Whole-body MRI and PET/CT in multiple myeloma patients during staging and after treatment: personal experience in a longitudinal study

Whole-Body MRI Is an Effective Imaging Modality for Hematological Malignancy Treatment Response Assessment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) for assessment of hematological malignancies' therapeutic response.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched up to August 2021 to identify studies reporting the diagnostic performance of WB-MRI for the assessment of hematological malignancies' treatment response. A bivariate random-effects model was applied for the generation of the pooled diagnostic performance.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies with 457 patients with lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and sarcoma (very small proportion) were analyzed. Overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of WB-MRI were 0.88 (95% CI: 0.73-0.95) and 0.86 (95% CI: 0.73-0.93), respectively. Studies using whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (WB-DWI) showed higher sensitivity than those that did not (0.94 vs. 0.55, p = 0.02). The pooled concordance rate of WB-MRI to assess hematological malignancies' treatment response with reference standard was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.59-0.96). WB-MRI and PET/CT showed similar diagnostic performance (sensitivity [0.83 vs. 0.92, p = 0.11] and specificity [0.87 vs. 0.76, p = 0.73]).

CONCLUSION

WB-MRI has high diagnostic performance for hematological malignancies' treatment response assessment. The adding of WB-DWI is strongly associated with increased sensitivity.

Optimization of whole-body 2-[18F]FDG-PET/MRI imaging protocol for the initial staging of patients with myeloma

OBJECTIVE

To determine the optimal 2-[¹⁸F]FDG-PET/MRI imaging protocol for the initial staging of patients with suspected or confirmed multiple myeloma.

METHODS

Radiologists and nuclear medicine specialists reviewed all PET/MRI exams of 104 patients with a monoclonal gammopathy (MG). The presence of focal and diffuse bone marrow involvement (BMI) was assessed using 4 different image datasets: WB-MRI, PET, WB-PET/MRI, and WB-DCE-PET/MRI. A reference standard was established by a panel review of all baseline and follow-up imaging, and biological and pathological information. The diagnostic performance for each image dataset to detect BMI was evaluated and compared (Fisher's exact test).

RESULTS

Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for focal BMI of WB-MRI was 87%, 97%, and 92%; of PET was 78%, 97%, and 95%; of WB-PET/MRI was 93%, 97%, and 95%; and of WB-DCE-PET/MRI was 93%, 97%, and 95%, respectively. WB-PET/MRI and WB-DCE-PET/MRI were statistically superior to PET (p = 0.036) without decreasing specificity. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of WB-MRI for diffuse BMI detection was 91%, 80%, and 85%; of 3DT1-PET was 53%, 89%, and 74%; of WB-PET/MRI was 98%, 66%, and 79%; and of WB-DCE-PET/MRI was 98%, 59%, and 75%, respectively. PET lacked sensitivity compared to all other dataset studies (p < 0.0001). WB-MRI had the best accuracy without reaching statistical significance when compared to the other datasets.

CONCLUSION

The WB-PET/MRI dataset including T1 and T2 Dixon, WB-DWI, and PET images provides optimal diagnostic performance to detect both focal lesions and diffuse BMI, with limited added value of WB-DCE for baseline staging of patients with MG. Key Points • The combination of morphological and functional MRI sequences and metabolic (2-[¹⁸F]FDG-PET) images increases the diagnostic performance of PET/MRI to detect focal bone lesions. • The adjunction of dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences did not improve diagnostic performance.

Comparative Performance of Whole Body MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Evaluation of Response to Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

Background: Traditional approaches for evaluating multiple myeloma (MM) treatment response have low sensitivity for residual disease. Recent studies highlight utility of whole-body MRI or FDG PET/CT in evaluating treatment response, with increasing emphasis on DWI. Objective: This systematic review was conducted to assess the diagnostic accuracy of whole-body MRI and FDG PET/CT for treatment response assessment in MM. Evidence Acquisition: Studies using whole-body MRI or FDG PET/CT to evaluate MM treatment response were identified through search of PubMed and EMBASE databases through June 30, 2021. Pooled sensitivity and specificity for detecting response were calculated by bivariate modeling. Diagnostic performance of whole-body MRI and FDG PET/CT were compared. Subgroup analyses assessed studies comparing both modalities and studies in which whole-body MRI included DWI. Evidence Synthesis: Twelve studies comprising 373 patients were included: six evaluated both modalities, four evaluated whole-body MRI only, and two evaluated FDG PET/CT only; of studies with MRI, five used DWI. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 87% (95% CI, 75%-93%) and 57% (95% CI, 37%-76%) for whole-body MRI, versus 64% (95% CI, 45%-79%) and 82% (95% CI, 75%-88%) for FDG PET/CT (sensitivity: p = .29; specificity: p = .01). For studies directly comparing the modalities, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 90% (95% CI, 80%-100%) and 56% (95% CI, 44%-68%) for whole-body MRI, versus 66% (95% CI, 47%-85%) and 81% (95% CI, 72%-90%) for FDG PET/CT (sensitivity: p = .18; specificity: p < .001). Sensitivity and specificity were 93% (95% CI, 75%-98%) and 57% (95% CI, 21%-87%) for DWI, versus 74% (95% CI, 60%-85%) and 56% (95% CI, 38%-73%) for whole-body MRI without DWI (sensitivity: p = .27; specificity: p = .99). AUC was 0.84 for whole-body MRI, 0.83 for FDG PET/CT, and 0.92 for DWI. Conclusion: FDG PET/CT had significantly higher specificity, whereas whole-body MRI had higher sensitivity (though non-significant). DWI may contribute to the high sensitivity of whole-body MRI. Clinical Impact: This meta-analysis suggests potential complementary roles of whole-body MRI and FDG PET/CT in MM treatment response assessment. Future studies should explore their combination through PET/MRI.

Comparison of the diagnostic performance and impact on management of 18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI in multiple myeloma

PURPOSE

Comparative data on the impact of imaging on management is lacking for multiple myeloma. This study compared the diagnostic performance and impact on management of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) in treatment-naive myeloma.

METHODS

Forty-six patients undergoing 18F-FDG PET/CT and WBMRI were reviewed by a nuclear medicine physician and radiologist, respectively, for the presence of myeloma bone disease. Blinded clinical and imaging data were reviewed by two haematologists in consensus and management recorded following clinical data ± 18F-FDG PET/CT or WBMRI. Bone disease was defined using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria and a clinical reference standard. Per-patient sensitivity for lesion detection was established. McNemar test compared management based on clinical assessment ± 18F-FDG PET/CT or WBMRI.

RESULTS

Sensitivity for bone lesions was 69.6% (32/46) for 18F-FDG PET/CT (54.3% (25/46) for PET component alone) and 91.3% (42/46) for WBMRI. 27/46 (58.7%) of cases were concordant. In 19/46 patients (41.3%) WBMRI detected more focal bone lesions than 18F-FDG PET/CT. Based on clinical data alone, 32/46 (69.6%) patients would have been treated. Addition of 18F-FDG PET/CT to clinical data increased this to 40/46 (87.0%) patients (p = 0.02); and WBMRI to clinical data to 43/46 (93.5%) patients (p = 0.002). The difference in treatment decisions was not statistically significant between 18F-FDG PET/CT and WBMRI (p = 0.08).

CONCLUSION

Compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT, WBMRI had a higher per patient sensitivity for bone disease. However, treatment decisions were not statistically different and either modality would be appropriate in initial staging, depending on local availability and expertise.

Whole Body Low Dose Computed Tomography (WBLDCT) Can Be Comparable to Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging (WBMRI) in the Assessment of Multiple Myeloma

Aim of the study is to compare the agreement between whole-body low-dose computed tomography (WBLDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) in the evaluation of bone marrow involvement in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Patients with biopsy-proven MM, who underwent both WBLDCT and WBMRI were retrospectively enrolled. After identifying the presence of focal bone involvement (focal infiltration pattern), the whole skeleton was divided into five anatomic districts (skull, spine, sternum and ribs, pelvis, and limbs). Patients were grouped according to the number and location of the lytic lesions (<5, 5-20, and >20) and Durie and Salmon staging system. The agreement between CT and MRI regarding focal pattern, staging, lesion number, and distribution was assessed using the Cohen Kappa statistics. The majority of patients showed focal involvement. According to the distribution of the focal lesions and Durie Salmon staging, the agreement between CT and MRI was substantial or almost perfect (all κ > 0.60). The agreement increased proportionally with the number of lesions in the pelvis and spine (κ = 0.373 to κ = 0.564, and κ = 0.469-0.624), while for the skull the agreement proportionally decreased without reaching a statistically significant difference (p > 0.05). In conclusion, WBLDCT showed an almost perfect agreement in the evaluation of focal involvement, staging, lesion number, and distribution of bone involvement in comparison with WBMRI.

Comparison of [18F]FDG PET/CT and MRI for Treatment Response Assessment in Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis

The present study was designed to assess the additional value of 2-deoxy-2[¹⁸F]fluoro-D-glucose ([¹⁸F]FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the treatment response assessment of multiple myeloma (MM). We performed a meta-analysis of all available studies to compare the detectability of treatment response of [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT and MRI in treated MM. We defined detecting a good therapeutic effect as positive, and residual disease as negative. We determined the sensitivities and specificities across studies, calculated the positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR), and made summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC) using hierarchical regression models. The pooled analysis included six studies that comprised 278 patients. The respective performance characteristics (95% confidence interval (CI)) of [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT and MRI were as follows: sensitivity of 80% (56% to 94%) and 25% (19% to 31%); specificity of 58% (44% to 71%) and 83% (71% to 91%); diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 6.0 (3.0-12.0) and 1.7 (0.7-2.7); positive LR of 1.8 (1.3-2.4) and 1.4 (0.7-2.7); and negative LR of 0.33 (0.21-0.53) and 0.81 (0.62-1.1). In the respective SROC curves, the area under the curve was 0.77 (SE, 0.038) and 0.59 (SE, 0.079) and the Q* index was 0.71 and 0.57. Compared with MRI, [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT had higher sensitivity and better DOR and SROC curves. Compared with MRI, [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT had greater ability to detect the treatment assessment of MM.

Minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma: defining the role of next generation sequencing and flow cytometry in routine diagnostic use

For patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma (MM) there have been significant treatment advances over the past decade, reflected in an increasing proportion of patients achieving durable remissions. Clinical trials repeatedly demonstrate that achieving a deep response to therapy, with a bone marrow assessment proving negative for minimal residual disease (MRD), confers a significant survival advantage. To accurately assess for minute quantities of residual cancer requires highly sensitive methods; either multiparameter flow cytometry or next generation sequencing are currently recommended for MM response assessment. Under optimal conditions, these methods can detect one aberrant cell amongst 1,000,000 normal cells (a sensitivity of 10^-6). Here, we will review the practical use of MRD assays in MM, including challenges in implementation for the routine diagnostic laboratory, standardisation across laboratories and clinical trials, the clinical integration of MRD status assessment into MM management and future directions for ongoing research.

Diagnostic performance of 18 F-FDG-PET/CT compared to standard skeletal survey for detecting bone destruction in smouldering multiple myeloma: time to move forward

Skeletal survey (SS) continues to be used in the community to detect bone disease in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). While the false-negative rate is high, the specificity of SS is less well characterised. Here, we compare the diagnostic accuracy of SS compared to ¹⁸ F-FDG-PET/CT (positron emission tomography/computed tomography) in 79 patients referred to our tertiary centre with a diagnosis of smouldering MM. SS had a specificity of 83·1% (95% confidence interval: 72·0-90·5%). This study reinforces the importance of using more specific imaging techniques to avoid inaccurate diagnosis that could lead to the risks associated with unnecessary therapy in patients with smouldering MM.

MRI versus 18F-FDG-PET/CT for detecting bone marrow involvement in multiple myeloma: diagnostic performance and clinical relevance

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic performance of MRI and ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT in detecting bone marrow involvement (BMI) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by our Institutional Review Board. Two radiologists and two nuclear medicine specialists independently and blindly reviewed 84 pairs of MRI and PET/CT scans obtained in 73 MM patients. Readers assessed the presence and patterns of BMI. The best valuable comparator (BVC) for BMI was established by a panel review of all baseline and follow-up imaging, and biological and pathological information. Intra- and inter-reader agreement and correlation between MRI and PET/CT were assessed using the prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa (k) coefficient. Diagnostic performance of MRI and PET/CT in detecting BMI was evaluated from ROC characteristics. Association between imaging and biological, pathological, and clinical findings was assessed using Wilcoxon rank-sum and chi-square tests.

RESULTS

Intra- and inter-reader agreement was very good for MRI (k = 0.90 [0.81; 1.00] and 0.88 [0.78; 0.98]). Intra- and inter-reader agreement was good for PET/CT (k = 0.80 [0.69; 0.91] and 0.71 [0.56; 0.86]). The sensitivity of MRI to detect BMI (97% [90%; 100%]) was significantly superior to that of PET/CT (76% [64%; 85%]) (p < 0.001). The specificity of MRI (86% [57%; 98%]) was lower than that of PET/CT (93% [66%; 100%]), without reaching statistical significance (p = 0.32). There was a strong correlation between decisions regarding patient management and PET/CT findings (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

MRI is significantly more sensitive than PET/CT to detect BMI in MM. Patient management is more strongly correlated with PET/CT findings.

KEY POINTS

• MRI and PET/CT have very close diagnostic value for the detection of bone marrow involvement in multiple myeloma. • MRI has a significantly higher sensitivity and better reproducibility. • PET/CT findings appear to have a higher impact on clinical decisions.

National survey of imaging practice for suspected or confirmed plasma cell malignancies

OBJECTIVE:

Cross-sectional imaging is now recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) for patients with suspected and newly diagnosed myeloma instead of skeletal survey. The objectives of this study were: (1) To evaluate compliance of current UK imaging practice with reference to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence best-practice clinical guidelines for plasma cell malignancies. (2) To identify factors which may influence diagnostic imaging choices.

METHODS:

We conducted a national online survey to assess compliance with guidelines and to identify challenges to implementation (endorsed by Myeloma UK, UK Myeloma Forum and the British Society of Skeletal Radiologists).

RESULTS:

Responses were received from 31 district general and 28 teaching hospitals. For suspected and confirmed myeloma, skeletal survey remained the most frequent first-line imaging test (suspected myeloma 44.3%, confirmed myeloma 37.7%). Only 9.8 % of responders offered first-line whole body MRI.

CONCLUSION:

Significant challenges remain to standardisation of imaging practice in accordance with national best-practice guidelines.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:

This is the first publication to date evaluating current UK imaging practice for assessing myeloma since the publication of new guidelines recommending use of advanced cross-sectional imaging techniques. Skeletal survey remains the most commonly performed first-line imaging test in patients with suspected or confirmed myeloma and this is largely due to resource limitations within radiology departments.

Whole-Body MR Imaging: The Novel, "Intrinsically Hybrid," Approach to Metastases, Myeloma, Lymphoma, in Bones and Beyond

Whole-body MR imaging (WB-MR imaging) has become a modality of choice for detecting bone metastases in multiple cancers, and bone marrow involvement by multiple myeloma or lymphoma. Combination of anatomic and functional sequences imparts an inherently hybrid dimension to this nonirradiating tool and extends the screening of malignancies outside the skeleton. WB-MR imaging outperforms bone scintigraphy and CT and offers an alternative to PET in many tumors by time of lesion detection and assessment of treatment response. Much work has been done to standardize procedures, optimize sequences, validate indications, confirm preliminary research into new applications, rendering clinical application more user-friendly.

The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Multiple Myeloma Staging according to IMPeTUs: Comparison of the Durie-Salmon Plus and Other Staging Systems

We aimed at comparing the Durie–Salmon Plus (DS Plus) staging system based on Italian Myeloma criteria for PET USe (IMPeTUs) with other two staging systems in predicting prognosis of patients with all stages of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). A total of 33 MM patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. The variation between the DS Plus classification and Durie–Salmon staging system (DSS) or Revised International Staging System (RISS) classification was assessed. When staged by the DSS, patients in stage I and stage II did not reach the median overall survival (OS), and the median OS was 33 months for stage III (p=0.3621). When staged by the DS Plus, patients in stage I did not reach the median OS of stage I, and the median OS for stages II and III was 38 and nine months, respectively (p=0.0064). When staged by the RISS, patients in stage I did not reach the median OS, and the median OS was 33 and 16 months for stage II and stage III, respectively (p=0.0319). The concordances between two staging systems were 0.07 (DS Plus versus DSS) and 0.37 (DS Plus versus RISS), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that DS Plus stage III (HR: 11.539, p=0.021) and the Deauville score of bone marrow ≥4 (HR: 3.487, p=0.031) were independent prognostic factors associated with OS. Both the DS Plus based on IMPeTUs and RISS possessed a better potential in characterizing and stratifying MM patients compared with the DSS. Moreover, DS Plus stage III and the Deauville score of bone marrow ≥4 were reliable prognostic factors in newly diagnosed MM patients.

Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI before and early after treatment of multiple myeloma: a prospective comparative study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of WB-MRI and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in detecting infiltration pattern, disease activity, and response to treatment in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-six patients with confirmed MM were included in the present study for pre-treatment evaluation. Among these individuals, 22 patients were available for the post-treatment evaluation of response to therapy. All patients were imaged with both WB-MRI and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. All radiographic findings of infiltration pattern, disease activity, and response to therapy were compared. The diagnostic performance of both modalities was estimated using bone marrow aspirate and biopsy as the reference test.

RESULTS

For detection of active myelomatous tissue at diagnosis, WB-MRI achieved higher sensitivity (94%) than ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT (75%) (p = 0.0039), whereas both modalities achieved the same specificity (80%). For detection of residual myelomatous tissue after treatment, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT achieved higher specificity (86%) than WB-MRI (43%) (p = 0.0081), whereas both modalities achieved the same sensitivity (75%).

CONCLUSION

WB-MRI is more sensitive than ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of MM before treatment; however, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT is more specific than WB-MRI in detecting residual involvement in treated patients.

Comparison of whole body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) to whole body computed tomography (WBCT) or 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT (18F-FDG PET/CT) in patients with myeloma: Systematic review of diagnostic performance

OBJECTIVES

To undertake a systematic review to determine the diagnostic performance of whole body MRI (WBMRI) including diffusion weighted sequences (DWI) compared to whole body computed tomography (WBCT) or 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT (18F-FDG PET/CT) in patients with myeloma.

METHODS

Two researchers searched the primary literature independently for WBMRI studies of myeloma. Data were extracted focusing on the diagnostic ability of WBMRI versus WBCT and 18F-FDG PET/CT. Meta-analysis was intended.

RESULTS

6 of 2857 articles were eligible that included 147 patients, published from 2008 to 2016. Studies were heterogeneous including both newly diagnosed & relapsed patients. All were single centre studies. Four of the six studies (66.7%) accrued prospectively and 5/6 (83.3%, 3 prospective) included WBMRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT. Three of seven (42.9%) included DWI. The lack of an independent reference standard for individual lesions was noted in 5/6 (83.3%) studies. Studies reported that WBMRI detected more lesions than 18F-FDG PET/CT (sensitivity 68-100% versus 47-100%) but was less specific (specificity 37-83% versus 62-85.7%). No paper assessed impact on management.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies were heterogeneous, the majority lacking an independent reference standard. Future prospective trials should address these limitations and assess the impact of WBMRI on management.

Minimal residual disease analysis in myeloma - when, why and where

The primary hurdle in the path to curing multiple myeloma (MM) is defining a validated minimal residual disease (MRD) and its utility in the therapeutic decision making. A better definition of MRD will aid in tailoring MM therapy further to address the clonal heterogeneity and genomic instability and overcome patient's ineffective immune surveillance. MRD analysis can define the logical endpoint for maintenance therapy, in addition also aids in providing a better clinical end point for studies comparing novel agents in myeloma. MRD is a surrogate for the survival in MM. Guidelines for global incorporation of MRD in myeloma are fraught with lack of standardization, universal availability and abridged physicians' understanding of MRD modalities. We aimed at addressing some of the frequently asked questions in the MRD assessment and will also place in perspective some arguments in favor of MRD assessment in routine practice and clinical trial scenario.

Diagnostic Advances in Multiple Myeloma

There have been several advances in the diagnosis of multiple myeloma (MM) in recent years. Serum free light chains have improved the ability to diagnose light chain MM; however, there are still difficulties in the serologic diagnosis of MM in some cases, particularly IgA MM. A novel heavy/light chain assay is able to improve the accuracy of diagnosis in these cases. Free light chains may also improve the diagnosis of extramedullary disease in difficult cases such as disease involving the central nervous system, pleura, or ascites. Advances in imaging such as whole body low-dose computed tomography (CT) whole body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) have improved sensitivity in identifying lytic bone lesions, which would enable earlier treatment, and monitoring of osseous disease particularly in non- or oligosecretory disease. New techniques such as fused PET/MRI may further enhance the diagnosis of both bone lesions and extramedullary disease.

PET/MR Imaging of Multiple Myeloma

PET-magnetic resonance (MR) is a hybrid imaging modality that combines PET and MR. Evidence for this new modality is in the process of being developed, but both component modalities are well tested in the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma. It allows advanced bimodality imaging of the whole body with an adaptable field of view and it can be used for monitoring plasma cell dyscrasias for progression to multiple myeloma, for assessing disease burden in patients with known multiple myeloma, for assessing response to therapy and relapse after remission, and for radiation therapy treatment planning.

The Role of Imaging in the Treatment of Patients With Multiple Myeloma in 2016

The novel criteria for the diagnosis of symptomatic multiple myeloma have revealed the value of modern imaging for the management of patients with myeloma. Whole-body low-dose CT (LDCT) has increased sensitivity over conventional radiography for the detection of osteolytic lesions, and several myeloma organizations and institutions have suggested that whole-body LDCT should replace conventional radiography for the work-up of patients with myeloma. MRI is the best imaging method for the depiction of marrow infiltration by myeloma cells. Whole-body MRI (or at least MRI of the spine and pelvis if whole-body MRI is not available) should be performed for all patients with smoldering multiple myeloma with no lytic lesions to look for occult disease, which may justify treatment. In addition, MRI accurately illustrates the presence of plasmacytomas, spinal cord, and/or nerve compression for surgical intervention or radiation therapy; it is also recommended for the work-up of solitary bone plasmacytoma, and it may distinguish malignant from benign fractures (which is very important in cases of patients in biochemical remission with no other signs of progression). Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) seems to improve MRI diagnosis in patients with myeloma. PET/CT is a functional imaging technique, more sensitive than conventional radiography for the detection of lytic lesions, which probably allows better definition of complete response and minimal residual disease compared with all other imaging methods. PET/CT has shown the best results in the follow-up of patients with myeloma and has an independent prognostic value both at diagnosis and following treatment. PET/CT can also be used for the work-up of solitary bone plasmacytoma and nonsecretory myeloma.

MR imaging and PET/CT in diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma is a common hematologic malignancy among the elderly population. Although there have been many advances in treatment over the past few decades, the overall prognosis for the disease remains poor. Conventional radiography has long been the standard of reference for the imaging of multiple myeloma. However, 10%-20% of patients with multiple myeloma do not have evidence of disease at conventional radiography. There is a growing body of evidence supporting use of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma. MR imaging is useful in detection of bone marrow infiltration, a finding often missed at conventional radiography. FDG PET/CT is especially sensitive for the detection of extramedullary disease and can help detect the metabolically active lesions that often precede evidence of osseous destruction at conventional radiography. MR imaging and FDG PET/CT are useful tools that can provide essential information for diagnosis and management of patients with multiple myeloma. Both modalities allow accurate localization of disease after chemotherapy or autologous stem cell transplantation and can provide important prognostic information that can influence further clinical decision making regarding therapy, particularly when tumor serum markers may be a less reliable indicator of disease burden after repeated treatments.