Unterbringungen und Beschränkungen an einer psychiatrischen Abteilung: 2003-2006

No gender differences in the pharmacological emergency treatment of schizophrenia: results of a 21-year observation

Patients suffering from schizophrenia are at high risk for admission and treatment in locked units. This study investigated gender differences in the pharmacological emergency treatment of schizophrenia patients over a 21-year observation period. The current retrospective study was conducted at the Division of Psychiatry I of the Medical University Innsbruck. All adult patients (n = 845; 425 female) suffering from schizophrenia who were admitted involuntarily to one of the acute psychiatric units in the years 1997, 2002, 2007, 2012 and 2017 were included in the study. In the years mentioned above, 590 schizophrenia patients (297 men, 293 women) admitted to a locked unit received pharmacological emergency treatment. With the exception of clozapine which was more frequently administered to men no significant differences between men and women were found in terms of the choice, dosage, and type of application of medication (antipsychotics and benzodiazepines). Since most treatment guidelines for schizophrenia do not consider gender differences at all, it is not surprising that acute treatment is almost the same for men and women. However, in times when individualized therapies gain more and more importance, the consideration of sex differences should be part of new treatment concepts.

Trends in pharmacological emergency treatment of patients suffering from schizophrenia over a 16-year observation period

Patients suffering from schizophrenia are often treated in locked psychiatric units because of psychomotor agitation, hostility and aggressive behavior, or suicidality. Because of legal conditions, investigations on these acutely ill patients are difficult, and many studies do not represent 'real-life psychiatry'. This retrospective survey was conducted at the Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics of the Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria. Data were collected from the records of all adult inpatients suffering from a schizophrenia spectrum disorder according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th ed. (ICD-10) (F2x) who had been admitted to a locked unit in 1997, 2002, 2007, and 2012. In addition to demographic data, diagnoses at the time of admission, length of stay at the locked unit, and psychopharmacological treatment (3 h before and following admission) were recorded. The mean length of stay at a locked unit decreased significantly from 11.8±4.43 days (mean±SD) in 1997 to 8.5±12.96 days (mean±SD) in 2012. The use of antipsychotics decreased nonsignificantly from 1997 to 2012. Despite an increasing use of second compared with first-generation antipsychotic drugs over the course of time, haloperidol was the most frequently used single compound in all investigated years except 2012. The majority of medications were administered orally. The use of benzodiazepines did not change substantially over the course of time. All in all, pharmacological emergency treatment of patients suffering from schizophrenia spectrum disorders in locked units was in line with current treatment guidelines, which recommend the use of second-generation antipsychotic drugs, monotherapy, oral application, and cautious dosing.

Risk of violence of inpatients with severe mental illness--do patients with schizophrenia pose harm to others?

Individuals suffering from schizophrenia are frequently considered to be dangerous. The current longitudinal chart review was carried out to investigate the diagnostic mix of patients who were admitted to the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy at the Medical University Innsbruck due to risk of harm to others. The sample consisted of all adult inpatients admitted to psychiatric acute care units in the years 1992, 1997, 2002, and 2007. Data collection included diagnoses, criteria for risk of harm to others, and the use of mechanical restraint. Altogether, 7222 admissions were reviewed. Of these, 529 patients had to be admitted to a locked unit because of risk of harm to others. Among those mechanical restraint was more often used in patients with organic mental disorders, Cluster B personality disorders, and mania than in patients with schizophrenia. Patients suffering from schizophrenia with comorbid psychoactive substance use constitute a potentially harmful population and are therefore frequently admitted to locked units due to risk of harm to others. However, in the current study additional coercive measures were more commonly applied in patients suffering from personality disorders and organic mental disorders.

[Mechanical restraint: the clinical practice in a psychiatric university hospital]

BACKGROUND

Public opinion on psychiatric medicine is still dominated by images of repression; in particular, the aspects of involuntary admissions, restraint, isolation, or involuntary administration of medication contribute significantly to public prejudice. Furthermore, violations of individual privacy rights and the use of coercion in psychiatry is an ethical challenge. The aim of this study was to describe the "practice of mechanical restraint" at a university hospital in Austria.

METHODS

In this study, all admissions to the closed ward at the Department of Psychiatry of the University Clinic of Innsbruck between July and December 2009 were assessed through retrospective data analysis.

RESULTS

529 admissions were identified during the study period. In 148 admitted patients mechanical restraint was arranged at least once. Mechanical restraint was used most frequently and over the longest period of time in patients of the ICD diagnosis group F0. In most cases, "self- harm" had been the reason for restraint. Fourteen percent of the restraints were due to a "danger to others". In patients with "danger to others", a 5 point fixation was used significantly more often than in patients without danger to others, where a restriction by bedrail and/or abdominal belt was most common.

CONCLUSIONS

A comparison of these data with those of other centers is limited due to diverse documentation systems. A unified approach in terms of an effective quality management would be desirable in this regard.