Management Impact of Metachronous Oligometastatic Disease Identified on 18F-Fluciclovine (Axumin™) PET/CT in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer

Impact of 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT on plans for androgen deprivation therapy in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: data analysis from two prospective clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Despite early detection and primary therapy improvements, biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer remains common. The advent of highly sensitive molecular imaging has facilitated identification of men with limited metastatic disease burden that might be more optimally treated with metastases-directed therapy than with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The LOCATE (NCT02680041) and FALCON (NCT02578940) trials assessed the impact of 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT on the management of patients with BCR after curative-intent primary therapy. We performed a secondary analysis of LOCATE and FALCON data to characterize sites of recurrence and management decisions for BCR patients who had an intended management plan including ADT prior to undergoing 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT.

METHODS

Data from 317 LOCATE/FALCON patients who underwent 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT were analyzed and those with a prescan plan for ADT (± another treatment) were selected. 18F-Fluciclovine detection rates were determined at the patient level and for the prostate/prostate bed region, pelvic and extra-pelvic lymph nodes (LN), soft tissues, and bones. The patients' pre- and postscan treatment plans were compared and were stratified by imaging results.

RESULTS

A total of 146 patients had a prescan plan for ADT (60 as monotherapy and 86 in combination with another modality). 18F-Fluciclovine detected lesions in 85 of 146 (58%) patients planned for ADT. Detection rates in the prostate/bed, pelvic LN, extra-pelvic LN, soft tissues and bone were 30%, 25%, 13%, 2.1%, and 13%, respectively. Twenty-five (17%) patients had positivity confined to the prostate/bed, 21 (14%) had 18F-fluciclovine-positive pelvic LN (±prostate/bed) but no other involvement and 39 (27%) had involvement outside the prostate/bed and pelvic LN. Postscan, 93 of 146 (64%) patients had a management change, 55 (59%) of which were to abort ADT. Only 25% of the patients originally planned for ADT monotherapy still had an unaltered plan for ADT monotherapy postscan. Patients with a postscan plan for ADT monotherapy had the most disseminated disease. Disease in the prostate/bed only was most common in those whose plan was altered to abort ADT.

CONCLUSIONS

18F-Fluciclovine-PET/CT influenced management plans for the majority of patients with a prescan plan for ADT. Plans were commonly amended to target salvage therapy for lesions identified with 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT, and consequently likely spared/delayed patients the morbidity associated with ADT.

Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: Current Status and Future Challenges

In accordance with the spectrum theory of metastatic disease, an oligometastatic clinical state has been proposed as an intermediary step along the natural history of cancer with few (typically 1-3) metastatic lesions identifiable on imaging that may be amenable to metastasis-directed therapy. Effective therapy of oligometastatic disease is anticipated to impact cancer evolution by delaying progression and improving patient outcome at a minimal or acceptable cost of toxicity. There has been increasing recognition of oligometastatic disease in prostate cancer with the advent of new-generation imaging agents, most notably the recently approved PET radiotracers based on targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen. Early clinical trials with metastasis-directed therapy of oligometastases have provided evidence for delaying the employment of systematic therapy and improving outcome in selected patients. Despite these encouraging results, much needs to be investigated and learned about the underlying biology of the oligometastatic state along the evolutionary clinical course of prostate cancer, the identification of relevant imaging and nonimaging predictive and prognostic biomarkers, and the development of treatment strategies to optimize short-term and long-term patient outcome. We provide a review of the current status and the lingering challenges of this rapidly evolving clinical space in prostate cancer.