Prognostic significance of host immune status in patients with late relapsing renal cell carcinoma treated with targeted therapy

Neutrophil extracellular traps in relationship to efficacy of systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of systemic therapy regimens, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (IO-TKI) and targeted therapy, for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) remains unpredictable due to the lack of effective biomarkers. Neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) plays an important role in promoting ccRCC. This study explores the NET predictive value of the efficacy in metastatic ccRCC.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, patients with metastatic ccRCC who received targeted drugs and IO-TKI were included. Immunofluorescence staining was utilized to quantify the levels of tissue NETs through cell counts of H3Cit(+) and MPO(+) cells.

RESULTS

A total of 183 patients with metastatic ccRCC were enrolled, including 150 patients who received TKIs and 33 patients who received IO-TKI. The levels of NETs in tumor tissue were significantly higher than in para-tumor tissue (p < 0.001). In terms of predicting drug efficacy, a correlation between NET levels and progression-free survival (PFS) was observed in the TKI with metachronous metastasis group (HR 1.73 [95% CI 1.02-2.91], log-rank p = 0.037), while no correlation was observed in the TKI with synchronous metastasis group and IO-TKI group. Regarding overall survival (OS), activated NET levels were associated with poor OS in both TKI (HR 1.60 [95% CI 1.05-2.43], log-rank p  = 0.017) and IO-TKI group (HR 4.35 [95% CI 1.06-17.82], log-rank p =0.047). IMDC score (HR 1.462 [95% CI 1.030-2.075], p = 0.033) and tumor tissue NET levels (HR 1.733 [95% CI 1.165-2.579], p = 0.007) were independent prognostic risk factors for OS in patients with metastatic ccRCC.NET level was associated with poor OS in both TKI (HR 1.60 [95% CI 1.05-2.43], log-rank p  = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

The active NET levels in tumor tissue can predict drug efficacy in patients with metastatic ccRCC who received systemic therapy. Elevated levels of NETs in tumor tissue were also associated with poor efficacy in OS.

Preoperative prognostic model for localized and locally advanced renal cell carcinoma: Michinoku Japan Urological Cancer Study Group

BACKGROUND

The Modified International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Dataset Consortium model (mIMDC) is a preoperative prognostic model for pT3cN0M0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This study aimed to validate the mIMDC and to construct a new model in a localized and locally advanced RCC (LLRCC).

METHODS

A database was established (the Michinoku Japan Urological Cancer Study Group database) consisting of 79 patients who were clinically diagnosed with LLRCC (cT3b/c/4NanyM0) and underwent radical nephrectomy from December 2007 to May 2018. Using univariable and multivariable analyses, we retrospectively analyzed disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in this database, constructed a new prognostic model according to these results, and estimated the model fit using c-index on the new and mIMDC models.

RESULTS

Independent poorer prognostic factors for both DFS and OS include the following: ≥ 1 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, 2.0 mg/dL C-reactive protein, and > upper normal limit of white blood cell count. The median DFS in the favorable (no factor), intermediate (one factor), and poor-risk group (two or three factors) was 76.1, 14.3, and 4.0 months, respectively (P < 0.001). The 3-year OS in the favorable, intermediate, and poor-risk group were 92%, 44%, and 0%, respectively (P < 0.001). The c-indices of the new and mIMDC models were 0.67 and 0.60 for DFS (P = 0.060) and 0.74 and 0.63 for OS (P = 0.012), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The new preoperative prognostic model in LLRCC can be used in patient care and clinical trials.

Clinico-Pathological Features Influencing the Prognostic Role of Body Mass Index in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated by Immuno-Oncology Combinations (ARON-1)

BACKGROUND

Obesity has been associated with improved response to immunotherapy in cancer patients. We investigated the role of body mass index (BMI) in patients from the ARON-1 study (NCT05287464) treated by dual immuno-oncology agents (IO+IO) or a combination of immuno-oncology drug and a tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) as first-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Medical records of patients with documented mRCC treated by immuno-oncology combinations were reviewed at 47 institutions from 16 countries. Patients were assessed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (OS), and overall clinical benefit (OCB), defined as the sum of the rate of partial/complete responses and stable disease. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to explore the association of variables of interest with survival.

RESULTS

A total of 675 patients were included; BMI was >25 kg/m2 in 345 patients (51%) and was associated with improved OS (55.7 vs. 28.4 months, P < .001). The OCB of patients with BMI >25 kg/m2 versus those with BMI ≤25 kg/m2 was significantly higher only in patients with nonclear cell histology (81% vs. 65%, P = .011), and patients with liver metastases (76% vs. 58%, P = .007), Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio >4 (77% vs 62%, P = .022) or treated by nivolumab plus ipilimumab (77% vs. 64%, P = .044). In the BMI ≤25 kg/m2 subgroup, significant differences were found between patients with NLR >4 versus ≤4 (62% vs. 82%, P = .002) and patients treated by IO+IO versus IO+TKIs combinations (64% vs. 83%, P = .002).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that the prognostic significance and the association of BMI with treatment outcome varies across clinico-pathological mRCC subgroups.

Adjuvant therapy in renal cell carcinoma in the immunotherapy era: where do we stand?

Locoregional, as well as metastatic renal cell carcinoma, tends to relapse after nephrectomy or metastasectomy. Adjuvant therapy seems to be an effective strategy to reduce the risk of recurrence. All anti-VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitors except sunitinib have failed to show any benefit in the adjuvant setting in patients with locally advanced disease and an intermediate-to-high chance of recurrence. On the other hand, immune checkpoint inhibitors, which are now used in the first-line in the metastatic setting, are being tested in the adjuvant setting. Pembrolizumab has shown benefit in the adjuvant setting in patients with a high risk of recurrence or with resected metastatic disease with no evidence of disease. Results for other checkpoint inhibitors are still awaited.

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Early Tumor Shrinkage as Predictive Biomarkers in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated With Lenvatinib, PD-1 Inhibitors, in Combination With TACE

Purpose: The purpose of this prospective observational study was to investigate the relationship between pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and posttreatment early tumor shrinkage (ETS), and clinical outcomes in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) who received lenvatinib, programmed death-1 inhibitors plus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Patients and Methods: A total of 63 uHCC patients were treated with this triple combination. Multivariate analyses to determine the independent factors associated with overall survival (OS) were employed. The link between NLR and clinical results was further analyzed. Furthermore, the predictive value of combining NLR with ETS should be investigated to stratify patients receiving treatment for survival benefits. Results: Progression-free survival and OS were 9.8 and 23.0 months, respectively, with a median follow-up of 20.8 months. On a multivariate analysis of OS, NLR was the only independent prognostic factor. Patients with NLR low (NLR < 3.2) had longer progression-free survival (19.3 vs 7.3 months, P < 0.001) and OS (28.9 vs 16.9 months, P < 0.001), higher objective response rate (86.7% vs 39.4%, P < 0.001), and a higher chance of achieving ETS ≥ 10% (ETS high) (73.3% vs 21.1%, P < 0.001) compared with patients with NLR high (NLR ≥ 3.2). The Spearman correlation analysis also showed the strong consistency between NLR and ETS (R2 = 0.6751). In the subgroup analysis, greater OS benefit was found in the NLR low/ETS high group than the NLR high/ETS low group (χ2 = 31.258, P < 0.001), while there was no survival difference for patients in the NLR low/ETS low group compared with in the NLR high/ETS high group (χ2 = 0.046, P = 0.830). Conclusion: NLR has the potential to identify which patients would benefit from this triple therapy, and when combined with ETS, it has the potential to provide greater predictive power in selecting the appropriate candidates for this combination treatment.

Cancer Immunotherapy: Harnessing the Immune System to Fight Cancer

The advent of cancer immunotherapy has represented an unprecedented revolution in patients with hematological and solid tumors [...].

Concomitant Use of Statins, Metformin, or Proton Pump Inhibitors in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with First-Line Combination Therapies

BACKGROUND

Drug-drug interactions are a major concern in oncology and may potentially affect the outcome of patients with cancer.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to determine whether the concomitant use of statins, metformin, or proton pump inhibitors affects survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line combination therapies.

METHODS

Medical records of patients with documented metastatic renal cell carcinoma between January 2016 and November 2021 were reviewed at 17 participating centers. This research was conducted in ten institutions, including both referral centers and local hospitals. Patients were assessed for overall survival, progression-free survival, and overall clinical benefit. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to explore the association of variables of interest with overall survival and progression-free survival.

RESULTS

A total of 304 patients receiving dual immunotherapy (51%) or immunotherapy/vascular endothelial growth factor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (49%) combinations were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective study. Statin use was a significant prognostic factor for longer overall survival in a univariate analysis (hazard ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.26-0.87; p = 0.016) and a multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.31-0.74; p < 0.001) and was significantly associated with an overall clinical benefit (83% in statin users vs 71% in non-users; p = 0.045). Otherwise, the use of metformin or proton pump inhibitors did not affect the outcome of these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests a prognostic impact of statin use in patients receiving first-line immuno-oncology combinations. The mechanism of this interaction warrants further elucidation.

Real-World Treatment with Nivolumab or Cabozantinib for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) in the Veneto Region of Italy: Results of AMOUR Study

Background

Second- or third-line treatment options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have dramatically changed in the last few years. There are no criteria for the choice between nivolumab and cabozantinib, which both demonstrated overall survival (OS) gain in pivotal trials.

Objective

We conducted an analysis of oncological outcomes in patients treated in the Veneto Region (Italy), studying different sequences of TKI-nivolumab-cabozantinib or TKI-cabozantinib-nivolumab in a publicly funded healthcare system.

Patients and Methods

We conducted a retrospective, real-world analysis of all consecutive patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab or cabozantinib in 2017–2018 at 19 Oncology Units in the Veneto Region.

Results

We identified 170 patients, 73 % males, median age 68.4 years. All patients started second-line treatment, 59 % received a third-line therapy. Patients with NLR > 3 had a shorter OS (p < 0.0001). In the second-line treatment, nivolumab was administered to 108 patients (63 %), cabozantinib to 29 (17 %); in the third-line treatment nivolumab was administered to 42 patients (25 %), cabozantinib to 49 (29 %). Median OS and PFS in second line treatment were 28.4 and 6.6 months for nivolumab, 16.8 and 6.6 months for cabozantinib. Median OS and PFS in third-line treatment were 27 and 5.2 months for nivolumab, 16.6 and 7.5 months for cabozantinib. Median OS for nivolumab>cabozantinib sequence versus cabozantinib > nivolumab was 28.8 versus 19.9 months (p = 0.2); median PFS for both the sequences were similar at 5.7 months. A cost effectiveness per month of survival of the two sequences analysis was performed: the cost per month for the nivolumab > cabozantinib sequence was 1738.60whereas the cost for the other one was €1624.80.

Conclusions

In our real-world cohort, most patients received nivolumab as second-line treatment. Outcomes of single drugs are superimposable with those in the published literature. Both the sequences of nivolumab and cabozantinib appear to be viable, effective strategies from an OS and cost-effective perspective.

Risk of cardiovascular toxicities and hypertension in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with novel hormonal agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: With hormonal agents quickly expanding as novel therapeutic options in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC), the toxicity profile of enzalutamide, apalutamide, and darolutamide should be kept in mind.Methods: We performed an updated meta-analysis with the aim to analyze the risk of treatment-related cardiovascular (CV) events, any grade, and grade 3-4 (G3-4) hypertension in nmCRPC patients treated with enzalutamide, apalutamide, and darolutamide plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) versus ADT plus placebo in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Results were compared by calculating Relative Risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs); RRs were combined with Mantel-Haenszel method.Results: Three RCTs involving 4110 patients were available for the meta-analysis. According to our results, the addition of novel hormonal agents was associated with a significantly increased risk of CV events (RR = 1.71; 95% CI 1.29-2.27) and G3-4 hypertension (RR = 1.53; 95% CI 1.19-1.97). In addition, a trend toward a higher risk of any grade hypertension was reported in the experimental arm.Conclusions: The use of enzalutamide, apalutamide, and darolutamide in nmCRPC patients implies a careful benefit-risk assessment. Real-world, large-cohort studies are warranted to confirm the findings of our meta-analysis.

An up-to-date evaluation of cabozantinib for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma

Introduction: In the evolving treatment scenario of metastatic renal cell carcinoma, cabozantinib is gaining increasing attention, presenting as a cornerstone therapy, both as a monotherapy and in combination with immune-checkpoint inhibitors.Areas covered: In this review, the authors explore the role of cabozantinib in the treatment of metastatic clear cell and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma, presenting data from the most recent clinical trials and investigating ongoing studies. They, furthermore, evaluate the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and immunomodulatory effect of cabozantinib, as well as underlining the tolerability profile and patients' quality of life.Expert opinion: Cabozantinib's administration as a single agent is restricted to intermediate- and poor-risk patients (according to IMDC criteria). The further advent of anti-VEGF-receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor regimens (such as pembrolizumab + axitinib) has allowed to expand the use of cabozantinib, leading to its combination with nivolumab. In the next few years, more information is required to look for the application of cabozantinib-based combinations as a later-line approach in metastatic RCC patients, beside their use in the first-line setting.

Outcomes of axitinib versus sunitinib as first-line therapy to patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the immune-oncology era

Although combination immune checkpoint inhibitor (immuno‐oncology [IO]) therapy is the first‐line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), it mostly causes resistance and tumor regrowth. Therefore, an optimal second‐line therapy is necessary. Such therapy typically comprises vascular endothelial growth factor receptor‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR‐TKIs). This study was aimed at comparing the efficacy of two TKIs—axitinib and sunitinib—in mRCC patients. From January 2008 to October 2018, we registered 703 mRCC patients from 8 Japanese institutes. Of these, 408 patients received axitinib or sunitinib as the first‐line treatment. Thereafter, efficacy and survival rate were compared between the axitinib and sunitinib groups. To reduce the effects of selection bias and potential confounders, propensity score matching analysis was performed. Axitinib and sunitinib were administered in 274 and 134 patients, respectively. More than 25% of the patients received nivolumab sequence therapy. To calculate the propensity scores for each patient, we performed multivariate logistic regression analysis. The objective response rate, progression‐free survival (PFS), cause‐specific survival, and overall survival (OS) were significantly better in the axitinib group than in the sunitinib group. Furthermore, the OS was better in the nivolumab‐treated patients in the axitinib group. Axitinib showed higher efficacy and afforded greater survival benefits than did sunitinib when administered as first‐line therapy in mRCC patients. Thus, from among VEGFR‐TKIs, axitinib might be a possible option for application in the middle of IO drug‐based treatment sequences.

Immune-based combinations for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Recent years have witnessed the advent of novel treatment options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), including combination therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Herein, we conducted an up-to-date and comprehensive meta-analysis including recently published data of phase III clinical trials evaluating immune-based combinations in mRCC.

METHODS

We retrieved all the relevant trials published from 15th June 2008 to 24th February 2021, evaluating immune-based combinations in treatment-naïve mRCC through PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane library, and EMBASE; additionally, proceedings of the main international oncological meetings were also searched for relevant abstracts. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), complete response (CR) rate, and overall response rate (ORR). Hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for OS and PFS, and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for CR rate and ORR, were extracted.

RESULTS

Overall, 6 phase III studies involving 5175 treatment-naïve mRCC patients were available for the meta-analysis (immune-based combinations, n = 2576; sunitinib, n = 2597). According to our results, the use of immune-based combinations decreased the risk of death by 26% (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.67-0.81, P < 0.001); similarly, a PFS benefit was observed (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.54-0.85, P = 0.001). In addition, immune-based combinations showed better CR rate and ORR, with ORs of 3.04 (95% CI 2.31-3.99, P = 0.001) and 2.53 (95% CI 1.77-3.62, P < 0.03), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our meta-analysis confirm the clinical benefit provided by immunotherapy combinations, with CR rate more than tripled in mRCCs receiving immune-based combinations. Further studies in real-world setting are warranted to validate the findings of our meta-analysis, the most updated to systematically evaluate immune-based combinations in mRCC.

Tumor Growth Rate Decline despite Progressive Disease May Predict Improved Nivolumab Treatment Outcome in mRCC: When RECIST Is Not Enough

Simple Summary

The treatment scenario of metastatic renal cell carcinoma has drastically changed in recent years, with the advent of immunotherapy. Since 2015 immune-checkpoint inhibitors, either alone or in combination with other compounds, are constantly enriching the treatment scenario, with a drastic change of patients’ outcomes. The benefit from immunotherapy is difficult to capture with the currently available assessment radiological criteria. Often, with rhe use of immunotherapy, we can observe atypical patterns of response, such as hyperprogression or pseudoprogression. Pseudoprogression consists of an initial increase in tumor burden followed by a response to therapy, while hyperprogression is defined as a tumor growth rate that was at least 2-fold greater in patients with disease progression during immunotherapy. We performed a retrospective monocentric study to explore the impact of tumor growth rate change after immunotherapy administration as second or later line of treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Abstract

Treatment response is usually assessed by the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST). These criteria may not be adequate to evaluate the response to immunotherapy, considering the peculiar patterns of response reported with this therapy. With the advent of immunotherapy these criteria have been modified to include the evaluation of the peculiar responses seen with this type of therapy (iRECIST criteria), including pseudoprogressions and hyperprogressions. Tumor growth rate (TGR) is a dynamic evaluation that takes into account the kinetics of response to treatment and may help catch the real efficacy of an immunotherapy approach. We performed a retrospective monocentric study to explore the impact of TGR change after nivolumab administration as the second or later line of treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We evaluated 27 patients, divided into three categories: Disease control (DC) if there was no PD; lower velocity PD (LvPD) if disease progressed but the TGR at second assessment (TGR2) was lower than the TGR at first assessment (TGR1); higher velocity PD (HvPD) if TGR2 was higher than TGR1. The median OS for the DC group was 11.0 months (95% CI 5.0–17.0) (reference) vs. (not reached) NR (95% CI NR-NR) for LvPD (HR 0.27; 95% CI 0.06–1.30; p 0.102) vs. NR (95% CI NR–NR) for HvPD (HR 0.23; 95% CI 0.06–0.88; p 0.032). There was no difference between LvPD and DC (HR 1.21; 95% CI 0.20–7.28; p 0.838). In patients with metastatic RCC, the second or later line of nivolumab treatment may lead to a deceleration in TGR resulting in an improved survival outcome similar to that observed in patients experiencing tumor regression. In this subgroup, especially in the presence of a clinical benefit, continuing the treatment beyond progression can be recommended.

Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib or axitinib compared to nivolumab plus ipilimumab or cabozantinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a number needed to treat analysis

Introduction: Substantial paradigm shifts have been recently registered in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), with combination therapies including immunotherapy showing unprecedented results. We performed number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH) analyses to evaluate these approaches in mRCC.Areas covered: Clinical data of mRCC patients enrolled in four phase III trials were collected. The rates at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months for overall survival (OS), duration of response (DoR), and progression-free survival (PFS) were considered. At 6 months, the number of patients that should be treated to prevent one death with sunitinib was 20 for both pembrolizumab-lenvatinib or axitinib, 14 for nivolumab-cabozantinib, and 50 for nivolumab-ipilimumab. NNT was 100 (at 6 months) or >100 (at 12 and 18 months) for nivolumab-ipilimumab. The combinations reported peculiar and not superimposable safety profiles at the NNH analysis.Expert opinion: Although our results should be interpreted with caution, the analysis provides useful insight into the increasingly compelling interpretation of clinical trials. Immune combinations present clinically meaningful differences in terms of efficacy, with some treatments reporting different results at the NNT and the NNH analyses.

The Molecular Characteristics of Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: What's the Story Morning Glory?

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas are a miscellaneous group of tumors that include different histological subtypes, each one characterized by peculiarity in terms of genetic alteration, clinical behavior, prognosis, and treatment response. Because of their low incidence and poor enrollment in clinical trials, alongside their heterogeneity, additional efforts are required to better unveil the pathogenetic mechanisms and, consequently, to improve the treatment algorithm. Nowadays, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mTOR and MET inhibitors, and even cisplatin-based chemotherapy and immunotherapy are potential weapons that are still under evaluation in this setting. Various biomarkers have been evaluated for detecting progression and monitoring renal cell carcinoma, but more studies are necessary to improve this field. In this review, we provide an overview on the molecular characteristics of this group of tumors and the recently published trials, giving an insight into what might become the future therapeutic standard in this complex world of non-clear cell kidney cancers.

Comparative effectiveness of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors according to IMDC risk groups in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Aim: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combinations have become the new standard of primary systemic treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients. We performed a meta-analysis aimed at evaluating ICIs plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) combinations across International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk groups. Materials & methods: All the relevant randomized clinical trials were retrieved through Cochrane library, PubMed/Med and EMBASE; three Phase III randomized clinical trials were included. Results: ICI-TKI combinations significantly decreased the risk of death in IMDC poor- and intermediate-risk patients. Conversely, a nonstatistically significant benefit was observed in favorable-risk patients. Conclusion: Our results suggest that IMDC poor-risk patients benefit most from ICI-TKI combinations, while a proportion of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients could respond to targeted agent monotherapy.

Impact of Clinicopathological Features on Survival in Patients Treated with First-line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Plus Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

CONTEXT

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have reported unprecedented results in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients, as monotherapy or in combination with other anticancer agents. However, little information is available regarding the association between different clinicopathological features and survival in this setting.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a meta-analysis aimed at exploring the predictive value of routinely collected clinicopathological data in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating ICIs plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in treatment-naïve patients with mRCC.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We retrieved all the relevant RCTs through PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE; additionally, proceedings of the main international oncological meetings were also searched for relevant abstracts. Eligible studies included RCTs assessing first-line ICI-TKI versus sunitinib in treatment-naïve mRCC patients; the primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), measured as hazard ratio (HR) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI).

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Overall, three phase III RCTs involving 1769 patients with advanced or metastatic RCC were included. Compared with sunitinib, the ICI-TKI combination significantly decreased the risk of death in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) 0 (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.57-0.76) and ECOG-PS 1 (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.54-0.77). Similarly, the combination was associated with prolonged OS in patients who were <65 yr old (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.49-0.67), in mRCC patients ≥65 yr old (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.90), as well as in male (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.56-0.78) and female (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52-0.83) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our results, the magnitude of benefit of the ICI-TKI combination over sunitinib monotherapy in treatment-naïve mRCC patients was consistent across the clinicopathological subgroups. Despite the limitations affecting the analysis, we believe that the results of the current meta-analysis could assist clinicians and researchers in the design and interpretation of future clinical trials on combination therapies in this setting.

PATIENT SUMMARY

First-line combinations of an immune checkpoint inhibitor plus a tyrosine kinase inhibitor improved survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients. This survival benefit was consistent across all subgroups of mRCC patients irrespective of clinicopathological features such as patient performance status, age <65 and ≥65 yr, and male and female gender.

Impact of Serum γ-Glutamyltransferase on Overall Survival in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Era of Targeted Therapy

BACKGROUND

γ-Glutamyltransferase (GGT) is a marker of oxidative stress. Elevated serum GGT is linked to poor survival in various malignancies; however, there are no data on metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Additionally, GGT expression in cancer tissues remains largely unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The present study was designed to determine the prognostic role of serum GGT in patients with mRCC and the association between systemic and local GGT levels.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Pretherapeutic serum GGT and other clinicopathological parameters were retrospectively compared with overall survival (OS) in 146 consecutive patients with mRCC receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. GGT expression was analyzed in 65 resected specimens using immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

A total of 82 patients (56%) died during the follow-up period (median 34.9 months). Median OS was 16.0 months and 36.8 months in patients with elevated GGT levels and without elevated GGT, respectively (P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, elevated serum GGT was an independent adverse prognostic factor (hazard ratio [HR] 4.04, P < 0.001), together with high neutrophils (HR 2.06, P = 0.041), low albumin (HR 2.00, P = 0.006), high lactate dehydrogenase (HR 2.68, P < 0.001), and high De Ritis ratio (HR 1.97, P = 0.004). Preoperative serum GGT levels were 29, 48, and 109 U/l in patients whose renal cancer cells showed negative to weak, moderate, and strong GGT expression, respectively (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated serum GGT was an unfavorable prognostic factor in mRCC, and overexpression of GGT in renal cancer cells might be responsible for elevation of serum GGT.

Encephalic Leukocytoclastic Vasculitis during Treatment with Sunitinib for Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report

Renal cell carcinoma is a malignant tumor that arises in the kidney parenchyma. For many years, sunitinib has represented the mainstay of medical treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Herein, we present the case of a 66-year-old woman with metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma undergoing treatment with sunitinib for two years that developed encephalic leukocytoclastic vasculitis, probably due to a paraneoplastic syndrome.

Prognostic and predictive factors to nivolumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a single center study

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) scenario has radically changed with the advent of immunotherapy; in this setting, the identification of predictive and prognostic factors represents an urgent clinical need to evaluate which patients are the best candidate for an immunotherapy approach. The aim of our study was to analyze the association between nivolumab in pretreated patients with metastatic RCC and clinicopathological features, metastatic sites, and clinical outcomes. A total of 37 patients treated between January 2017 and April 2020 in our institution were retrospectively evaluated. All patients received nivolumab as second- or later-line of therapy after progression on previous tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) from immunotherapy start and OS from first-line start. Univariate analysis was performed through the log-rank test and a Cox regression proportional hazards model was employed in multivariable analysis. Of the 12 variables analyzed, 4 were significantly associated with prognoses at multivariate analysis. Cox proportional hazard ratio models confirmed that International Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk group, liver metastases at diagnosis, and central nervous system (CNS) metastases at diagnosis were associated with worse OS with an estimated hazard ratio of 4.76 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.05-19.8] for liver metastases and 2.27 (95% CI, 1.13-28.9) for CNS metastases. Pancreatic metastases at diagnosis were correlated to a better prognosis with an estimated hazard ratio of 0.15 (95% CI, 0.02-0.38). IMDC risk group, liver metastases at diagnosis, and CNS metastases at diagnosis may identify a population of patients treated with immunotherapy in second- or later-line associated with worse prognosis.

Previous Use of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Agents Decreases Efficacy of Fruquintinib in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies

Purpose

Fruquintinib is an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) agent. The FRESCO trial demonstrated that patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to standard therapies could benefit from fruquintinib with tolerable adverse events (AEs). However, the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib in clinical practice has scarcely been reported, especially in patients with previous use of anti-VEGFR agents.

Methods

This retrospective study investigated the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib in patients with mCRC between January 2019 and December 2019. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by a Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test. A Cox regression model was performed to identify independent prognostic factors.

Results

A total of 46 patients were included. The median PFS and OS were 3.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9–4.3 months) and 9.0 months (95% CI, 7.2–10.8 months), respectively. Patients previously treated with anti-VEGFR agents had shorter median PFS compared with those without previous use of anti-VEGFR agents (1.9 vs. 3.7 months, P = 0.006), while the median OS was similar between the two groups (8.5 vs. 9.0 months, P = 0.992). Multivariate analysis revealed that the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was an independent prognostic factor in PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.230; 95% CI, 1.191–4.517, P = 0.014) and OS (HR, 4.221; 95% CI, 1.683–10.586; P = 0.002). The most common non-hematological and hematological AEs were hand-foot syndrome (37.0%) and anemia (39.1%), respectively.

Conclusion

Fruquintinib was an effective third-line therapy in mCRC with tolerable AEs. Efficacy of fruquintinib was decreased in patients with previous use of anti-VEGFR agents. NLR was an independent prognostic factor in PFS and OS in patients treated with fruquintinib.

Immune system and angiogenesis-related potential surrogate biomarkers of response to everolimus-based treatment in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: an exploratory study

Purpose

mTOR inhibitor everolimus is used for hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). No reliable predictive biomarker of response is available. Following evidences from other solid tumors, we aimed to assess the association between treatment-associated immune system features and everolimus activity.

Methods

We retrospectively explored a correlation with the therapeutic activity of everolimus and tumor-associated immune pathways with ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), circulating lymphocytes, and endothelial cells (CECs) in 3 different HR+ mBC studies, including the BALLET phase IIIb study.

Results

The circulating levels of CD3⁺/CD8⁺, CD3⁺/CD4⁺, and overall T lymphocytes were higher in responders versus non-responders at baseline (p = 0.017, p < 0.001, p = 0.034) and after treatment (p = 0.01, p = 0.003, p = 0.023). Reduced CECs, a tumor neoangiogenesis marker, were observed in responders after treatment (p < 0.001). Patients with low NLR (≤ 4.4) showed a better progression-free survival compared to patients with high NLR (> 4.4) (p = 0.01). IPA showed that the majority of immunity-related genes were found upregulated in responders compared to non-responders before treatment, but not after.

Conclusions

Lymphocytes subpopulations, CECs and NLR could be interesting biomarkers predictive of response to everolimus-based regimens, potentially useful in daily clinical practice to select/monitor everolimus-based treatment in mBC. Further studies to confirm such hypotheses are warranted.

Pretreatment elevated prognostic nutritional index predicts a favorable prognosis in patients with prostate cancer

Background

The prognostic nutritional index (PNI), an immunity and nutrition based prognostic score, was correlated with clinical outcomes in different tumors. However, the prognostic significance of PNI has not been investigated in hormone sensitive prostate cancer (PCa). The objective of this study was to determine the prognostic significance of PNI in hormone sensitive PCa.

Methods

Two hundred eighty PCa patients undergoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as first line therapy at three centers were enrolled. The serum albumin levels and peripheral lymphocyte count were measured at the time of diagnosis. PNI was calculated as 10 * serum albumin (g/dL) + 0.005 * total lymphocyte count (per mm3). Patients were categorized in two groups using a cut-off point of 50.2 as calculated by the receiver-operating curve analysis. Univariate and multivariate cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate PNI as a favorable prognostic factor for progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). Prognostic accuracy was evaluated with the Harrell concordance index.

Results

Multivariate analyses identified PNI as an independent prognostic indicator with respect to PFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.521, p = 0.001), CSS (HR = 0.421, p = 0.002) and OS (HR = 0.429, p = 0.001). Patients with elevated PNI had better clinical outcomes. The addition of PNI to the final models improved predictive accuracy (c-index: 0.758, 0.830 and 0.782) for PFS, CSS and OS compared with the clinicopathological base models (c-index: 0.736, 0.801 and 0.752), which included Gleason score and incidence of metastasis.

Conclusions

Elevated pretreatment PNI was a favorable prognostic indicator for PCa patients treated with ADT.

Prognostic role of pretreatment blood lymphocyte count in patients with solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

To evaluate the prognostic value of pretreatment lymphocyte counts with respect to clinical outcomes in patients with solid tumors.

Methods

Systematic literature search of electronic databases (Pubmed, Embase and Web of Science) up to May 1, 2018 was carried out by two independent reviewers. We included Eligible studies assessed the prognostic impact of pretreatment lymphocytes and had reported hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for endpoints including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Only English publications were included.

Results

A total of 42 studies comprising 13,272 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Low pretreatment lymphocyte count was associated with poor OS (HR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.16–1.39, P < 0.001, I² = 58.5%) and PFS (HR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.15–1.40, P < 0.001, I² = 25.7%). Subgroup analysis disaggregated by cancer type indicated that low pretreatment lymphocytes were most closely associated with poor OS in colorectal cancer followed by breast cancer and renal cancer.

Conclusions

Low pretreatment lymphocyte count may represent an unfavorable prognostic factor for clinical outcomes in patients with solid tumors.

The Interplay between Inflammation, Anti-Angiogenic Agents, and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Perspectives for Renal Cell Cancer Treatment

Treatment options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have been expanding in the last years, from the consolidation of several anti-angiogenic agents to the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The rationale for the use of immunomodulating agents derived from the observation that RCC usually shows a diffuse immune-cell infiltrate. ICIs target Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes Antigen 4 (CTLA-4), programmed death 1 (PD-1), or its ligand (PD-L1), showing promising therapeutic efficacy in RCC. PD-L1 expression is associated with poor prognosis; however, its predictive role remains debated. In fact, ICIs may be a valid option even for PD-L1 negative patients. The establishment of valid predictors of treatment response to available therapeutic options is advocated to identify those patients who could benefit from these agents. Both local and systemic inflammation contribute to tumorigenesis and development of cancer. The interplay of tumor-immune status and of cancer-related systemic inflammation is pivotal for ICI-treatment outcome, but there is an unmet need for a more precise characterization. To date, little is known on the role of inflammation markers on PD-1 blockade in RCC. In this paper, we review the current knowledge on the interplay between inflammation markers, PD-1 axis, and anti-angiogenic agents in RCC, focusing on biological rationale, implications for treatment, and possible future perspectives.

Prognostic value of pretreatment neutrophil count in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: In recent years, inflammation has become widely recognized as a crucial component in tumor development and progression. Neutrophils are one of the most common inflammatory markers during hematological examinations. The prognostic value of neutrophils in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remains inconsistent. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the prognostic value of pretreatment neutrophil count in patients with mRCC.

Methods: PubMed, Web of Science and Embase were searched for data on the association between pretreatment neutrophil count and mRCC prognosis up to October 7, 2017. We sorted out relevant studies and extracted the hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results: A total of 13 studies containing 3,021 patients with mRCC were summarized in the present meta-analysis. An elevated pretreatment neutrophil count yielded a worse OS (HR=2.17, 95% CI=1.68–2.79, P<0.001) and PFS (HR=1.78, 95% CI=0.91–3.49, P<0.001). Furthermore, we performed a subgroup analysis based on cut-off value, ethnicity, treatment method and analysis type. As a result, the association between pretreatment neutrophil count and survival was statistically significant in the subgroups of cut-off value, ethnicity, treatment method and analysis type.

Conclusion: Our results show that the pretreatment neutrophil count is associated with mRCC outcomes and can be used as a valuable inflammatory marker for prognosis monitoring.

Role of systemic inflammatory response markers in urological malignancy

The systemic inflammatory response is associated with survival in patients with a variety of cancers. This inflammatory response is measured in the peripheral blood, and can be monitored using two categories of indices: concentration of specific serum proteins (albumin, C-reactive protein) and differential blood cell count (neutrophils, lymphocytes and platelets). Furthermore, combinations of these indices, such as the Glasgow Prognostic Score, which consists of the serum C-reactive protein and albumin level; the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; and the prognostic nutritional index, which is based on peripheral blood lymphocyte count and serum albumin level, have also been evaluated and compared in cancer research. To date, there are hundreds of studies that have shown the prognostic value of systemic inflammatory response markers in patients with urological cancer. Most studies have evaluated the prognostic and predictive role of the pretreatment value of the markers, although some have focused on the role of the post-treatment value at specific points during the clinical course. The advantages of systemic inflammatory response markers are that they are easily measurable and inexpensive in the clinical setting. However, it is important to consider how clinicians use these markers in clinical practice. The present review provides a concise overview regarding systemic inflammatory markers in urological cancers, specifically C-reactive protein, Glasgow Prognostic Score/modified Glasgow Prognostic Score, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and prognostic nutritional index.

Immunotherapy in renal cell carcinoma: latest evidence and clinical implications

Advances in understanding the mechanisms of tumour-induced immunosuppression have led to the development of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients, including those with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The optimal combination between immunotherapy and targeted agents (as well as the possible favourable sequential therapy of these two classes of drugs) remains an open question at this moment. Several trials are currently underway to assess the combination of anti-programmed-death 1 (PD-1) or anti-PD-ligand(L)1 agents with other immunotherapies or with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). In this editorial, we described the results of the most recent clinical trials on the use of immunotherapies in RCC and the emerging data on the research for reliable biomarkers of tumour response in this setting. In addition, we have focused on the role of the gut microbiome and tumour microenvironment in the development of future therapeutic strategies for RCC patients.

Pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is associated with outcome of advanced-stage cancer patients treated with immunotherapy: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To investigate the association between pretreatment blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and clinical outcomes for advanced-stage cancer patients treated with immunotherapy.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature search to assess the relationship between pretreatment blood NLR and overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) in advanced-stage cancer patients treated with immunotherapy. Published data including hazard ratios (HRs) and related 95% confidence interval (CI) were extracted. Pooled estimates of treatment outcomes were calculated using RevMan 5.3.5.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies with 4647 patients were included in the current study. The pooled results suggested that high pretreatment blood NLR was correlated with significant shorter OS (HR = 1.98, 95% CI 1.66-2.36, P < 0.001) and PFS (HR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.48-2.15, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis stratified by study targets revealed that anti-VEGF/VEGFR therapy (HR = 2.04, 95% CI 1.61-2.60, P < 0.001) and immune checkpoints blockade (HR = 2.16, 95% CI 1.86-2.51, P < 0.001) were significantly associated with inferior OS while other targets (HR = 1.63, 95% CI 0.89-2.99, P = 0.120) were not associated with OS. There was no correlation between distinct NLR cutoff values and OS ([Formula: see text] = 0.218, P = 0.329) or PFS benefit ([Formula: see text] = - 0.386, P = 0.140). Of note, HRs of PFS showed significant correlation with HRs of OS ([Formula: see text] = 0.656, P = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

Elevated pretreatment blood NLR was a promising prognostic and predictive biomarker for advanced-stage cancer patients treated with immunotherapy.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio, Platelet-to-lymphocyte Ratio, and C-reactive Protein as New and Simple Prognostic Factors in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer Treated With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Inflammation plays a crucial role in cancer development. In this study, we evaluate the prognostic values of systemic inflammation markers such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) for the progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for published studies on the effect of NLR, PLR, and CRP in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

RESULTS

In the meta-analysis, NLR (hazard ratio [HR], 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27-3.18; P = .003) and PLR (HR, 6.96; 95% CI, 5.04-9.62; P < .001) had a significant influence on progression-free survival, whereas all considered proinflammatory markers had a significant impact on overall survival: NLR (HR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.67-2.73; P < .001), PLR (HR, 14.67; 95% CI, 11.10-19.57; P < .001), and CRP (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.26-3.05; P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Inflammation markers such as NLR, PLR, and CRP are predictors of clinical outcome and could provide additional information to individualize treatment.

Meta-analysis of the efficacy of the pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of prognosis in renal carcinoma patients receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors

The data on the impact of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are inconsistent. We therefore performed a meta-analysis to assess the prognostic value of pretreatment NLR in patients treated with TKIs for mRCC. We searched the Embase, Medline, PubMed, Cochrane and ISI Web of Knowledge to identify clinical studies that had evaluated the association between the pretreatment NLR and prognosis in mRCC patients. Prognostic outcomes included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Nine studies encompassing a total of 1091 participants were included. We found that a high NLR was an effective prognostic marker of both OS (pooled HR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.35-2.77; P = 0.0003) and PFS (pooled HR: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.42-3.17; P = 0.0002). Subgroup analysis revealed that studies reporting a NLR ≥ 3 showed a more significant effect of NLR on both OS (pooled HR: 2.50, 95% CI: 1.99-3.14; P = 0.0003) and PFS (pooled HR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.26-3.75). This meta-analysis suggests that high pretreatment NLR is associated with a poor prognosis in mRCC patients receiving TKI treatment.

Primary Tumor Characteristics Are Important Prognostic Factors for Sorafenib-Treated Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

We aimed to identify prognostic factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with sorafenib. We investigated 177 patients, including 116 who received sorafenib as first-line therapy, using the Cox regression model. During a median follow-up period of 19.2 months, the PFS and OS were 6.4 and 32.6 months among all patients and 7.4 months and undetermined for first-line sorafenib-treated patients, respectively. Clinical T3-4 stage (hazard ratio [HR] 2.56) and a primary tumor size >7 cm (HR 0.34) were significant prognostic factors for PFS among all patients, as were tumor size >7 cm (HR 0.12), collecting system invasion (HR 5.67), and tumor necrosis (HR 4.11) for OS (p < 0.05). In first-line sorafenib-treated patients, ≥4 metastatic lesions (HR 28.57), clinical T3-4 stage (HR 4.34), collecting system invasion (univariate analysis HR 2.11; multivariate analysis HR 0.07), lymphovascular invasion (HR 13.35), and tumor necrosis (HR 6.69) were significant prognosticators of PFS, as were bone metastasis (HR 5.49) and clinical T3-4 stages (HR 4.1) for OS (p < 0.05). Our study thus identified a number of primary tumor-related characteristics as important prognostic factors in sorafenib-treated mRCC patients.

Outcomes of Patients With Late-Relapse Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Targeted Therapies: A Single Institution Experience

BACKGROUND

Late relapse with presentation of metastatic disease >5 years after nephrectomy with curative intent is a known behavior of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but data on outcomes, especially regarding targeted therapies, are limited. In this study, we analyze clinicopathologic features and response to targeted therapy in patients with late-relapse metastatic RCC (mRCC).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed clinical data on consecutive patients treated with targeted therapy for mRCC diagnosed >5 years after nephrectomy with curative intent.

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients (100% clear cell histology, median age 72 years, 83% males, all with prior nephrectomies) met inclusion criteria; 71% had favorable risk, and 25% had intermediate risk by International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium criteria. The estimated median overall survival for all patients was 60.5 months, and the 3-year overall survival rate was 71.78% (95% confidence interval, 47.98%-84.77%). All patients were treated with targeted therapy; first-line treatments included pazopanib (46%), sorafenib (25%), sunitinib (17%), and cytokine (13%), with no significant difference in time to treatment failure between therapies. Median time on first-line therapy was 19.7 months; 67% of patients received second-line treatment. Metastases were detected at considerable rates in sites considered historically uncommon, such as the pancreas, adrenal glands, and soft tissue.

CONCLUSION

Patients with late-relapse mRCC treated with targeted therapy had prolonged survival that compared favorably to historical controls, and metastases in uncommon sites were noted.

A retrospective study of predictive factors for unexpectedly prolonged or shortened progression-free survival and overall survival among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received first-line targeted therapy

Background

To identify predictors of prolonged or shortened progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who received first-line targeted therapies.

Methods

This retrospective study included 146 patients with mRCC who were treated during 2007–2015. These patients were divided into a group with the worst response (WG), an expected group (EG), and a group with the best response (BG), based on their PFS (≤3 monthsnths, 3–18 monthsnths, and >18 monthsnths, respectively) and OS (<1 year, 1–3 years, and >3 years, respectively). To identify significant predictive factors, the BG and WG were compared to the EG using the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Heng risk models.

Results

The overall PFS and OS were 9.3 months and 16.4 months, respectively. The median PFS for the WG (41.8 %), EG (45.9 %), and BG (12.3 %) were 2.7 months, 9.3 months, and 56.6 months, respectively, and the median OS for the WG (45.9 %), EG (35.6 %), and BG (18.5 %) were 5.5 months, 21.6 months, and 63.1 months, respectively; these outcomes were significantly different (p < 0.001). Nephrectomy (odds ratio [OR]: 7.15) was a significant predictor of PFS in the BG, and the significant predictors of OS in the BG were MSKCC intermediate risk (OR: 0.12), poor risk (OR: 0.04), and a disease-free interval of <1 year (OR: 0.23) (all, p < 0.05). Anemia (OR: 3.25) was a significant predictor of PFS in the WG, and the significant predictors of OS were age (OR: 1.05), anemia (OR: 4.13), lymphocytopenia (OR: 4.76), disease-free interval of <1 year (OR: 4.8), and synchronous metastasis (OR: 3.52) (all, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

We identified several significant predictors of unexpectedly good and poor response to first-line targeted therapy among patients with mRCC.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2615-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical efficacy of nivolumab in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Nivolumab is a recombinant, humanized monoclonal antibody that binds PD-1. The binding of PD-1 with PD-L1, expressed on antigen-presenting cells and tumor cells, suppresses the ability of T-lymphocytes to recognize and destroy tumor cells. Nivolumab reverts this inhibitory signal and has led to a significant prolongation of overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

AREAS COVERED

The rationale for immunotherapy in metastatic RCC, key immune checkpoint pathways, nivolumab pharmacodynamics, results from the main clinical trials, and predictors of response are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Nivolumab demonstrated a statistically significant advantage over everolimus in overall survival in metastatic RCC patients after first-line antiangiogenic therapy. Nevertheless, a number of issues remain to be resolved regarding the use of this drug in RCC. It is now imperative to identify which patients can benefit most from immunotherapy and studies are ongoing to define its role in other settings and/or in combinations with antiCTLA4 or antiangiogenic drugs.

Role of dose exposure and inflammatory status in a single center, real-world analysis of sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

AIM, PATIENTS & METHODS: To evaluate the real-world setting use of sunitinib, we reviewed data of our patients from January 2007 to December 2014.

RESULTS

In 114 patients, sunitinib was used as first-line TKI. Out of 110 evaluable patients, 5 complete responses, 37 partial responses, 42 stabilizations were reported. Median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 14.3 and 28.4 months. Patients who received ≥ 4 full-dose cycles had a better OS (p = 0.02). A neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio <3 was associated both with OS and progression-free survival (50.4 vs 8.4 and 20.0 vs 3.3 months).

CONCLUSION

Sunitinib is active and feasible. Patients receiving <4 full-dose cycles or having increased neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio achieved worse outcomes: therefore, these are present potential predictive factors.

Inside the 2015 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Genitourinary Cancers Symposium, Rosen Shingle Creek, Orlando, FL, USA, 26-28 February 2015 The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Genitourinary Cancers Symposium was held in Orlando (FL, USA), from 26 to 28 February 2015. This meeting was focused on 'Integrating Biology into patient-centric care' and represented an attractive opportunity for oncology professionals with a special interest in the diagnosis and treatment of genitourinary tumors. The identification and validation of biomarkers for tumor response had been the focus of several researchers at the symposium, together with the development of novel targeted agents. This report is a summary of the highlights on kidney and prostate tumors presented at the 2015 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium by various investigators.

Prognostic significance of systemic neutrophil and leukocyte alterations in surgically treated endometrial cancer patients: a monoinstitutional study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of an elevated neutrophil count at the time of the initial diagnosis in patients with surgically treated endometrial cancer.

METHODS

The baseline characteristics and outcome data of patients who were diagnosed with endometrial cancer between January 2000 and December 2010 were collected and retrospectively reviewed. The patients were separated into two groups according to their neutrophil counts. The clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival rates of the two groups were compared. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to investigate the prognostic significance of an elevated neutrophil count among patients with surgically treated endometrial cancer.

RESULTS

An elevated neutrophil count was found to be associated with an advanced clinical stage (P<0.0001), lymphovascular space involvement (P=0.0003), cervical involvement (P=0.0049), the proportion of patients that received adjuvant therapy (P=0.0020), elevated NLR (P<0.0001), and treatment failure (P<0.0001). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that age (hazard ratio (HR)=2.23, 95% confidence interval (95% CI)=1.30 to 3.91; P=0.0035), clinical stage (HR=4.72, 95% CI=2.61 to 8.90; P<0.0001), lymphovascular space involvement (HR=3.15, 95% CI=1.60 to 6.68; P=0.0007), an elevated neutrophil count (HR=2.76, 95% CI=1.43 to 5.03; P=0.0033), and an elevated white blood cell count (HR=2.79, 95% CI=1.50 to 4.96; P=0.0017) were significant predictors of survival.

CONCLUSION

The elevated neutrophil or leukocyte counts at the time of the initial diagnosis are independent prognostic factors in patients with surgically treated endometrial cancer.