Choosing the right interface for positive airway pressure therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea

[Factors affecting adherence to CPAP therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome]

OBJECTIVE

Analysis of factors affecting adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The literature search was carried out using the databases PubMED, Google Scholar, E-library, Cyberleninka for the period 2013-2023 and included reviews and original articles.

RESULTS

The main groups of factors affecting adherence to CPAP therapy in patients with OSA have been established. These include sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors, the severity of OSA and the severity of clinical symptoms, and psychosocial factors. Strategies that can improve adherence were identified (educational technologies for patients, telemedicine technologies, behavioral therapy, modern technical interventions).

CONCLUSION

Factors that improve adherence to CPAP therapy are high levels of education and income, more severe OSA forms accompanied by daytime sleepiness, support from the patient's spouse and social support. Factors such as low levels of education and income, smoking, symptoms of depression and hypochondria, as well as side-effects worsen adherence to CPAP therapy, including refusal to continue treatment. It should be noted that all the identified factors are very closely associated with each other, so it is necessary to evaluate them comprehensively in each patient with OSA.

Long-term non-invasive ventilation in children: Transition from hospital to home

Long-term non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is an accepted therapy for sleep-related respiratory disorders and respiratory insufficiency or failure. Increase in the use of long-term NIV may, in part, be driven by an increase in the number of children surviving critical illness with comorbidities. As a result, some children start on long-term NIV as part of transitioning from hospital to home. NIV may be used in acute illness to avoid intubation, facilitate extubation or support tracheostomy decannulation, and to avoid the need for a tracheostomy for long-term invasive ventilation. The decision about whether long-term NIV is appropriate for an individual child and their family needs to be made with care. Preparing for transition from the hospital to home involves understanding how NIV equipment is obtained and set-up, education and training for parents/caregivers, and arranging a plan for clinical follow-up. While planning for these transitions is challenging, the goals of a shorter time in hospital and a child living well at home with their family are important.

Ineffective CPAP Treatment After Effective CPAP Titration

CASE PRESENTATION

A 67-year-old woman was evaluated for snoring, frequent awakenings, excessive sleepiness, nocturia, headaches, witnessed apneas, and choking and gasping from sleep. Medical history included OSA, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, depression in remission, and mild intermittent asthma. Epworth sleepiness scale score was 22 (abnormal is ≥10, maximum score is 24; increasing scores represent increasing sleepiness). She had been prescribed CPAP therapy. She reported initial nasal mask discomfort (ResMed AirFit N20 nasal mask), which improved with change to an oronasal mask. Patient used nightly, with acceptable tolerance. Sleep onset and wake times remained consistent, with an average total sleep time of 7 hours. She denied alcohol intake, sedative medication use, or changes in weight.

Clinical side effects of continuous positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea

CPAP is considered the gold standard treatment in OSA and is highly efficacious in controlling OSA symptoms. However, treatment effectiveness is limited because of many factors including low adherence due to side effects. This review highlights the range of side effects associated with CPAP therapy in patients with OSA. This information is important for the initiation of patients onto CPAP as well as their continued care while on treatment, given the increase in non-medically supervised CPAP care models in use globally.

Mask interfaces for home non-invasive ventilation in infants and children

The selection of the mask interface for non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is recognized to be an essential part for therapy success. While nasal masks are the first recommended option in children and adults, there are indications for other mask types such as intolerance or complications from nasal masks. Evidence comparing performance, adherence and complication risk among mask interfaces in pediatrics is, however, scarce and information is often extrapolated from adult studies. Given this gap in knowledge and the lack of guidelines on NIV initiation in children, mask selection often relies on the clinicians' knowledge and expertise. Careful mask selection, a well-fitting headgear and time investment for mask desensitization are some important recommendations for adequate mask adaptation in children. Frequent mask-related complications include nasal symptoms, unintentional leak, mask displacement, skin injury, and midface hypoplasia. Close monitoring and a pro-active approach may help to minimize complications and promote the optimal use of home NIV.

Predictors of oronasal breathing among obstructive sleep apnea patients and controls

Oronasal breathing may adversely impact obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients either by increasing upper airway collapsibility or by influencing continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment outcomes. Predicting a preferential breathing route would be helpful to guide CPAP interface prescription. We hypothesized that anthropometric measurements but not self-reported oronasal breathing are predictors of objectively measured oronasal breathing. Seventeen OSA patients and nine healthy subjects underwent overnight polysomnography with an oronasal mask with two sealed compartments attached to independent pneumotacographs. Subjects answered questionnaires about nasal symptoms and perceived breathing route. Oronasal breathing was more common (P = <0.001) among OSA patients than controls while awake (62 ± 44 vs. 5 ± 6%) and during sleep (59 ± 39 vs. 25 ± 21%, respectively). Oronasal breathing was associated with OSA severity (P = 0.009), age (P = 0.005), body mass index (P = 0.044), and neck circumference (P = 0.004). There was no agreement between objective measurement and self-reported breathing route among OSA patients while awake (κ = -0.12) and asleep (κ = -0.02). The breathing route remained unchanged after 92% of obstructive apneas. These results suggest that oronasal breathing is more common among OSA patients than controls during both wakefulness and sleep and is associated with OSA severity and anthropometric measures. Self-reporting is not a reliable predictor of oronasal breathing and should not be considered an indication for oronasal CPAP.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) interface choice for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients is often guided by nasal symptoms and self-reported breathing route. We showed that oronasal breathing can be predicted by anthropometric measurements and OSA severity but not by self-reported oronasal breathing. Self-reported breathing and nasal symptoms should not be considered for CPAP interface choice.

Prevention of leakage due to mouth opening through applying an oral shield device (Sominpax™) during nasal CPAP therapy of patients with obstructive sleep apnea

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

The first line treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP), for which a variety of masks are available. While nasal masks (NM) are the first choice; oronasal masks (ONM) are also frequently used to prevent mouth dryness resulting from mouth opening. Our cross-sectional, prospective, randomized, un-blinded study addressed the efficacy of wearing an oral shield in addition to NM in preventing mouth leakage METHODS: Patients with OSA and established therapy using NM and complaining about mouth dryness (n = 29) underwent three polysomnographies (PSGs) using NM, ONM or a nose mask in combination with an oral shield (NMS). Mask leakage was continuously documented and objective sleep quality was assessed.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in the apnea-hypopnea-index (AHI) between ONM (8.5/h; SD 6,7) and NM/nasal mask combined with oral shield device (NMS) (2.6/h; SD 2,3; 2.7/h; SD 2,6) (p < 0,05) as well as in leakage [ONM (39.7 l/min SD 12,4); NM (34.6 l/min SD 9,4); NMS (33.1 l/min SD 9,6)] (p = 0.011). Furthermore, analysis of sleep quality (NREM3) favored NM and NMS over ONM (p = 0.02). There were no significant differences between NM and NMS in any objective outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data consistently confirmed the NM as the first choice for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy of OSA. Notably, we demonstrated a high potential of the oral shield for patients with mouth opening to achieve additional comfort and thereby possibly compliance, without affecting nCPAP therapy effectiveness.