MR imaging of perianal fistulas in Crohn's disease: sensitivity and specificity of STIR sequences

Comparing the Efficacy of a Combination of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and T2-STIR (Short Tau Inversion Recovery) Imaging With Contrast-Enhanced MRI in the Evaluation of Perianal Fistula

BACKGROUND

Perianal fistula is clinically diagnosed and commonly characterized using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and T2-weighted imaging are emerging techniques that can obviate the need for contrast injection in cases where contrast administration is not feasible or contraindicated. The main objective of our study was to compare the efficacy of the combination of DWI and T2 STIR (short tau inversion recovery) imaging with contrast-enhanced MRI for the diagnosis and characterization of perianal fistula.

METHODS

Sixty-nine patients with clinical perianal fistula with at least one external opening were evaluated with DWI, T2 STIR, and contrast MRI. A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India. The chi-square test was done to find the association between categorical variables. The Kappa test was done to estimate the agreement between two different tests in measuring the outcome. The validity of tests was measured using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy.

RESULTS

The combination of DWI and T2 STIR is equivalent to contrast-enhanced MRI in the evaluation of primary and complicated perianal fistula. The combination of DWI and T2 STIR is superior to DWI alone in the classification and characterization of perianal fistula. However, DWI is superior to T2 STIR in differentiating perianal inflammation with abscess from perianal inflammation without abscess and can be used as an alternative to post-contrast fat-suppressed T1-WI in the detection of perianal abscesses and disease activity.

CONCLUSION

DWI can be used as an adjunct to T2 STIR, and the combination of DWI and T2 STIR can replace the post-contrast fat-suppressed T1 MRI sequence in the classification and characterization of perianal fistula.

Can Short Tau Inversion Recovery (STIR) Imaging Be Used as a Stand-Alone Sequence To Assess a Perianal Fistulous Tract on MRI? A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing STIR and T1-Post Contrast Imaging

INTRODUCTION

Perianal fistulas demand precise preoperative assessment for optimal surgical outcomes. MRI, using Short Tau Inversion Recovery (STIR) and T1-post contrast sequences, plays a crucial role in this evaluation.This retrospective cohort study compared STIR imaging's diagnostic efficacy with T1-post contrast sequences in identifying perianal fistulous tracts. The study investigated whether STIR imaging could serve as the sole diagnostic sequence, simplifying clinical practice.

METHODS

In a tertiary care hospital, 100 patients underwent pelvic MRI for suspected perianal fistulas. Radiologists independently evaluated STIR and T1-post contrast sequences for internal openings, tract extent, distinction, abscess presence, and tract type. Sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), and Cohen's kappa analysis were used for diagnostic assessment.

RESULTS

STIR imaging showed notable sensitivity (79.8-97.9%) and specificity (100%) for identifying internal openings and tracts. Combined with T1-post contrast, diagnostic accuracy improved significantly, with near-perfect AUC values. Kappa values indicated moderate to substantial agreement between radiological assessments and clinical diagnosis. The combined sequences achieved 100% sensitivity and specificity for tract visualization.

CONCLUSION

STIR imaging presents promise as a singular diagnostic tool for perianal fistulas, especially when combined with T1-post contrast sequences. While offering potential clinical diagnosis simplifications, further studies are warranted to validate its utility and ensure comprehensive diagnostic accuracy.

Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced 3D Imaging with 2D Imaging in the Evaluation of Perianal Fistula at 3T: A Prospective Observational Study

Introduction  Perianal fistula and its recurrence is a challenging entity for surgeons. It is a well-establi1shed fact that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings influence surgical procedures and reduce the rate of recurrence. In this study, we assessed the contrast-enhanced (CE) three dimensional T1 sequences [sampling perfection with application optimized contrast using different flip angle evolution (SPACE) and volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE)] in a 3T MRI system to evaluate perianal fistulas and compared them with two-dimensional (2D) sequences. Materials and Methods  Forty-four patients (mean age, 38.8 ± 15.3 [standard deviation]; 32 males, 12 females) with perianal fistula were included in this prospective study. The patients underwent conventional noncontrast, 2D sequences, diffusion-weighted imaging, followed by postcontrast, 2D T1 images in both axial and coronal planes, and 3D sequences at 3T. Acquisition times were recorded for each sequence. Each postcontrast sequence was evaluated in terms of image quality, presence of artifacts, fistula type, presence of an abscess, visibility, and number of internal orifices. The surgical findings were considered the gold standard. The imaging findings were compared with the surgical findings. Results  In all three sequences, the fistula type and abscess were identified correctly in all patients. The sensitivity value for identification of ramifications utilizing CE 3D T1 VIBE sequence, CE 3D T1 SPACE, and CE 2D T1 images was 100, 86, and 36%, respectively. The number of internal orifices was identified by the CE 3D T1 VIBE and CE 3D T1 SPACE sequences in 100 and 92% of patients, respectively. CE 2D T1 images correctly identified internal orifices in 80% of patients. The overall scan time for each 3D sequence was shorter than for the combined postcontrast 2D sequences. Conclusion  CE 3D T1 SPACE and CE 3D T1 VIBE sequences outperformed conventional CE 2D sequences in the evaluation of perianal fistulas in terms of visibility and the number of internal orifices with a shorter scanning time. Among the 3D sequences, CE 3D T1 VIBE is slightly superior to CE 3D T1 SPACE sequence.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Anorectal Disease

This review summarizes the relevant literature for the selection of the initial imaging in 4 clinical scenarios in patients with suspected inflammatory disease or postoperative complication of the anorectum. These clinical scenarios include suspected perianal fistula or abscess; rectovesicular or rectovaginal fistula; proctitis or pouchitis; and suspected complication following proctectomy, coloproctectomy, or colectomy with a pouch or other anastomosis. The appropriateness of imaging modalities as they apply to each clinical scenario is rated as usually appropriate, may be appropriate, and usually not appropriate to assist the selection of the most appropriate imaging modality in the corresponding clinical scenarios of anorectal disease. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Perianal fistula imaging: a comparison between two-channel superficial Flex coil and eight-channel body coil

Purpose

Perianal fistula is an important health problem with devastating morbidity. For diagnosis and prevention of recurrence, perianal fistula imaging (PFI) is crucial. The aim of this study was to investigate if a Flex-M superficial coil images would provide more information than images obtained with a phased-array body coil in PFI.

Material and methods

Thirty-one fistulas of 29 patients were prospectively evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging. A phased-array body coil was used in all patients as in routine practice, and sequences with Flex-M coil were also obtained. Afterwards, images were evaluated by two experienced radiologists who were blinded to the patients, coil and also to each other. The site of internal and external openings, and presence or absence of abscess and secondary tracts were recorded.

Results

The conspicuity of images was better with the Flex-M coil. Both radiologists saw more internal openings with the Flex-M coil. Cohen’s κ value was 0.100 (p = 0.201) for Reader 1 and 0.110 (p = 0.361) for Reader 2 between these two coils. Additionally, numerically more internal/external openings and secondary tracts were seen by both readers. Interobserver variability was not statistically significant, and Cohen’s κ values signifyied good concordance between readers.

Conclusions

In our study we showed that multichannel superficial phased-array coils improved imaging quality in PFI. We think that Flex-M coil can easily be used in routine clinical practice to gather better images of perianal fistulas.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Short Tau Inversion Recovery as a Limited Protocol for Diagnosing Perianal Fistula

Introduction

Perianal fistula refers to abnormal communication between perianal skin and anal canal. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoanal ultrasound have been used in the evaluation of perianal fistula. Endoanal ultrasound is a cost-effective but operator-dependent technique. MRI provides accurate details regarding anal canal anatomy and effectively identifies the fistulae. For evidence-based care, a cost-effective and an accurate imaging modality is required in a developing country. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of short tau inversion recovery (STIR) as a limited protocol MRI pelvis in diagnosing perianal fistula taking surgical findings as the gold standard.

Materials and methods

A retrospective review of MRI pelvis from 1^st February 2018 to 1^st July 2018 was undertaken. Patients of any age or gender suspected to have perianal fistula were included. One radiologist interpreted the complete MRI pelvis and the other radiologist only viewed axial and coronal STIR sequences as a limited protocol. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy of axial and coronal STIR sequence were calculated taking surgical findings as the gold standard.

Results

In total, 150 patients were included in this study. The mean age of the patients was 43.20 ± 13.75 years. In total, 122 (81.3%) were males and 28 (18.7%) were females. Using STIR as a limited protocol, fistulae were found in 125 (83.3%) patients, whereas on surgery, the fistulae were found in 119 (79.3%) patients. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy of STIR as limited protocol MRI pelvis in diagnosing perianal fistulae was found to be 96.6%, 67.7%, 92.0%, 84.0%, and 90.6%, respectively, taking surgical findings as the gold standard.

Conclusion

STIR has high sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing in the perianal fistula. Using STIR as a limited protocol in a developing country can help improving patient care by accurately diagnosing perianal fistulae. Moreover, it is recommended that further studies for identifying internal opening on STIR should also be carried out to improve patient care.

A comparable method to Gd-contrast enhancement in the preoperative evaluation of anal fistula

To explore a comparable method to Gd-contrast enhancement in the preoperative evaluation of anal fistula to evaluate its morphology changes.Forty-six patients with anal fistula were enrolled. Each patient acquired a 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) routine sequence, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequence and fat suppression T1 weighted imaging (FS T1WI) contrast enhancement (CE) scanning. To record the morphology performances of the internal orifice and the fistulas on the transverse images of fat suppression T2 weighted imaging (FS T2WI), DWI, FS T2WI combined with DWI, FS T1WI Gd-CE, with the standard of the surgical pathology results. Two observers evaluated images in consensus. The conspicuity and the diagnostic performance rate were compared between the 4 imaging data sets.The consistencies of interobservers about the conspicuity scores and the diagnostic performance rates of the internal orifice and the fistula were good. The conspicuity of the internal orifice was higher for the set of FS T2WI, FS T2WI+DWI, and FS T1WI+CE than DWI. The diagnostic performance rate of the internal orifice was higher for the set of FS T2WI, FS T2WI+DWI, and FS T1WI+CE than DWI. The conspicuity of the fistula was higher for the set of FS T2WI+DWI and FS T1WI+CE than FS T2WI or DWI. There were no significantly differences between the 4 sets of FS T2WI, DWI, FS T2WI+DWI, and FS T1WI+CE in the diagnostic performance rate of the fistula.The set of FS T2WI combined with DWI was comparable to FS T1WI CE in evaluation of anal fistula morphology changes.

MRI anatomy and pathology of the anal canal

The normal function of the anal sphincter complex is crucial for quality of life, as it is the mechanism by which fecal continence is maintained. Additionally, the anal sphincter complex is an integral part of the coordinated effort of defecation. As imaging plays an important role in assessment of pathologic conditions involving the anal region, understanding the normal anatomy of the anal sphincter complex is important for correct image interpretation and accurate diagnosis. This review discusses the anatomy and function of the anal sphincter complex, important technical considerations for MRI, and various inflammatory, infectious, and neoplastic processes, as well as pathologic structural conditions that affect the anal region. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy Stage: 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:1018-1032.

Preoperative assessment of simple and complex anorectal fistulas: Tridimensional endoanal ultrasound? Magnetic resonance? Both?

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of tridimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) and magnetic resonance (MR) in the preoperative assessment of both simple and complex anorectal fistulas.

METHODS

All the patients referred for the treatment of anal fistulas were enrolled in this study and underwent, as preoperative assessment, anamnestic evaluation, clinical examination, and unenhanced and H2O2-enhanced 3D-EAUS and MR. The results of imaging evaluation were compared with surgical findings, considered as reference standard.

RESULTS

During the study period, 124 patients operated on for anal fistulas underwent complete preoperative imaging assessment. Perfect agreement between 3D-EAUS and surgery in the anal fistulas' severity grading was found (K = 1). The fistulas were classified as simple in 68/126 (53.9%) and complex in 58/126 (46.03%) cases, according to fistulas' Parks' classification and the most recent American Guidelines. In both simple and complex anal fistulas, 3D-EAUS did not show a significantly higher accuracy in the evaluation of internal openings, if compared with MR (P = 0.47; McNemar's Chi-square test). In the complex anal fistulas, MR showed a significantly higher accuracy in the evaluation of secondary extensions if compared with 3D-EAUS (P = 0.041; McNemar's Chi-square test), whereas in the simple anal fistulas, no significant difference was found.

CONCLUSION

In the preoperative work-up of patients with anorectal fistulas, 3D-EAUS may represent the first-line diagnostic tool. In cases of fistulas classified as complex by 3D-EAUS, MR may be indicated as adjunctive diagnostic imaging examination, to more carefully describe the fistulas' complete anatomy.

The treatment of anal fistula: second ACPGBI Position Statement - 2018

It is over 10 years since the first ACPGBI Position Statement on the management of anal fistula was published in 2007. This second edition is the result of scrutiny of the literature published during this time; it updates the original Position Statement and reviews the published evidence surrounding treatments for anal fistula that have been developed since the original publication.