Characterization and Correction of Symptomatic Hip Impingement in American Football Linemen

Effects of COVID-19 on Rate of Injury and Position-Specific Injury During the 2020 National Football League Season

ABSTRACT

Costello II, JP, Wagner, JD, Dahl, VA, Cohen, JL, Reuter, AM, and Kaplan, LD. Effects of COVID-19 on rate of injury and position-specific injury during the 2020 National Football League season. J Strength Cond Res 38(1): 97-104, 2024-Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the National Football League (NFL) made changes to its operations for the 2020 season. We hypothesize an increase in the rate of injuries during the 2020 season. Publicly available data were reviewed to identify NFL injuries from the 2015-2020 seasons. Player position, description of injury, date of injury, and injury setting were recorded. p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. For the 2020 season, compared with the 2015-2019 seasons, there was an increased risk of injury during the regular season overall relative risk (RR) = 1.308 ( p < 0.05), week (W)1 RR = 7.33 ( p < 0.05), W1-6 RR = 1.964 ( p < 0.05), W7-12 RR = 1.8909 ( p < 0.05), and during the postseason overall RR = 1.1444 ( p < 0.05), calculated using analysis of variance. There was an overall increased risk of abdominal or core injuries RR = 1.248 ( p < 0.05), groin or hip injuries RR = 2.534 ( p < 0.05), and hamstring injuries RR = 3.644 ( p < 0.05). There was an increased risk of hamstring injuries in cornerbacks RR = 3.219 ( p < 0.05) and running backs RR = 1.1394 ( p < 0.05), hip or groin injuries in guards RR = 1.105 ( p < 0.05), Achilles tendon injuries in safeties RR = 1.6976 ( p < 0.05), quadriceps injuries in running backs RR = 1.6191 ( p < 0.05), and arm injuries in defensive tackles RR = 1.221 ( p < 0.05). There was an increase in the overall rate of injuries in the 2020 NFL season, both in the regular season and postseason, compared with the 2015-2019 seasons. The overall rate of abdominal or core, groin or hip, and hamstring injuries increased. Specific player positions saw unique increases in rates of injuries. These findings may be due to numerous operational changes implemented, such as reduced in-person training and the elimination of the preseason, leading to suboptimal, sports-specific conditioning and increased risk of musculoskeletal injury.

Hip Range of Motion Is Increased After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review

Purpose

To investigate the impact of arthroscopic correction of symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement on postoperative hip range of motion (ROM), as an objectively measured postoperative clinically reported outcome.

Methods

A systematic review of the current literature was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, OVID/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were queried in November 2020. Studies not reporting pre- to postoperative ROM measurements were excluded. Methodologic quality was assessed using the MINORS assessment, and certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Effect size using standardized mean differences assessed magnitude of change between pre- and postoperative ROM.

Results

In total, 23 studies were included evaluating 2,332 patients. Mean age ranged from 18 to 44.2 years. Flexion, internal rotation (IR), and external rotation (ER) were the predominantly measured ROMs reported in 91%, 100% and 65% of studies, respectively. Observed change following hip arthroscopy was considered significant in 57.1% (flexion), 74% (IR), and 20% (ER). Effect size of change in significantly improved ROMs were weak (16.7% flexion, 33.3% ER), moderate (58.3% flexion, 29.4% IR), and large (25% flexion, 64.7% IR, 66.7% ER). For goniometric assessment mean observed changes ranged as follows: flexion: 0.1° to 12.2°; IR: 3.6° to 21.9°; ER: –2.6° to 12.8°. For computed tomography–simulated assessment, the mean observed change ranged as follows: flexion: 3.0° to 8.0°; IR 9.3° to 14.0°.

Conclusions

Outcome studies demonstrate overall increased range of flexion and IR post-hip arthroscopy, with a moderate and large effect respectively. Change in ER is less impacted following hip arthroscopy. Certainty of evidence to support this observation is low. Current research evaluating changes in this functional ability is limited by a lack of prospective studies and non-standardized measurement evaluation techniques.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, systematic review of Level II-IV studies.

Over one third of patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement display femoral or acetabular version abnormalities

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was investigate the relationship between version and torsional abnormalities of the acetabulum, femur and tibia in patients with symptomatic FAI.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines using the EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed and Cochrane databases. Original research articles evaluating the described version and torsional parameters in FAI were included. The MINORS criteria were used to appraise study quality and risk of bias. Mean version and torsion values were displayed using forest plots and the estimated proportion of hips displaying abnormalities in version/torsion were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 1206 articles were identified from the initial search, with 43 articles, involving 8861 hips, meeting the inclusion criteria. All studies evaluating femoral or acetabular version in FAI reported 'normal' mean version values (10-25 °). However, distribution analysis revealed that an estimated 31% and 51% of patients with FAI displayed abnormal central acetabular and femoral version, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Up to 51% of patients presenting with symptomatic FAI show an abnormal femoral version, whilst up to 31% demonstrate abnormal acetabular version. This high percentage of version abnormalities highlights the importance of evaluating these parameters routinely during assessment of patients with FAI, to guide clinical decision-making.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Acetabular Rim Disorders/Pincer-type Femoroacetabular Impingement and Hip Arthroscopy

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) can lead to acetabular impaction, chondral injury, and labral pathology secondary to deformities of the proximal femur (CAM-type FAI), acetabulum (pincer-type FAI), or with combined FAI. While the majority of cases are of the combined type, this paper focuses on acetabular overcoverage/pincer-type deformities. Various pincer subtypes include focal anterior overcoverage, global retroversion, global overcoverage/profunda, protrusio, subspine impingement, and os acetabuli/rim fracture variants. A thorough history and physical examination, plain radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, 3-dimensional computerized tomography, and diagnostic injections can lead to an accurate assessment of pincer-type variants. Appropriately indicated arthroscopic management techniques and pearls for the various pincer subtypes can lead to improved patient-related outcome measures and a high rate of return to athletic activity for the majority of these patients.

Use of a 3D virtual dynamic hip model to quantify the amount of osteoplasty required in femoroacetabular impingement patients

OBJECTIVE

Compare required osteoplasty predicted by a 3D virtual dynamic hip model in femoroacetabular impingement patients to actual osteoplasty performed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective study on 20 consecutive FAI patients with a preoperative CT who underwent arthroscopy from October 2016 to September 2017. A 3D virtual dynamic hip model was created from the CT. The model displayed virtual osteoplasty depth required to restore physiologic range of motion on an osteoplasty map. Depths of virtual osteoplasty and actual osteoplasty at surgery were compared and correlated with alpha angle, lateral center edge angle, femoral version, and acetabular version.

RESULTS

Actual femoroplasty depth correlated with alpha angle (r = 0.85, p ≤ 0.001) and actual acetabuloplasty depth correlated with lateral center edge angle (r = 0.83, p < 0.001). Virtual osteoplasty depth did not correlate with alpha angle (p = 0.25), lateral center edge angle (p = 0.50), femoral version (p = 0.09), or acetabular version (p = 0.09). The 3D model predicted a mean virtual osteoplasty of 6.2 ± 0.3 mm compared to mean actual osteoplasty of 5.9 ± 1.1 mm. There was no significant difference between the two means (p = 0.26), though there was a significant difference in variance (p = 0.001). There was poor test reliability between virtual osteoplasty compared with actual osteoplasty (ICC = 0.30).

CONCLUSION

3D model predicted virtual osteoplasty depths varied with actual osteoplasty and was independent of 2D measurements.