Effects of inclined surfaces on gait variability and stability in unilateral lower limb amputees

Asymmetry of peak plantar pressure in transfemoral amputees during indoor and outdoor walking

This study investigates the differences in peak plantar pressure between the amputated and intact limbs of transfemoral amputees when walking outdoors. Ten non-amputees (aged 24.4 ± 2.0 years, 176.9 ± 2.5 cm, 72.3 ± 7.9 kg) and six transfemoral amputees (48.5 ± 6.3 years, 173.8 ± 4.2 cm, 82.0 ± 11.9 kg) participated in the study. Over approximately 1.6 km, the participants encountered various obstacles, including stairs, uneven surfaces, hills, and level ground, both indoors and outdoors. Throughout the walking session, the peak plantar pressure in both feet was monitored using wearable insole sensors. For all terrains, the percentage asymmetry was determined. Significant changes in peak plantar pressure asymmetry were found between the intact and amputated limbs, particularly when walking on level ground indoors, uneven terrains, descending stairs, and on steep slopes outdoors (all p < 0.05). These findings highlight the greater peak plantar pressure asymmetry in transfemoral amputees when walking outside. In addition, this study revealed that not all terrains contribute uniformly to this asymmetry.

Human-Prosthetic Interaction (HumanIT): A study protocol for a clinical trial evaluating brain neuroplasticity and functional performance after lower limb loss

BACKGROUND

Lower limb amputation contributes to structural and functional brain alterations, adversely affecting gait, balance, and overall quality of life. Therefore, selecting an appropriate prosthetic ankle is critical in enhancing the well-being of these individuals. Despite the availability of various prostheses, their impact on brain neuroplasticity remains poorly understood.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective is to examine differences in the degree of brain neuroplasticity using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between individuals wearing a new passive ankle prosthesis with an articulated ankle joint and a standard passive prosthesis, and to examine changes in brain neuroplasticity within these two prosthetic groups. The second objective is to investigate the influence of prosthetic type on walking performance and quality of life. The final objective is to determine whether the type of prosthesis induces differences in the walking movement pattern.

METHODS

Participants with a unilateral transtibial amputation will follow a 24-week protocol. Prior to rehabilitation, baseline MRI scans will be performed, followed by allocation to the intervention arms and commencement of rehabilitation. After 12 weeks, baseline functional performance tests and a quality of life questionnaire will be administered. At the end of the 24-week period, participants will undergo the same MRI scans, functional performance tests and questionnaire to evaluate any changes. A control group of able-bodied individuals will be included for comparative analysis.

CONCLUSION

This study aims to unravel the differences in brain neuroplasticity and prosthesis type in patients with a unilateral transtibial amputation and provide insights into the therapeutic benefits of prosthetic devices. The findings could validate the therapeutic benefits of more advanced lower limb prostheses, potentially leading to a societal impact ultimately improving the quality of life for individuals with lower limb amputation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05818410 (Clinicaltrials.gov).

Unsupervised Cluster Analysis of Walking Activity Data for Healthy Individuals and Individuals with Lower Limb Amputation

This is the first investigation to perform an unsupervised cluster analysis of activities performed by individuals with lower limb amputation (ILLAs) and individuals without gait impairment, in free-living conditions. Eight individuals with no gait impairments and four ILLAs wore a thigh-based accelerometer and walked on an improvised route across a variety of terrains in the vicinity of their homes. Their physical activity data were clustered to extract 'unique' groupings in a low-dimension feature space in an unsupervised learning approach, and an algorithm was created to automatically distinguish such activities. After testing three dimensionality reduction methods-namely, principal component analysis (PCA), t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (tSNE), and uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP)-we selected tSNE due to its performance and stable outputs. Cluster formation of activities via DBSCAN only occurred after the data were reduced to two dimensions via tSNE and contained only samples for a single individual. Additionally, through analysis of the t-SNE plots, appreciable clusters in walking-based activities were only apparent with ground walking and stair ambulation. Through a combination of density-based clustering and analysis of cluster distance and density, a novel algorithm inspired by the t-SNE plots, resulting in three proposed and validated hypotheses, was able to identify cluster formations that arose from ground walking and stair ambulation. Low dimensional clustering of activities has thus been found feasible when analyzing individual sets of data and can currently recognize stair and ground walking ambulation.

Osseointegrated prostheses improve balance and balance confidence in individuals with unilateral transfemoral limb loss

BACKGROUND

More than half of patients with lower-limb amputation who use socket prostheses experience at least one fall annually. These falls are primarily attributed to reduced proprioception which negatively affects balance. A promising alternative to socket prostheses are osseointegrated prostheses that involve direct fixation of the prosthetic limb to the residual limb through a bone-anchored implant, yet its effect on balance remains unknown.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Do osseointegrated prostheses change static and dynamic balance, as well as patient reported measures of balance confidence, compared to a socket prosthesis?

METHODS

A sample of 10 patients with unilateral transfemoral amputation scheduled to undergo prosthesis osseointegration were enrolled (6 F/4 M, BMI: 26.7 ± 2.9 kg/m2, Age: 46.1 ± 6.3 years). Motion capture data during quiet standing (eyes opened and eyes closed) and overground walking at a self-selected speed, and the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale, were collected before (with socket prosthesis) and 12-months following osseointegration. Postural sway via the center of pressure (COP), variability of spatiotemporal parameters, and ABC scores were compared using a repeated measures design before and after osseointegration.

RESULTS

Following prosthesis osseointegration, COP path length and 95 % confidence ellipse area were reduced during quiet standing (d = 0.75, P = 0.09; d = 0.52, P = 0.29, respectively) and the variability of step width and length were reduced during overground walking (d = 0.50, P = 0.06; d = 0.72, P = 0.06, respectively). Furthermore, patients reported significantly improved ABC scores with an osseointegrated prosthesis compared to a socket prosthesis (d = -1.36, P = 0.01).

SIGNIFICANCE

Improvements in postural sway, reductions in gait variability, and greater balance confidence indicate that osseointegrated prostheses improve balance for people with unilateral transfemoral amputation.

Therapeutic benefits of lower limb prostheses: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Enhancing the quality of life of people with a lower limb amputation is critical in prosthetic development and rehabilitation. Yet, no overview is available concerning the impact of passive, quasi-passive and active ankle-foot prostheses on quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the therapeutic benefits of performing daily activities with passive, quasi-passive and active ankle-foot prostheses in people with a lower limb amputation.

METHODS

We searched the Pubmed, Web of Science, Scopus and Pedro databases, and backward citations until November 3, 2021. Only English-written randomised controlled trials, cross-sectional, cross-over and cohort studies were included when the population comprised individuals with a unilateral transfemoral or transtibial amputation, wearing passive, quasi-passive or active ankle-foot prostheses. The intervention and outcome measures had to include any aspect of quality of life assessed while performing daily activities. We synthesised the participants' characteristics, type of prosthesis, intervention, outcome and main results, and conducted risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. This study is registered on PROSPERO, number CRD42021290189.

RESULTS

We identified 4281 records and included 34 studies in total. Results indicate that quasi-passive and active prostheses are favoured over passive prostheses based on biomechanical, physiological, performance and subjective measures in the short-term. All studies had a moderate or high risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

Compared to passive ankle-foot prostheses, quasi-passive and active prostheses significantly enhance the quality of life. Future research should investigate the long-term therapeutic benefits of prosthetics devices.

Evaluation of an articulated passive ankle-foot prosthesis

Background

Current ankle prostheses for people with unilateral transtibial amputation (TTA) or transfemoral amputation (TFA) are unable to mimic able-bodied performance during daily activities. A new mechanical ankle–foot prosthesis was developed to further optimise the gait of people with a lower-limb amputation. This study aimed to evaluate the Talaris Demonstrator (TD) during daily activities by means of performance-related, physiological and subjective outcome measures.

Materials and methods

Forty-two participants completed a protocol assessing performance and functional mobility with their current prosthesis and the TD. The protocol comprised the L-test, 2 min of stair climbing, 2 min of inclined treadmill walking, 6 min of treadmill walking at 3 different speeds in consecutive blocks of 2 min, and a 3-m Backward Walk test (3mBWT). Heart rate was measured during each task, and oxygen uptake was collected during all tasks except for the L-test and 3mBWT. Time of execution was recorded on the L-test and 3mBWT, and the rate of perceived exertion (score = 6–20), fatigue and comfort (score = 0–100) were assessed after each task. Paired sample t-tests and Wilcoxon Signed-rank tests were performed to compare outcomes between prosthetic devices. Benjamini–Hochberg corrections were applied to control for multiple comparisons with a level of significance set at α = 0.05.

Results

Subjects with a TTA (N = 28) were faster with their current prosthesis compared to the TD on the L-test and 3mBWT (p = 0.005). In participants with a TFA (N = 14), we observed a tendency towards a higher heart rate during the L-test and towards increased comfort during inclined walking, with the TD compared to the participants’ current prosthetic device (0.05 < p < 0.10). Further, no significant results were observed.

Conclusion

The Talaris Demonstrator is a novel state-of-the-art passive ankle–foot prosthesis for both people with a TTA and TFA. Subjective measures indicate the added value of this device, while overall task performance and intensity of effort do not differ between the Talaris Demonstrator and the current prosthesis. Further investigations unravelling both acute and more prolonged adaptations will be conducted to evaluate the TD more thoroughly.

Task dependent changes in mechanical and biomechanical measures result from manipulating stiffness settings in a prosthetic foot

BACKGROUND

Adaptation of lower limb function to different gait tasks is inherently not as effective among individuals with lower limb amputation as compared to able-bodied individuals. Varying stiffness of a prosthetic foot may be a way of facilitating gait tasks that require larger ankle joint range of motion.

METHODS

Three stiffness settings of a novel prosthetic foot design were tested for level walking at three speeds as well as for 7,5° incline and decline walking. Outcome measures, describing ankle range of motion and ankle dynamic joint stiffness were contrasted across the three stiffness settings. Standardized mechanical tests were done for the hindfoot and forefoot.

FINDINGS

Dorsiflexion angle was incrementally increased with a softer foot and a faster walking speed / higher degree of slope. The concurrent dynamic joint stiffness exhibited a less systematic change, especially during INCLINE and DECLINE walking. The small difference seen between the stiffness settings for hindfoot loading limits analysis for the effects of stiffness during weight acceptance, however, a stiffer foot significantly restricted plantarflexion during DECLINE.

INTERPRETATIONS

Varying stiffness settings within a prosthetic foot does have an effect on prosthetic foot dynamics, and differences are task dependent, specifically in parameters involving kinetic attributes. When considering the need for increased ankle range of motion while performing more demanding gait tasks, a foot that allows the users themselves to adjust stiffness according to the task at hand may be of benefit for active individuals, possibly enhancing the user's satisfaction and comfort during various daily activities.

Discrimination capability of linear and nonlinear gait features in group classification

The variability of human movement can be defined as normal variations occurring in motor activity and quantified using linear statistics or nonlinear methods. In the human movement field, linear and nonlinear measures of variability have been used to discriminate groups and conditions in different contexts. Indeed, some authors support the idea that these gait features provide complementary information about movement. However, it is unclear which type of gait variability measure best discriminates different groups or conditions, as a comparison of the discrimination capacity between linear and nonlinear gait variability features in different groups has not been assessed. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to test the discrimination capacity of linear and nonlinear gait features to determine which type of feature would be the most efficient for discriminating older and younger adults and between lower limb amputees and nonamputees using classification algorithms. Data from previously published studies were used. The classification task was performed using the k-nearest neighbors and random forest algorithms. Our results showed that using a combination of linear and nonlinear features resulted in the highest mean accuracy rates (>90%) in group classification, reinforcing the idea that these features are complementary and express different aspects of movement.