Radiographic Anatomy of the Native Anterior Cruciate Ligament: a Systematic Review

Tibial Tunnel Placement in ACL Reconstruction Using a Novel Grid and Biplanar Stereoradiographic Imaging

Background:

Nonanatomic graft placement is a frequent cause of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) failure, and it can be attributed to either tibial or femoral tunnel malposition. To describe tibial tunnel placement in ACLR, we used EOS, a low-dose biplanar stereoradiographic imaging modality, to create a comprehensive grid that combines anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) coordinates.

Purpose:

To (1) validate the automated grid generated from EOS imaging and (2) compare the results with optimal tibial tunnel placement.

Study Design:

Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods:

Using EOS, 3-dimensional models were created of the knees of 37 patients who had undergone ACLR. From the most medial, lateral, anterior, and posterior points on the tibial plateau of the EOS 3-dimensional model for each patient, an automated and personalized grid was generated from 2 independent observers’ series of reconstructions. To validate this grid, each observer also manually measured the ML and AP distances, the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and the tibial slope for each patient. The ideal tibial tunnel placement, as described in the literature, was compared with the actual tibial tunnel grid coordinates of each patient.

Results:

The automated grid metrics for observer 1 gave a mean (95% CI) AP depth of 54.7 mm (53.4-55.9), ML width of 75.0 mm (73.3-76.6), MPTA of 84.9° (83.7-86.0), and slope of 7.2° (5.4-9.0). The differences with corresponding manual measurements were means (95% CIs) of 2.4 mm (1.4-3.4 mm), 0.5 mm (–1.3 to 2.2 mm), 1.2° (–0.4° to 2.9°), and –0.4° (–2.1° to 1.2°), respectively. The correlation between automated and manual measurements was r = 0.78 for the AP depth, r = 0.68 for the ML width, r = 0.18 for the MPTA, and r = 0.44 for the slope. The center of the actual tibial aperture on the plateau was a mean of 5.5 mm (95% CI, 4.8-6.1 mm) away from the referenced anatomic position, with a tendency toward more medial placement.

Conclusion:

The automated grid created using biplanar stereoradiographic imaging provided a novel, precise, and reproducible description of the tibial tunnel placement in ACLR.

Clinical Relevance:

This technique can be used during preoperative planning, intraoperative guidance, and postoperative evaluation of tibial tunnel placement in ACLR.

Clinico-radiological outcomes following anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the TransLateral, all-inside technique

We present early clinical outcomes of patients following anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a TransLateral, single bundle, all-inside technique with a one-year follow-up and radiological evaluation of socket position. Eligible Patients who underwent a primary ACL reconstruction, using the TransLateral, all-inside technique alone, between Jan 2013 and Feb 2016 were included in this study. Of this group, all patients underwent isolated semitendinosus graft harvest. The Lysholm knee scores were measured preoperatively and at one-year follow-up in 40 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction. Postoperatively, antero-posterior and lateral radiographs were obtained to evaluate the position of the femoral socket (using the Bernard and Hertel Grid) and tibial socket (using the Amis-Jakob line). There were 36 males and 4 females with a mean age of 27.1 years (range 16-49). There was a single non-surgical related mortality prior to the one year follow up. We report no postoperative infections or graft failure at one year. The mean preoperative Lysholm score was 68.7 (Range: 29-95). The mean Lysholm score increased to 92.5% (Range: 59-100, p < 0.05). Evaluation of femoral sockets revealed accurate positioning on the Bernard and Hertel Grid with a mean ACL center of 27% along Blumensaat's line and 34% of the height of the intercondylar notch. The mean tibial socket position was 41.8% (Range: 32%-47%) along the Amis-Jakob Line. Our single surgeon case series utilizing the all-inside, TransLateral ACLR technique highlights good early outcomes with no postoperative complications or graft failure at one year.

The posterior horn of the lateral meniscus is a reliable novel landmark for femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction

PURPOSE

Femoral tunnel placement is essential for good outcome in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. In the past, several attempts have been made to optimize femoral tunnel placement. It was observed that the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus was always located directly below to the desired femoral ACL tunnel position, when the knee was brought to deep flexion (> 120°). The goal of the present study was to verify the hypothesis that the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus can be used as a landmark for femoral tunnel placement.

METHODS

Out of a consecutive series of ACL reconstructions done by a single surgeon, 55 lateral radiographs were evaluated according to the quadrant method by Bernard and Hertel. Additionally, on anterior-posterior radiographs the femoral tunnel angle was determined.

RESULTS

In the present case series the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus could be identified and used as a landmark for femoral tunnel placement in all cases. The mean tunnel depth was 24 ± 5.1% and the mean tunnel height was 31.3 ± 5.7%. The mean femoral tunnel angle was 41 ± 4.9° using the anatomical axis as a reference. Compared to previous cadaver studies the data of the present study were within their anatomical range of the native ACL insertion site.

CONCLUSION

The suggested technique using the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus as a landmark for femoral tunnel placement showed reproducible results and matches the native ACL insertion site compared to previous cadaveric studies. In particular, non-experienced ACL surgeons will benefit from this apparent landmark and the corresponding easy-to-use ACL reconstruction method.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The capsular line reference, a new arthroscopic reference for posterior/anterior femoral tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Femoral malposition is the first cause for graft rupture during ACL reconstruction. Arthroscopic landmarks can be difficult to identify. So, landmark has to be found for reliable tunnel placement. A proximal-distal reference was described as "Apex reference" reported by Hart et al. but no posterior/anterior reference exists in the literature. The purpose of this study was to do a 3D CT-scan assessment of the femoral tunnel positioning using the Capsular Line Reference (CLR) as a landmark for posterior/anterior placement in ACL reconstruction. We hypothesized the CLR could provide a precise and reliable antero/posterior femoral tunnel positioning less than 2 mm from the Bernard & Hertel posterior quarter.

METHODS

Seven cadaveric knee specimens with a mean age of 79.2 ± 11 years were used. Using standard approaches, the CLR was identified corresponding to a white line (the capsule) appearing at the posterior border of the femoral condyle after bony debridement of the medial and posterior part of the lateral femoral condyle. The center of the tunnel was marked. An inside-out technique with anteromedial drilling technique was performed using an 8-mm diameter reamer. The distal femurs were sawed and a CT-scan was done for each specimen to obtain 3-dimensional image reconstructions. These 3D reconstructions were analyzed to measure the position tunnel center on the posterior/anterior axis and the distance from the posterior/anterior quadrant according to the Bernard & Hertel method.

RESULTS

The mean position for the posterior/anterior axis was 27.0 ± 1.8% (25-28.9) with a median of 26.9%. The position from the first quarter of the Bernard & Hertel method was 0.9 ± 0.8 mm (0-1.8) with a median of 0.8 mm.

CONCLUSION

The CLR is a reliable and reproducible arthroscopic landmark to place the femoral tunnel for ACL reconstruction in the anterior/posterior axis. Proximal/distal position depends on the choice of the surgeon to reproduce anteromedial or posterolateral fibers.

A Method of Accurate Bone Tunnel Placement for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Based on 3-Dimensional Printing Technology: A Cadaveric Study

PURPOSE

To explore a method of bone tunnel placement for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction based on 3-dimensional (3D) printing technology and to assess its accuracy.

METHODS

Twenty human cadaveric knees were scanned by thin-layer computed tomography (CT). To obtain data on bones used to establish a knee joint model by computer software, customized bone anchors were installed before CT. The reference point was determined at the femoral and tibial footprint areas of the ACL. The site and direction of the bone tunnels of the femur and tibia were designed and calibrated on the knee joint model according to the reference point. The resin template was designed and printed by 3D printing. Placement of the bone tunnels was accomplished by use of templates, and the cadaveric knees were scanned again to compare the concordance of the internal opening of the bone tunnels and reference points.

RESULTS

The twenty 3D printing templates were designed and printed successfully. CT data analysis between the planned and actual drilled tunnel positions showed mean deviations of 0.57 mm (range, 0-1.5 mm; standard deviation, 0.42 mm) at the femur and 0.58 mm (range, 0-1.5 mm; standard deviation, 0.47 mm) at the tibia.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of bone tunnel placement for ACL reconstruction in cadaveric adult knees based on 3D printing technology is high.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This method can improve the accuracy of bone tunnel placement for ACL reconstruction in clinical sports medicine.

The Anatomic Centers of the Femoral and Tibial Insertions of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Systematic Review of Imaging and Cadaveric Studies Reporting Normal Center Locations

BACKGROUND

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is regularly reconstructed if knee joint function is impaired. Anatomic graft tunnel placement, often assessed with varying measurement methods, in the femur and tibia is considered important for an optimal clinical outcome. A consensus on the exact location of the femoral and tibial footprint centers is lacking.

PURPOSE

To systematically review the literature regarding anatomic centers of the femoral and tibial ACL footprints and assess the mean, median, and percentiles of normal centers.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in the PubMed/Medline database in November 2015. Search terms were the following: "ACL" and "insertion anatomy" or "anatomic footprint" or "radiographic landmarks" or "quadrant methods" or "tunnel placement" or "cadaveric femoral" or "cadaveric tibial." English-language articles that reported the location of the ACL footprint according to the Bernard and Hertel grid in the femur and the Stäubli and Rauschning method in the tibia were included. Weighted means, weighted medians, and weighted 5th and 95th percentiles were calculated.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 1393 articles. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 16 studies with measurements on cadaveric specimens or a healthy population were reviewed. The weighted mean of the femoral insertion center based on measurements in 218 knees was 29% in the deep-shallow (DS) direction and 35% in the high-low (HL) direction. The weighted median was 26% for DS and 34% for HL. The weighted 5th and 95th percentiles for DS were 24% and 37%, respectively, and for HL were 28% and 43%, respectively. The weighted mean of the tibial insertion center in the anterior-posterior direction based on measurements in 300 knees was 42%, and the weighted median was 44%; the 5th and 95th percentiles were 39% and 46%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our results show slight differences between the weighted means and medians in the femoral and tibial insertion centers. We recommend the use of the 5th and 95th percentiles when considering postoperative placement to be "in or out of the anatomic range."

Comparing Dimensions of Four-Strand Hamstring Tendon Grafts with Native Anterior and Posterior Cruciate Ligaments

Background. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether or not there was any incompatibility between four-strand hamstring tendons taken from the same knee and the dimensions of the ACL and PCL. Methods. 15 fresh frozen cadaver hamstrings were prepared as four-strand grafts and measurements made of the ACL and PCL circumferences in the midsection were made in the narrowest part of the midsection. The cross-section areas and diameters were calculated with geometric calculations used to measure the cross-sectional area of cylinders. Accepting that the geometric insertions were elliptical, the length, width, and area were calculated for entry areas. Results. A significant relationship at 96.2% was determined between the ACL mid and the hamstring diameter. A significant relationship at 96.7% was determined between the ACL and the hamstring mid area. A significant relationship at 96.4% was determined between the PCL mid and the hamstring diameter. A significant relationship at 95.7% was determined between the PCL and the hamstring mid area. Conclusion. For the reconstruction of ACL and PCL, it was determined that there is less incompatibility between the four-strand hamstring tendons taken from the same knee and the dimensions of the midsection PCL compared to the ACL dimensions.