Kim JW, Kim T, Shin J, Choe G, Lim HJ, Rhee CS, Lee K, Cho SW. Prediction of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Based on Respiratory Sounds Recorded Between Sleep Onset and Sleep Offset.
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2018;
12:72-78. [PMID:
30189718 PMCID:
PMC6315207 DOI:
10.21053/ceo.2018.00388]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2018] [Accepted: 07/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
To develop a simple algorithm for prescreening of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on the basis of respiratory sounds recorded during polysomnography during all sleep stages between sleep onset and offset.
METHODS
Patients who underwent attended, in-laboratory, full-night polysomnography were included. For all patients, audio recordings were performed with an air-conduction microphone during polysomnography. Analyses included all sleep stages (i.e., N1, N2, N3, rapid eye movement, and waking). After noise reduction preprocessing, data were segmented into 5-s windows and sound features were extracted. Prediction models were established and validated with 10-fold cross-validation by using simple logistic regression. Binary classifications were separately conducted for three different threshold criteria at apnea hypopnea index (AHI) of 5, 15, or 30. Prediction model characteristics, including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (precision), negative predictive value, and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic were computed.
RESULTS
A total of 116 subjects were included; their mean age, body mass index, and AHI were 50.4 years, 25.5 kg/m2 , and 23.0/hr, respectively. A total of 508 sound features were extracted from respiratory sounds recorded throughout sleep. Accuracies of binary classifiers at AHIs of 5, 15, and 30 were 82.7%, 84.4%, and 85.3%, respectively. Prediction performances for the classifiers at AHIs of 5, 15, and 30 were AUC, 0.83, 0.901, and 0.91; sensitivity, 87.5%, 81.6%, and 60%; and specificity, 67.8%, 87.5%, and 94.1%. Respective precision values of the classifiers were 89.5%, 87.5%, and 78.2% for AHIs of 5, 15, and 30.
CONCLUSION
This study showed that our binary classifier predicted patients with AHI of ≥15 with sensitivity and specificity of >80% by using respiratory sounds during sleep. Since our prediction model included all sleep stage data, algorithms based on respiratory sounds may have a high value for prescreening OSA with mobile devices.
Collapse