Resilience, aging, and response to radiation exposure (RARRE) in nonhuman primates: a resource review

Product Development within the National Institutes of Health Radiation and Nuclear Countermeasures Program

The Radiation and Nuclear Countermeasures Program (RNCP) at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH) was established to facilitate the development of medical countermeasures (MCMs) and diagnostic approaches for use in a radiation public health emergency. Approvals for MCMs can be very challenging but are made possible under the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Animal Rule, which is designed to enable licensure of drugs or biologics when clinical efficacy studies are unethical or unfeasible. The NIAID portfolio includes grants, contracts, and inter-agency agreements designed to span all aspects of drug development and encompasses basic research through FDA approval. In addition, NIAID manages an active portfolio of biodosimetry approaches to assess injuries and absorbed radiation levels to guide triage and treatment decisions. NIAID, together with grantees, contractors, and other stakeholders with promising products, works to advance candidate MCMs and biodosimetry tools through an established product development pipeline. In addition to managing grants and contracts, NIAID tests promising candidates in our established preclinical animal models, and the NIAID Program Officers work closely with sponsors as product managers to guide them through the process. In addition, a valuable benefit for stakeholders is working with the NIAID Office of Regulatory Affairs, where NIAID coordinates with the FDA to facilitate interactions between sponsors and the agency. Activities funded by NIAID include basic research (e.g., library screens to discover new products, determine early efficacy, and delineate mechanism of action) and the development of small and large animal models of radiation-induced hematopoietic, gastrointestinal, lung, kidney, and skin injury, radiation combined injury, and radionuclide decorporation. NIAID also sponsors Good Laboratory Practice product safety, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and toxicology studies, as well as efficacy and dose-ranging studies to optimize product regimens. For later-stage candidates, NIAID funds large-scale manufacturing and formulation development of products. The program also supports Phase 1 human clinical studies to ensure human safety and to bridge pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and efficacy data from animals to humans. To date, NIAID has supported >900 animal studies and one clinical study, evaluating >500 new/repurposed radiation MCMs and biodosimetric approaches. NIAID sponsorship led to the approval of three of the six drugs for acute radiation syndrome under the FDA Animal Rule, five Investigational New Drug applications, and 18 additional submissions for Investigational Device Exemptions, while advancing 38 projects to the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority for follow-on research and development.

Radiation-induced multi-organ injury

PURPOSE

Natural history studies have been informative in dissecting radiation injury, isolating its effects, and compartmentalizing injury based on the extent of exposure and the elapsed time post-irradiation. Although radiation injury models are useful for investigating the mechanism of action in isolated subsyndromes and development of medical countermeasures (MCMs), it is clear that ionizing radiation exposure leads to multi-organ injury (MOI).

METHODS

The Radiation and Nuclear Countermeasures Program within the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases partnered with the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority to convene a virtual two-day meeting titled 'Radiation-Induced Multi-Organ Injury' on June 7-8, 2022. Invited subject matter experts presented their research findings in MOI, including study of mechanisms and possible MCMs to address complex radiation-induced injuries.

RESULTS

This workshop report summarizes key information from each presentation and discussion by the speakers and audience participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the mechanisms that lead to radiation-induced MOI is critical to advancing candidate MCMs that could mitigate the injury and reduce associated morbidity and mortality. The observation that some of these mechanisms associated with MOI include systemic injuries, such as inflammation and vascular damage, suggests that MCMs that address systemic pathways could be effective against multiple organ systems.

Sex differences in radiation research

PURPOSE

The Sex Differences in Radiation Research workshop addressed the role of sex as a confounder in radiation research and its implication in real-world radiological and nuclear applications.

METHODS

In April 2022, HHS-wide partners from the Radiation and Nuclear Countermeasures Program, the Office of Research on Women's Health National Institutes of Health Office of Women's Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and the Radiological and Nuclear Countermeasures Branch at the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority conducted a workshop to address the scientific implication and knowledge gaps in understanding sex in basic and translational research. The goals of this workshop were to examine sex differences in 1. Radiation animal models and understand how these may affect radiation medical countermeasure development; 2. Biodosimetry and/or biomarkers used to assess acute radiation syndrome, delayed effects of acute radiation exposure, and/or predict major organ morbidities; 3. medical research that lacks representation from both sexes. In addition, regulatory policies that influence inclusion of women in research, and the gaps that exist in drug development and device clearance were discussed. Finally, real-world sex differences in human health scenarios were also considered.

RESULTS

This report provides an overview of the two-day workshop, and open discussion among academic investigators, industry researchers, and U.S. government representatives.

CONCLUSIONS

This meeting highlighted that current study designs lack the power to determine statistical significance based on sex, and much is unknown about the underlying factors that contribute to these differences. Investigators should accommodate both sexes in all stages of research to ensure that the outcome is robust, reproducible, and accurate, and will benefit public health.