1
|
Kanakarajan H, De Baene W, Gehring K, Eekers DBP, Hanssens P, Sitskoorn M. Factors associated with the local control of brain metastases: a systematic search and machine learning application. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2024; 24:177. [PMID: 38907265 PMCID: PMC11191176 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-024-02579-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhancing Local Control (LC) of brain metastases is pivotal for improving overall survival, which makes the prediction of local treatment failure a crucial aspect of treatment planning. Understanding the factors that influence LC of brain metastases is imperative for optimizing treatment strategies and subsequently extending overall survival. Machine learning algorithms may help to identify factors that predict outcomes. METHODS This paper systematically reviews these factors associated with LC to select candidate predictor features for a practical application of predictive modeling. A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies in which the LC of brain metastases is assessed for adult patients. EMBASE, PubMed, Web-of-Science, and the Cochrane Database were searched up to December 24, 2020. All studies investigating the LC of brain metastases as one of the endpoints were included, regardless of primary tumor type or treatment type. We first grouped studies based on primary tumor types resulting in lung, breast, and melanoma groups. Studies that did not focus on a specific primary cancer type were grouped based on treatment types resulting in surgery, SRT, and whole-brain radiotherapy groups. For each group, significant factors associated with LC were identified and discussed. As a second project, we assessed the practical importance of selected features in predicting LC after Stereotactic Radiotherapy (SRT) with a Random Forest machine learning model. Accuracy and Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the Random Forest model, trained with the list of factors that were found to be associated with LC for the SRT treatment group, were reported. RESULTS The systematic literature search identified 6270 unique records. After screening titles and abstracts, 410 full texts were considered, and ultimately 159 studies were included for review. Most of the studies focused on the LC of the brain metastases for a specific primary tumor type or after a specific treatment type. Higher SRT radiation dose was found to be associated with better LC in lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma groups. Also, a higher dose was associated with better LC in the SRT group, while higher tumor volume was associated with worse LC in this group. The Random Forest model predicted the LC of brain metastases with an accuracy of 80% and an AUC of 0.84. CONCLUSION This paper thoroughly examines factors associated with LC in brain metastases and highlights the translational value of our findings for selecting variables to predict LC in a sample of patients who underwent SRT. The prediction model holds great promise for clinicians, offering a valuable tool to predict personalized treatment outcomes and foresee the impact of changes in treatment characteristics such as radiation dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hemalatha Kanakarajan
- Department of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
| | - Wouter De Baene
- Department of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Karin Gehring
- Department of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Daniëlle B P Eekers
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Patrick Hanssens
- Gamma Knife Center, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Margriet Sitskoorn
- Department of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rostampour N, Rezaeian S, Sarbakhsh P, Meola A, Choupani J, Doosti-Irani A, Nemati H, Almasi T, Badrigilan S, Chang SD. Efficacy of Stereotactic Radiosurgery as Single or Combined Therapy for Brain Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 186:104015. [PMID: 37146702 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2023] Open
Abstract
To determine the efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in treating patients with brain metastases (BMs), a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and a direct comparison of cohort studies were performed. Relevant literature regarding the effectiveness of SRS alone and in combination with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and surgery was retrieved using systematic database searches up to April 2019. The patterns of overall survival (OS), one-year OS, progression-free survival (PFS), one-year local brain control (LBC), one-year distant brain control (DBC), neurological death (ND), and complication rate were analyzed. A total of 18 RCTs and 37 cohorts were included in the meta-analysis. Our data revealed that SRS carried a better OS than SRS+WBRT (p= 0.048) and WBRT (p= 0.041). Also, SRS+WBRT demonstrated a significantly improved PFS, LBC, and DBC compared to WBRT alone and SRS alone. Finally, SRS achieved the same LBC as high as surgery, but intracranial relapse occurred considerably more frequently in the absence of WBRT. However, there were not any significant differences in ND and toxicities between SRS and other groups. Therefore, SRS alone may be a better alternative since increased patient survival may outweigh the increased risk of brain tumor recurrence associated with it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nima Rostampour
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medcine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Shahab Rezaeian
- Research Center for Environmental Determinants of Health (RCEDH), Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran; Epidemiology and Biostatistics Department, School of Public Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Parvin Sarbakhsh
- Research Center for Environmental Determinants of Health (RCEDH), Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Antonio Meola
- Depratment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Jalal Choupani
- Immunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Amin Doosti-Irani
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
| | - Hossein Nemati
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Health, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Tinoosh Almasi
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medcine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Samireh Badrigilan
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medcine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
| | - Steven D Chang
- Depratment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oh SA, Yea JW, Park JW, Park J. Use of a head-tilting baseplate during volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to better protect organs at risk in hippocampal sparing whole brain radiotherapy (HS-WBRT). PLoS One 2020; 15:e0232430. [PMID: 32348379 PMCID: PMC7190113 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Coplanar arcs are used with limited arc range to prevent direct beam entrance through the lens, which is challenging for satisfactory planning of hippocampal sparing in whole brain radiotherapy (HS-WBRT) with VMAT. We evaluated the dosimetric impact of applying a head-tilting technique during VMAT, which allows unrestricted use of the arc range. METHODS AND MATERIALS Twenty patients with multiple brain metastases who had received two computed tomography (CT)-simulation sessions between January 2016 and December 2018 were included. One session was delivered in a traditional supine position; the other was delivered with a tilting acrylic supine baseplate (MedTec, USA) to elevate the patients' head by 40°. For each patient, a VMAT without (sVMAT) and with head-tilting (htVMAT) plan was generated. Conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), and organ at risk (OAR) dose were evaluated. The Wilcoxon-signed test was used to compare the effect between two plans. RESULTS The mean CI was 0.860±0.007 and 0.864±0.008 (p<0.05), and mean HI was 0.179±0.020 and 0.167±0.021 (p<0.05) for sVMAT and htVMAT, respectively. The mean dose to the hippocampus (9.91±0.30 Gy) was significantly lower in htVMAT than in sVMAT (10.36±0.29 Gy, P<0.05). htVMAT was associated with significantly reduced mean dose to the parotid gland, and right and left lens (4.77±1.97 Gy vs. 5.92±1.68 Gy, p<0.05; 3.29±0.44 Gy vs. 7.22±1.26 Gy, p<0.05; 3.33±0.45 Gy vs. 6.73±1.01 Gy, p<0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION This is the first study to demonstrate that the head-tilting technique might be useful for HS-WBRT planning with VMAT. This method could remove the limitations associated with the arc range, resulting in improved dose distribution and conformity, while sparing healthy organs, including the hippocampus, lens, and parotid gland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Se An Oh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Ji Woon Yea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu, South Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Jae Won Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu, South Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Jaehyeon Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu, South Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li D, Xu S, Sun M, Qiao L, Wang L, Liu Y. MAID chemotherapy regimen as a treatment strategy for metastatic malignant ameloblastoma: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e15873. [PMID: 31232921 PMCID: PMC6636961 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000015873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE Ameloblastoma is generally characterized as a benign tumor originating in odontogenic epithelium. However, few cases of metastatic malignant ameloblastoma have also been reported. Due to the low incidence of malignant ameloblastoma, there is no established treatment regimen. To explore effective treatment for malignant ameloblastoma, we reported this case study. PATIENTS CONCERNS This report described a case of a 28-year-old malignant ameloblastoma female patient with multiple metastasis (brain and lung). DIAGNOSES The patient presented ameloblastoma of the left mandible in 2012. Three years later, local recurrence and brain metastasis was observed during a follow-up examination. Five years later, malignant ameloblastoma was detected by imaging and immunohistochemistry in the bilateral multiple pulmonary nodules and mediastinal lymph nodes. INTERVENTIONS The patient was initially treated with tumor resection. Three years later after local recurrence and brain metastasis, she was accepted the extensive mandibulectomy supplemented with brain stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). When diagnosed with pulmonary metastasis, the patient received combined chemotherapy regimen of MAID (mesna, adriamycin, ifosfamide and dacarbazine) for 6 cycles. OUTCOMES The efficacy evaluation was partial remission (PR) after the 6 cycles of MAID. The last patient follow-up was July 24th 2018, and no evidence of progression was observed. The progression-free survival (PFS) of the patient was more than 9 months. LESSONS Surgical resection is the optimal treatment for locally recurrent ameloblastoma. SBRT may be an effective treatment for unresectable oligometastasis of malignant ameloblastoma. Finally, combined chemotherapy of MAID showed encouraging effects in the management of metastatic malignant ameloblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danyang Li
- Department of Medical Oncology of Zhengzhou University Affiliated Cancer Hospital
| | - Shuning Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology of Zhengzhou University Affiliated Cancer Hospital
| | - Miaomiao Sun
- Department of Pathology of Zhengzhou University Affiliated Cancer Hospital
| | - Lei Qiao
- Department of Medical Oncology of Zhengzhou University Affiliated Cancer Hospital
| | - Lifeng Wang
- Department of Imaging of Zhengzhou University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Henan Cancer Hosptial, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Ying Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology of Zhengzhou University Affiliated Cancer Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cheng H, Chen H, Lv Y, Chen Z, Li CSR. Prospective memory impairment following whole brain radiotherapy in patients with metastatic brain cancer. Cancer Med 2018; 7:5315-5321. [PMID: 30259694 PMCID: PMC6198199 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2018] [Revised: 08/22/2018] [Accepted: 08/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the prospective memory (PM) impairment following whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in cancer patients with brain metastases. METHOD Eighty-one patients with metastatic brain cancer, agreeing to undergo WBRT, were enrolled and subjected to a battery of cognitive neuropsychological tests, including the mini-mental state examination (MMSE), verbal fluency test (VFT), digit span test (DST), and event-based and time-based prospective memory (EBPM and TBPM) tasks, before and after radiotherapy. RESULTS The patients with metastatic brain cancer after WBRT exhibited a significant decrease in the MMSE, DST, VFT, and EBPM scores (t = 6.258, 10.192, 5.361, -5.892, P < 0.01), but nonsignificant decrease in the TBPM scores (t = -1.172, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION There is significant EBPM impairment in cancer patients with brain metastases after WBRT, whereas that in the TBPM remained relatively unaffected. The result suggests that EBPM impairment may be as an early cognitive impairment marker in patients with BM who undergo WBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huaidong Cheng
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.,Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Haijun Chen
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Yue Lv
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Zhendong Chen
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Chiang-Shan R Li
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Boost Irradiation Integrated to Whole Brain Radiotherapy in the Management of Brain Metastases. Pathol Oncol Res 2018; 26:149-157. [DOI: 10.1007/s12253-018-0383-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2017] [Accepted: 01/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
7
|
Yuan X, Liu WJ, Li B, Shen ZT, Shen JS, Zhu XX. A Bayesian network meta-analysis of whole brain radiotherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastasis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96:e7698. [PMID: 28834873 PMCID: PMC5571995 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000007698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2017] [Revised: 06/04/2017] [Accepted: 07/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
This study was conducted to compare the effects of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS) in treatment of brain metastasis.A systematical retrieval in PubMed and Embase databases was performed for relative literatures on the effects of WBRT and SRS in treatment of brain metastasis. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed by using the ADDIS software. The effect sizes included odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). A random effects model was used for the pooled analysis for all the outcome measures, including 1-year distant control rate, 1-year local control rate, 1-year survival rate, and complication. The consistency was tested by using node-splitting analysis and inconsistency standard deviation. The convergence was estimated according to the Brooks-Gelman-Rubin method.A total of 12 literatures were included in this meta-analysis. WBRT + SRS showed higher 1-year distant control rate than SRS. WBRT + SRS was better for the 1-year local control rate than WBRT. SRS and WBRT + SRS had higher 1-year survival rate than the WBRT. In addition, there was no difference in complication among the three therapies.Comprehensively, WBRT + SRS might be the choice of treatment for brain metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command, Medical School of Nanjing University
| | - Wen-Jie Liu
- Blood Purification Center, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Bing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command, Medical School of Nanjing University
| | - Ze-Tian Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command, Medical School of Nanjing University
| | - Jun-shu Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command, Medical School of Nanjing University
| | - Xi-Xu Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command, Medical School of Nanjing University
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Borghetti P, Pedretti S, Spiazzi L, Avitabile R, Urpis M, Foscarini F, Tesini G, Trevisan F, Ghirardelli P, Pandini SA, Triggiani L, Magrini SM, Buglione M. Whole brain radiotherapy with adjuvant or concomitant boost in brain metastasis: dosimetric comparison between helical and volumetric IMRT technique. Radiat Oncol 2016; 11:59. [PMID: 27094398 PMCID: PMC4837558 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-016-0634-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2016] [Accepted: 04/12/2016] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare and evaluate the possible advantages related to the use of VMAT and helical IMRT and two different modalities of boost delivering, adjuvant stereotactic boost (SRS) or simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), in the treatment of brain metastasis (BM) in RPA classes I-II patients. METHODS Ten patients were treated with helical IMRT, 5 of them with SRS after whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and 5 with SIB. MRI co-registration with planning CT was mandatory and prescribed doses were 30 Gy in 10 fractions (fr) for WBRT and 15Gy/1fr or 45Gy/10fr in SRS or SIB, respectively. For each patient, 4 "treatment plans" (VMAT SRS and SIB, helical IMRT SRS and SIB) were calculated and accepted if PTV boost was included in 95 % isodose and dose constraints of the main organs at risk were respected without major deviations. Homogeneity Index (HI), Conformal Index (CI) and Conformal Number (CN) were considered to compare the different plans. Moreover, time of treatment delivery was calculated and considered in the analysis. RESULTS Volume of brain metastasis ranged between 1.43 and 51.01 cc (mean 12.89 ± 6.37 ml) and 3 patients had double lesions. V95% resulted over 95 % in the average for each kind of technique, but the "target coverage" was inadequate for VMAT planning with two sites. The HI resulted close to the ideal value of zero in all cases; VMAT-SIB, VMAT-SRS, Helical IMRT-SIB and Helical IMRT-SRS showed mean CI of 2.15, 2.10, 2.44 and 1.66, respectively (optimal range: 1.5-2.0). Helical IMRT-SRS was related to the best and reliable finding of CN (0.66). The mean of treatment time was 210 s, 467 s, 440 s, 1598 s, respectively, for VMAT-SIB, VMAT-SRS, Helical IMRT-SIB and Helical IMRT-SRS. CONCLUSIONS This dosimetric comparison show that helical IMRT obtain better target coverage and respect of CI and CN; VMAT could be acceptable in solitary metastasis. SIB modality can be considered as a good choice for clinical and logistic compliance; literature's preliminary data are confirming also a radiobiological benefit for SIB. Helical IMRT-SRS seems less effective for the long time of treatment compared to other techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Borghetti
- Radiation Oncology Department, University and Spedali Civili Brescia, P.le Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, Italy.
| | - Sara Pedretti
- Radiation Oncology Department, University and Spedali Civili Brescia, P.le Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luigi Spiazzi
- Medical Physics Department, Spedali Civili Brescia, P.le Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, Italy
| | - Rossella Avitabile
- Medical Physics Department, Spedali Civili Brescia, P.le Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, Italy
| | - Mauro Urpis
- Radiation Oncology Department, University and Spedali Civili Brescia, P.le Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, Italy
| | - Federica Foscarini
- Radiation Oncology Department, University and Spedali Civili Brescia, P.le Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giulia Tesini
- Medical Physics Department, Spedali Civili Brescia, P.le Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, Italy
| | - Francesca Trevisan
- Radiation Oncology Department, University and Spedali Civili Brescia, P.le Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, Italy
| | - Paolo Ghirardelli
- Radiation Oncology Department, University and Spedali Civili Brescia, P.le Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, Italy
| | - Sara Angela Pandini
- Radiation Oncology Department, University and Spedali Civili Brescia, P.le Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luca Triggiani
- Radiation Oncology Department, University and Spedali Civili Brescia, P.le Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, Italy
| | - Stefano Maria Magrini
- Radiation Oncology Department, University and Spedali Civili Brescia, P.le Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, Italy
| | - Michela Buglione
- Radiation Oncology Department, University and Spedali Civili Brescia, P.le Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|