Prediction of malignancy of submandibular gland tumors with apparent diffusion coefficient

Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS): What the radiologists need to know?

We aim to review the new modifications in MR imaging technique, image interpretation, lexicon, and scoring system of the last version of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS v2.1) in a simple and practical way. This last version of PI-RADS v2.1 describes the new technical modifications in the protocol of Multiparametric MRI (MpMRI) including T2, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) parameters. It includes also; new guidelines in the image interpretation specifications in new locations (lesions located in the central zone and anterior fibromuscular stroma), clarification of T2 scoring of lesions of the transition zone, the distinction between DWI score 2 and 3 lesions in the transition zone and peripheral zone, as well as between positive and negative enhancement in DCE. Biparametric MRI (BpMRI) along with simplified PI-RADS is gaining more acceptances in the assessment of clinically significant prostatic cancer.

Differentiation malignant from benign parotid tumors in children with diffusion-weighted MR imaging

PURPOSE

To differentiate pediatric solid malignant from the benign parotid tumors with diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study comprising 38 children with parotid tumors (21 boys and 17 girls aged from 2 months to 17 years) was conducted using (DWI) of the parotid gland. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were generated. The ADC value of the parotid tumors was calculated.

RESULTS

The mean ADC value of malignant parotid tumors (1.08 ± 0.1, 1.04 ± 0.1 × 10^-3mm²/s) was significantly lower [P = 0.001] than that of benign lesions (1.69 ± 0.2, 1.72 ± 0.3 × 10^-3mm²/s). A threshold of ADC of 1.40, 1.33 × 10^-3mm²/s was used for differentiating malignant parotid tumors from benign lesions and led to the best results of the area under the curve of 0.940, 0.929, accuracy of 86, 89%, sensitivity of 94, 94%, specificity of 80, 85%, negative predictive value of 94.1, 94.4%, and positive predictive value of 81, 85%. There was insignificant difference in ADC values of malignant lesions (P = 0.23, 0.30) as well as within benign lesions (P = 0.25, 0.08).

CONCLUSION

DWI is an innovative anticipating imaging technique that can be used in the differentiation of pediatric solid malignant parotid tumors from benign lesions.

Prediction of skull base osteomyelitis in necrotising otitis externa with diffusion-weighted imaging

OBJECTIVE

To predict skull base osteomyelitis in patients with necrotising otitis externa using diffusion-weighted imaging.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of 25 necrotising otitis externa patients with skull base osteomyelitis (n = 10) or without skull base involvement (n = 14) who underwent a single-shot diffusion-weighted imaging of the skull base.

RESULTS

The respective mean apparent diffusion coefficient values of the skull base, as determined by two reviewers, were 0.851 ± 0.15 and 0.841 ± 0.14 ×10-3mm2/s for the skull base osteomyelitis patients, and 1.065 ± 0.19 and 1.045 ± 0.20 ×10-3mm2/s for the necrotising otitis externa patients without skull base involvement. The difference in apparent diffusion coefficients between the groups was significant, for both reviewers (p = 0.008 and 0.012). The optimal threshold apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting skull base osteomyelitis in necrotising otitis externa patients was 0.945 ×10-3mm2/s and 0.915 ×10-3mm2/s, with an area under the curve of 0.825 and 0.800, accuracy of 87.5 and 83.3 per cent, sensitivity of 85.7 and 90.0 per cent, and specificity of 90.0 and 78.6 per cent, for each reviewer respectively.

CONCLUSION

Apparent diffusion coefficient is a non-invasive imaging parameter useful for predicting skull base osteomyelitis in necrotising otitis externa patients.

Differentiation of sublingual thyroglossal duct cyst from midline dermoid cyst with diffusion weighted imaging

PURPOSE

to differentiate sublingual thyroglossal duct cyst (TGDC) from midline dermoid cyst (DC) with diffusion weighted imaging (DWI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 22 consecutive patients (11 male and 11 female aged 5-15 years) with midline cystic lesion at floor of mouth. They underwent DWI of floor of mouth. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the cystic lesions was calculated and correlated with surgical findings.

RESULTS

The mean ADC value of TGDC of 1st observer was (2.20 ± 0.28 × 10^-3 mm²/s) and of 2nd observer was (2.28 ± 0.27 × 10^-3 mm²/s) was significantly higher than that of DC (P = 0.001) whose ADC of 1st observer was (1.55 ± 0.15 × 10^-3 mm²/s) and of 2nd observer was (1.53 ± 0.11 × 10^-3 mm²/s). There was excellent inter-observer agreement of both readings (r = 92%, P = 0.001). When ADC of 1.76 and 1.62 × 10^-3 mm²/s was used as a threshold value for differentiating TGDC from DC, the best results were obtained with area under the curve of 0.94 and 0.96, accuracy of 90% and 86%, sensitivity of 91% and 91%%, specificity of 90% and 80%, negative predictive value of 90% and 88% and positive predictive value of 92% and 84% of both reviewers respectively.

CONCLUSION

DWI is reliable and reproducible imaging modality for differentiation sublingual TGDC from DC.

Arterial spin labelling and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation of recurrent head and neck cancer from post-radiation changes

Objective

To assess arterial spin labelling and diffusion-weighted imaging in the differentiation of recurrent head and neck cancer from post-radiation changes.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted of 47 patients with head and neck cancer, treated with radiotherapy, who underwent magnetic resonance arterial spin labelling and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Tumour blood flow and apparent diffusion co-efficient of the lesion were calculated.

Results

There was significant difference (p= 0.001) in tumour blood flow between patients with recurrent head and neck cancer (n= 31) (47.37 ± 16.3 ml/100 g/minute) and those with post-radiation changes (n= 16) (18.80 ± 2.9 ml/100 g/minute). The thresholds of tumour blood flow and apparent diffusion co-efficient used for differentiating recurrence from post-radiation changes were more than 24.0 ml/100 g/minute and 1.21 × 10−3mm2/second or less, with area under the curve values of 0.94 and 0.90, and accuracy rates of 88.2 per cent and 88.2 per cent, respectively. The combined tumour blood flow and apparent diffusion co-efficient values used for differentiating recurrence from post-radiation changes had an area under the curve of 0.96 and an accuracy of 90.2 per cent.

Conclusion

Combined tumour blood flow and apparent diffusion co-efficient can differentiate recurrence from post-radiation changes.

Routine and Advanced Diffusion Imaging Modules of the Salivary Glands

This article reviews the role of routine and advanced diffusion imaging modules of the salivary glands. Routine and advanced diffusion imaging modules have a role in differentiation of malignant from benign salivary gland tumors, characterization of some benign salivary gland tumors, and staging of salivary gland cancer. The role of advanced diffusion modules in patients with salivary gland cancer after surgery, radiation therapy, or radioiodine therapy is discussed. Advanced diffusion imaging modules can help in diagnosis and staging of Sjögren syndrome.