Predicting Soft Tissue Sarcoma Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using an MRI-Based Delta-Radiomics Approach

The impact of radiomics in the management of soft tissue sarcoma

INTRODUCTION

Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are rare malignancies. Pre-therapeutic tumour grading and assessment are crucial in making treatment decisions. Radiomics is a high-throughput method for analysing imaging data, providing quantitative information beyond expert assessment. This review highlights the role of radiomic texture analysis in STSs evaluation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review according to the Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus using the search terms: 'radiomics [All Fields] AND ("soft tissue sarcoma" [All Fields] OR "soft tissue sarcomas" [All Fields])'. Only original articles, referring to humans, were included.

RESULTS

A preliminary search conducted on PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus provided 74 and 93 studies respectively. Based on the previously described criteria, 49 papers were selected, with a publication range from July 2015 to June 2023. The main domains of interest were risk stratification, histological grading prediction, technical feasibility/reproductive aspects, treatment response.

CONCLUSIONS

With an increasing interest over the last years, the use of radiomics appears to have potential for assessing STSs from initial diagnosis to predicting treatment response. However, additional and extensive research is necessary to validate the effectiveness of radiomics parameters and to integrate them into a comprehensive decision support system.

CT and MRI radiomics of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas: an updated systematic review of reproducibility and validation strategies

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review radiomic feature reproducibility and model validation strategies in recent studies dealing with CT and MRI radiomics of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas, thus updating a previous version of this review which included studies published up to 2020.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted on EMBASE and PubMed databases for papers published between January 2021 and March 2023. Data regarding radiomic feature reproducibility and model validation strategies were extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS

Out of 201 identified papers, 55 were included. They dealt with radiomics of bone (n = 23) or soft-tissue (n = 32) tumors. Thirty-two (out of 54 employing manual or semiautomatic segmentation, 59%) studies included a feature reproducibility analysis. Reproducibility was assessed based on intra/interobserver segmentation variability in 30 (55%) and geometrical transformations of the region of interest in 2 (4%) studies. At least one machine learning validation technique was used for model development in 34 (62%) papers, and K-fold cross-validation was employed most frequently. A clinical validation of the model was reported in 38 (69%) papers. It was performed using a separate dataset from the primary institution (internal test) in 22 (40%), an independent dataset from another institution (external test) in 14 (25%) and both in 2 (4%) studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to papers published up to 2020, a clear improvement was noted with almost double publications reporting methodological aspects related to reproducibility and validation. Larger multicenter investigations including external clinical validation and the publication of databases in open-access repositories could further improve methodology and bring radiomics from a research area to the clinical stage.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

An improvement in feature reproducibility and model validation strategies has been shown in this updated systematic review on radiomics of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas, highlighting efforts to enhance methodology and bring radiomics from a research area to the clinical stage.

KEY POINTS

• 2021-2023 radiomic studies on CT and MRI of musculoskeletal sarcomas were reviewed. • Feature reproducibility was assessed in more than half (59%) of the studies. • Model clinical validation was performed in 69% of the studies. • Internal (44%) and/or external (29%) test datasets were employed for clinical validation.

Radiomics in Musculoskeletal Tumors

Sarcomas are heterogeneous rare tumors predominantly affecting the musculoskeletal (MSK) system. Due to significant variations in their natural history and variable response to conventional treatments, the discovery of novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers to guide therapeutic decision-making is an active and ongoing field of research. As new cellular, molecular, and metabolic biomarkers continue to be discovered, quantitative radiologic imaging is becoming increasingly important in sarcoma management. Radiomics offers the potential for discovering novel imaging diagnostic and predictive biomarkers using standard-of-care medical imaging. In this review, we detail the core concepts of radiomics and the application of radiomics to date in MSK sarcoma research. Also described are specific challenges related to radiomic studies, as well as viewpoints on clinical adoption and future perspectives in the field.

The role of imaging in extremity sarcoma surgery

The surgical management of extremity bone and soft tissue sarcomas has evolved significantly over the last 50 years. The introduction and refinement of high-resolution cross-sectional imaging has allowed accurate assessment of anatomy and tumor extent, and in the current era more than 90% of patients can successfully undergo limb-salvage surgery. Advances in imaging have also revolutionized the clinician's ability to assess treatment response, detect metastatic disease, and perform intraoperative surgical navigation. This review summarizes the broad and essential role radiology plays in caring for sarcoma patients from diagnosis to post-treatment surveillance. Present evidence-based imaging paradigms are highlighted along with key future directions.

How AI May Transform Musculoskeletal Imaging

While musculoskeletal imaging volumes are increasing, there is a relative shortage of subspecialized musculoskeletal radiologists to interpret the studies. Will artificial intelligence (AI) be the solution? For AI to be the solution, the wide implementation of AI-supported data acquisition methods in clinical practice requires establishing trusted and reliable results. This implementation will demand close collaboration between core AI researchers and clinical radiologists. Upon successful clinical implementation, a wide variety of AI-based tools can improve the musculoskeletal radiologist's workflow by triaging imaging examinations, helping with image interpretation, and decreasing the reporting time. Additional AI applications may also be helpful for business, education, and research purposes if successfully integrated into the daily practice of musculoskeletal radiology. The question is not whether AI will replace radiologists, but rather how musculoskeletal radiologists can take advantage of AI to enhance their expert capabilities.

Radiomics and artificial intelligence for soft-tissue sarcomas: Current status and perspectives

This article proposes a summary of the current status of the research regarding the use of radiomics and artificial intelligence to improve the radiological assessment of patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS), a heterogeneous group of rare and ubiquitous mesenchymal malignancies. After a first part explaining the principle of radiomics approaches, from raw image post-processing to extraction of radiomics features mined with unsupervised and supervised machine-learning algorithms, and the current research involving deep learning algorithms in STS, especially convolutional neural networks, this review details their main research developments since the formalisation of 'radiomics' in oncologic imaging in 2010. This review focuses on CT and MRI and does not involve ultrasonography. Radiomics and deep radiomics have been successfully applied to develop predictive models to discriminate between benign soft-tissue tumors and STS, to predict the histologic grade (i.e., the most important prognostic marker of STS), the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, and the patients' survivals and probability for presenting distant metastases. The main findings, limitations and expectations are discussed for each of these outcomes. Overall, after a first decade of publications emphasizing the potential of radiomics through retrospective proof-of-concept studies, almost all positive but with heterogeneous and often non-replicable methods, radiomics is now at a turning point in order to provide robust demonstrations of its clinical impact through open-science, independent databases, and application of good and standardized practices in radiomics such as those provided by the Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative, without forgetting innovative research paths involving other '-omics' data to better understand the relationships between imaging of STS, gene-expression profiles and tumor microenvironment.

Spatial assessments in texture analysis: what the radiologist needs to know

To date, studies investigating radiomics-based predictive models have tended to err on the side of data-driven or exploratory analysis of many thousands of extracted features. In particular, spatial assessments of texture have proven to be especially adept at assessing for features of intratumoral heterogeneity in oncologic imaging, which likewise may correspond with tumor biology and behavior. These spatial assessments can be generally classified as spatial filters, which detect areas of rapid change within the grayscale in order to enhance edges and/or textures within an image, or neighborhood-based methods, which quantify gray-level differences of neighboring pixels/voxels within a set distance. Given the high dimensionality of radiomics datasets, data dimensionality reduction methods have been proposed in an attempt to optimize model performance in machine learning studies; however, it should be noted that these approaches should only be applied to training data in order to avoid information leakage and model overfitting. While area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic is perhaps the most commonly reported assessment of model performance, it is prone to overestimation when output classifications are unbalanced. In such cases, confusion matrices may be additionally reported, whereby diagnostic cut points for model predicted probability may hold more clinical significance to clinical colleagues with respect to related forms of diagnostic testing.