Stress-ECG vs. CT coronary angiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a “real-world” experience

Diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography angiography versus exercise electrocardiography for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Both coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and exercise electrocardiography (ExECG) are non-invasive testing methods for the evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, there was controversy on the diagnostic performance of these methods due to the limited data in each single study. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to address these issues.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and Embase databases up to May 22, 2015. Two authors identified eligible studies, extracted data and accessed quality. Pooled estimation of sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), summary receiver-operating characteristic curve (SROC) and the area under curve (AUC) of CCTA and ExECG for the diagnosis of CAD were calculated using Stata, Meta-Disc and Review Manager statistical software.

RESULTS

Seven articles were included. Pooled sensitivity of CCTA and ExECG were 0.98 [95% confidence intervals (CIs): 0.95-0.99] and 0.66 (95% CIs: 0.59-0.72); pooled specificity of CCTA and ExECG were 0.84 (95% CIs: 0.81-0.87) and 0.75 (95% CIs: 0.71-0.79); pooled DOR of CCTA and ExECG were 110.24 (95% CIs: 35.07-346.55) and 6.28 (95% CIs: 2.06-19.13); and AUC of CCTA and ExECG were 0.9950±0.0046 and 0.7727±0.0638, respectively. There is no heterogeneity caused by threshold effect in CCTA or ExECG analysis. The Deeks' test showed no potential publication bias (P=0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

CCTA has better diagnostic performance than ExECG in the evaluation of CAD, which can provide a better solution for the clinical problem of the diagnosis for CAD.

Role of MDCT coronary angiography in the clinical setting: economic implications

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the incremental value and cost-effectiveness ratio of introducing coronary angiography (CA) with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT-CA) in the diagnostic management of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) compared with the traditional diagnostic workup.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Five hundred and fifty consecutive patients who underwent MDCT-CA between January 2009 and June 2011 were considered. Patients with atypical chest pain and suspected obstructive CAD were directed to one of two diagnostic pathways: the traditional protocol (examination, stress test, CA) and the current protocol (examination, stress test, MDCT-CA, and CA, if necessary). The costs of each protocol and for the individual method were calculated. Based on the results, the cost-effectiveness ratio of the two diagnostic pathways was compared. A third, modified, diagnostic pathway has been proposed with its relative cost-effectiveness ratio (examination, MDCT-CA, stress test, and CA, if necessary).

RESULTS

Stress test vs. MDCT-CA had an accuracy of 66%, a sensitivity and specificity of 21% and 87%, respectively, and a positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive value of 40% and 70%, respectively. Comparison between conventional CA (CCA) and MDCT-CA showed a sensitivity and specificity of 92% and 89%, respectively, a PPV and NPV of 89%, and an accuracy of 92%. The traditional protocol has higher costs than the second protocol: 1,645 euro against 322 euro (mean), but it shows a better cost-effectiveness ratio. The new proposed protocol has lower costs, mean 261 euro, with a better costeffectiveness ratio than the traditional protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic protocol for patients with suspected CAD has been modified by the introduction of MDCT-CA. Our study confirms the greater diagnostic performance of MDCT-CA compared with stress test and its similar accuracy to CCA. The use of MDCT-CA to select patients for CCA has a favourable cost-effectiveness profile.

Role of coronary angiography MDCT in the clinical setting: changes in diagnostic workup in the real world

PURPOSE

The authors sought to evaluate the incremental value of introducing coronary angiography with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT-CA) compared with the conventional diagnostic workup in managing patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) workup.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 531 consecutive patients underwent MDCT-CA between April 2008 and August 2010. For each patient the pretest probability of CAD was obtained by using the Morise score as well as the diagnostic performance of the exercise test and of MDCT-CA, considering conventional coronary angiography (CCA) as the gold standard. Based on these results, we calculated the posttest likelihood of CAD after stress testing, comparing the incremental diagnostic value for each category of cardiovascular risk with data obtained with MDCT-CA. The conventional diagnostic workup (without MDCT-CA) was then compared with the modified workup (including MDCT-CA).

RESULTS

The diagnostic performance of the exercise test for identifying patients with significant lesions had a sensitivity and specificity of 20% and 88%, respectively, with positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive value of 41% and 72%, respectively. Taking CA as the gold standard, MDCT-CA had 93% sensitivity, 89% specificity, 88% PPV and 93% NPV compared with CCA in evaluating significant stenoses in the per-patient analysis. The overall diagnostic accuracy of MDCT-CA was 91%. The exercise tests provided no significant incremental diagnostic value compared with cardiovascular history in patients with a low to intermediate risk. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of these protocols showed improved performance results for the modified protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

MDCT-CA is the reference modality for the noninvasive exclusion of critical CAD. It provides a very high incremental diagnostic value compared with exercise testing in patients with a low to intermediate risk of CAD. The use of diagnostic protocols based on MDCT-CA ensures improved diagnostic performance compared with those involving conventional exercise electrocardiograms.

Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in a large population of patients without revascularisation: registry data on the comparison between male and female population

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) for detecting significant coronary artery stenosis (≥50% lumen reduction) compared with conventional coronary angiography (CAG) in a male and female population.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 1,372 patients (882 men, 490 women; mean age 59.3 ± 11.9 years) in sinus rhythm imaged with CTCA (64-slice technology) and CAG were enrolled. Diagnostic accuracy and likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-) of CTCA were assessed against CAG for the male and female populations.

RESULTS

The prevalence of obstructive disease was 53% (men 58%; women 43%). CAG demonstrated the absence of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in 47% (men 42%; women 56%), single-vessel disease in 25% (men 36%; women 22%) and multivessel disease in 29% (men 32%; women 23%) of patients. In the per-patient analysis, sensitivity, specificity and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of CTCA were 99% (men 98%; women 100%), 92% (men 92%; women 92%), 94% (men 95%; women 90%) and 99% (men 98%; women 100%), respectively. The per-patient likelihood ratios (LR) in the total population (LR+=12.4 and LR-=0.011), the male (LR+=12.9 and LR-=0.016) and female (LR =11.9 and LR-=0) populations were very good. We observed no significant differences in diagnostic accuracy between male and female populations.

CONCLUSIONS

CTCA is a reliable diagnostic modality with high sensitivity and NPV in the female population.

Computed tomography coronary angiography in the selection of outlier patients: a feasibility report

PURPOSE

This study evaluated criteria, presence and distribution of outlier patients by means of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) in a large institutional database.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From a population of 2,881 consecutive patients (1,842 men, mean age 62 ± 13 years) in sinus rhythm who underwent CTCA, we extracted data on patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). We selected patient outliers in the fifth and sixth decades of life with the following criteria: ≥ 3 risk factors and absence of CAD, zero to one risk factors and ≥ 5 diseased coronary segments. Diabetes was excluded from risk factors because of the different impact on CAD.

RESULTS

The patient population consisted of 2,432 individuals with suspected CAD (1,495 men, age 62 ± 13 years). The prevalence of obstructive CAD (≥ 50% lumen reduction at CTCA) was 36% (863/2,432). Patients with normal coronary arteries accounted for 34% of the total (837/2,432; 431 men, age 55 ± 14 years). Of these, 210 were in the fifth and 231 in the 6th decade (men 196, women 245); those with ≥ 3 risk factors accounted for 4.2% of the total (102/2,432; men 42, women 60). Patients with ≥ 5 diseased coronary segments accounted for 28% of the total (686/2,432; 510 men, age 68 ± 10 years). Of these, 115 were in the fifth and 270 in the sixth decade (men 309, women 76); those with zero to one risk factors accounted for 3.0% (73/2,432; men 66, women 7).

CONCLUSIONS

CTCA is a reliable noninvasive diagnostic modality that can be used to identify outlier patients. This will enable dedicated trials aimed at characterising biomarkers and genomics of protective and nonprotective factors against CAD and its complications.

The diagnostic performance of multi-slice coronary computed tomographic angiography: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The use of coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) for evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) is growing rapidly, yet questions remain regarding its diagnostic accuracy and its impact on clinical decision-making and patient outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies examining (a) CCTA's diagnostic accuracy; and (b) the impact of CCTA on clinical decision-making and/or patient outcomes. Diagnostic accuracy estimates were limited to patient-based analyses of occlusion; outcome studies were eligible for inclusion if they involved patients at low-to-intermediate risk of CAD. Pooled accuracy estimates were derived using bivariate random effects models; non-diagnostic CCTA results were conservatively assumed to be false positives.

RESULTS

A total of 42 diagnostic accuracy studies and 11 patient outcome studies were identified. The pooled mean sensitivity for CCTA in primary analyses was 98% (95% CI: 96%, 99%); specificity was 85% (81%, 89%). A small number of outcome studies set primarily in the emergency department found triage of low-risk patients using CCTA produced no serious adverse outcomes and was time-saving relative to standard triage care. Outcome studies in the outpatient setting were limited to four case series that did not directly compare patient care or outcomes with those of contemporaneous patients evaluated without CCTA.

CONCLUSIONS

CCTA appears to have high diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected CAD, but its potential impact on clinical decision-making and patient outcomes is less well-understood, particularly in non-emergent settings.