Automatic Cardiac Self-Gating of Small-Animal PET Data

Advances in Preclinical PET

The classical intent of PET imaging is to obtain the most accurate estimate of the amount of positron-emitting radiotracer in the smallest possible volume element located anywhere in the imaging subject at any time using the least amount of radioactivity. Reaching this goal, however, is confounded by an enormous array of interlinked technical issues that limit imaging system performance. As a result, advances in PET, human or animal, are the result of cumulative innovations across each of the component elements of PET, from data acquisition to image analysis. In the report that follows, we trace several of these advances across the imaging process with a focus on small animal PET.

Image-Derived Input Functions for Quantification of A1 Adenosine Receptors Availability in Mice Brains Using PET and [18F]CPFPX

Purpose

In vivo imaging for the A₁ adenosine receptors (A₁ARs) with positron emission tomography (PET) using 8-cyclopentyl-3-(3-[¹⁸F]fluoropropyl)-1-propylxan- thine ([¹⁸F]CPFPX) has become an important tool for studying physiological processes quantitatively in mice. However, the measurement of arterial input functions (AIFs) on mice is a method with restricted applicability because of the small total blood volume and the related difficulties in withdrawing blood. Therefore, the aim of this study was to extract an appropriate [¹⁸F]CPFPX image-derived input function (IDIF) from dynamic PET images of mice.

Procedures

In this study, five mice were scanned with [¹⁸F]CPFPX for 60 min. Arterial blood samples (n = 7 per animal) were collected from the femoral artery and corrected for metabolites. To generate IDIFs, three different approaches were selected: (A) volume of interest (VOI) placed over the heart (cube, 10 mm); (B) VOI set over abdominal vena cava/aorta region with a cuboid (5 × 5 × 15 mm); and (C) with 1 × 1 × 1 mm voxels on five consecutive slices. A calculated scaling factor (α) was used to correct for partial volume effect; the method of obtaining the total metabolite correction of [¹⁸F]CPFPX for IDIFs was developed. Three IDIFs were validated by comparison with AIF. Validation included the following: visual performance; computing area under the curve (AUC) ratios (IDIF/AIF) of whole-blood curves and parent curves; and the mean distribution volume (V_T) ratios (IDIF/AIF) of A₁ARs calculated by Logan plot and two-tissue compartment model.

Results

Compared with the AIF, the IDIF with VOI over heart showed the best performance among the three IDIFs after scaling by 1.77 (α) in terms of visual analysis, AUC ratios (IDIF/AIF; whole-blood AUC ratio, 1.03 ± 0.06; parent curve AUC ratio, 1.01 ± 0.10) and V_T ratios (IDIF/AIF; Logan V_T ratio, 1.00 ± 0.17; two-tissue compartment model V_T ratio, 1.00 ± 0.13) evaluation. The A₁ARs distribution of average parametric images was in good accordance to autoradiography of the mouse brain.

Conclusion

The proposed study provides evidence that IDIF with VOI over heart can replace AIF effectively for quantification of A₁ARs using PET and [¹⁸F]CPFPX in mice brains.