Perceived symptom targets of antidepressants, anxiolytics, and sedatives: the search for modifiable factors that improve adherence

Antidepressant Adherence Among Hispanics: Patients in an Integrated Health Care Model

Purpose

We report on antidepressant (AD) adherence among Hispanics seeking mental health services in a community primary care clinic in Texas as an ancillary outcome from a National Institutes of Health-funded study that collected data on Hispanic AD adherence over a period of two years (February 2016-February 2018). Adherence to AD medications was measured throughout the year-long trial and compared across various demographic characteristics. Since Hispanic individuals often experience stigma and cultural barriers related to AD treatment, we sought to understand what factors may increase the likelihood of non-adherence in this population.

Patients and Methods

This study focused on 69 patients who were prescribed AD medications while receiving treatment through an integrated health care model. Adherence was measured with the Patient Adherence Questionnaire, a validated 2-item questionnaire that asks patients about their medication use (missed medications or dosage changes) over the past week. We looked at patient adherence at two key time points (4-weeks and 13-weeks) and utilized logistic regression to identify factors that may increase or decrease the likelihood of adherence in Hispanic patients at a community primary care clinic.

Results

Non-adherence to AD medication was 49.3% at 4-weeks and 57% at 13-weeks post-treatment initiation. Logistic regression analyses revealed that age was the only significant predictor of AD non-adherence. As age increased, the likelihood of adherence increased by 12.2% at 13-weeks post-treatment initiation and by 11.1% at 4-weeks post-treatment initiation.

Conclusion

The likelihood of Hispanic patients to adhere to AD therapy increased with the age of the patient. Since primary care is the most likely place to be prescribed an AD for Hispanic patients, further research to better understand adherence is essential. Integrated health care interventions designed to help identify, reduce, or eliminate barriers to adherence and improve cultural understanding may help address issues of non-adherence in primary care settings.

Barriers and Facilitating Factors of Adherence to Antidepressant Treatments: An Exploratory Qualitative Study with Patients and Psychiatrists

This study examines the experiences and expectations of patients with depressive disorders regarding the disease and different antidepressants, as well as examining the barriers and facilitating factors that could affect their adherence to medications. An exploratory qualitative study was carried out. The study involved two focus groups made up of patients and caregivers and six semi-structured interviews with psychiatrists. In both cases, the participants were selected by intentional theoretical sampling, seeking maximum significance variation of social types. Prejudice about the side effects of medication was relevant. The importance of patients being well informed about the disease/treatments was noteworthy. The stigmatization of antidepressants by patients was identified as a barrier to medication adherence. The involvement of family members and the motivation of patients to be actively involved in the process to recover from the disease were identified as facilitating factors. The work carried out suggests the need for patients to have rigorous information about the disease/treatment to reduce the possible prejudices generated by beliefs. Maintaining greater contact and monitoring of patients/caregivers to help therapeutic adherence in patients with depressive disorders was also identified as being of great importance.

Effectiveness of interventions to improve medication adherence in adults with depressive disorders: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Non-adherence to medication is a major obstacle in the treatment of depressive disorders. We systematically reviewed the literature to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving adherence to medication among adults with depressive disorders with emphasis on initiation and implementation phase.

METHODS

We searched Medline, EMBASE, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PsycINFO, Social Science Citation Index and Science Citation Index for randomized or non-randomized controlled trials up to January 2022. Risk of bias was assessed using the criteria of the Cochrane Collaboration. Meta-analyses, cumulative and meta-regression analyses for adherence were conducted.

RESULTS

Forty-six trials (n = 24,324) were included. Pooled estimate indicates an increase in the probability of adherence to antidepressants at 6 months with the different types of interventions (OR 1.33; 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.62). The improvement in adherence is obtained from 3 months (OR 1.62, 95% CI: 1.25 to 2.10) but it is attenuated at 12 months (OR 1.25, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.53). Selected articles show methodological differences, mainly the diversity of both the severity of the depressive disorder and intervention procedures. In the samples of these studies, patients with depression and anxiety seem to benefit most from intervention (OR 2.77, 95% CI: 1.74 to 4.42) and collaborative care is the most effective intervention to improve adherence (OR 1.88, 95% CI: 1.40 to 2.54).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that interventions aimed at improving adherence to medication among adults with depressive disorders are effective up to six months. However, the evidence on the effectiveness of long-term adherence is insufficient and supports the need for further research efforts.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) number: CRD42017065723 .

Validation of the Arabic and French Versions of a Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices (KAP) Questionnaire on Tranquilizer Misuse

Tranquilizer misuse is an emerging international public health concern. The psychosocial determinants of this misuse remain understudied. Instruments to measure the Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices (KAP) of tranquilizer misuse are unavailable, except for a recently published questionnaire validated in the Spanish language. We translated the KAP questionnaire into Arabic and French, adapted it and undertook a complete validation procedure in the general adult population in Lebanon. The content validity indicators were good: item content validity index ranged between 0.89 and 1.00, the content validity index scale average was ≥0.95 and the modified Kappa statistic for each of the KAP items was equal to I-CVI. The intra-class correlation coefficient values (n = 100) were ≥0.62 for all Knowledge and Attitudes items, demonstrating the item reliability. Confirmatory factorial analysis (n = 1450) showed that the selected model of Knowledge and Attitude constructs has adequate fit indicators and encompassed three factors that showed acceptable internal reliability: Knowledge (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.72), personal Attitudes towards tranquilizers (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.79) and Attitudes towards healthcare providers (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.65). The Arabic/French questionnaire was highly accepted, with a response rate of 95.72% and item non-response rate ≤3.6%. The availability of a cross-cultural adapted and multilingual validated questionnaire would stimulate research on tranquilizer misuse.

Comparison of Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional Approaches in Studies on Knowledge, Attitude and Practices Related to Non-Medical Tranquilizer Use

Research about the association of knowledge and attitudes with practices (KAP) of non-medical tranquilizer use is scarce. We compared findings from cross-sectional and longitudinal approaches in a KAP-based study on non-medical tranquilizer use in Spain using data collected from the same population. Eight-hundred forty-seven participants completed a validated KAP questionnaire at baseline and were then followed-up bimonthly for one year for episodes of non-medical tranquilizer use. Non-medical use was defined as unprescribed use, non-adherence to treatment, storage/sharing of tranquilizers, or a combination of those practices. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using logistic regression from cross-sectional data and generalized linear mixed models for repeated measures in the longitudinal approach. Only the longitudinal approach showed that limited knowledge about the effect of tranquilizers on behaviour [OR: 3.24 (95% CI: 1.12–9.38)] and about the negative effect of their excessive consumption [OR: 4.12 (95% CI: 1.5–11.33)] is associated with storing/sharing tranquilizers. Both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses indicated that personal attitudes towards tranquilizers and attitudes towards healthcare providers are associated with non-medical tranquilizer use, yet with different magnitude of associations. Differences between the two approaches were also observed for individual types of non-medical use. Certain discrepancies exist between findings from longitudinal and cross-sectional approaches on KAP of non-medical tranquilizer use. KAP studies are the backbone for designing and evaluating prevention programs on non-medical tranquilizer use, and hence choosing a proper study design, scrutinizing the associated biases, and carefully interpreting findings from those studies are required.

Association of knowledge and attitudes with practices of misuse of tranquilizers: A cohort study in Spain

BACKGROUND

Tranquilizer misuse represents a growing international public health problem with heavy social and economic consequences. We aimed to identify the psychosocial determinants of this misuse practice, focusing on modifiable factors including knowledge and attitudes towards these medications.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study involving 847 adults accompanying children in primary care clinics was carried out in Spain. A validated Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices (KAP) questionnaire on tranquilizer use was self-administered at baseline, and then participants were followed-up bimonthly. A misuse event was defined as unprescribed intake of tranquilizers, storing/sharing leftovers of tranquilizers, and/or not adhering to the prescribed treatment period, timing or dosage. Poisson regression models were applied to estimate adjusted Incidence Rate Ratios (IRRs) of misuse and their 95 % Confidence Intervals (CIs).

FINDINGS

Individuals' personal attitudes towards tranquilizers and treating physicians are strongly associated with the misuse of these drugs. These attitudes include: individuals' acceptance of taking tranquilizers to improve sleeping [IRR: 5.10 (95 %CI: 2.74-9.48)], to work better [IRR: 2.04 (95 %CI: 1.05-3.99)], or for recreational purposes [IRR: 1.85 (95 %CI: 1.04-3.32)]; willingness to prolong the course of tranquilizer treatment without medical consultation [IRR: 2.45 (95 %CI: 1.46-4.13)]; agreeing on storing tranquilizers for possible future need [IRR: 5.07 (95 %CI: 2.73-9.40)]; and untrusting the physician's decision about tranquilizer prescription [IRR: 1.92 (95 %CI: 1.12-3.30)]. The level of knowledge is marginally associated with tranquilizer misuse.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a strong association between individuals' attitudes towards tranquilizers and the misuse practices of these drugs. Educational interventional studies could help reduce the incidence of tranquilizer misuse.