1
|
Francolini G, Morelli I, Carnevale MG, Grassi R, Nardone V, Loi M, Valzano M, Salvestrini V, Livi L, Desideri I. Integration between Novel Imaging Technologies and Modern Radiotherapy Techniques: How the Eye Drove the Chisel. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:5277. [PMID: 36358695 PMCID: PMC9656145 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Targeted dose-escalation and reduction of dose to adjacent organs at risk have been the main goal of radiotherapy in the last decade. Prostate cancer benefited the most from this process. In recent years, the development of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) radically changed clinical practice, also thanks to the availability of modern imaging techniques. The aim of this paper is to explore the relationship between diagnostic imaging and prostate cancer radiotherapy techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS Aiming to provide an overview of the integration between modern imaging and radiotherapy techniques, we performed a non-systematic search of papers exploring the predictive value of imaging before treatment, the role of radiomics in predicting treatment outcomes, implementation of novel imaging in RT planning and influence of imaging integration on use of RT in current clinical practice. Three independent authors (GF, IM and ID) performed an independent review focusing on these issues. Key references were derived from a PubMed query. Hand searching and clinicaltrials.gov were also used, and grey literature was searched for further papers of interest. The final choice of papers included was discussed between all co-authors. RESULTS This paper contains a narrative report and a critical discussion of the role of new modern techniques in predicting outcomes before treatment, in radiotherapy planning and in the integration with systemic therapy in the management of prostate cancer. Also, the role of radiomics in a tailored treatment approach is explored. CONCLUSIONS Integration between diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy is of great importance for the modern treatment of prostate cancer. Future clinical trials should be aimed at exploring the real clinical benefit of complex workflows in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulio Francolini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Ilaria Morelli
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Carnevale
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Roberta Grassi
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Valerio Nardone
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Mauro Loi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Marianna Valzano
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Viola Salvestrini
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Isacco Desideri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fernandes MC, Yildirim O, Woo S, Vargas HA, Hricak H. The role of MRI in prostate cancer: current and future directions. MAGMA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2022; 35:503-521. [PMID: 35294642 PMCID: PMC9378354 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-022-01006-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 01/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
There has been an increasing role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the management of prostate cancer. MRI already plays an essential role in the detection and staging, with the introduction of functional MRI sequences. Recent advancements in radiomics and artificial intelligence are being tested to potentially improve detection, assessment of aggressiveness, and provide usefulness as a prognostic marker. MRI can improve pretreatment risk stratification and therefore selection of and follow-up of patients for active surveillance. MRI can also assist in guiding targeted biopsy, treatment planning and follow-up after treatment to assess local recurrence. MRI has gained importance in the evaluation of metastatic disease with emerging technology including whole-body MRI and integrated positron emission tomography/MRI, allowing for not only better detection but also quantification. The main goal of this article is to review the most recent advances on MRI in prostate cancer and provide insights into its potential clinical roles from the radiologist's perspective. In each of the sections, specific roles of MRI tailored to each clinical setting are discussed along with its strengths and weakness including already established material related to MRI and the introduction of recent advancements on MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Clara Fernandes
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Onur Yildirim
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Sungmin Woo
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| | - Hebert Alberto Vargas
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Hedvig Hricak
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bottero M, Faiella A, Giannarelli D, Farneti A, D'Urso P, Bertini L, Landoni V, Vici P, Sanguineti G. A prospective study assessing the pattern of response of local disease at DCE-MRI after salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 35:21-26. [PMID: 35516461 PMCID: PMC9065465 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 10/29/2022] Open
|
4
|
Granata V, Fusco R, Belli A, Danti G, Bicci E, Cutolo C, Petrillo A, Izzo F. Diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging in abdominal oncological setting: why and when. Infect Agent Cancer 2022; 17:25. [PMID: 35681237 PMCID: PMC9185934 DOI: 10.1186/s13027-022-00441-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
This article provides an overview of diffusion kurtosis (DKI) imaging in abdominal oncology. DKI allows for more data on tissue structures than the conventional diffusion model (DWI). However, DKI requires high quality images at b-values greater than 1000 s/mm2 and high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) that traditionally MRI systems are not able to acquire and therefore there are generally amplified anatomical distortions on the images due to less homogeneity of the field. Advances in both hardware and software on modern MRI scanners have currently enabled ultra-high b-value imaging and offered the ability to apply DKI to multiple extracranial sites. Previous studies have evaluated the ability of DKI to characterize and discriminate tumor grade compared to conventional DWI. Additionally, in several studies the DKI sequences used were based on planar echo (EPI) acquisition, which is susceptible to motion, metal and air artefacts and prone to low SNRs and distortions, leading to low quality images for some small lesions, which may affect the accuracy of the results. Another problem is the optimal b-value of DKI, which remains to be explored and not yet standardized, as well as the manual selection of the ROI, which could affect the accuracy of some parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", I-80131, Naples, Italy.
| | | | - Andrea Belli
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", I-80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Ginevra Danti
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.,Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, SIRM Foundation, Milan, Italy
| | - Eleonora Bicci
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Carmen Cutolo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Antonella Petrillo
- Division of Radiology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", I-80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", I-80131, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Borgheresi A, De Muzio F, Agostini A, Ottaviani L, Bruno A, Granata V, Fusco R, Danti G, Flammia F, Grassi R, Grassi F, Bruno F, Palumbo P, Barile A, Miele V, Giovagnoni A. Lymph Nodes Evaluation in Rectal Cancer: Where Do We Stand and Future Perspective. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11092599. [PMID: 35566723 PMCID: PMC9104021 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11092599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The assessment of nodal involvement in patients with rectal cancer (RC) is fundamental in disease management. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is routinely used for local and nodal staging of RC by using morphological criteria. The actual dimensional and morphological criteria for nodal assessment present several limitations in terms of sensitivity and specificity. For these reasons, several different techniques, such as Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI), Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM), Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging (DKI), and Dynamic Contrast Enhancement (DCE) in MRI have been introduced but still not fully validated. Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/CT plays a pivotal role in the assessment of LNs; more recently PET/MRI has been introduced. The advantages and limitations of these imaging modalities will be provided in this narrative review. The second part of the review includes experimental techniques, such as iron-oxide particles (SPIO), and dual-energy CT (DECT). Radiomics analysis is an active field of research, and the evidence about LNs in RC will be discussed. The review also discusses the different recommendations between the European and North American guidelines for the evaluation of LNs in RC, from anatomical considerations to structured reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Borgheresi
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy; (A.B.); (A.A.); (A.B.); (A.G.)
| | - Federica De Muzio
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy;
| | - Andrea Agostini
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy; (A.B.); (A.A.); (A.B.); (A.G.)
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University Hospital Ospedali Riuniti, 60126 Ancona, Italy;
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.D.); (R.G.); (F.G.); (F.B.); (P.P.); (V.M.)
| | - Letizia Ottaviani
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University Hospital Ospedali Riuniti, 60126 Ancona, Italy;
| | - Alessandra Bruno
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy; (A.B.); (A.A.); (A.B.); (A.G.)
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Medical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013 Napoli, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Ginevra Danti
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.D.); (R.G.); (F.G.); (F.B.); (P.P.); (V.M.)
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy;
| | - Federica Flammia
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy;
| | - Roberta Grassi
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.D.); (R.G.); (F.G.); (F.B.); (P.P.); (V.M.)
- Division of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80128 Naples, Italy
| | - Francesca Grassi
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.D.); (R.G.); (F.G.); (F.B.); (P.P.); (V.M.)
- Division of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80128 Naples, Italy
| | - Federico Bruno
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.D.); (R.G.); (F.G.); (F.B.); (P.P.); (V.M.)
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy;
| | - Pierpaolo Palumbo
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.D.); (R.G.); (F.G.); (F.B.); (P.P.); (V.M.)
- Abruzzo Health Unit 1, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Area of Cardiovascular and Interventional Imaging, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Antonio Barile
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy;
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.D.); (R.G.); (F.G.); (F.B.); (P.P.); (V.M.)
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy;
| | - Andrea Giovagnoni
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy; (A.B.); (A.A.); (A.B.); (A.G.)
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University Hospital Ospedali Riuniti, 60126 Ancona, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Terlizzi M, Limkin EJ, Moukasse Y, Blanchard P. Adjuvant or Salvage Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer after Prostatectomy: Current Status, Controversies and Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071688. [PMID: 35406460 PMCID: PMC8996903 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The management of patients with biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy has undergone significant changes in recent years. Currently, close monitoring of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) with early salvage radiotherapy (RT) in case of recurrence is the standard of care based on several randomized trials and a meta-analysis that has demonstrated its non-inferiority to adjuvant RT. Uncertainties remain regarding the management of patients at very high risk of recurrence, including appropriate selection criteria for adjuvant hormone therapy, and the role of imaging in refining the treatment strategy. This review explains this paradigm shift, raises points of controversy, and suggests ways to think about the future. Abstract Nearly one-third of the patients who undergo prostatectomy for prostate cancer have a biochemical recurrence (BCR) during follow-up. While several randomized trials have shown that adjuvant radiation therapy (aRT) improves biochemical control, this strategy has not been widely used because of the risk of toxicity and the fear of overtreating patients who would not have relapsed. In addition, the possibility of close PSA monitoring in the era of ultrasensitive assays enables to anticipate early salvage strategies (sRT). Three recent randomized trials and their meta-analysis have confirmed that aRT does not improve event-free survival compared to sRT, imposing the latter as the new standard of treatment. The addition of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to RT has been shown to improve biochemical control and metastasis-free survival, but the precise definition of to whom it should be proposed is still a matter of debate. The development of genomic tests or the use of artificial intelligence will allow more individualized treatment in the future. Therapeutic intensification with the combination of new-generation hormone therapy and RT is under study. Finally, the growing importance of metabolic imaging (PET/CT) due to its performance especially for low PSA levels will help in further personalizing management strategies.
Collapse
|
7
|
Advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Techniques: Technical Principles and Applications in Nanomedicine. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071626. [PMID: 35406399 PMCID: PMC8997011 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a consolidated imaging tool for the multiparametric assessment of tissues in various pathologies from degenerative and inflammatory diseases to cancer. In recent years, the continuous technological evolution of the equipment has led to the development of sequences that provide not only anatomical but also functional and metabolic information. In addition, there is a growing and emerging field of research in clinical applications using MRI to exploit the diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities of nanocompounds. This review illustrates the application of the most advanced magnetic resonance techniques in the field of nanomedicine. Abstract In the last decades, nanotechnology has been used in a wide range of biomedical applications, both diagnostic and therapeutic. In this scenario, imaging techniques represent a fundamental tool to obtain information about the properties of nanoconstructs and their interactions with the biological environment in preclinical and clinical settings. This paper reviews the state of the art of the application of magnetic resonance imaging in the field of nanomedicine, as well as the use of nanoparticles as diagnostic and therapeutic tools, especially in cancer, including the characteristics that hinder the use of nanoparticles in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
8
|
Albano D, Bruno F, Agostini A, Angileri SA, Benenati M, Bicchierai G, Cellina M, Chianca V, Cozzi D, Danti G, De Muzio F, Di Meglio L, Gentili F, Giacobbe G, Grazzini G, Grazzini I, Guerriero P, Messina C, Micci G, Palumbo P, Rocco MP, Grassi R, Miele V, Barile A. Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging: state of the art and applications in whole-body imaging. Jpn J Radiol 2021; 40:341-366. [PMID: 34951000 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-021-01223-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging is a non-invasive technique used for the evaluation of tissue vascularity features through imaging series acquisition after contrast medium administration. Over the years, the study technique and protocols have evolved, seeing a growing application of this method across different imaging modalities for the study of almost all body districts. The main and most consolidated current applications concern MRI imaging for the study of tumors, but an increasing number of studies are evaluating the use of this technique also for inflammatory pathologies and functional studies. Furthermore, the recent advent of artificial intelligence techniques is opening up a vast scenario for the analysis of quantitative information deriving from DCE. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive update on the techniques, protocols, and clinical applications - both established and emerging - of DCE in whole-body imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico Albano
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
- Dipartimento Di Biomedicina, Neuroscienze E Diagnostica Avanzata, Sezione Di Scienze Radiologiche, Università Degli Studi Di Palermo, via Vetoio 1L'Aquila, 67100, Palermo, Italy
| | - Federico Bruno
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Milan, Italy.
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
| | - Andrea Agostini
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Milan, Italy
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, Department of Radiology, University Politecnica delle Marche, University Hospital "Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I - G.M. Lancisi - G. Salesi", Ancona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Alessio Angileri
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Milan, Italy
- Radiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Benenati
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Milan, Italy
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Oncologia ed Ematologia, RadioterapiaRome, Italy
| | - Giulia Bicchierai
- Diagnostic Senology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Michaela Cellina
- Department of Radiology, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Ospedale Fatebenefratelli, Milan, Italy
| | - Vito Chianca
- Ospedale Evangelico Betania, Naples, Italy
- Clinica Di Radiologia, Istituto Imaging Della Svizzera Italiana - Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Diletta Cozzi
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Milan, Italy
- Department of Emergency Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Ginevra Danti
- Department of Emergency Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Federica De Muzio
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Letizia Di Meglio
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Gentili
- Unit of Diagnostic Imaging, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy
| | - Giuliana Giacobbe
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Milan, Italy
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Giulia Grazzini
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Irene Grazzini
- Department of Radiology, Section of Neuroradiology, San Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Pasquale Guerriero
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Milan, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Micci
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Milan, Italy
- Dipartimento Di Biomedicina, Neuroscienze E Diagnostica Avanzata, Sezione Di Scienze Radiologiche, Università Degli Studi Di Palermo, via Vetoio 1L'Aquila, 67100, Palermo, Italy
| | - Pierpaolo Palumbo
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Milan, Italy
- Abruzzo Health Unit 1, Department of diagnostic Imaging, Area of Cardiovascular and Interventional Imaging, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Maria Paola Rocco
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto Grassi
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Milan, Italy
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Antonio Barile
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zattoni F, Heidegger I, Kasivisvanathan V, Kretschmer A, Marra G, Magli A, Preisser F, Tilki D, Tsaur I, Valerio M, van den Bergh R, Kesch C, Ceci F, Fankhauser C, Gandaglia G. Radiation Therapy After Radical Prostatectomy: What Has Changed Over Time? Front Surg 2021; 8:691473. [PMID: 34307443 PMCID: PMC8298897 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.691473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The role and timing of radiotherapy (RT) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) remains controversial. While recent trials support the oncological safety of early salvage RT (SRT) compared to adjuvant RT (ART) in selected patients, previous randomized studies demonstrated that ART might improve recurrence-free survival in patients at high risk for local recurrence based on adverse pathology. Although ART might improve survival, this approach is characterized by a risk of overtreatment in up to 40% of cases. SRT is defined as the administration of RT to the prostatic bed and to the surrounding tissues in the patient with PSA recurrence after surgery but no evidence of distant metastatic disease. The delivery of salvage therapies exclusively in men who experience biochemical recurrence (BCR) has the potential advantage of reducing the risk of side effects without theoretically compromising outcomes. However, how to select patients at risk of progression who are more likely to benefit from a more aggressive treatment after RP, the exact timing of RT after RP, and the use of hormone therapy and its duration at the time of RT are still open issues. Moreover, what the role of novel imaging techniques and genomic classifiers are in identifying the most optimal post-operative management of PCa patients treated with RP is yet to be clarified. This narrative review summarizes most relevant published data to guide a multidisciplinary team in selecting appropriate candidates for post-prostatectomy radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Zattoni
- Urology Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Isabel Heidegger
- Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Alessandro Magli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Udine General Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | - Felix Preisser
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Igor Tsaur
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Mainz University Medicine, Mainz, Germany
| | | | | | - Claudia Kesch
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|