Measuring impact of vaccination among wildlife: The case of bait vaccine campaigns for classical swine fever epidemic among wild boar in Japan.
PLoS Comput Biol 2022;
18:e1010510. [PMID:
36201410 PMCID:
PMC9536577 DOI:
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010510]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Understanding the impact of vaccination in a host population is essential to control infectious diseases. However, the impact of bait vaccination against wildlife diseases is difficult to evaluate. The vaccination history of host animals is generally not observable in wildlife, and it is difficult to distinguish immunity by vaccination from that caused by disease infection. For these reasons, the impact of bait vaccination against classical swine fever (CSF) in wild boar inhabiting Japan has not been evaluated accurately. In this study, we aimed to estimate the impact of the bait vaccination campaign by modelling the dynamics of CSF and the vaccination process among a Japanese wild boar population. The model was designed to estimate the impact of bait vaccination despite lack of data regarding the demography and movement of wild boar. Using our model, we solved the theoretical relationship between the impact of vaccination, the time-series change in the proportion of infected wild boar, and that of immunised wild boar. Using this derived relationship, the increase in antibody prevalence against CSF because of vaccine campaigns in 2019 was estimated to be 12.1 percentage points (95% confidence interval: 7.8–16.5). Referring to previous reports on the basic reproduction number (R0) of CSF in wild boar living outside Japan, the amount of vaccine distribution required for CSF elimination by reducing the effective reproduction number under unity was also estimated. An approximate 1.6 (when R0 = 1.5, target vaccination coverage is 33.3% of total population) to 2.9 (when R0 = 2.5, target vaccination coverage is 60.0% of total population) times larger amount of vaccine distribution would be required than the total amount of vaccine distribution in four vaccination campaigns in 2019.
Vaccination of wildlife is important to control infectious diseases in animals. However, the impact of common vaccination of wildlife, bait vaccination, is difficult to evaluate owing to difficulty in obtaining the vaccination history at the individual level. Mathematical modelling can estimate the impact of vaccination; however, the demography and movement of hosts are required to describe disease dynamics. In this study, we aimed to estimate the impact of bait vaccination by modelling the dynamics of classical swine fever (CSF) and the vaccination among Japanese wild boar. The model was designed to estimate the impact of bait vaccination despite lack of data regarding the demography and movement of wild boar. Using our model, the increase in antibody prevalence because of vaccination in 2019 was estimated to be 12 percentage points. Furthermore, we estimated the amount of vaccine distribution required for CSF elimination by reducing the effective reproduction number under unity. Referring to previous reports on the basic reproduction number of CSF in wild boar living outside Japan, it was estimated that an approximate 1.6 to 2.9 times larger amount of vaccine distribution would be required than the total amount of vaccine distribution in four vaccination campaigns in 2019.
Collapse