Beneficial effects of adaptive servo-ventilation on natriuretic peptides and diastolic function in acute heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction and sleep-disordered breathing

The efficacy and safety of adaptive servo-ventilation therapy for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

It is unclear whether adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) therapy for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is effective. The aim of this study was to investigate the details of ASV use, and to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ASV in real-world HFpEF patients. We retrospectively enrolled 36 HFpEF patients at nine cardiovascular centers who initiated ASV therapy during hospitalization or on outpatient basis and were able to continue using it at home from 2012 to 2017 and survived for at least one year thereafter. The number of hospitalizations for heart failure (HF) during the 12 months before and 12 months after introduction of ASV at home was compared. The median number of HF hospitalizations for each patient was significantly reduced from 1 [interquartile range: 1-2] in the 12 months before introduction of ASV to 0 [0-0] in the 12 months after introduction of ASV (p < 0.001). In subgroup analysis, reduction in heart failure hospitalization was significantly greater in female patients, patients with a body mass index < 25, and those with moderate or severe tricuspid valve regurgitation. In patients with HFpEF, the number of HF hospitalizations was significantly decreased after the introduction of ASV. HFpEF patients with female sex, BMI < 25, or moderate to severe tricuspid valve regurgitation are potential candidates who might benefit from ASV therapy.

Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for central sleep apnoea in adults

BACKGROUND

Central sleep apnoea (CSA) is characterised by abnormal patterns of ventilation during sleep due to a dysfunctional drive to breathe. Consequently, people with CSA may present poor sleep quality, sleep fragmentation, inattention, fatigue, daytime sleepiness, and reduced quality of life.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPV) for the treatment of adults with CSA.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus on 6 September 2021. We applied no restrictions on language of publication. We also searched clinical trials registries for ongoing and unpublished studies, and scanned the reference lists of included studies to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reported in full text, those published as abstract only, and unpublished data.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias of the included studies using the Cochrane risk of bias tool version 1.0, and the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. In the case of disagreement, a third review author was consulted.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 15 RCTs with a total of 1936 participants, ranging from 10 to 1325 participants. All studies had important methodological limitations. We assessed most studies (11 studies) as at high risk of bias for at least one domain, and all studies as at unclear risk of bias for at least two domains. The trials included participants aged > 18 years old, of which 70% to 100% were men, who were followed from one week to 60 months. The included studies assessed the effects of different modes of NIPV and CSA. Most participants had CSA associated with chronic heart failure. Because CSA encompasses a variety of causes and underlying clinical conditions, data were carefully analysed, and different conditions and populations were not pooled. The findings for the primary outcomes for the seven evaluated comparisons are presented below.  Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) plus best supportive care versus best supportive care in CSA associated with chronic heart failure In the short term, CPAP plus best supportive care may reduce central apnoea hypopnoea index (AHI) (mean difference (MD) -14.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) -20.11 to -9.09; 1 study; 205 participants). However, CPAP plus best supportive care may result in little to no difference in cardiovascular mortality compared to best supportive care alone. The evidence for the effect of CPAP plus best supportive care on all-cause mortality is very uncertain. No adverse effects were observed with CPAP, and the results for adverse events in the best supportive care group were not reported. Adaptive servo ventilation (ASV) versus CPAP in CSA associated with chronic heart failure The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of ASV versus CPAP on quality of life evaluated in both the short and medium term. Data on adverse events were not reported, and it is not clear whether data were sought but not found. ASV versus bilevel ventilation in CSA associated with chronic heart failure In the short term, ASV may result in little to no difference in central AHI. No adverse events were detected with ASV, and the results for adverse events in the bilevel ventilation group were not reported. ASV plus best supportive care versus best supportive care in CSA associated with chronic heart failure In the medium term, ASV plus best supportive care may reduce AHI compared to best supportive care alone (MD -20.30, 95% CI -28.75 to -11.85; 1 study; 30 participants). In the long term, ASV plus best supportive care likely increases cardiovascular mortality compared to best supportive care (risk ratio (RR) 1.25, 95% CI 1.04, 1.49; 1 study; 1325 participants). The evidence suggests that ASV plus best supportive care may result in little to no difference in quality of life in the short, medium, and long term, and in all-cause mortality in the medium and long term. Data on adverse events were evaluated but not reported. ASV plus best supportive care versus best supportive care in CSA with acute heart failure with preserved ejection fraction Only adverse events were reported for this comparison, and no adverse events were recorded in either group. ASV versus CPAP maintenance in CPAP-induced CSA In the short term, ASV may slightly reduce central AHI (MD -4.10, 95% CI -6.67 to -1.53; 1 study; 60 participants), but may result in little to no difference in quality of life. Data on adverse events were not reported, and it is not clear whether data were sought but not found. ASV versus bilevel ventilation in CPAP-induced CSA In the short term, ASV may slightly reduce central AHI (MD -8.70, 95% CI -11.42 to -5.98; 1 study; 30 participants) compared to bilevel ventilation. Data on adverse events were not reported, and it is not clear whether data were sought but not found.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

CPAP plus best supportive care may reduce central AHI in people with CSA associated with chronic heart failure compared to best supportive care alone. Although ASV plus best supportive care may reduce AHI in people with CSA associated with chronic heart failure, it likely increases cardiovascular mortality in these individuals. In people with CPAP-induced CSA, ASV may slightly reduce central AHI compared to bilevel ventilation and to CPAP. In the absence of data showing a favourable impact on meaningful patient-centred outcomes and defining clinically important differences in outcomes in CSA patients, these findings need to be interpreted with caution. Considering the level of certainty of the available evidence and the heterogeneity of participants with CSA, we could draw no definitive conclusions, and further high-quality trials focusing on patient-centred outcomes, such as quality of life, quality of sleep, and longer-term survival, are needed to determine whether one mode of NIPV is better than another or than best supportive care for any particular CSA patient group.

The effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac function: a comparative echocardiography-conductance catheter study

Background

Echocardiographic parameters of diastolic function depend on cardiac loading conditions, which are altered by positive pressure ventilation. The direct effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on cardiac diastolic function are unknown.

Methods

Twenty-five patients without apparent diastolic dysfunction undergoing coronary angiography were ventilated noninvasively at PEEPs of 0, 5, and 10 cmH₂O (in randomized order). Echocardiographic diastolic assessment and pressure–volume-loop analysis from conductance catheters were compared. The time constant for pressure decay (τ) was modeled with exponential decay. End-diastolic and end-systolic pressure volume relationships (EDPVRs and ESPVRs, respectively) from temporary caval occlusion were analyzed with generalized linear mixed-effects and linear mixed models. Transmural pressures were calculated using esophageal balloons.

Results

τ values for intracavitary cardiac pressure increased with the PEEP (n = 25; no PEEP, 44 ± 5 ms; 5 cmH₂O PEEP, 46 ± 6 ms; 10 cmH₂O PEEP, 45 ± 6 ms; p < 0.001). This increase disappeared when corrected for transmural pressure and diastole length. The transmural EDPVR was unaffected by PEEP. The ESPVR increased slightly with PEEP. Echocardiographic mitral inflow parameters and tissue Doppler values decreased with PEEP [peak E wave (n = 25): no PEEP, 0.76 ± 0.13 m/s; 5 cmH₂O PEEP, 0.74 ± 0.14 m/s; 10 cmH₂O PEEP, 0.68 ± 0.13 m/s; p = 0.016; peak A wave (n = 24): no PEEP, 0.74 ± 0.12 m/s; 5 cmH₂O PEEP, 0.7 ± 0.11 m/s; 10 cmH₂O PEEP, 0.67 ± 0.15 m/s; p = 0.014; E’ septal (n = 24): no PEEP, 0.085 ± 0.016 m/s; 5 cmH₂O PEEP, 0.08 ± 0.013 m/s; 10 cmH₂O PEEP, 0.075 ± 0.012 m/s; p = 0.002].

Conclusions

PEEP does not affect active diastolic relaxation or passive ventricular filling properties. Dynamic echocardiographic filling parameters may reflect changing loading conditions rather than intrinsic diastolic function. PEEP may have slight positive inotropic effects.

Clinical trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02267291, registered 17. October 2014.

Graphical abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-022-02014-1.

Cheyne-Stokes Breathing as a Predictive Indicator of Heart Failure in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea; A Retrospective Case Control Study Using Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Remote Monitoring Data

Objective

We conducted a retrospective case control study to examine whether remote monitoring of Cheyne-Stokes breathing (CSB) was useful for predicting the onset of heart failure (HF) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).

Methods

Among patients with OSA treated at our hospital, 33 patients with HF that occurred between July 2014 and May 2021 [11 patients with acute HF (AHF); 22 patients with chronic HF (CHF) exacerbation] were included in the HF group. Of the 618 stable patients, 149 patients with a 30-days average CSB rate (CSB%) ≧1% were included in the non-HF control group. The chronologic change of CSB% were compared among the AHF, CHF and Control groups. Furthermore, of the 149 patients in the non-HF control group, 44 patients were matched for CSB%, body mass index, and sex in a ratio of 1:2 to 22 patients with CHF. The average cycle length (CL) of CSB was compared among three groups: CHF in stable period (CHF-stable group), CHF in exacerbation period (CHF-exacerbation group), and control group. In addition, according to the status of HF, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine the optimal cut-off points for variation of CSB% and CL.

Results

Chronological change in CSB% among the three groups was significantly different. Standard deviation of CSB% (SD CSB%) before onset HF was significantly higher in both the AHF and CHF groups than in the control group. The CL of CSB was significantly longer in the CHF group than in the control group and was longer during the exacerbation period than during the stable period. The optimal cut-off value of CL that could differentiate patients with and without the onset of HF was 68.9 s.

Conclusion

The HF group demonstrated greater CSB variations and longer CL than the non-HF control group. Furthermore, the CL was longer during the exacerbation period of HF even in the same patient. These results suggest that remote monitoring of CPAP device data for CSB variations and CL might allow early prediction of the onset and exacerbation of HF.

Novel technologies in the management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a promise during the time of disappointment from pharmacological approaches?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite numerous attempts, none of a wide variety of tested drugs achieved meaningful improvement in the outcomes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), making new therapeutic strategies a major unmet medical need. The medical device industry embraced the challenge, developing novel technologies directed to face specific aspects of the pathophysiology of HFpEF. This review focuses on some of the most promising technologies attaining meaningful clinical progress recently in the field of HFpEF therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Implantable pulmonary artery pressure, monitoring for optimization of medical therapy, proved to be beneficial in heart failure admissions in a large postmarketing clinical study. Investigational devices, such as inter-atrial shunts and transvenous phrenic nerve stimulators for the treatment of central sleep apnea with Cheyne-Stokes breathing, are currently being evaluated in HFpEF cohorts in recent trials.

SUMMARY

Device-based therapies for HFpEF demonstrated encouraging safety and efficacy results in various stages of the disease. Further efforts are needed to ensure that these devices will reach clinical use and contribute to the management of HFpEF patients.

Cohort profile: FACE, prospective follow-up of chronic heart failure patients with sleep-disordered breathing indicated for adaptive servo ventilation

PURPOSE

FACE is a prospective cohort study designed to assess the effect of adding adaptive servoventilation (ASV) to standard care on morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure (HF) with preserved (HFpEF), mid-range (HFmrEF) or reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who have sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) with an indication for ASV. We describe the study design, ongoing data collection and baseline participant characteristics.

PARTICIPANTS

Consecutive patients with HFpEF, HFmrEF or HFrEF plus SDB with central sleep apnoea (CSA) and indication for ASV were enrolled in the study cohort between November 2009 and December 2018; the ASV group includes those treated with ASV and the control group consists of patients who refused ASV or stopped treatment early. Follow-up is based on standard clinical practice, with visits at inclusion, after 3, 12 and 24 months of follow-up. Primary endpoint is the time to first event: all-cause death or unplanned hospitalisation (or unplanned prolongation of a planned hospitalisation) for worsening of HF, cardiovascular death or unplanned hospitalisation for worsening of HF, and all-cause death or all-cause unplanned hospitalisation.

FINDINGS TO DATE

503 patients have been enrolled, mean age of 72 years, 88% male, 31% with HFrEF. HF was commonly of ischaemic origin, and the number of comorbidities was high. SDB was severe (median Apnoea-Hypopnoea Index 42/hour), and CSA was the main indication for ASV (69%). HF was highly symptomatic; most patients were in NYHA class II (38%) or III (29%).

FUTURE PLANS

Patient follow-up is ongoing. Given the heterogeneous nature of the enrolled population, a decision was made to use latent class analysis to define homogeneous patient subgroups, and then evaluate outcomes by cluster, and in the ASV and control groups (overall and within patient clusters). First analysis will be performed after 3 months, a second analysis at the 2-year follow-up.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01831128; Pre-results.

Positive airway pressure therapy for the treatment of central sleep apnoea associated with heart failure

BACKGROUND

Ischaemic heart disease including heart failure is the most common cause of death in the world, and the incidence of the condition is rapidly increasing. Heart failure is characterised by symptoms such as fatigue and breathlessness during light activity, as well as disordered breathing during sleep. In particular, sleep disordered breathing (SDB), including central sleep apnoea (CSA) and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), is highly prevalent in people with chronic heart failure. A previous meta-analysis demonstrated that positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy dramatically increased the survival rate of people with heart failure who had CSA, and thus could contribute to improving the prognosis of these individuals. However, recent trials found that adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) including PAP therapy had a higher risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. A meta-analysis that included recent trials was therefore needed.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of positive airway pressure therapy for people with heart failure who experience central sleep apnoea.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection on 7 February 2019 with no limitations on date, language, or publication status. We also searched two clinical trials registers in July 2019 and checked the reference lists of primary studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We excluded cross-over trials and included individually randomised controlled trials, reported as full-texts, those published as abstract only, and unpublished data.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted outcome data from the included studies. We double-checked that data had been entered correctly by comparing the data presented in the systematic review with study reports. We analysed dichotomous data as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and continuous data as mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% CIs. Furthermore, we performed subgroup analysis in the ASV group or continuous PAP group separately. We used GRADEpro GDT software to assess the quality of evidence as it relates to those studies that contribute data to the meta-analyses for the prespecified outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 16 randomised controlled trials involving a total of 2125 participants. The trials evaluated PAP therapy consisting of ASV or continuous PAP therapy for 1 to 31 months. Many trials included participants with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Only one trial included participants with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. We are uncertain about the effects of PAP therapy on all-cause mortality (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.21; participants = 1804; studies = 6; I² = 47%; very low-quality evidence). We found moderate-quality evidence of no difference between PAP therapy and usual care on cardiac-related mortality (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.24; participants = 1775; studies = 5; I² = 11%). We found low-quality evidence of no difference between PAP therapy and usual care on all-cause rehospitalisation (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.30; participants = 1533; studies = 5; I² = 40%) and cardiac-related rehospitalisation (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.35; participants = 1533; studies = 5; I² = 40%). In contrast, PAP therapy showed some indication of an improvement in quality of life scores assessed by all measurements (SMD -0.32, 95% CI -0.67 to 0.04; participants = 1617; studies = 6; I² = 76%; low-quality evidence) and by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MD -0.51, 95% CI -0.78 to -0.24; participants = 1458; studies = 4; I² = 0%; low-quality evidence) compared with usual care. Death due to pneumonia (N = 1, 3% of PAP group); cardiac arrest (N = 18, 3% of PAP group); heart transplantation (N = 8, 1% of PAP group); cardiac worsening (N = 3, 9% of PAP group); deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (N = 1, 3% of PAP group); and foot ulcer (N = 1, 3% of PAP group) occurred in the PAP therapy group, whereas cardiac arrest (N = 16, 2% of usual care group); heart transplantation (N = 12, 2% of usual care group); cardiac worsening (N = 5, 14% of usual care group); and duodenal ulcer (N = 1, 3% of usual care group) occurred in the usual care group across three trials.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The effect of PAP therapy on all-cause mortality was uncertain. In addition, although we found evidence that PAP therapy did not reduce the risk of cardiac-related mortality and rehospitalisation, there was some indication of an improvement in quality of life for heart failure patients with CSA. Furthermore, the evidence was insufficient to determine whether adverse events were more common with PAP than with usual care. These findings were limited by low- or very low-quality evidence. PAP therapy may be worth considering for individuals with heart failure to improve quality of life.