing factors. AS event was enriched in m6A-modified genes, and the methylation level was positively correlated with the number of AS events in genes. The dynamic change in m6A enrichment was associated with 115 differentially skipping exon (SE-DAS) events within 92 genes involving in various processes, including muscle contraction and myofibril assembly. We obtained 23.4% SE-DAS events (27/115) regulated by METTL3-meditaed m6A and experimentally validated the aberrant splicing of ZNF280D, PHE4DIP, and NEB. The inhibition of m6A methyltransferase METTL3 could induce the conversion of oxidative fiber to glycolytic fiber in PSCs.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggested that m6A modification could contribute to significant difference in phenotypes between oxidative and glycolytic muscles by mediating the regulation of AS. These findings would provide novel insights into mechanisms underlying muscle fiber conversion.