Neck-preserving femoral stems

Twenty-year results of a neck-preserving short-stem prosthesis in primary total hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The use of short-stemmed femoral components with preservation of the femoral neck has been advocated for younger and more active patients undergoing joint replacement. This study reports the long-term outcomes of the Collum Femoris-Preserving (CFP) prosthesis on a previous report.

METHODS

Between January 1999 and December 2000, a total of 149 patients underwent total hip arthroplasty procedure using the CFP stem in a single institution. At latest follow-up, 79 patients were available and were included in this study. The mean age of the cohort was 73.4 (range, 44-92 years) with a mean follow-up of 20.7 years (range 20-21). The average age was 52.1 years at index procedure (range, 21-71 years).

RESULTS

The Kaplan-Meier survivorship free from revision for any cause at 5, 10 and 20 years was 93.2% (87.8-96.3%), 93.2% (87.8-96.3%) and 83.0% (75.7-88.3%), respectively. At 20 years follow-up, the revision for any cause occurred in 26.6% (21 of 79) of patients. The most common causes for revision surgery were aseptic loosening, dislocation, and polyethylene wear with 6.3% (5 out of 79), respectively. Periprosthetic fracture occurred in four patients (5.1%) followed by periprosthetic joint infection in two patients (2.5%). Revision surgery of the femoral stem was required in four patients (5.1%). There was a statistically significant improvement of the Harris Hip Scores from 53 to 83.7 (range 56-91).

CONCLUSION

The long-term outcomes of the CFP stem are excellent, demonstrating a low rate of aseptic loosening with an excellent survivorship within 2 decades.

Neck-sparing short femoral stems: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Neck sparing short femoral stems are supposed to ease restoration of the proximal femoral anatomy and physiological hip biomechanics. This stem design is of particular interest as they have the potential to generate prosthetic hips that have higher functional performance with an improved lifespan, and revise more easily. Unlike previously published meta-analysis, this meta-analysis was initiated to determine if neck sparing short femoral stems compared to conventional stems: (1) resulted in improved functional performance; (2) reduced risk of thigh pain; (3) reduced risk of reoperation/revision, and 4) reduced stress shielding related bone loss in the proximal femur.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Literature databases were searched between 1st January 2005 and 30th March 2019. The primary search was conducted using the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Open Grey, Trip Pro, Evidence Search, and Cochrane. Eligible studies were assessed for homogeneity, with continuous outcomes expressed as standardized mean difference with 95% confidence interval and dichotomous data as odds-ratio with 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Ten randomised clinical trials were eligible; these trials included 1259 total hip arthroplasty procedures, inclusive of 616 neck sparing short stems and 643 conventional stems. We were not able to find a significant functional advantage of using neck sparing short stems based on Harris Hip scores (0.0850; 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.20 [p=0.40]) and WOMAC scores (-0.0605; 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.15 [p=0.87]). We found a trend in favour of neck sparing short stems to reduce the risk of thigh pain but this was non significant (odds ratio of 0.11; 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.43 [p=0.178]). Neck sparing short stems were associated with similar early- to mid-term dislocation and revision rates compared to conventional stems with odds ratio of 1.435 (95% CI: 0.545 to 3.780 [p=0.968]) and of 0.581 (95% CI: 0.220 to 1.532 [p=0.972]), respectively. Neck sparing short stems were found to have less bone loss in both Gruen zones 1 and 7 (3.324; 95% CI: -7.683 to 1.036 [p<0.001], and of -4.632; 95% CI: -9682 to 0.418 [p<0.001], respectively).

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Neck sparing short femoral stems achieve excellent early to mid-term outcomes in both clinical and radiological outcome scores that are in keeping with conventional stems functionally. Hitherto, results from this meta-analysis suggest that neck-sparing stems may achieve better maintenance of bone mineral density than their conventional counterparts, in addition to fewer cases of thigh pain.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I; meta-analysis.

Straight stem and threaded cup in patients under 60 years of age: 28.8-30.2 years of follow-up

Purpose

The aim of this retrospective observational study of one cohort was to evaluate the long-term outcome in patients younger than 60 years after total hip arthroplasty using a straight uncemented stem and an uncemented threaded cup.

Methods

Between 1986 and 1987, 75 hips of 75 patients (mean age, 53.35 ± 6.17 years) were consecutively implanted with an Alloclassic Zweymüller/Alloclassic SL stem and an Alloclassic CSF cup. Forty-four patients had died over the last 30 years. The remaining 31 patients (mean age, 82.9 ± 6.4 years) were reinvited for follow-up examinations. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were carried out.

Results

At a mean follow-up of 29.5 (28.8–30.2), 4 patients (5.3%) were lost to follow-up.

For the endpoint aseptic loosening (defined as the removal of stem or the cup for 2 cases), the overall survival rate is 97.3%. For the endpoint revision for any reason (22 patients), the survival rate is 70.6%. Eleven patients needed an exchange of head and liner, caused by wear. The average time from implantation until change of head and liner was 21.44 years (SD 5.92). Other reasons for revision surgery were septic loosening (3 cases), aseptic loosening of stem and cup (1 case), aseptic loosening of stem (1 case), periprosthetic calcification (2 cases), implant fracture (1 case), periprosthetic fracture (1 case), intraoperative fissure of stem (1 case), and total wear of liner including cup (1 case).

Conclusion

The combination of a straight stem (Alloclassic) and a screw cup (CSF) shows excellent results in young patients under the age of 60 at ultra-long-term follow-up at 30 years. Revisions due to wear of the polyethylene liner are more likely than in the older patients.

An Ultra-Short Femoral Neck-Preserving Hip Prosthesis: A 2-Year Follow-up Study with Radiostereometric Analysis and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry in a Stepwise Introduction

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a diaphyseal stem may risk bone loss. In order to save proximal bone stock in young patients with a high activity level and a long life expectancy, the interest in short stems has evolved. The purpose of this prospective observational cohort study was to evaluate the fixation of, and bone remodeling around, the Primoris femoral neck-preserving hip implant.

METHODS

Fifty younger patients with end-stage osteoarthritis were managed with the Primoris hip implant. We evaluated bone mineral density (BMD) using dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and implant migration using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). A region-of-interest (ROI) protocol for 4 ROIs was applied to assess BMD. The association between BMD and migration was evaluated to determine the fixation of the Primoris implant and bone remodeling in the proximal part of the femur. Follow-up evaluation was performed at regular intervals from day 1 (baseline) until 24 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The major stem migrations were subsidence (Y axis; mean, 0.38 mm) at 6 weeks and varus tilt (rotation) (Z axis; mean, 0.93°) at 6 to 12 months. In ROI4 (the calcar area), a significant gain in bone was found with a mean difference of 4.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8% to 7.4%; p < 0.02) at 24 months postoperatively. Significant bone loss was found in ROI1 and ROI2, with a mean difference of -4.9% (95% CI, -7.4% to -2.4%; p = 0.0003) and -8.9% (95% CI, -11.5% to -6.2%; p = 0.0001), respectively. Linear regression and multivariate regression analysis showed a significant negative association between maximal total point motion and BMD (p = 0.02, R = 15%; and p < 0.05, R = 26%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The Primoris component showed satisfactory primary stability with promising results at the 24-month follow-up. DXA scans showed limited stress-shielding with the proximal loading pattern of the Primoris. Better bone quality was associated with less implant migration.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

30-Years of experience with the cementless implanted Alloclassic CSF screw cup total hip arthroplasty system - An ultra-long-term follow-up

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate our long-term results with the Alloclassic CSF screw cup total hip arthroplasty system. This is the first study to provide a 30-year follow-up, based upon our 30-year follow up study on the Alloclassic stem system.

METHODS

We reviewed 178 Alloclassic CSF screw cup systems, implanted in 171 patients from 1986 to 1987. The Zweymüller stem family was used in all cases. 136 patients had died over the last 30 years, so twenty-nine out of 35 patients being still alive, with a mean follow-up of 29,46 years (SD 0,48), were contacted by telephone and evaluated radiologically and clinically. Our loss-to-follow up was 17,14%. The mean age at follow-up was 83,01 years (72,4-95,2; SD 6,86).

RESULTS

If the endpoint is defined as the removal of the cup for aseptic loosening (3 cases), the overall survival rate is 98,31%. If the endpoint is revision for any reason (27 cases), the survival rate is 84,83%. Eleven patients needed an exchange of head and liner. The mean time from implantation until change of head and liner was 21,44 years (SD 5,92).

CONCLUSION

After 30 years of monitoring we can state that the evaluated system is very reliable in primary and secondary THA.

Femoral neck preservation with a short hip stem produced with powder manufacturing: mid-term results of a consecutive case series

Stress shielding and thigh pain are not uncommon after cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) using conventional hip stems. It has been postulated that short, neck-preserving stems may overcome these disadvantages of standard stems and, hence, further improve clinical outcome. The purpose of our retrospective study was to assess the mid-term performance of a neck-preserving hip stem for which, as of yet, no clinical results have been published. A population of 146 consecutive patients who received 152 neck-preserving stems over a 1.6-year period was retrospectively reviewed. Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were collected, along with radiographic data. One hundred and forty-four THAs implanted in 136 patients were available for analysis. After a mean follow-up of 56 months, mean HHS and WOMAC improved significantly versus preoperative values. Aseptic loosening was not observed. Five-year survival with revision of any component for any reason as the endpoint was 99.3% (95% confidence interval, 95.2-99.9%). Excellent mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes were observed with the study device. We attribute this to the metaphyseal fit in combination with retention of the femoral neck. However, our findings need to be confirmed by multicentre studies with larger patient samples.

30-years of experience with the cementless implanted Alloclassic total hip arthroplasty system-An ultra-long-term follow-up

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate our long-term results with the Zweymüller hochgezogen and SL total hip arthroplasty system. This is the first study to provide a 30-year follow-up.

METHODS

We reviewed 186 Alloclassic stem systems (Zweymüller hochgezogen (112) and SL (74), implanted in 179 patients from 1986 to 1987.Two different types of cementless acetabular components were used.143 patients had died over the last 30 years, so thirty out of 36 patients being still alive, with a mean follow-up of 29,48 years (SD 0,51), were contacted by telephone and evaluated radiologically and clinically. Our loss-to-follow up was 16,7%. The mean age at follow-up was 83,57 years (72,4-95,2; SD 6,77).

RESULTS

If the endpoint is defined as the removal of the stem for aseptic loosening (3 cases), the overall survival rate is 98,38%. If the endpoint is revision for any reason (27 cases), the survival rate is 85,48%. Eleven patients needed an exchange of head and liner. The mean time from implantation until change of head and liner was 21,44 years (SD 5,92).Most of the radiolucent lines and osteolytic zones were found in the proximal Gruen-zones 1 and 7 (69,7 and 21,2%).

CONCLUSION

After 30 years of monitoring we can state that the evaluated system is very reliable in primary and secondary THA.

Long-term follow-up of 1217 consecutive short-stem total hip arthroplasty (THA): a retrospective single-center experience

BACKGROUND

An arthroplasty registry in Germany has been recently established but long-term results for most short-stem innovations are missing. Short-stem hip arthroplasty is usually indicated in young active patients. Our indication was extended to older age groups, femoral neck fractures (FNF), and dysplasia. We evaluated all total hip arthroplasties (THAs) in this population with a collum femoris preserving stem (CFP) performed from 2003 to 2013.

METHODS

A consecutive cohort of 1217 CFP THAs with a mean age of 68.7 years was followed retrospectively for a median of 4.8 years (patient follow-up interquartile range from 3.0 to 6.9 years). A questionnaire, which we used in two previous studies, was answered by 89.15% of patients and included information regarding complaints, grade of satisfaction, re-operations, and dislocation. Of the 1217 patients, 77 had died. Survival of the stem and the cup was assessed using a competing risks approach according to an Aalen-Johanson estimator with revision for septic or aseptic loosening or death as a competing endpoint.

RESULTS

Of the patients who answered the questionnaire, 92.5% had no complaints related to the procedures. In all 1217 patients, there were 43 revisions (4.2%) as follows: stem and cup revisions due to aseptic loosening of the stem (n = 10), infections (n = 6), pain (n = 4), or trauma (n = 3); cup revisions due to aseptic loosening (n = 3), dislocation (n = 5), and offset revisions (n = 12). Survivorship was 96% for the stem and 99% for the cup 9 years postoperatively. Statistical analysis confirmed a higher risk for revision in patients with a younger age (p = 0.033), male sex (p = 0.040), dysplasia (p = 0.032), and undersized or extra-large stems for stem revisions (p = 0.001) and female sex (p = 0.036) for cup revisions. FNF (p > 0.20) and age ≥ 80 years (p = 0.114) had no higher risk for loosening of the stem. Our data is also compared with the current literature, especially with the available CFP studies.

CONCLUSION

The survival rate of the CFP stem was as high as 96% after 9 years of followup which compares well-to-previously published long-term survival rates. There is no higher risk for revision in patients 80 years old or older and in cases with femoral neck fractures. The CFP preserves also allowed using standard stems in the rare cases of revision.

Total Hip Arthroplasty by the Direct Anterior Approach Using a Neck-preserving Stem: Safety, efficacy and learning curve

BACKGROUND

The concept of femoral neck preservation in total hip replacement (THR) was introduced in 1993. It is postulated that retaining cortical bone of the femoral neck offers triplanar stability, uniform stress distribution, and accommodates physiological anteversion. However, data on safety, efficacy and learning curve are lacking.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively assessed all patients who were operated for a THR with a short neck preserving stem (MiniHip) between 2012 and 2014. The safety and learning curve were assessed by recording operative time; stem size; and adverse events including periprosthetic fracture; paresthesia; and limb length discrepancy (LLD). The cohort was divided into equal groups to assess the learning curve effect, and the cumulative sums (CUSUM) test was performed to monitor intraoperative neck fractures. For assessment of efficacy, Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores were compared preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

138 patients with median age 62 years (range 35-82 years) were included with a median followup of 42 months (range 30-56 months). The minimum followup was 2.5 years. The OHS, SF-36 (physical and mental component) scores improved by a mean score of 26, 28, and 27 points, respectively. All patients had LLD of <10 mm (1.9 mm ± 1.3). Adverse events included intraoperative neck fracture (n = 6), subsidence (n = 1), periprosthetic fracture (n = 1), paresthesia (n = 12), and trochanteric bursitis (n = 2). After early modification of the technique to use a smaller finishing broach, the CUSUM test demonstrated acceptable intraoperative neck fracture risk. The second surgery group had a reduced risk of intraoperative neck fracture (5/69 vs. 1/69 P = 0.2), reduced operative time (66 vs. 61 min, P = 0.06), and increased stem size (5 vs. 6, P = 0.09) although these differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The MiniHip stem is safe alternative to standard THR with good functional outcomes but with a learning curve for the surgical technique, implants sizing, and the risk of intraoperative neck fractures.

Hip Resurfacing: International Perspectives: Review Article

BACKGROUND

The hip resurfacing concept was developed for young and active patients, especially for femoral bone stock preservation. However, concerns about metal-on-metal bearings with adverse reactions to metal debris have led to a drop off in hip-resurfacing procedures.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The goal of this review is to evaluate our current knowledge of survivorship of second-generation hip resurfacing devices and elaborate international perspectives for product improvement.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search provided information on national joint arthroplasty registers worldwide with a minimum of 3000 reported hip resurfacings. It culminated in the analysis of six registers.

RESULTS

Long-term data showed that available hip resurfacing device survivorship ranged from 95 to 99.7% with 10 years of follow-up, in selected patient populations. The criteria for success were well known, male gender, good bone quality, head component size greater than 48 mm, and cup inclination less than 45°. On the other hand, the recent recall of some hip-resurfacing devices has resulted in huge medico-legal problems and has discredited all implants. It has brought about the recent evolution of hip resurfacing. Femoral fixation is now available for cemented and cementless surfaces. Bearings are still always metal-on-metal, but new types have come on board. Newer designs suggest that ceramic-on-ceramic, cross-linked polyethylene, and oxinium may be applied in this configuration.

CONCLUSIONS

In 2015, the evolution of hip resurfacing is ongoing in terms of implant design, alternative bearings, and implant fixation with hopes of improving survivorship.

Periprosthetic bone density changes after MiniHipTM cementless femoral short stem: one-year results of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study

Introduction: The purpose of the current study was to investigate the reaction of the femur to the implantation of the MiniHip^TM in terms of: (1) bone density change during one year; (2) correlations between stem length, CCD (caput-collum-diaphyseal), femoral offset, T-value, and bone density; (3) other co-variables that influence the change of bone density.

Patients and methods: MiniHip^TM implant was performed for 62 patients. The age range of the patients who underwent treatment was 25–78 years. Periprothestic bone density was determined within two weeks postoperatively, after three, six, and twelve months utilizing the DEXA scan.

Results: The highest change was observed in the first three months post-implantation, while significant decrease in density was recorded at proximal Gruen zones 1, 2, and 7, and at distal Gruen zone 4. The decrease in density reached a plateau between the third and sixth months after operation. Afterwards, bone density recovered up to the 12th postoperative month. The correlation analysis showed significant difference between Gruen zone 1 and stem size and CCD. The same significant trend was not reached for Gruen zone 7. Femoral offset showed no correlation. Covariance analysis was unable to establish connection of the results with diagnosis, pairings, or gender.

Discussion: MiniHip^TM densitometric results are promising and comparable to good results of the other representatives of the femoral neck partially-sustaining short stem prostheses with a lower proximal bone density reduction. Periprosthetic bone resorption is a multifactorial process where stem size, CCD angle, and patient-specific variables such as T-value have an impact on the periprosthetic bone remodeling. In particular, this applies to Gruen zone 1.

Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcome from Neck-Preserving, Short-Stem Arthroplasty and Resurfacing Arthroplasty in Younger Osteoarthritis Patients

Hip resurfacing has been considered a good treatment option for younger, active osteoarthritis patients. However, there are several identified issues concerning risk for neck fractures and issues related to current metal-on-metal implant designs. Neck-preserving short-stem implants have been discussed as a potential alternative, but it is yet unclear which method is better suited for younger adults. We compared hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome scores (HOOS) from a young group of patients (n = 52, age 48.9 ± 6.1 years) who had received hip resurfacing (HR) with a cohort of patients (n = 73, age 48.2 ± 6.6 years) who had received neck-preserving, short-stem implant total hip arthroplasty (THA). Additionally, durations for both types of surgery were compared. HOOS improved significantly preoperatively to last followup (>1 year) in both groups (p < 0.0001, η (2) = 0.69); there were no group effects or interactions. Surgery duration was significantly longer for resurfacing (104.4 min ± 17.8) than MiniHip surgery (62.5 min ± 14.8), U = 85.0, p < 0.0001, η (2) = 0.56. The neck-preserving short-stem approach may be preferable to resurfacing due to the less challenging surgery, similar outcome, and controversy regarding resurfacing implant designs.