Retrospective Brain Motion Correction in Glutamate Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (GluCEST) MRI

Cerebral Glutamate Alterations Using Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Imaging in a Rat Model of Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Sepsis

Glutamate-weighted chemical exchange saturation transfer (GluCEST) is a useful imaging tool to detect glutamate signal alterations caused by neuroinflammation. This study aimed to visualize and quantitatively evaluate hippocampal glutamate alterations in a rat model of sepsis-induced brain injury using GluCEST and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (¹H-MRS). Twenty-one Sprague Dawley rats were divided into three groups (sepsis-induced groups (SEP05, n = 7 and SEP10, n = 7) and controls (n = 7)). Sepsis was induced through a single intraperitoneal injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) at a dose of 5 mg/kg (SEP05) or 10 mg/kg (SEP10). GluCEST values and ¹H-MRS concentrations in the hippocampal region were quantified using conventional magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry and a water scaling method, respectively. In addition, we examined immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence staining to observe the immune response and activity in the hippocampal region after LPS exposure. The GluCEST and ¹H-MRS results showed that GluCEST values and glutamate concentrations were significantly higher in sepsis-induced rats than those in controls as the LPS dose increased. GluCEST imaging may be a helpful technique for defining biomarkers to estimate glutamate-related metabolism in sepsis-associated diseases.

Regional Mapping of Brain Glutamate Distributions Using Glutamate-Weighted Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Imaging

PURPOSE

To investigate glutamate signal distributions in multiple brain regions of a healthy rat brain using glutamate-weighted chemical exchange saturation transfer (GluCEST) imaging.

METHOD

The GluCEST data were obtained using a 7.0 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner, and all data were analyzed using conventional magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry in eight brain regions (cortex, hippocampus, corpus callosum, and rest of midbrain in each hemisphere). GluCEST data acquisition was performed again one month later in five randomly selected rats to evaluate the stability of the GluCEST signal. To evaluate glutamate level changes calculated by GluCEST data, we compared the results with the concentration of glutamate acquired from 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS) data in the cortex and hippocampus.

RESULTS

GluCEST signals showed significant differences (all p ≤ 0.001) between the corpus callosum (-1.71 ± 1.04%; white matter) and other brain regions (3.59 ± 0.41%, cortex; 5.47 ± 0.61%, hippocampus; 4.49 ± 1.11%, rest of midbrain; gray matter). The stability test of GluCEST findings for each brain region was not significantly different (all p ≥ 0.263). In line with the GluCEST results, glutamate concentrations measured by 1H MRS also appeared higher in the hippocampus (7.30 ± 0.16 μmol/g) than the cortex (6.89 ± 0.72 μmol/g).

CONCLUSION

Mapping of GluCEST signals in the healthy rat brain clearly visualize glutamate distributions. These findings may yield a valuable database and insights for comparing glutamate signal changes in pre-clinical brain diseases.

Optimization of Keyhole Imaging Parameters for Glutamate Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer MRI at 7.0 T

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of a reference image and keyhole factor (K_f) selections for high-frequency substitution on keyhole imaging technique for applications in glutamate chemical exchange saturation transfer (GluCEST) imaging.

PROCEDURES

The CEST data were obtained using a 7.0 T MRI scanner. We used varied K_f ranges that constituted from 16.67 to 75 % of the full k-space. The reference image was respectively selected for - 3 and + 3 ppm images that associated with the GluCEST calculation and the unsaturated image. The zero-padding algorithm was applied for the missing k-space lines in the low-frequency data collected to compare the results obtained from using the keyhole imaging technique. All the techniques were evaluated using a healthy rat group and extended to the status epilepticus rat group to explore their applicability and usability.

RESULTS

The calculated GluCEST signals and visually inspected results from the reconstructed GluCEST maps indicated that the combination of unsaturated image as a reference image, and over 50 % of K_f showed consistent signals and image quality compared with the fully sampled CEST data.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining the keyhole imaging technique with GluCEST imaging enables stable image reconstruction and quantitative evaluation, and this approach is potentially applicable in various CEST imaging applications.