Impact of Nonhybrid 99mTc-MDP-SPECT/CT Image Fusion in Diagnostic and Treatment of Oromaxillofacial Malignancies

Loco-regional recurrence after surgical treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma: Proposals for follow-up imaging based on literature, national guidelines and institutional experience

The recurrence rate following the treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) by primary surgery is about 10%-26%. The earliest possible diagnosis of residual tumour, recurrence of local tumour disease, and subsequent metastasis is essential for an improvement of the overall survival and of the survival period for affected patients. No international consensus exists for a post-therapeutic surveillance schedule for OSCCs. Based on a review of the literature, existing guidelines, and our institutional experience, we have established an algorithm for the follow-up of these patients regarding the timing and techniques of postoperative imaging. We recommend a follow-up interval of 6 weeks during the first half-year after discharge from hospital by single clinical and alternating clinical check-ups combined with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), followed by an interval of 3 months in the second half-year, with clinical and radiological check-ups. In year 2, we recommend a follow-up interval of 3 months with single clinical and alternating clinical check-ups combined with CT or MRI. In year 3, we recommend screening every 6 months, both clinically and via imaging, because of the decreased risk of recurrence. From year 5 onwards, our recommendation is a clinical and imaging-based examination every 6-12 months, depending on patient risk factors and disease progression. Four standard imaging techniques, namely positron emission tomography (PET), CT, MRI, and ultrasound (US), are discussed concerning their range of application, sensitivity, and specificity. Furthermore, the technical aspects of our institutional protocols are described in detail. In highly frequented head and neck cancer centres, PET and US are of secondary importance, since CT and MRI are nowadays highly efficient tools in primary diagnostic and post-therapeutic surveillance.

The added value of PET/Ce-CT/DW-MRI fusion in assessment of hepatic focal lesions: PET/Ce-CT/DW-MRI fusion in hepatic focal lesion

INTRODUCTION

The liver hosts a variety of benign and malignant tumors. Accurate diagnosis can be challenging in certain cases, especially in patients with a history of malignancy or in those with underlying liver pathology, such as cirrhosis.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the added clinical value of multi-modality liver imaging utilizing PET/Ce-CT/DW-MRI for characterization of hepatic focal lesions (HFL) and compare it with each diagnostic modality when interpreted alone.

METHODS

The study included 35 patients with HFL. They were 7 females & 28 males; their age ranged from 41 to 78years, all patients underwent PET/Ce-CT and DW-MRI scans. Ce-CT, PET and DW-MR images were reviewed independently, and then combined PET/Ce-CT, PET/DW-MRI and PET/Ce-CT/DW-MRI scans were analyzed. The results were correlated with histopathology or clinical/imaging follow-up.

RESULTS

The 35 patients had 98 focal lesions. Fifty-three lesions were finally diagnosed as primary hepatocellular carcinoma, 18 lesions were metastases, 7 lesions were lymphoma and 20 lesions were benign. On a patient based analysis; the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy were 100%, 67%, 94%, 100% and 94% for PET/Ce-CT compared to 97%, 83%, 97%, 83% and 94 % for DW-MRI, respectively. Combined PET/Ce-CT/DW-MR scans raise those parameters up to 100%. On a lesion based analysis; the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy were 94%, 75%, 94%, 75%, 90% for PET/Ce-CT compared to 94%, 95%, 99%, 97% and 94 % for DW-MRI, respectively. All these parameters were 100 % with PET/Ce-CT/DW-MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of DW-MRI to PET/Ce-CT is valuable in the characterization of hepatic focal lesions.

Diagnostic value of retrospective PET-MRI fusion in head-and-neck cancer

Background

To assess the diagnostic value of retrospective PET-MRI fusion and to compare the results with side-by-side analysis and single modality use of PET and of MRI alone for locoregional tumour and nodal staging of head-and-neck cancer.

Methods

Thirty-three patients with head-and-neck cancer underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI and PET/CT for staging. The diagnostic data of MRI, PET, side-by-side analysis of MRI and PET images and retrospective PET-MRI fusion were systematically analysed for tumour and lymph node staging using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The results were correlated to the histopathological evaluation.

Results

The overall sensitivity/specificity for tumour staging for MRI, PET, side-by-side analysis and retrospective PET-MRI fusion was 79%/66%, 82%/100%, 86%/100% and 89%/100%, respectively. The overall sensitivity/specificity for nodal staging on a patient basis for MRI, PET, side-by-side analysis and PET-MRI fusion was 94%/64%, 94%/91%, 94%/82% and 94%/82%, respectively. MRI, PET, side-by-side analysis and retrospective image fusion were associated with correct diagnosis/over-staging/under-staging of N-staging in 70.4%/18.5%/11.1%, 81.5%/7.4%/11.1%, 81.5%/11.1%/7.4% and 81.5%/11.1%/7.4%, respectively.

ROC analysis showed no significant differences in tumor detection between the investigated methods. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) for MRI, PET, side-by-side analysis and retrospective PET-MRI fusion were 0.667/0.667/0.702/0.708 (p > 0.05). The most reliable technique in detection of cervical lymph node metastases was PET imaging (AUC: 0.95), followed by side-by-side analysis and retrospective image fusion technique (AUC: 0.941), which however, was not significantly better then the MRI (AUC 0.935; p > 0.05).

Conclusions

We found a beneficial use of multimodal imaging, compared with MRI or PET imaging alone, particular in individual cases of recurrent tumour disease. Side-by-side analysis and retrospective image fusion analysis did not perform significantly differently.