1
|
Revol J, Lafit G, Ceulemans E. A new sample-size planning approach for person-specific VAR(1) studies: Predictive accuracy analysis. Behav Res Methods 2024; 56:7152-7167. [PMID: 38717682 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02413-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 08/30/2024]
Abstract
Researchers increasingly study short-term dynamic processes that evolve within single individuals using N = 1 studies. The processes of interest are typically captured by fitting a VAR(1) model to the resulting data. A crucial question is how to perform sample-size planning and thus decide on the number of measurement occasions that are needed. The most popular approach is to perform a power analysis, which focuses on detecting the effects of interest. We argue that performing sample-size planning based on out-of-sample predictive accuracy yields additional important information regarding potential overfitting of the model. Predictive accuracy quantifies how well the estimated VAR(1) model will allow predicting unseen data from the same individual. We propose a new simulation-based sample-size planning method called predictive accuracy analysis (PAA), and an associated Shiny app. This approach makes use of a novel predictive accuracy metric that accounts for the multivariate nature of the prediction problem. We showcase how the values of the different VAR(1) model parameters impact power and predictive accuracy-based sample-size recommendations using simulated data sets and real data applications. The range of recommended sample sizes is smaller for predictive accuracy analysis than for power analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan Revol
- Research Group of Quantitative Psychology and Individual Differences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Ginette Lafit
- Methodology of Educational Sciences Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Eva Ceulemans
- Research Group of Quantitative Psychology and Individual Differences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Peng J, Yuan S, Wei Z, Liu C, Li K, Wei X, Yuan S, Guo Z, Wu L, Feng T, Zhou Y, Li J, Yang Q, Liu X, Wu S, Ren L. Temporal network of experience sampling methodology identifies sleep disturbance as a central symptom in generalized anxiety disorder. BMC Psychiatry 2024; 24:241. [PMID: 38553683 PMCID: PMC10981297 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-05698-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A temporal network of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) symptoms could provide valuable understanding of the occurrence and maintenance of GAD. We aim to obtain an exploratory conceptualization of temporal GAD network and identify the central symptom. METHODS A sample of participants (n = 115) with elevated GAD-7 scores (Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Questionnaire [GAD-7] ≥ 10) participated in an online daily diary study in which they reported their GAD symptoms based on DSM-5 diagnostic criteria (eight symptoms in total) for 50 consecutive days. We used a multilevel VAR model to obtain the temporal network. RESULTS In temporal network, a lot of lagged relationships exist among GAD symptoms and these lagged relationships are all positive. All symptoms have autocorrelations and there are also some interesting feedback loops in temporal network. Sleep disturbance has the highest Out-strength centrality. CONCLUSIONS This study indicates how GAD symptoms interact with each other and strengthen themselves over time, and particularly highlights the relationships between sleep disturbance and other GAD symptoms. Sleep disturbance may play an important role in the dynamic development and maintenance process of GAD. The present study may develop the knowledge of the theoretical model, diagnosis, prevention and intervention of GAD from a temporal symptoms network perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaxi Peng
- Mental Health Education Center, Chengdu University, 610106, Chengdu, China
| | - Shuai Yuan
- University of Amsterdam, 1018WB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Zihan Wei
- Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, 710032, Xi'an, China
| | - Chang Liu
- Brain Park, School of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, 3800, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Kuiliang Li
- Department of Psychology, Army Medical University, 400038, Chongqing, China
| | - Xinyi Wei
- Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China, 100000, Beijing, China
| | - Shangqing Yuan
- School of Psychology, Capital Normal University, 100089, Beijing, China
| | - Zhihua Guo
- Department of Military Medical Psychology, Air Force Medical University, 710032, Xi'an, China
| | - Lin Wu
- Department of Military Medical Psychology, Air Force Medical University, 710032, Xi'an, China
| | - Tingwei Feng
- Department of Military Medical Psychology, Air Force Medical University, 710032, Xi'an, China
| | - Yu Zhou
- Military Psychology Section, Logistics University of PAP, 300309, Tianjin, China
- Military Mental Health Services & Research Center, 300309, Tianjin, China
| | - Jiayi Li
- Military Psychology Section, Logistics University of PAP, 300309, Tianjin, China
- Military Mental Health Services & Research Center, 300309, Tianjin, China
| | - Qun Yang
- Department of Military Medical Psychology, Air Force Medical University, 710032, Xi'an, China
| | - Xufeng Liu
- Department of Military Medical Psychology, Air Force Medical University, 710032, Xi'an, China
| | - Shengjun Wu
- Department of Military Medical Psychology, Air Force Medical University, 710032, Xi'an, China.
| | - Lei Ren
- Military Psychology Section, Logistics University of PAP, 300309, Tianjin, China.
- Military Mental Health Services & Research Center, 300309, Tianjin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kupers E, Loopers J, Albers C, Bakker A, Minnaert A. An experience sampling study on the links between daily teacher self-efficacy, need-supportive teaching and student intrinsic motivation. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1159108. [PMID: 37546457 PMCID: PMC10400435 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1159108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Why are some teachers more successful at motivating students than others? We know from previous literature that teachers' self-efficacy relates to the extent in which they engage in need-supportive teaching in the classroom, which in turn relates to student intrinsic motivation. However, teachers' self-efficacy is hypothesized to be dependent on their previous mastery experiences, e.g., of engaging students in the classroom. This "feedback loop" where the teacher not only influences the student but also the other way around, in a process unfolding over time, can only be investigated empirically with an intensive longitudinal design. This is precisely what we did in the current study. Methods Secondary school teachers (n = 4) and students (n = 90) participated in an experience sampling study throughout one school year, resulting in a unique dataset with 48-59 repeated measurement points per class. Results Visual exploration of the time series revealed that teacher self-efficacy can vary substantially from lesson to lesson, with characteristic patterns of stabilization and de-stabilization. We conducted Vector Autoregressive Analysis (VAR) for each of the four cases to test whether, and how, the variables relate to each other over time. We found an "overspill effect" for student motivation, meaning that students' motivation in today's lesson predicts their motivation in tomorrow's lesson. Furthermore, in two cases we found that today's student motivation predicts tomorrow's teacher self-efficacy, but not the other way around.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Kupers
- Department of Inclusive and Special Needs Education, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Judith Loopers
- Department of Inclusive and Special Needs Education, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Casper Albers
- Department of Psychometrics and Statistics, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Alianne Bakker
- Department of Inclusive and Special Needs Education, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Alexander Minnaert
- Department of Inclusive and Special Needs Education, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Halpin PF, Gates K, Liu S. Guest Editors' Introduction to the Special Issue on Forecasting with Intensive Longitudinal Data. PSYCHOMETRIKA 2022; 87:373-375. [PMID: 35230595 DOI: 10.1007/s11336-022-09850-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Peter F Halpin
- School of Education, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 100 E Cameron Ave, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-3500, USA.
| | - Kathleen Gates
- Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 341A Davie Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-3720, USA
| | - Siwei Liu
- Department of Human Ecology, University of California at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bringmann LF, Albers C, Bockting C, Borsboom D, Ceulemans E, Cramer A, Epskamp S, Eronen MI, Hamaker E, Kuppens P, Lutz W, McNally RJ, Molenaar P, Tio P, Voelkle MC, Wichers M. Psychopathological networks: Theory, methods and practice. Behav Res Ther 2021; 149:104011. [PMID: 34998034 DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2021.104011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2021] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
In recent years, network approaches to psychopathology have sparked much debate and have had a significant impact on how mental disorders are perceived in the field of clinical psychology. However, there are many important challenges in moving from theory to empirical research and clinical practice and vice versa. Therefore, in this article, we bring together different points of view on psychological networks by methodologists and clinicians to give a critical overview on these challenges, and to present an agenda for addressing these challenges. In contrast to previous reviews, we especially focus on methodological issues related to temporal networks. This includes topics such as selecting and assessing the quality of the nodes in the network, distinguishing between- and within-person effects in networks, relating items that are measured at different time scales, and dealing with changes in network structures. These issues are not only important for researchers using network models on empirical data, but also for clinicians, who are increasingly likely to encounter (person-specific) networks in the consulting room.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura F Bringmann
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation (ICPE), P.O. Box 30.001 (CC72), 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands; University of Groningen, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, Department of Psychometrics and Statistics, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Casper Albers
- University of Groningen, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, Department of Psychometrics and Statistics, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Claudi Bockting
- Centre for Urban Mental Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Denny Borsboom
- Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eva Ceulemans
- KU Leuven, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Angélique Cramer
- RIVM National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, the Netherlands
| | - Sacha Epskamp
- Centre for Urban Mental Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Markus I Eronen
- Department of Theoretical Philosophy, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen Hamaker
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - Peter Kuppens
- KU Leuven, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Wolfgang Lutz
- Department of Psychology, University of Trier, Germany
| | | | - Peter Molenaar
- Department of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, USA
| | - Pia Tio
- Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Manuel C Voelkle
- Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marieke Wichers
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation (ICPE), P.O. Box 30.001 (CC72), 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|