Critical insights into the effects of plastic pyrolysis oil on emission and performance characteristics of CI engine

Catalyst-mediated pyrolysis of waste plastics: tuning yield, composition, and nature of pyrolysis oil

With ever-increasing plastic waste, a robust and sustainable methodology to valorize the waste and tweak, the composition of the value added product is the need of the hour. The present study describes the effect of different heterogeneous catalyst systems on the yield, composition and nature of the pyrolysis oil produced from various waste polyolefins like high-density polyethylene (HDPE), linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE), and polypropylene (PP). The waste polyolefins were subjected to thermal as well as catalytic pyrolysis. Liquid, gas, and solid products were obtained during the pyrolysis. Various catalysts such as activated alumina (AAL), ZSM-5, FCC catalyst, and halloysite clay (HNT) were used. Usage of catalysts has reduced the temperature of the pyrolysis reaction from 470 to 450 °C with better liquid product yield. PP waste generated higher liquid yield compared to LLDPE and HDPE waste. The highest liquid yield of 70.0% was achieved with PP waste using AAL catalyst at 450 °C. The sulfur and chloride content was found to be < 10 and < 20 ppm respectively in all the pyrolysis liquid. Pyrolysis liquid products were analyzed using gas chromatography (GC), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectroscopy, and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrophotometry (GC-MS). The obtained liquid products consist of paraffin, naphthene, olefin and aromatic components. Catalyst regeneration experiments with AAL showed that the product distribution profile remains the same up to three cycles of regeneration.

Current Trends in Waste Plastics’ Liquefaction into Fuel Fraction: A Review

Polymers and plastics are crucial materials in many sectors of our economy, due to their numerous advantages. They also have some disadvantages, among the most important are problems with the recycling and disposal of used plastics. The recovery of waste plastics is increasing every year, but over 27% of plastics are landfilled. The rest is recycled, where, unfortunately, incineration is still the most common management method. From an economic perspective, waste management methods that lead to added-value products are most preferred—as in the case of material and chemical recycling. Since chemical recycling can be used for difficult wastes (poorly selected, contaminated), it seems to be the most effective way of managing these materials. Moreover, as a result this of kind of recycling, it is possible to obtain commercially valuable products, such as fractions for fuel composition and monomers for the reproduction of polymers. This review focuses on various liquefaction technologies as a prospective recycling method for three types of plastic waste: PE, PP and PS.