Metabolic Tumor Width Parameters as Determined on PET/CT Predict Disease-free Survival and Treatment Response in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus

Prognostic potential of integrated morphologic and metabolic parameters of pre-therapeutic [18F]FDG-PET/CT regarding progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in NSCLC-patients

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic potential of pre-therapeutic [18F]FDG-PET/CT variables regarding prediction of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in NSCLC-patients.

METHOD

NSCLC-patients who underwent pre-therapeutic [18F]FDG-PET/CT were retrospectively analyzed. The following imaging features were collected from the primary tumor: tumor size, tumor density, central necrosis, spicules and SUVmax. For standardization, an indexSUVmax was calculated (SUVmax primary tumor/SUVmax liver). Descriptive statistics and correlations of survival time analyses for PFS and OS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression including a hazard ratio (HR). A value of p < 0.05 was set as statistically significant. The 95%-confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. The median follow-up time was 63 (IQR 27-106) months.

RESULTS

This study included a total of 82 patients (25 women, 57 men; mean age: 66 ± 9 years). IndexSUVmax (PFS: HR = 1.0, CI: 1.0-1.1, p = 0.49; OS: HR = 1.0, CI: 0.9-1.2, p = 0.41), tumor size (PFS: HR = 1.0, CI: 0.9-1.0, p = 0.08; OS: HR = 1.0, CI: 0.9-1.0, p = 0.07), tumor density (PFS: HR = 0.9, CI: 0.6-1.4, p = 0.73; OS: HR = 0.3; CI: 0.1-1.1; p = 0.07), central necrosis (PFS: HR = 1.0, CI: 0.6-1.8, p = 0.98; OS: HR = 0.6, CI: 0.2-1.9, p = 0.40) and spicules (PFS: HR = 1.0, CI: 0.6-1.9, p = 0.91; OS: HR = 1.3, CI: 0.4-3.7, p = 0.65) did not significantly affect PFS and OS in the study population. An optimal threshold value for the indexSUVmax was determined by ROC analysis and Youden's index. There was no significant difference in PFS with an indexSUVmax-threshold of 3.8 (13 vs. 27 months; p = 0.45) and in OS with an indexSUVmax-threshold of 4.0 (113 vs. 106 months; p = 0.40).

CONCLUSIONS

SUVmax and morphologic parameters from pre-therapeutic [18F]FDG-PET/CT were not able to predict PFS and OS in NSCLC-patients.

Role of dynamic and parametric whole-body FDG PET/CT imaging in molecular characterization of primary breast cancer: a single institution experience

AIM

The aim of this pilot study was to assess the role of dynamic whole-body PET and parametric imaging in the biological characterization of primary breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

In total 24 histologically proven primary breast cancer lesions in 21 consecutive patients were retrospectively analyzed. Each patient underwent 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose whole-body dynamic PET-CT before any treatment. Dynamic PET images were acquired in the list mode for a total duration of 70 min. The reconstructed parametric imaging generated Patlak plot-based 'Slope' and 'Intercept' images, from which parametric indices ki and DV were obtained. The standard uptake value (SUV) metric was also obtained by summing the last few frames of the dynamic study. ki, distribution volume (DV) and SUV were correlated with the histological tumor grade, biomarkers [hormone receptors and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) neu expression] and molecular subtypes (A, B and C) as well as with tumor size, regional nodal metastases and distant metastases.

RESULTS

The mean ki was found to be significantly higher in grade III than II lesions (P = 0.005), HER-2 neu positive status (P = 0.04) and molecular subtype B (P = 0.04) as well as in greater than T1 lesions(P = 0.0003 and P = 0.04, respectively) and node-positive lesions (P = 0.009). Though mean ki was not found to be significant for the hormone receptors status (P = 0.08), it showed the best correlation compared to the other parameters (P = 0.8 for DV and P = 0.1 for SUV). Spearman's correlation test, area under the curve (AUC) and mismatch percentage also revealed ki to predict tumor grade (AUC, 0.95; r = 0.7; P = 0.0001), HER-2 neu status and molecular subtypes (AUC, 0.81; r = 0.49 and P = 0.01) along with the hormone receptors status (AUC, 0.83; r = 0.32; P = 0.1). The mean DV failed to show any association with any of the biological or anatomical staging parameters. Though ki was found to be comparable to that of SUV in almost all the assessed parameters, it appeared to be better for predicting hormone receptors status even though both parameters were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Our initial observation in a small cohort of breast cancer patients suggests that ki is promising in stratifying primary breast cancer lesions according to the tumor grade and biological characteristics.

Current and Future Perspectives of the Use of Organoids in Radiobiology

The majority of cancer patients will be treated with radiotherapy, either alone or together with chemotherapy and/or surgery. Optimising the balance between tumour control and the probability of normal tissue side effects is the primary goal of radiation treatment. Therefore, it is imperative to understand the effects that irradiation will have on both normal and cancer tissue. The more classical lab models of immortal cell lines and in vivo animal models have been fundamental to radiobiological studies to date. However, each of these comes with their own limitations and new complementary models are required to fill the gaps left by these traditional models. In this review, we discuss how organoids, three-dimensional tissue-resembling structures derived from tissue-resident, embryonic or induced pluripotent stem cells, overcome the limitations of these models and thus have a growing importance in the field of radiation biology research. The roles of organoids in understanding radiation-induced tissue responses and in moving towards precision medicine are examined. Finally, the limitations of organoids in radiobiology and the steps being made to overcome these limitations are considered.

Accuracy of Detecting Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis on the accuracy of endoscopic biopsies, EUS, and 18F-FDG PET(-CT) for detecting residual disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for esophageal cancer.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

After nCRT, one-third of patients have a pathologically complete response in the resection specimen. Before an active surveillance strategy could be offered to these patients, clinically complete responders should be accurately identified.

METHODS

Embase, Medline, Cochrane, and Web-of-Science were searched until February 2018 for studies on accuracy of endoscopic biopsies, EUS, or PET(-CT) for detecting locoregional residual disease after nCRT for squamous cell- or adenocarcinoma. Pooled sensitivities and specificities were calculated using random-effect meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Forty-four studies were included for meta-analyses. For detecting residual disease at the primary tumor site, 12 studies evaluated endoscopic biopsies, 11 qualitative EUS, 14 qualitative PET, 8 quantitative PET using maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), and 7 quantitative PET using percentage reduction of SUVmax (%ΔSUVmax). Pooled sensitivities and specificities were 33% and 95% for endoscopic biopsies, 96% and 8% for qualitative EUS, 74% and 52% for qualitative PET, 69% and 72% for PET-SUVmax, and 73% and 63% for PET-%ΔSUVmax. For detecting residual nodal disease, 11 studies evaluated qualitative EUS with a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 68% and 57%, respectively. In subgroup analyses, sensitivity of PET-%ΔSUVmax and EUS for nodal disease was higher in squamous cell carcinoma than adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Current literature suggests insufficient accuracy of endoscopic biopsies, EUS, and 18F-FDG PET(-CT) as single modalities for detecting residual disease after nCRT for esophageal cancer.

Prognostic Significance of Metabolic Parameters and Textural Features on 18F-FDG PET/CT in Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of Breast

To investigate the prognostic significance of metabolic parameters and texture analysis on ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) in patients with breast invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), from August 2005 to May 2015, IDC patients who had undergone pre-treatment FDG PET/CT were enrolled. The metabolic parameters, including maximal standardized uptake value of breast tumor (SUVbt) and ipsilateral axillary lymph node (SUVln), metabolic tumor volume (MTVbt) and total lesion glycolysis (TLGbt) of breast tumor, whole-body MTV (MTVwb) and whole-body TLG (TLGwb) were recorded. Nine textural features of tumor (four co-occurrence matrices and five SUV-based statistics) were measured. The prognostic significance of above parameters and clinical factors was assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Thirty-five patients were enrolled. Patients with low and high MTVwb had 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 81.0 and 14.3% (p < 0.0001). The 5-year overall survival for low and high MTVwb was 88.5% and 43.6% (p = 0.0005). Multivariate analyses showed MTVwb was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (HR: 8.29, 95% CI: 2.17–31.64, p = 0.0020). The SUV, TLG and textural features were not independently predictive. Elevated MTVwb was an independent predictor for shorter PFS in patients with breast IDC.

Preoperative image-guided identification of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer (PRIDE): a multicenter observational study

BACKGROUND

Nearly one third of patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for locally advanced esophageal cancer have a pathologic complete response (pCR) of the primary tumor upon histopathological evaluation of the resection specimen. The primary aim of this study is to develop a model that predicts the probability of pCR to nCRT in esophageal cancer, based on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT). Accurate response prediction could lead to a patient-tailored approach with omission of surgery in the future in case of predicted pCR or additional neoadjuvant treatment in case of non-pCR.

METHODS

The PRIDE study is a prospective, single arm, observational multicenter study designed to develop a multimodal prediction model for histopathological response to nCRT for esophageal cancer. A total of 200 patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer - of which at least 130 patients with adenocarcinoma and at least 61 patients with squamous cell carcinoma - scheduled to receive nCRT followed by esophagectomy will be included. The primary modalities to be incorporated in the prediction model are quantitative parameters derived from MRI and ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT scans, which will be acquired at fixed intervals before, during and after nCRT. Secondary modalities include blood samples for analysis of the presence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at 3 time-points (before, during and after nCRT), and an endoscopy with (random) bite-on-bite biopsies of the primary tumor site and other suspected lesions in the esophagus as well as an endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with fine needle aspiration of suspected lymph nodes after finishing nCRT. The main study endpoint is the performance of the model for pCR prediction. Secondary endpoints include progression-free and overall survival.

DISCUSSION

If the multimodal PRIDE concept provides high predictive performance for pCR, the results of this study will play an important role in accurate identification of esophageal cancer patients with a pCR to nCRT. These patients might benefit from a patient-tailored approach with omission of surgery in the future. Vice versa, patients with non-pCR might benefit from additional neoadjuvant treatment, or ineffective therapy could be stopped.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The article reports on a health care intervention on human participants and was prospectively registered on March 22, 2018 under ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03474341 .

Radiological prediction of positive circumferential resection margin in oesophageal cancer

PURPOSE

A positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) is regarded as a poor prognostic indicator in oesophageal cancer (OC) but its prediction can be challenging. MRI is used to predict a threatened CRM in rectal cancer but is not commonly performed in OC unlike PET/CT, which is now routinely used. Therefore, this study assessed the additional predictive value of PET-defined tumour variables compared with EUS and CT T-stage. The prognostic significance of CRM status was also assessed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 117 consecutive patients [median age 64.0 (range 24-78), 102 males, 110 adenocarcinomas, 6 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), 1 neuro-endocrine] treated between 1st March 2012 and 31st July 2015. A binary logistic regression model tested 5 staging variables; EUS T-stage (≤T2 vs ≥ T3), CT T-stage (≤T2 vs ≥ T3), PET metabolic tumour length (MTL), PET metabolic tumour width (MTW) and the maximum standardised uptake value (SUV_max).

RESULTS

The CRM was positive in 43.6%. Sixty-seven (57.3%) patients received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), 31 patients (26.5%) underwent surgery alone and 19 patients (16.2%) had neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (NACRT). Median overall survival (OS) was 36.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 24.1-47.9) and the 2-year OS was 55.4%. A binary logistic regression model showed EUS ≥ T3 tumours were independently and significantly more likely to have a positive CRM than EUS ≤ T2 tumours (HR 5.188, 95% CI 1.265-21.273, p = 0.022). CT T-stage, PET MTL, PET MTW and SUV_max were not significantly associated with CRM status (p = 0.783, 0.852, 0.605 and 0.413, respectively). There was a significant difference in OS between CRM positive and negative groups (X² 4.920, df 1, p = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

Advanced EUS T-stage is associated with a positive CRM, but PET-defined tumour variables are unlikely to provide additional predictive information. This study demonstrates the continued benefit of EUS as part of a multi-modality OC staging pathway.

Prognostic Value of Volume-Based Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients after Comprehensive Therapy

Objective

We assessed the prognostic value of standardized uptake value (SUV) and volume-based methods including whole-body metabolic tumor volume (WBMTV) and whole-body total lesion glycolysis (WBTLG) using ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) after therapy.

Methods

A total of 221 posttherapy NPC cases were enrolled, all of whom had undergone PET/CT scanning and follow-up in this retrospective study. The diagnostic results of PET/CT were analyzed and compared with histopathological diagnosis or clinical follow-up. Receiver operator characteristic curves, the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test were used to assess the optimal cutoff values for WBMTV and WBTLG to identify independent predictors of survival.

Results

The detection rates of the threshold SUV were 2.5, 20%, and 40%, and SUV background methods were 65.6% (378/576), 80.2% (462/576), 71.5% (412/576), and 90.4% (521/576), respectively (P < 0.005). Patients with a WBMTV < 8.10 and/or a WBTLG < 35.58 had significantly better 5-year overall survival than those above the cutoffs (90.7% versus 51.2%, P < 0.001; 91.7% versus 50.4%, P < 0.001), respectively. Multivariate Cox regression modeling showed both WBTLG (RR, 1.002; P = 0.004) and age (RR, 1.046; P = 0.006) could be used to predict overall survival. WBTLG (RR, 1.003; P < 0.001) may have predictive relevance in estimating disease-free survival.

Conclusions

SUV volume-based threshold background methodology had a significantly higher detection rate for metastatic lesions. WBTLG could be used as an independent prognostic indicator for posttherapy NPC.

Interim 18F-FDG-PET/CT during chemo-radiotherapy in the management of oesophageal cancer patients. A systematic review

Oesophageal cancer is an aggressive disease. The possibility to early stratify patients as responsive and non-responsive with a non-invasive method is extremely appealing. The uptake of Fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) in tumours, provided by positron emission tomography (PET) images, has been proved to be useful to assess the initial staging of the disease, recurrence, and response to chemotherapy and chemo-radiotherapy (CRT). In the last years, efforts have been focused on the possibility to use ad interim ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT (PET_int) to evaluate response during radiation therapy. However, controversial findings have been reported, although some relevant results would support its use for individual therapeutic decision. The present review assembles the comprehensive literature of the last decade to evaluate whether and in which cases PET_int may offer predictive potential in oesophageal cancer. All the analysed studies (13 studies, 697 patients) denoted PET_int as a challenging examination for early assessment of outcomes during CRT. In particular, 8 studies advocated the predictivity of PET_int, whilst 5 did not find any correlation between the interim variation of PET parameters and the pathological complete response and/or the clinical outcome. The reasons that possibly have caused contradictions among the studies demand further research with prospective and uniform protocols and methods of analysis to assess the predictive and prognostic value of PET_int in oesophageal cancer.

The predictive value of 18F-FDG PET for pathological response of primary tumor in patients with esophageal cancer during or after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We want to review the value of 18-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography for response prediction of primary tumor in patients with esophageal cancer during or after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

Studies were searched in Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library with specific search strategy. The published articles were included according to the criteria established in advance. The included studies were divided into two groups according to the time of the repeat positron emission tomography: during (Group A) or after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (Group B). The studies that performed the repeat positron emission tomography after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were graded Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio were obtained for both groups on the basis of no-existing of threshold effect.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were included in the present study. The threshold effect did not exist in both groups. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio were 85%, 59%, 6.82 with 95% confidence interval 76-91%, 48-69%, 2.25-20.72 in Group A. The equivalent values were 67%, 69%, 6.34 with 95% confidence interval 60-73%, 63-74%, 2.08-19.34 in Group B. The pooled sensitivity was 90% in four studies that enrolled patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma merely in Group B.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the present data, positron emission tomography should not be used routinely to guide treatment strategy in esophageal cancer patients. We speculated that positron emission tomography could be used as a tool to predict treatment response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Impact of PET/CT on radiation treatment in patients with esophageal cancer: A systematic review

PURPOSE

With the advances in radiotracers, positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is recognized as a useful adjunct to anatomic imaging with CT, MRI and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). The objective of this review was to comprehensively analyze the roles of PET/CT for the radiotherapy of esophageal cancer.

METHODS

In this review, we focused on issues concerning the application of PET/CT in TNM staging, target volume delineation and response to therapy, both for the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes. Furthermore, the following questions were addressed: how does PET/CT guide appropriate treatment protocols, how does it allow accurate tumor delineation and how does it guide prognosis and future treatment decisions.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

For the staging of esophageal cancer, PET/CT played a crucial role in exploring distant malignant lymph nodes and metastasis with high sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. PET/CT using different radiotracer provided a serial of thresholding methods based on standardized uptake value (SUV) to assist in auto-contouring the gross tumor volume (GTV). The change in SUV may offer a potential paradigm of personalized treatment to definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). In total, PET/CT has sought to further optimize radiotherapy treatment planning for patients with esophageal cancer.

18-fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission computed tomography as predictive of response after chemoradiation in oesophageal cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to evaluate if a baseline, an interim or a post-chemoradiation (CTRT) 18-fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) studies could provide information on pathologic response to CTRT and overall survival (OS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-one patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus, fit for trimodality therapy were prospectively enrolled. Most were men (93.5%), and had a stage III cancer (74.2%). Chemotherapy consisted of oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil (45.2%) and taxane/5-fluorouracil (54.8%). All patients underwent a baseline, an interim (performed 12 ± 2 days after the onset of CTRT) and a post-CTRT 18F-FDG PET/CT study. The 18F-FDG PET/CT variables evaluated were at baseline, interim and post-CTRT studies maximum standardised uptake value (SUV max) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). Clinical and 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters were correlated with pathologic complete response (pathCR) and OS.

RESULTS

Among the 31 patients studied, 61.3% achieved a clinical complete response (cCR) and 87.1% had surgery. The median OS was 35.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 19.9-NA). PathCR rate was 22.2%. There was only a marginal association between cCR and pathCR (p = 0.06). None of the other variables was predictive of pathCR. There was association between OS and baseline TLG (p = 0.03) at the optimal cutoff TLG value of 75.15. Additionally, TLG and ΔTLG post-CTRT were also associated with OS (p = 0.01 and 0.03, respectively).

CONCLUSION

None of the PET parameters is predictive of pathCR but TLG at baseline and post-CTRT are prognostic of OS.

Association between serum tumor markers and metabolic tumor volume or total lesion glycolysis in patients with recurrent small cell lung cancer

The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between serum tumor markers and the metabolic tumor volume (MTV) or total lesion glycolysis (TLG), as determined by fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with recurrent small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Data from 21 patients with recurrent SCLC were collected. The levels of neuron-specific enolase (NSE), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin 19 fragment 21-1 were measured at the time of the ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT examination. The MTV and TLG of all lesions were calculated. Pearson correlation analyses were used to estimate the correlations between NSE level and PET findings. Pearson correlation analyses showed that NSE was the only tumor marker to have a strong correlation with MTV or TLG (r=0.787, P<0.001; r=0.866, P<0.001, respectively). In patients with a normal NSE level, no correlation was found between NSE and MTV or TLG (r=0.018, P=0.958; r=-0.003, P=0.92, respectively), but a significant correlation was found in patients with an abnormal NSE level (r=0.789, P<0.01; r=0.872, P=0.01, respectively). Therefore, TLG and MTV may serve as sensitive markers of tumor burden in patients with recurrent SCLC, with TLG showing greater sensitivity. In patients with an abnormal NSE level, a higher NSE level indicates greater MTV and TLG.

The role of PET and PET-CT scanning in assessing response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The response to neoadjuvant (radio-)chemotherapy for esophageal carcinoma is often assessed with the aid of positron-emission tomography (PET), either alone or in combination with computed tomography (PET-CT). In this review, we discuss the diagnostic validity and clinical benefit of these imaging techniques.

METHODS

We systematically searched the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing PET-CT with conventional techniques such as endosonography and CT. We then determined the diagnostic validity of these methods on the basis of information from published systematic reviews, updated with further information from more recent primary studies.

RESULTS

We did not find any RCTs that addressed the question of the patient-relevant benefit of PET-CT. We found 20 studies of diagnostic methods, carried out on a total of 854 patients, of whom 82.2% were male. These studies had a high potential for bias. In two of them, PET-CT was directly compared with endosonography or CT. Estimates of sensitivity and specificity varied widely across studies. 54% of all patients (median value across studies) had no histopathological response to therapy at the end of treatment. Taking a reduction of the standard uptake value (SUV) by at least 35% as a threshold criterion, we found that the median negative predictive value of PET across all studies was 86.5.

CONCLUSION

There is no robust evidence for a patient-relevant benefit of PET and PET-CT in patients with esophageal carcinoma. PET could potentially be used to distinguish treatment responders from non-responders after the first cycle of treatment. RCTs with patient-relevant endpoints will be needed in order to determine whether this is useful.

State-of-the-art molecular imaging in esophageal cancer management: implications for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment

Molecular imaging techniques are increasingly being used in addition to standard imaging methods such as endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and computed tomography (CT) for many cancers including those of the esophagus. In this review, we will discuss the utility of the most widely used molecular imaging technique, (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET). (18)F-FDG PET has a variety of potential applications ranging from improving staging accuracy at the time of initial diagnosis to assisting in radiation target volume delineation. Furthermore, (18)F-FDG PET can be used to evaluate treatment response after completion of neoadjuvant therapy or potentially during neoadjuvant therapy. Finally, we will also discuss other novel molecular imaging techniques that have potential to further improve cancer care.

The application of functional imaging techniques to personalise chemoradiotherapy in upper gastrointestinal malignancies

Functional imaging gives information about physiological heterogeneity in tumours. The utility of functional imaging tests in providing predictive and prognostic information after chemoradiotherapy for both oesophageal cancer and pancreatic cancer will be reviewed. The benefit of incorporating functional imaging into radiotherapy planning is also evaluated. In cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract, the vast majority of functional imaging studies have used (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). Few studies in locally advanced pancreatic cancer have investigated the utility of functional imaging in risk-stratifying patients or aiding target volume definition. Certain themes from the oesophageal data emerge, including the need for a multiparametric assessment of functional images and the added value of response assessment rather than relying on single time point measures. The sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET to predict treatment response and survival are not currently high enough to inform treatment decisions. This suggests that a multimodal, multiparametric approach may be required. FDG-PET improves target volume definition in oesophageal cancer by improving the accuracy of tumour length definition and by improving the nodal staging of patients. The ideal functional imaging test would accurately identify patients who are unlikely to achieve a pathological complete response after chemoradiotherapy and would aid the delineation of a biological target volume that could be used for treatment intensification. The current limitations of published studies prevent integrating imaging-derived parameters into decision making on an individual patient basis. These limitations should inform future trial design in oesophageal and pancreatic cancers.

Degree of tumor shrinkage following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a potential predictor for complete pathological response in esophageal cancer?

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) before surgery results in a pathological complete response (pCR) rate in about 1/3 of the patients, which is correlated with survival. It was hypothesized that volumetric tumor response to CRT would correlate with outcomes. Patients who completed trimodality therapy, where planning, pre-, and post-CRT computed tomography scans were available, and pathology was reviewed by a central pathologist, were eligible for analysis. Absolute and relative tumor volume change pretreatment and post-treatment were correlated with pCR, locoregional recurrence (LRR), disease-free survival, and overall survival. Fifty-six patients were analyzed. pCR was observed in 30% of patients. Median follow up was 20.3 (range 4-89) months. The 2- and 4-year overall survival was 61.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 45-74) and 25.0% (95%CI: 11-41); proportion disease free was 32.1% (95% CI: 19-46) and 20.6% (9-36) at 2 and 4 years, respectively. The median relative volume reduction was 17% (95% CI: -24, -3%). Using 20% as the criteria, the proportion of patients with pCR of ≥20% versus <20% was 13/25 (52%) versus 4/31 (13%) for those who did not (odds ratio 7.3; 95% CI: 2-27). The LRR at 2 and 4 years were 29.5% (95% CI: 16-43) and 36.2% (95% CI: 23-50). The relative tumor reduction ≥20% was significantly correlated with LRR (hazard ratio 0.24; 95% CI: 0.07-0.8; p 0.02) at 2 and 4 years, respectively. Relative tumor volume reduction following CRT is correlated with pCR and LRR. Further investigations are warranted to examine the effect of volume change, alone or in conjunction with other factors as potential predictors for pathological response.

A systematic review of the predictive value of (18)FDG-PET in esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation on the survival outcome stratification

PURPOSE

We studied the predictive value of [(18) F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography ((18)FDG-PET) for assessing disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search (PUBMED/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane) was performed to identify full papers with (18)FDG-PET and survival data, using indexing terms and free text words. Studies with >10 patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, presenting sequential or at least one post-adjuvant treatment (18)FDG-PET data and Kaplan-Meier survival curves with >6 months median follow-up period were included. We performed a meta-analysis for DFS and OS using the hazard ratio (HRs) as outcome measure. Sources of heterogeneity study were also explored.

RESULTS

We identified 26 eligible studies including a total of 1,544 patients (average age 62 years, 82% males). The TNM distribution was as follows: stage I 7%, II 24%, III 53% and IV 15%. The pooled HRs for complete metabolic response versus no response were 0.51 for OS (95% CI, 0.4-0.64; P < 0.00001) and 0.47 for DFS (95% CI, 0.38-0.57; P < 0.00001), respectively. No statistical heterogeneity was present. To explore sources of clinical heterogeneity, we also realised subgroup and regression analyses. Taken into account the moderate correlation between OS and DFS (ρ = 0.54), we used joint bivariate random regression model. These analyses did not show a statistically significant impact of study characteristics and PET modalities on the pooled outcome estimates.

CONCLUSION

Despite methodological and clinical heterogeneity, metabolic response on (18)FDG-PET is a significant predictor of long-term survival data.

Prediction of outcome with FDG-PET in definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of ¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose uptake positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for the prediction of outcome in definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for esophageal cancer. We enrolled 56 patients with esophageal cancer treated with definitive CRT and examined by FDG-PET before treatment. We examined the correlation of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in FDG-PET of the primary tumor with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC) and response of the primary tumor. After definitive CRT, 30 patients had a clinical complete response (CR), making the CR rate 54%. For all 56 patients, the 2-year OS rate, PFS rate and LC rates were 64%, 38% and 51%, respectively. We divided the patients into two groups according to SUVmax: SUVmax < 10 (low-SUV) and ≥10 (high-SUV). The 2-year OS rates in the low- and high-SUV groups were 100% and 41%, the PFS rates were 73% and 19%, the LC rates were 71% and 39%, and the CR rates were 100% and 32%, respectively. A univariate analysis revealed significant differences between the low- and high-SUV group in OS, PFS, LC and response (P = 0.0005, 0.0002, 0.048, and <0.0001, respectively). SUVmax and T stage were significantly associated with OS, PFS, LC and response. A multivariate analysis showed significant differences between the SUVmax <10 and ≥10 groups in overall survival and response (P < 0.05). Our result suggests that the SUVmax in FDG-PET of the primary tumor before treatment may have prognostic value for esophageal cancer.

Usefulness of Combined Metabolic-Volumetric Indices of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the Early Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Outcomes in Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the usefulness of metabolic-volumetric indices of (18)F- fluorodeoxy-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy outcomes in breast cancer.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with locally advanced breast cancer were enrolled in the study. They underwent baseline (18)F-FDG PET/CT scan and received four or six cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, interim (18)F-FDG PET/CT was done after second cycle of chemotherapy. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of the primary lesions were calculated. Reduction rates of these parameters were obtained between baseline and interim (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Chemotherapy outcomes were assessed using tumor size reduction rate and histological grading system (Miller and Payne system). Reduction rates of SUVmax, MTV, and TLG correlated with chemotherapy outcomes.

RESULTS

MTV and TLG reduction rates showed significant correlation with tumor size reduction rate (R = 0.68, P = 0.0004; R = 0.62, P = 0.002, respectively). However, SUVmax reduction rate showed no significant correlation. MTV and TLG reduction rates were significantly higher in responders than nonresponders, as determined by Miller and Payne system (P < 0.0007, P < 0.002). However, SUVmax reduction rate showed no significant difference. On ROC analysis, the area under the MTV and TLG curves was 0.886, and that of SUVmax was 0.743. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value to predict histopathologic response were the same for MTV and TLG, and the values were 100 %, 85.7 %, 83.3 %, and 100 %, respectively (at the reduction rate of 93.2 % for MTV, and 95.8 % for TLG).

CONCLUSION

Changes of metabolic-volumetric indices successfully reflected the neoadjuvant chemotherapy outcomes. MTV and TLG could be robust indices in discriminating pathologic responder as SUVmax, after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Prognostic value of metabolic volume measured by F-18 FDG PET-CT in patients with esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

  The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of the metabolic tumor volume (MTV) measured by F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET-CT) in predicting recurrence free survival (RFS) in patients with esophageal cancer.

METHODS

  Forty-five patients with squamous cell carcinoma, who had undergone whole-body F-18 FDG PET-CT scans before surgical resection, were included in this study. All patients were treated with Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. The MTV was quantified within the primary tumor using the 50% threshold of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max ) of the FDG uptake areas. The cutoff value of MTV₅₀ was determined through receiver-operating characteristic curve. The Kaplan Meier method was used to find out the relationship between RFS and MTV₅₀ . Univariate analysis and multivariate proportional hazards regression analysis were applied to test the significance of volumetric parameter of F-18 FDG PET-CT and other conventional prognostic factors for the prediction of RFS.

RESULTS

  Overall median follow up period was 17.87 months (range: 1.07-63.27 months). The median survival between treatment completion and recurrence was 15.5 months (range: 1.37-72.43 months). Recurrence was found in eight patients. On univariate analysis, MTV₅₀ (P = 0.0032), N stage (P = 0.0004), American Joint Committee on Cancer stage (P = 0.0101), tumor location (P = 0.0054) and adjuvant treatment (P = 0.0373) were significant predictors of RFS. Multivariate analysis showed that the independent prognostic factors were MTV₅₀ (P = 0.0465), N stage (P = 0.0303) and tumor location (P = 0.0270).

CONCLUSION

  Volume based parameter of F-18 FDG PET-CT may have a role in providing prognostic information in esophageal cancer patients who received esophagectomy.

Evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer: PET response criteria in solid tumors versus response evaluation criteria in solid tumors

Recently, PET response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST) have been proposed as a new standardized method to assess chemotherapeutic response metabolically and quantitatively. The aim of this study was to evaluate therapeutic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer, comparing PERCIST with the currently widely used response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST).

METHODS

Fifty-one patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, adriamycin, and cisplatin), followed by surgery were studied. Chemotherapeutic lesion responses were evaluated using (18)F-FDG PET and CT according to the RECIST and PERCIST methods. The PET/CT scans were obtained before chemotherapy and about 2 wk after completion of chemotherapy. Associations were statistically analyzed between survival (overall and disease-free survival) and clinicopathologic results (histology [well-, moderately, and poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma], lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, clinical stage, pathologic stage, resection level, reduction rate of tumor diameter, reduction rate of tumor uptake, chemotherapeutic responses in RECIST and PERCIST, and pathologic response).

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in response classification between RECIST and PERCIST (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P < 0.0001). Univariate analysis showed that lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, resection level, pathologic stage, and PERCIST were significant factors associated with disease-free or overall survival in this study. Although multivariate analysis demonstrated that venous invasion (disease-free survival: hazard ratio [HR] = 4.519, P = 0.002; overall survival: HR = 5.591, P = 0.003) and resection level (disease-free survival: HR = 11.078, P = 0.001) were the significant predictors, PERCIST was also significant in noninvasive therapy response assessment before surgery (disease-free survival: HR = 4.060, P = 0.025; overall survival: HR = 8.953, P = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

RECIST based on the anatomic size reduction rate did not demonstrate the correlation between therapeutic responses and prognosis in patients with esophageal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, PERCIST was found to be the strongest independent predictor of outcomes. Given the significance of noninvasive radiologic imaging in formulating clinical treatment strategies, PERCIST might be considered more suitable for evaluation of chemotherapeutic response to esophageal cancer than RECIST.

Metabolic response at repeat PET/CT predicts pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in oesophageal cancer

OBJECTIVES

Reports have suggested that a reduction in tumour 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake on positron emission tomography (PET) examination during or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy may predict pathological response in oesophageal cancer. Our aim was to determine whether metabolic response predicts pathological response to a standardised neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen within a prospective clinical trial.

METHODS

Consecutive patients staged with potentially curable oesophageal cancer who underwent treatment within a non-randomised clinical trial were included. A standardised chemotherapy regimen (two cycles of oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil) was used. PET/CT was performed before chemotherapy and repeated 24-28 days after the start of cycle 2.

RESULTS

Forty-eight subjects were included: mean age 65 years; 37 male. Using the median percentage reduction in SUV(max) (42%) to define metabolic response, pathological response was seen in 71% of metabolic responders (17/24) compared with 33% of non-responders (8/24; P = 0.009, sensitivity 68%, specificity 70%). Pathological response was seen in 81% of subjects with a complete metabolic response (13/16) compared with 38% of those with a less than complete response (12/32; P = 0.0042, sensitivity 52%, specificity 87%). There was no significant histology-based effect.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significant association between metabolic response and pathological response; however, accuracy in predicting pathological response was relatively low.

Comparison of different SUV-based methods for response prediction to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer by FDG-PET and MRI

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare different analysis methods of 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data for prediction of histopathological response (HPR) to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCTx) in patients with advanced rectal cancer.

PROCEDURES

Twenty-eight patients of a previously published clinical trial underwent serial FDG-PET/computed tomography scans at baseline, 14 days after initiation, and after completion of RCTx. In addition, MRI was performed at baseline and after the end of therapy. Response prediction was correlated with different image analysis algorithms comprising pure metabolic parameters taking into account the FDG uptake, volume-based parameters measuring the lesion volume in either MRI or PET data, and integrated parameters combining metabolic and volumetric information. The established two-dimensional (2D) regions of interest (ROI; diameter 1.5 cm) served as standard of reference. Changes between the parameters at the defined time points were calculated and analyzed for their potential to predict HPR to RCTx using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Additionally, the interobserver reliability of fixed-size algorithms was analyzed.

RESULTS

Histopathology classified eight of 28 patients as non-responders and 20 patients as responders to RCTx. ROC analysis of the standard 2D ROI technique revealed areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.64 and 0.71 for the early and late time points. Corresponding AUCs for three-dimensional (3D) volume of interest technique resulted in AUCs of 0.75 for both early and late time points, respectively. Volumetric parameters showed AUCs ranging from 0.52 to 0.57 (early time points) and 0.46 to 0.76 (later time points), respectively. Corresponding AUCs for the integrated parameters were ranging between 0.70 and 0.73 (early time points) and 0.66 and 0.76 (late time points). Analysis of intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) for three different readers resulted in the best intra-class correlation values for the changes of 3D standard uptake value (SUV(3D)), for both early (ICC = 0.96) and late (ICC = 0.96) time points, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study emphasizes that 3D-based approaches for assessing SUV values consistently belonged to the group of parameters with the highest AUC values for prediction of HPR to neoadjuvant RCTx in patients with rectal cancer. MRI was not a good predictor for therapy response; hence, the MRI information derived from combined anatomic and metabolic parameters showed unsatisfying results too.

Can ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography predict responses to neoadjuvant therapy in oesophageal cancer patients? A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Neoadjuvant therapy for the treatment of oesophageal cancer was introduced in an effort to improve prognosis. Response assessment is crucial for the treatment of patients with oesophageal cancer. Currently, ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET) seems to be the best available tool to assess neoadjuvant therapy response in patients with oesophageal cancer. The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET for the evaluation of neoadjuvant therapy responses in patients with oesophageal cancer using a meta-analysis. A unified procedure and evaluation standard for ¹⁸F-FDG PET in the assessment of neoadjuvant therapy response should be established.

METHODS

All published English-language studies pertaining to the assessment of neoadjuvant therapy response in patients with oesophageal cancer using ¹⁸F-FDG PET in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were collected. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies quality assessment tool. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratios and summary receiver operating characteristic curves were obtained using statistical software.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies included in the meta-analysis fulfilled the inclusion criteria of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies quality assessment tool. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratios for F-¹⁸FDG PET in the evaluation of neoadjuvant therapy response in patients with oesophageal cancer were 70.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 64.4-75.8], 70.1% (95% CI: 65.1-74.8) and 9.389 (95% CI: 3.482-25.319), respectively. The area under the curve and the Q value for the summary receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.8244 and 0.7575, respectively.

CONCLUSION

¹⁸F-FDG PET has some value in the assessment of neoadjuvant therapy response in patients with oesophageal cancer. A 50% reduction in standardized uptake value between pretherapy and posttherapy positron emission tomography scans performed in the first 2 weeks after the initiation of neoadjuvant therapy is the optimal condition for predicting a response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with oesophageal cancer.

F-18 FDG PET/CT contributes to more accurate detection of lymph nodal metastasis from actively proliferating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

Evaluating the status of disease progression is critical for planning a therapeutic strategy for esophageal cancer. In this regard, F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-labeled positron emission tomography (PET) is one of the most useful diagnostic modalities. However, there is room to improve its diagnostic performance, such as distinguishing lymph nodal metastases from false positives. In this study, we examined the diagnostic accuracy of fluorodeoxyglucose PET accompanied by computed tomography imaging (PET/CT) to detect regional lymph nodal metastasis from esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

A total of 102 patients diagnosed as ESCC were subjected to this study. These patients had a preoperative PET/CT examination to evaluate the existence of metastasis. The values of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in primary tumors and in metastasized lymph nodes were measured to analyze their relationship with various clinicopathologic characteristics including the status of tumor cell proliferation, which was assessed by immunohistochemistry for Ki-67.

RESULTS

The SUVmax of the primary tumor was positively correlated with tumor size and vessel invasion, and was positively related with the SUVmax of lymph nodal metastasis, especially in cases of poorly differentiated ESCC. The SUVmax of metastasized lymph nodes was higher in larger-sized metastasized lymph nodes, whereas the Ki-labeling index of lymph nodal metastasis was positively related with the SUVmax per unit area (SUVmax/mm). The diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT (87.3%) was higher than that of conventional CT scans (78.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

The improved diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT can be explained by its ability to detect actively progressive metastasis at an early phase regardless of size.

Tumour heterogeneity in oesophageal cancer assessed by CT texture analysis: preliminary evidence of an association with tumour metabolism, stage, and survival

AIM

To undertake a pilot study assessing whether tumour heterogeneity evaluated using computed tomography texture analysis (CTTA) has the potential to provide a marker of tumour aggression and prognosis in oesophageal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 21 patients, unenhanced CT images of the primary oesophageal lesion obtained using positron-emission tomography (PET)-CT examinations underwent CTTA. CTTA was carried out using a software algorithm that selectively filters and extracts textures at different anatomical scales between filter values 1.0 (fine detail) and 2.5 (coarse features) with quantification as entropy and uniformity (measures image heterogeneity). Texture parameters were correlated with average tumour 2-[(18)F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) uptake [standardized uptake values (SUV(mean) and SUV(max))] and clinical staging as determined by endoscopic ultrasound (nodal involvement) and PET-CT (distant metastases). The relationship between tumour stage, FDG uptake, and texture with survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Tumour heterogeneity correlated with SUV(max) and SUV(mean). The closest correlations were found for SUV(mean) measured as uniformity and entropy with coarse filtration (r=-0.754, p<0.0001; and r=0.748, p=0.0001 respectively). Heterogeneity was also significantly greater in patients with clinical stage III or IV for filter values between 1.0 and 2.0 (maximum difference at filter value 1.5: entropy: p=0.027; uniformity p=0.032). The median (range) survival was 21 (4-34) months. Tumour heterogeneity assessed by CTTA (coarse uniformity) was an independent predictor of survival [odds ratio (OR)=4.45 (95% CI: 1.08, 18.37); p=0.039].

CONCLUSION

CTTA assessment of tumour heterogeneity has the potential to identify oesophageal cancers with adverse biological features and provide a prognostic indicator of survival.

FDG-PET parameters as prognostic factor in esophageal cancer patients: a review

BACKGROUND

(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has been used extensively to explore whether FDG Uptake can be used to provide prognostic information for esophageal cancer patients. The aim of the present review is to evaluate the literature available to date concerning the potential prognostic value of FDG uptake in esophageal cancer patients, in terms of absolute pretreatment values and of decrease in FDG uptake during or after neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

A computer-aided search of the English language literature concerning esophageal cancer and standardized uptake values was performed. This search focused on clinical studies evaluating the prognostic value of FDG uptake as an absolute value or the decrease in FDG uptake and using overall mortality and/or disease-related mortality as an end point.

RESULTS

In total, 31 studies met the predefined criteria. Two main groups were identified based on the tested prognostic parameter: (1) FDG uptake and (2) decrease in FDG uptake. Most studies showed that pretreatment FDG uptake and postneoadjuvant treatment FDG uptake, as absolute values, are predictors for survival in univariate analysis. Moreover, early decrease in FDG uptake during neoadjuvant therapy is predictive for response and survival in most studies described. However, late decrease in FDG uptake after completion of neoadjuvant therapy was predictive for pathological response and survival in only 2 of 6 studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Measuring decrease in FDG uptake early during neoadjuvant therapy is most appealing, moreover because the observed range of values expressed as relative decrease to discriminate responding from nonresponding patients is very small. At present inter-institutional comparison of results is difficult because several different normalization factors for FDG uptake are in use. Therefore, more research focusing on standardization of protocols and inter-institutional differences should be performed, before a PET-guided algorithm can be universally advocated.

Outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer staged with [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET): can postchemoradiotherapy FDG-PET predict the utility of resection?

PURPOSE

To determine whether [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) can delineate patients with esophageal cancer who may not benefit from esophagectomy after chemoradiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed records of 163 patients with histologically confirmed stage I to IVA esophageal cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy with or without resection with curative intent. All patients received surgical evaluation. Initial and postchemoradiotherapy FDG-PET scans and prognostic/treatment variables were analyzed. FDG-PET complete response (PET-CR) after chemoradiotherapy was defined as standardized uptake value ≤ 3.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight patients received trimodality therapy and 75 received chemoradiotherapy. Surgery was deferred primarily due to medical inoperability or unresectable/metastatic disease after chemoradiotherapy. A total of 105 patients were evaluable for postchemoradiotherapy FDG-PET response. Thirty-one percent achieved a PET-CR. PET-CR predicted for improved outcomes for chemoradiotherapy (2-year overall survival, 71% v 11%, P < .01; 2-year freedom from local failure [LFF], 75% v 28%, P < .01), but not trimodality therapy. On multivariate analysis of patients treated with chemoradiotherapy, PET-CR is the strongest independent prognostic variable (survival hazard ratio [HR], 9.82, P < .01; LFF HR, 14.13, P < .01). PET-CR predicted for improved outcomes regardless of histology, although patients with adenocarcinoma achieved a PET-CR less often.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with trimodality therapy found no benefit with PET-CR, likely because FDG-PET residual disease was resected. Definitive chemoradiotherapy patients achieving PET-CR had excellent outcomes equivalent to trimodality therapy despite poorer baseline characteristics. Patients who achieve a PET-CR may not benefit from added resection given their excellent outcomes without resection. These results should be validated in a prospective trial of FDG-PET-directed therapy for esophageal cancer.

Radioembolization of liver tumors with yttrium-90 microspheres

Radioembolization (RE), also termed selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT), has been gradually introduced to the clinical arsenal of cytoreductive modalities in recent years. There is growing evidence for efficiency in liver tumors of various entities, with the most prominent ones being hepatocellular carcinoma, colorectal cancer, and neuroendocrine tumors. Hepatic metastases of numerous other tumor entities including breast cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, and pancreatic cancer are treatment-sensitive, even when being refractory to other treatment modalities such as bland-embolization, regional, or systemic chemotherapy. The antitumor effect of SIRT is related to radiation rather than embolization, with extraordinary high local radiation doses obtained selectively at the site of viable tumor and little affection of the surrounding normal liver tissue. Morphologic changes after RE may pose difficulties for interpretation in conventional restaging with regard to tumor viability and true response to treatment. Therefore, functional imaging, that is, metabolic imaging with (18)F fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (computed tomography) in the majority of treated tumors, is regarded the gold standard in this respect and should be included for pre- and post-SIRT assessment. To prevent serious toxicity to be associated with the potent antitumor efficacy, meticulous pretreatment evaluation is of particular importance. Improvements in predicting dosimetry will help optimize treatment and patient selection. Nuclear medicine procedures are essential for planning, performing, and monitoring of RE. However, the interdisciplinary aspect of patient management has to be emphasized for this particular treatment form. As SIRT is moving forward from the salvage setting indication to the use in earlier stages of hepatic tumor disease and with the advent of new treatment protocols and targeted therapies, embedding SIRT into a multidisciplinary approach will become even more important. This article focuses on procedural and technical aspects for selection, preparation, and performance of treatment as well as post-therapeutic monitoring and response assessment.

PET Imaging for Traumatic Brain Injury

Traumatic brain injury represents a substantial public health problem for which clinicians have limited treatment avenues. Traditional FDG-positron emission tomography (PET) brain imaging has provided unique insights into this disease including prognostic information. With the advent and implementation of novel tracers as well as improvement in instrumentation, molecular brain imaging using PET can further illustrate traumatic brain injury pathophysiology and point to novel treatment strategies.

Prediction of tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with esophageal cancer with use of 18F FDG PET: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To systematically review the accuracy of fluorine 18 ((18)F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in the prediction of tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with esophageal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were systematically searched for relevant studies. Methodologic quality of the included studies was assessed. Sensitivities and specificities of (18)F FDG PET in individual studies were calculated and underwent meta-analysis with a random effects model. A summary receiver operating characteristic curve (sROC) was constructed with the Moses-Shapiro-Littenberg method. A chi(2) test was performed to test for heterogeneity (defined as P < .10). Potential sources for heterogeneity were explored by assessing whether certain covariates significantly (P < .05) influenced the relative diagnostic odds ratio.

RESULTS

Twenty reports, comprising a total of 849 patients with esophageal cancer, were included. Overall, the studies were of moderate methodologic quality. Sensitivity and specificity of (18)F FDG PET ranged from 33% to 100% and from 30% to 100%, respectively, with pooled estimates of 67% (95% confidence interval: 62%, 72%) and 68% (95% confidence interval: 64%, 73%), respectively. The area under the sROC curve was 0.7815. There was significant heterogeneity in both the sensitivity and specificity of the included studies (P < .0001). Spearman rho between the logit of sensitivity and the logit of 1-specificity was 0.086 (P = .719), which suggested that there was no threshold effect. Studies performed outside of the United States and studies of higher methodologic quality yielded significantly higher overall accuracy.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of current evidence, (18)F FDG PET should not yet be used in routine clinical practice to guide neoadjuvant therapy decisions in patients with esophageal cancer.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.09091324/-/DC1.

From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors

The purpose of this article is to review the status and limitations of anatomic tumor response metrics including the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), and RECIST 1.1. This article also reviews qualitative and quantitative approaches to metabolic tumor response assessment with (18)F-FDG PET and proposes a draft framework for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST), version 1.0.

METHODS

PubMed searches, including searches for the terms RECIST, positron, WHO, FDG, cancer (including specific types), treatment response, region of interest, and derivative references, were performed. Abstracts and articles judged most relevant to the goals of this report were reviewed with emphasis on limitations and strengths of the anatomic and PET approaches to treatment response assessment. On the basis of these data and the authors' experience, draft criteria were formulated for PET tumor response to treatment.

RESULTS

Approximately 3,000 potentially relevant references were screened. Anatomic imaging alone using standard WHO, RECIST, and RECIST 1.1 criteria is widely applied but still has limitations in response assessments. For example, despite effective treatment, changes in tumor size can be minimal in tumors such as lymphomas, sarcoma, hepatomas, mesothelioma, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor. CT tumor density, contrast enhancement, or MRI characteristics appear more informative than size but are not yet routinely applied. RECIST criteria may show progression of tumor more slowly than WHO criteria. RECIST 1.1 criteria (assessing a maximum of 5 tumor foci, vs. 10 in RECIST) result in a higher complete response rate than the original RECIST criteria, at least in lymph nodes. Variability appears greater in assessing progression than in assessing response. Qualitative and quantitative approaches to (18)F-FDG PET response assessment have been applied and require a consistent PET methodology to allow quantitative assessments. Statistically significant changes in tumor standardized uptake value (SUV) occur in careful test-retest studies of high-SUV tumors, with a change of 20% in SUV of a region 1 cm or larger in diameter; however, medically relevant beneficial changes are often associated with a 30% or greater decline. The more extensive the therapy, the greater the decline in SUV with most effective treatments. Important components of the proposed PERCIST criteria include assessing normal reference tissue values in a 3-cm-diameter region of interest in the liver, using a consistent PET protocol, using a fixed small region of interest about 1 cm(3) in volume (1.2-cm diameter) in the most active region of metabolically active tumors to minimize statistical variability, assessing tumor size, treating SUV lean measurements in the 1 (up to 5 optional) most metabolically active tumor focus as a continuous variable, requiring a 30% decline in SUV for "response," and deferring to RECIST 1.1 in cases that do not have (18)F-FDG avidity or are technically unsuitable. Criteria to define progression of tumor-absent new lesions are uncertain but are proposed.

CONCLUSION

Anatomic imaging alone using standard WHO, RECIST, and RECIST 1.1 criteria have limitations, particularly in assessing the activity of newer cancer therapies that stabilize disease, whereas (18)F-FDG PET appears particularly valuable in such cases. The proposed PERCIST 1.0 criteria should serve as a starting point for use in clinical trials and in structured quantitative clinical reporting. Undoubtedly, subsequent revisions and enhancements will be required as validation studies are undertaken in varying diseases and treatments.

Clinical usefulness of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the restaging of esophageal cancer after surgical resection and radiotherapy

AIM: To evaluate the clinical usefulness of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission and computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) in restaging of esophageal cancer after surgical resection and radiotherapy.

METHODS: Between January 2007 and Aug 2008, twenty histopathologically diagnosed esophageal cancer patients underwent 25 PET/CT scans (three patients had two scans and one patient had three scans) for restaging after surgical resection and radiotherapy. The standard reference for tumor recurrence was histopathologic confirmation or clinical follow-up for at least ten months after ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT examinations.

RESULTS: Tumor recurrence was confirmed histopathologically in seven of the 20 patients (35%) and by clinical and radiological follow-up in 13 (65%). ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was positive in 14 patients (68.4%) and negative in six (31.6%). ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was true positive in 11 patients, false positive in three and true negative in six. Overall, the accuracy of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was 85%, negative predictive value (NPV) was 100%, and positive predictive value (PPV) was 78.6%. The three false positive PET/CT findings comprised chronic inflammation of mediastinal lymph nodes (n = 2) and anastomosis inflammation (n = 1). PET/CT demonstrated distant metastasis in 10 patients. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging-guided salvage treatment in nine patients was performed. Treatment regimens were changed in 12 (60%) patients after introducing ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT into their conventional post-treatment follow-up program.

CONCLUSION: Whole body ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT is effective in detecting relapse of esophageal cancer after surgical resection and radiotherapy. It could also have important clinical impact on the management of esophageal cancer, influencing both clinical restaging and salvage treatment of patients.