1
|
Oehme S, Moewis P, Boeth H, Bartek B, von Tycowicz C, Ehrig R, Duda GN, Jung T. Altered knee kinematics after posterior cruciate ligament single-bundle reconstruction-a comprehensive prospective biomechanical in vivo analysis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2024; 12:1322136. [PMID: 38352697 PMCID: PMC10863728 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1322136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Passive tibiofemoral anterior-posterior (AP) laxity has been extensively investigated after posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) single-bundle reconstruction. However, the PCL also plays an important role in providing rotational stability in the knee. Little is known in relation to the effects of PCL single-bundle reconstruction on passive tibiofemoral rotational laxity. Gait biomechanics after PCL reconstruction are even less understood. The aim of this study was a comprehensive prospective biomechanical in vivo analysis of the effect of PCL single-bundle reconstruction on passive tibiofemoral rotational laxity, passive anterior-posterior laxity, and gait pattern. Methods: Eight patients undergoing PCL single-bundle reconstruction (seven male, one female, mean age 35.6 ± 6.6 years, BMI 28.0 ± 3.6 kg/m2) were analyzed preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. Three of the eight patients received additional posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstruction. Conventional stress radiography was used to evaluate passive translational tibiofemoral laxity. A previously established rotometer device with a C-arm fluoroscope was used to assess passive tibiofemoral rotational laxity. Functional gait analysis was used to examine knee kinematics during level walking. Results: The mean side-to-side difference (SSD) in passive posterior translation was significantly reduced postoperatively (12.1 ± 4.4 mm vs. 4.3 ± 1.8 mm; p < 0.01). A significant reduction in passive tibiofemoral rotational laxity at 90° knee flexion was observed postoperatively (27.8° ± 7.0° vs. 19.9° ± 7.5°; p = 0.02). The range of AP tibiofemoral motion during level walking was significantly reduced in the reconstructed knees when compared to the contralateral knees at 6-month follow-up (16.6 ± 2.4 mm vs. 13.5 ± 1.6 mm; p < 0.01). Conclusion: PCL single-bundle reconstruction with optional PLC reconstruction reduces increased passive tibiofemoral translational and rotational laxity in PCL insufficient knees. However, increased passive tibiofemoral translational laxity could not be fully restored and patients showed altered knee kinematics with a significantly reduced range of tibiofemoral AP translation during level walking at 6-month follow-up. The findings of this study indicate a remaining lack of restoration of biomechanics after PCL single-bundle reconstruction in the active and passive state, which could be a possible cause for joint degeneration after PCL single-bundle reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Oehme
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Philippe Moewis
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Julius Wolff Institute Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Heide Boeth
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Julius Wolff Institute Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Benjamin Bartek
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Rainald Ehrig
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Julius Wolff Institute Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Zuse Institute Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Georg N. Duda
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Julius Wolff Institute Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tobias Jung
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rhodes J, Tagawa A, McCoy A, Bazett-Jones D, Skinner A, Leveille L, Franklin C, Chafetz R, Tulchin-Francis K. Using Motion Analysis in the Evaluation, Treatment & Rehabilitation of Pediatric & Adolescent Knee Injuries: A Review of the Literature. Clin Sports Med 2022; 41:671-685. [DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2022.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
3
|
PCL insufficient patients with increased translational and rotational passive knee joint laxity have no increased range of anterior-posterior and rotational tibiofemoral motion during level walking. Sci Rep 2022; 12:13232. [PMID: 35918487 PMCID: PMC9345965 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-17328-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Passive translational tibiofemoral laxity has been extensively examined in posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) insufficient patients and belongs to the standard clinical assessment. However, objective measurements of passive rotational knee laxity, as well as range of tibiofemoral motion during active movements, are both not well understood. None of these are currently quantified in clinical evaluations of patients with PCL insufficiency. The objective of this study was to quantify passive translational and rotational knee laxity as well as range of anterior–posterior and rotational tibiofemoral motion during level walking in a PCL insufficient patient cohort as a basis for any later clinical evaluation and therapy. The laxity of 9 patient knees with isolated PCL insufficiency or additionally posterolateral corner (PLC) insufficiency (8 males, 1 female, age 36.78 ± 7.46 years) were analysed and compared to the contralateral (CL) knees. A rotometer device with a C-arm fluoroscope was used to assess the passive tibiofemoral rotational laxity while stress radiography was used to evaluate passive translational tibiofemoral laxity. Functional gait analysis was used to examine the range of anterior–posterior and rotational tibiofemoral motion during level walking. Passive translational laxity was significantly increased in PCL insufficient knees in comparison to the CL sides (15.5 ± 5.9 mm vs. 3.7 ± 1.9 mm, p < 0.01). Also, passive rotational laxity was significantly higher compared to the CL knees (26.1 ± 8.2° vs. 20.6 ± 5.6° at 90° knee flexion, p < 0.01; 19.0 ± 6.9° vs. 15.5 ± 5.9° at 60° knee flexion, p = 0.04). No significant differences were observed for the rotational (16.3 ± 3.7° vs. 15.2 ± 3.6°, p = 0.43) and translational (17.0 ± 5.4 mm vs. 16.1 ± 2.8 mm, p = 0.55) range of anterior–posterior and rotational tibiofemoral motion during level walking conditions for PCL insufficient knees compared to CL knees respectively. The present study illustrates that patients with PCL insufficiency show a substantial increased passive tibiofemoral laxity, not only in tibiofemoral translation but also in tibiofemoral rotation. Our data indicate that this increased passive multiplanar knee joint laxity can be widely compensated during level walking. Further studies should investigate progressive changes in knee joint laxity and kinematics post PCL injury and reconstruction to judge the individual need for therapy and effects of physiotherapy such as quadriceps force training on gait patterns in PCL insufficient patients.
Collapse
|
4
|
Wilms LM, Radke KL, Abrar DB, Latz D, Schock J, Frenken M, Windolf J, Antoch G, Filler TJ, Nebelung S. Micro- and Macroscale Assessment of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Functionality Based on Advanced MRI Techniques. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:1790. [PMID: 34679487 PMCID: PMC8535058 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11101790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
T2 mapping assesses tissue ultrastructure and composition, yet the association of imaging features and tissue functionality is oftentimes unclear. This study aimed to elucidate this association for the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) across the micro- and macroscale and as a function of loading. Ten human cadaveric knee joints were imaged using a clinical 3.0T scanner and high-resolution morphologic and T2 mapping sequences. Emulating the posterior drawer test, the joints were imaged in the unloaded (δ0) and loaded (δ1) configurations. For the entire PCL, its subregions, and its osseous insertion sites, loading-induced changes were parameterized as summary statistics and texture variables, i.e., entropy, homogeneity, contrast, and variance. Histology confirmed structural integrity. Statistical analysis was based on parametric and non-parametric tests. Mean PCL length (37.8 ± 1.8 mm [δ0]; 44.0 ± 1.6 mm [δ1] [p < 0.01]), mean T2 (35.5 ± 2.0 ms [δ0]; 37.9 ± 1.3 ms [δ1] [p = 0.01]), and mean contrast values (4.0 ± 0.6 [δ0]; 4.9 ± 0.9 [δ1] [p = 0.01]) increased significantly under loading. Other texture features or ligamentous, osseous, and meniscal structures remained unaltered. Beyond providing normative T2 values across various scales and configurations, this study suggests that ligaments can be imaged morphologically and functionally based on joint loading and advanced MRI acquisition and post-processing techniques to assess ligament integrity and functionality in variable diagnostic contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Marie Wilms
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Dusseldorf, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany; (K.L.R.); (D.B.A.); (J.S.); (M.F.); (G.A.); (S.N.)
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Dusseldorf, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany; (D.L.); (J.W.)
| | - Karl Ludger Radke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Dusseldorf, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany; (K.L.R.); (D.B.A.); (J.S.); (M.F.); (G.A.); (S.N.)
| | - Daniel Benjamin Abrar
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Dusseldorf, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany; (K.L.R.); (D.B.A.); (J.S.); (M.F.); (G.A.); (S.N.)
| | - David Latz
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Dusseldorf, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany; (D.L.); (J.W.)
| | - Justus Schock
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Dusseldorf, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany; (K.L.R.); (D.B.A.); (J.S.); (M.F.); (G.A.); (S.N.)
| | - Miriam Frenken
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Dusseldorf, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany; (K.L.R.); (D.B.A.); (J.S.); (M.F.); (G.A.); (S.N.)
| | - Joachim Windolf
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Dusseldorf, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany; (D.L.); (J.W.)
| | - Gerald Antoch
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Dusseldorf, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany; (K.L.R.); (D.B.A.); (J.S.); (M.F.); (G.A.); (S.N.)
| | - Timm Joachim Filler
- Institute for Anatomy I, Heinrich-Heine-University, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany;
| | - Sven Nebelung
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Dusseldorf, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany; (K.L.R.); (D.B.A.); (J.S.); (M.F.); (G.A.); (S.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Xiao Y, Ling M, Liang Z, Ding J, Zhan S, Hu H, Chen B. Dual fluoroscopic imaging and CT-based finite element modelling to estimate forces and stresses of grafts in anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction with different femoral tunnels. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2021; 16:495-504. [PMID: 33471313 PMCID: PMC7946688 DOI: 10.1007/s11548-021-02307-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 01/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Little is known about the in vivo forces and stresses on grafts used in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The aims of this study were to evaluate and compare the forces and stresses on grafts used in anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction at different locations of the femoral footprint (anterior vs middle vs posterior; high vs middle vs low) during a lunge motion. METHODS Establish subject-specific finite element models with different graft's tunnel loci to represent the primary ACL reconstructions. A displacement controlled finite element method was used to simulate lunge motions (full extension to ~ 100° of flexion) with six-degree-of-freedom knee kinematics data obtained from the validated dual fluoroscopic imaging techniques. The reaction force of the femur and maximal principal stresses of the grafts were subsequently calculated during knee flexion. RESULTS Increased and decreased graft forces were observed when the grafts were located higher and lower on the femoral footprint, respectively; anterior and posterior graft placement did not significantly affect the graft force. Lower and posterior graft placement resulted in less stress on the graft at higher degrees of flexion; there were no significant differences in stress when the grafts were placed from 0° to 30° of flexion on the femoral footprint. CONCLUSION The proposed method is able to simulate knee joint motion based on in vivo kinematics. The results demonstrate that posterior to the centre of the femoral footprint is the strategic location for graft placement, and this placement results in anatomical graft behaviour with a low stress state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Xiao
- Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Orthopaedics, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No. 1838 North Guangzhou Avenue, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China
- Department of Orthopedics, Academy of Orthopedics Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ming Ling
- Department of Orthopaedics, Fudan University Affiliated Huadong Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhenming Liang
- Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Orthopaedics, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No. 1838 North Guangzhou Avenue, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China
| | - Jian Ding
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Biomechanical Laboratory, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No. 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China
| | - Shi Zhan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Biomechanical Laboratory, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No. 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China
| | - Hai Hu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Biomechanical Laboratory, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No. 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China.
| | - Bin Chen
- Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Orthopaedics, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No. 1838 North Guangzhou Avenue, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|