Non-associative learning processes in vestibular nucleus

Neural Interruption by Unilateral Labyrinthectomy Biases the Directional Preference of Otolith-Related Vestibular Neurons

Background: The directional preference of otolith-related vestibular neurons elucidates the neuroanatomical link of labyrinths, but few direct experimental data have been provided. Methods: The directional preference of otolith-related vestibular neurons was measured in the vestibular nucleus using chemically induced unilateral labyrinthectomy (UL). For the model evaluation, static and dynamic behavioral tests as well as a histological test were performed. Extracellular neural activity was recorded for the neuronal responses to the horizontal head rotation and the linear head translation. Results: Seventy-seven neuronal activities were recorded, and the total population was divided into three groups: left UL (20), sham (35), and right UL (22). Based on directional preference, two sub-groups were again classified as contra- and ipsi-preferred neurons. There was no significance in the number of those sub-groups (contra-, 15/35, 43%; ipsi-, 20/35, 57%) in the sham (p = 0.155). However, more ipsi-preferred neurons (19/22, 86%) were observed after right UL (p = 6.056 × 10⁻⁵), while left UL caused more contra-preferred neurons (13/20, 65%) (p = 0.058). In particular, the convergent neurons mainly led this biased difference (ipsi-, 100% after right UL and contra-, 89% after left UL) (p < 0.002). Conclusions: The directional preference of the neurons depended on the side of the lesion, and its dominance was mainly led by the convergent neurons.

Visual-vestibular mismatch correlates with headache

BACKGROUND

Dizziness affects 20-30%of the general population. A subgroup of dizzy patients with chronic migraine suffers vertigo implying that the migraine has a vestibular component. Vestibular migraine remains a diagnosis of exclusion based on history.

OBJECTIVE

A link between headaches and dizziness suggests that these individuals would demonstrate dizziness and instability in complex, dynamic visual environments as a result of an inability to correctly process conflicting visual and vestibular signals.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 74 patients (22 men and 52 women; average age 56.2 years) who presented with complaints of dizziness participated. Effects of Visual-Vestibular Mismatch (VVM) were measured using a modified VVM questionnaire. Visual dependence was measured as the error to subjective visual vertical using a computerized Rod and Frame test.

RESULTS

Forty-two participants (56.8%) tested positive for VVM. Of these, 68.9%were patients with concomitant complaints of headaches. Visual dependence was present in 41.5%of all patients but showed no significant correlation with headache. 22.2%of patients had visual dependence and complained of headaches.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that sensory reweighting occurs in patients experiencing dizziness and headache, supports the role of vestibular involvement in this disorder, and provides future direction for novel interventions.

Repeated Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Modified the Neuronal Potential in the Vestibular Nucleus

Vestibular nucleus (VN) and cerebellar flocculus are known as the core candidates for the neuroplasticity of vestibular system. However, it has been still elusive how to induce the artificial neuroplasticity, especially caused by an electrical stimulation, and assess the neuronal information related with the plasticity. To understand the electrically induced neuroplasticity, the neuronal potentials in VN responding to the repeated electrical stimuli were examined. Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) was applied to excite the neurons in VN, and their activities were measured by an extracellular neural recording technique. Thirty-eight neuronal responses (17 for the regular and 21 for irregular neurons) were recorded and examined the potentials before and after stimulation. Two-third of the population (63.2%, 24/38) modified the potentials under the GVS repetition before stimulation (p = 0.037), and more than half of the population (21/38, 55.3%) changed the potentials after stimulation (p = 0.209). On the other hand, the plasticity-related neuronal modulation was hardly observed in the temporal responses of the neurons. The modification of the active glutamate receptors was also investigated to see if the repeated stimulation changed the number of both types of glutamate receptors, and the results showed that AMPA and NMDA receptors decreased after the repeated stimuli by 28.32 and 16.09%, respectively, implying the modification in the neuronal amplitudes.

Dominant parameter of galvanic vestibular stimulation for the non-associative learning processes

Electrical stimulus is one of the common stimulating methods, and Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) is the oldest form as an electrical stimulation. Nevertheless, GVS is still considered as a secondary stimulating tool for the medical purposes. Even though some unarguable findings have made using GVS, its use has been limited because of its ambiguity as an input source. For better understanding, many previous studies mainly focused on its functional effects, like the ocular reflexes. However, its fundamental effects on the neural activities are still elusive, such as the dominant influences by different parameters of GVS. Here we compared the effects on the neuronal responses by applying two different parameters, strength and rate, of GVS. To assess the dominance on the neuronal responses to these parameters, we designed three independent stimuli. Those stimuli were multiply applied to obtain the responding slopes based on the mechanism of non-associative learning processes, and the effects on the neurons were calculated as an inner angle between two responding slopes. Out of 23 neurons, 15 (65.2%) units were affected more by the strength with a statistical significance (p = 0.047). The ranges of the inner angles also implied the strength (- 3.354°~2.063°) mainly modulated by the neuronal responses comparing with those by the rate (- 2.001°~1.975°). The dominance of the parameters was closely related with the neuronal sensitivity to stimulation (SE) (p = 0.018), while there were few relations with the neuronal regularity, directional preference (DP), and the physiological response (PR) (p > 0.059). Thus, the neural information related with the dominance was delivered by the irregular neurons, and these types of neurons should be the targets for the stimulation. Graphical abstract.