Heterogeneous environmental regulations and green economic efficiency in China: the mediating role of industrial structure

The impact of urbanisation on green total factor productivity: Exploring threshold and mediating effects of human capital

Green development is main direction of high-quality economic development in China. Urbanisation and human capital (HC) are important factors affecting green development. This study examines effects of urbanisation and HC on green total factor productivity (GTFP) using least squares dummy variable model, based on provincial data in China from 2001 to 2019. This study then explored impact of urbanisation on GTFP through HC (educated HC, healthy HC, and HC structure), adopting mediating effect and threshold effect model. The results showed that urbanisation and three types of HC promote GTFP in China and coastal region. In inland region, urbanisation has insignificant impact on GTFP, while educated HC and HC structure improve it. The mediating analysis revealed that educated and healthy HC in China and coastal region enhance promotion effect of urbanisation on GTFP, whereas HC structure hinders it. In inland region, only healthy HC stimulates promotion effect of urbanisation on GTFP. Considering threshold effect of educated and healthy HC, promotion effect of urbanisation on GTFP is weaker than threshold value; but effect is stronger above threshold value. The promotion effect of urbanisation on GTFP is stronger when value of HC structure is below the threshold, while effect is weakened as value exceeds threshold value. Policy implications are documented to promote urbanisation in a differentiated manner, increase investment in HC, and strengthen coordination between urbanisation and HC.

Environmental regulation, industrial structure and energy efficiency: Evidence from 30 provinces in China

The government's environmental protection policy can significantly contribute to alleviating resource shortages and curbing environmental pollution, but the impact of various policy instruments implemented by the government on energy efficiency is unclear. Based on the panel data of 30 provinces in China from 2005 to 2021, this paper analyses the impact of environmental regulation and the industrial structure on energy efficiency from the perspective of resource taxes. The U-shaped relationship between environmental regulation and energy efficiency and between the optimization of industrial structure can significantly improve energy efficiency, and the optimization of industrial structure is conducive to weakening the initial inhibitory effect of environmental regulation. In addition, the analysis of regional heterogeneity showed that the impact of environmental regulation was stronger in the central and western regions, while the impact of industrial structure was stronger in the eastern and western regions. The conclusions of this study can help to expand the understanding of the relationship between environmental regulation and industrial structure on energy efficiency, provide policy enlightenment for the realization of green development and high-quality development, and provide Chinese examples and experiences for developing countries to improve energy efficiency.

Market or regulation? The competition effect between green finance and environmental enforcement on environmental quality and its "dominate-follow" pattern

Current research on environmental instruments often isolates the two mainstream types, market-based and regulation-based, overlooking their real-world interactions. In response, the intensity gap variable (EII_GAP) is constructed to link various instruments into a united system. Thus, based on the spatial econometrics of the spatial panel Durbin model (SPDM), the collective effects between market- and regulation-based environmental instruments on environmental quality are explored. Moreover, the political strategies for maximizing environmental benefits are discussed. Results show that the interaction pattern between market- and regulation-based environmental instruments on environmental quality is characterized by competition rather than cooperation. A unit widening in the intensity gap leads to 17 to 18% and 12 to 18% units of environmental quality improvement in local and adjacent areas, respectively. Furthermore, the "dominate-follow" approach as the most effective mode for maximizing environmental effects is proposed. This study recommends employing one type of instrument as the dominant while the other as the auxiliary. In provinces where one kind of environmental instrument takes domination, the environmental quality could be increased by around 8 to 113% after taking another contrary instrument as the auxiliary.

The driving influence of multidimensional urbanization on green total factor productivity in China: evidence from spatiotemporal analysis

China is experiencing a swift transformation from a rural to an urban society. This societal transition is the result of a country's ambition toward economic development. Rapid urbanization impacts on human wellbeing, environment, and infrastructure. Unlike many cases of urban extension, China's urbanization has led to increase in environmental issues, rather than to contain, and posed serious challenges to achieve sustainable development. To date, nevertheless, there is a little empirical enquiry on the spatiotemporal effects of multidimensional urbanization on green total factor productivity. Taking this into account, this article constructs a spatial panel data model based on 283 Chinese cities during 2006-2019. The results showed that the three types of urbanization (i.e., population, land, and economic) have positive effect on green total factor productivity (GTFP). Population urbanization has indirect positive effect on GTFP. Local land urbanization inhibits while surrounding land urbanization promotes GTFP. Economic urbanization has positive direct effect on GTFP. Considering regional heterogeneity, population and economic urbanization have positive effect on GTFP in eastern region. In central region, land urbanization significantly promotes GTFP, while economic urbanization has significant negative effect on GTFP. In the western region, the three types of urbanization are not conducive to GTFP. Considering sized heterogeneity, population and economic types of urbanization have significant negative effect on GTFP in small- and medium-sized cities. In large cities, the three types of urbanization have significant positive effects on GTFP. Considering temporal heterogeneity, the three types of urbanization significantly promote GTFP before 2014, but economic urbanization deteriorates GTFP after 2014. Our results recommend loosening Hukou system, improving land use efficiency, and developing technology and knowledge-intensive industries.

The impact of heterogeneous environmental regulation on high-quality economic development in China: based on the moderating effect of digital finance

Under the new normal of economic growth, implementing environmental regulation policies and developing digital finance have become essential factors affecting high-quality economic development. This study aims to examine whether environmental regulation has a positive effect on high-quality economic development and what impact digital finance has in the process of environmental regulation affecting high-quality economic development. This study uses the panel data of 30 provinces in China from 2011 to 2019 to measure the high-quality economic development by using the entropy-TOPSIS method based on constructing an indicator system for high-quality economic development. Then, environmental regulations are classified into four categories: economic, command based, legal, and supervised, and digital finance is included in the analysis framework. The impact of heterogeneous environmental regulations on high-quality economic development and the indirect influence mechanism played by digital finance are empirically analyzed. The results show that command-based environmental regulation significantly hinders improving economic development quality. In contrast, supervised environmental regulation plays a significant positive role and can therefore serve as an essential driver of high-quality economic development. In addition, digital finance plays a significant positive moderating role in the influence of environmental regulation on the economy's high-quality development level. After the robustness test, the conclusion is still valid. Further heterogeneity analysis shows that the impact of environmental regulation on high-quality economic development and the moderating effect of digital finance differ across dimensions of economic quality development and have regional heterogeneity. The research findings are conducive to formulating appropriate environmental regulation policies and giving full play to the positive role of digital finance, providing support for promoting high-quality economic development.

Heterogeneity and spillover effects of carbon emission trading on green innovation

The massive emission of greenhouse gases poses a serious threat to the ecological environment. In this context, the relevant effects of the carbon emission trading (CET) market, which promotes greenhouse gas emission reduction by market means, have been widely investigated. Taking the China's CET pilot as a research target, the heterogeneity and spillover effects of CET on green innovation are explored by using the sample data of 279 prefecture-level cities in China from 2008 to 2019. The results are as follows. First, on the whole, CET significantly promotes strategic green innovation, but it has no significant effect on substantive green innovation. Second, the green innovation effect of CET varies with the level of green innovation, and the heterogeneous effects of green innovation are also reflected in different degrees of marketization, fiscal decentralization and government environmental concern. Third, CET has a positive spillover effect on green innovation, and the spillover effect is more significant than the direct effect, accounting for 74.8% of the total effect. Finally, some corresponding policy suggestions are put forward according to the above research conclusions.

Environmental Regulation, Scientific and Technological Innovation, and Industrial Structure Upgrading in the Yellow River Basin, China

Industrial structure upgrading is an important prerequisite for achieving regional ecological environment protection and high-quality development, and environmental regulation can improve the capacity of scientific and technological innovation and promote industrial structure transformation and upgrading. Based on the panel data of 78 cities in the Yellow River Basin, the relationships among environmental regulation, scientific and technological innovation, and industrial structure upgrading in the Yellow River Basin were analyzed using the mediating effect model and the panel threshold model. The results showed the following findings: (1) Although both formal and informal environmental regulations can promote industrial structure upgrading in the Yellow River Basin, regional heterogeneity and temporal stage characteristics are observed. (2) Transmission mechanism test results show that formal and informal environmental regulations directly affect industrial structure upgrading and indirectly act on it through the level of scientific and technological innovation, showing a significant mediating effect. (3) Taking scientific and technological innovation as the threshold variable, formal environmental regulations have a corresponding relationship with industrial structure upgrading in the form of a broken line, and informal environmental regulations significantly promote industrial structure upgrading after scientific and technological innovation crosses a certain threshold. Finally, we discuss the article and make corresponding suggestions in terms of environmental regulation and technological innovation.

The Impact of Environmental Regulation, Industrial Structure, and Interaction on the High-Quality Development Efficiency of the Yellow River Basin in China from the Perspective of the Threshold Effect

High-quality development efficiency can comprehensively measure the development quality of a region. This study constructed the SE-SBM Model and measured the quality development efficiency of the Yellow River Basin from 2010 to 2019. In panel regression, the periodic effects of industrial structure, environmental regulation, and their interaction terms on the efficiency of high-quality development are analyzed. From the perspective of the threshold effect, we explore the possible threshold of interaction to change the efficiency of high-quality development. The results show: (1) From 2010 to 2019, the high-quality development efficiency of the Yellow River Basin's watershed segment showed a gradient development trend. (2) In panel regression, the interaction terms positively impact the whole basin's high-quality development efficiency. However, for different sub-basins, the impact of the core explanatory variable on the efficiency of high-quality development is different. (3) The Yellow River basin has a single significant threshold in the threshold regression. From the perspective of the sub-basin, the upper and lower reaches of the Yellow River have a single significant threshold. There is no threshold in midstream. Based on the research results, the article puts forward relevant suggestions, such as reasonably improving regional imports and exports and introducing high-quality foreign capital, which can provide a basis for relevant departments.