Concomitant adjuvant chemo-radiation therapy with anthracycline-based regimens in breast cancer: a single centre experience

Breast cancer patient perspective on opportunities and challenges of a genetic test aimed to predict radio-induced side effects before treatment: Analysis of the Italian branch of the REQUITE project

AIM

To explore breast cancer patient's perspective on future genetic testing for prediction of toxicity after breast radiotherapy (RT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study involved patient enrolled in the Italian branch of the REQUITE project conducted at the National Cancer Institute in Milan. Semi-structured interviews were conducted within one month from the end of radiotherapy treatment by two radiation oncologists and a radiotherapy technician previously trained by a clinical psychologist with experience in the oncology field. Semi-structured interviews are characterized by a set of pre-defined questions and developed ad hoc by researchers in Leicester within the REQUITE project. The interview questions investigated interest in undergoing the genetic test and expectations on its usefulness and disadvantages.

RESULTS

Eighteen interviews were conducted and analysed. Forty-five initial codes were combined into nine themes which were then clustered in two main macro-areas (i) Opportunities and (ii) Challenges. Overall, all patients understand the aim of the genetic test and considered its intrinsic opportunity to make the physician more confident with the treatment. Regarding side effects, most of patients felt prepared to RT but not without fear. Many women considered important to have the largest and reliable information, also about negative experiences. Prevailing emotions were anxiety and fear but not connected to genetic test's result.

CONCLUSIONS

A genetic test could be an opportunity because generate knowledge and give patients a dynamic role in the decision-making approach. Prediction of single patient radiosensitivity before RT could prompt suggestion to entail a more and more tailored radiation treatment in the era of personalized approach.

A matched cohort study of radio-chemotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in soft tissue sarcoma patients

PURPOSE

Adjuvant radiotherapy is the standard postoperative treatment after conservative surgery in high risk soft tissue sarcoma. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy is still debated. Therefore, a matched cohort analysis was performed in high risk soft tissue patients to analyse differences in terms of clinical outcome and toxicity between patients treated with concomitant radio-chemotherapy (RTCT) and radiotherapy (RT) alone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For each patient in RT group was selected a patient in the RTCT group matching for age, T stage and grading. Acute and late toxicity were recorded, overall survival, recurrence free survival and distant metastases free survival were analysed and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Ninety patients were selected, half of patients underwent radio-chemotherapy and half received radiotherapy alone. During the treatment Grade 3 dermatitis was recorded in 15 (16.7%) patients, 6 (6.7%) patients associated chemotherapy and during follow up 12 (13.3%) patients developed grade 2 late fibrosis, 3 (3.3%) joint stiffness and 1 (1.1%) patient experienced a bone fracture. There were no differences in the rate of acute and late toxicity between RTCT and RT alone group. Nineteen (21.1%) patients developed local recurrence, overall 5-year local relapse free survival was 83%. There were no differences between the two groups. 29 patients developed distant metastases, 14 (15.6%) patients in the RTCT group and 15 (16.7%) patients in the RT group. The 5-year distant metastases free survival was 67%. Age > 65 years was the only independent factor affecting distant recurrence (HR = 5.7, 95% CI 2.7-11.9; p = 0.001). At the time of analysis 15 (16.7%) patients were dead, 6 (6.7%) patients in the RTCT group and 9 (10%) patients in the RT group. 5-years overall survival was: 88%. At multivariate analysis age > 65 years was an independent prognostic factor of overall survival (HR = 3.7, 95% CI 1.2-12.1, p = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

Prospective randomized studies with large size population and with subgroup analysis for histological subtypes are necessary to clarify the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma patients. Tailored treatment has to be considered in elderly soft tissue patients to guarantee a better outcome in this high risk and fragile population.

Safety of concurrent adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma

INTRODUCTION:

This retrospective study analyzes the safety and feasibility of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in adjuvant treatment of soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

METHODS:

A total of 158 patients with STS were retrospectively analyzed. Anthracycline-based computed tomography was performed in high-risk patients. Acute radiotherapy toxicity and chemotherapy-related toxicity were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0; late radiotherapy toxicity was recorded according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria.

RESULTS:

Fifty-four (34.2%) patients received CRT. Mean follow up was 5.4 years (range .2-21.1 years). Local DFS-recurrence-free survival, distant DFS-relapse-free survival, and overall survival were 79.1%, 76.4%, and 64.6%, respectively, at last follow-up. Leukopenia occurred in 11.4% of patients. Skin acute toxicity developed in 60.1% of patients and determined interruption of radiotherapy treatment in 19 (12%) patients. Nineteen patients (12%) experienced moderate fibrosis (grade 2). Mild and moderate joint stiffness was recorded in 16 (10.1%) patients. Size ≥5 cm was the only predictor of local recurrence at multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 9.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-72.83, p = .028). Age and stage resulted as independent distant relapse predictors (HR 4.77, 95% CI 1.81-12.58, p = .002 and HR 4.83, CI 1.41-16.57, p = .012, respectively). At Cox regression univariate analysis, Karnofsky Performance Status, size, and stage were significant survival predictors (HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.02-4.87, p = .045; HR 2.88, 95% CI 1.10-7.52, p = .031; HR 2.59, 95% CI 1.11-6.04, p = .028).

CONCLUSIONS:

Concurrent CRT is a well-tolerated treatment option with no additional toxicity compared to exclusive radiotherapy or sequential CRT.

Image-guided radiotherapy for cardiac sparing in patients with left-sided breast cancer

Patients with left-sided breast cancer are at risk of cardiac toxicity because of cardiac irradiation during radiotherapy with the conventional 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy technique. In addition, many patients may receive chemotherapy prior to radiation, which may damage the myocardium and may increase the potential for late cardiac complications. New radiotherapy techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) may decrease the risk of cardiac toxicity because of the steep dose gradient limiting the volume of the heart irradiated to a high dose. Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is a new technique of IMRT delivery with daily imaging, which may further reduce excessive cardiac irradiation. Preliminary results of IGRT for cardiac sparing in patients with left-sided breast cancer are promising and need to be investigated in future prospective clinical studies.