An image processing tool for the detection of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity by evaluating the myocardial metabolic activity in [18F]FDG PET/CT

Robustness of [18F]FDG PET/CT radiomic analysis in the setting of drug-induced cardiotoxicity

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Standardization of radiomic data acquisition protocols is still at a very early stage, revealing a strong need to work towards the definition of uniform image processing methodologies The aim of this study is to identify sources of variability in radiomic data derived from image discretization and resampling methodologies prior to image feature extraction. Furthermore, to identify robust potential image-based biomarkers for the early detection of cardiotoxicity.

METHODS

Image post-acquisition processing, interpolation, and volume of interest (VOI) segmentation were performed. Four experiments were conducted to assess the reliability in terms of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of the radiomic features and the effects of the variation of voxel size and gray level discretization. Statistical analysis was performed separating the patients according to cardiotoxicity diagnosis. Differences of texture features were studied with Mann-Whitney U test. P-values <0.05 after multiple testing correction were considered statistically significant. Additionally, a non-supervised k-Means clustering algorithm was evaluated.

RESULTS

The effect of the variation in the voxel size demonstrated a non-dependency relationship with the values of the radiomic features, regardless of the chosen discretization method. The median ICC values were 0.306 and 0.872 for absolute agreement and consistency, respectively, when varying the discretization bin number. The median ICC values were 0.678 and 0.878 for absolute agreement and consistency, respectively, when varying the discretization bin size. A total of 16 first order, 6 Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM), 4 Gray Level Dependence Matrix (GLDM) and 4 Gray Level Run Length Matrix (GLRLM) features demonstrated statistically significant differences between the diagnosis groups for interim scans (P<0.05) for the fixed bin size (FBS) discretization methodology. However, no statistically significant differences between diagnostic groups were found for the fixed bin number (FBN) discretization methodology. Two clusters based on the radiomic features were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Gray level discretization has a major impact on the repeatability of the radiomic features. The selection of the optimal processing methodology has led to the identification of texture-based patterns for the differentiation of early cardiac damage profiles.

Novel Imaging Biomarkers to Assess Oncologic Treatment-Related Changes

Cancer therapeutics cause various treatment-related changes that may impact patient follow-up and disease monitoring. Although atypical responses such as pseudoprogression may be misinterpreted as treatment nonresponse, other changes, such as hyperprogressive disease seen with immunotherapy, must be recognized early for timely management. Radiation necrosis in the brain is a known response to radiotherapy and must be distinguished from local tumor recurrence. Radiotherapy can also cause adverse effects such as pneumonitis and local tissue toxicity. Systemic therapies, like chemotherapy and targeted therapies, are known to cause long-term cardiovascular effects. Thus, there is a need for robust biomarkers to identify, distinguish, and predict cancer treatment-related changes. Radiomics, which refers to the high-throughput extraction of subvisual features from radiologic images, has been widely explored for disease classification, risk stratification, and treatment-response prediction. Lately, there has been much interest in investigating the role of radiomics to assess oncologic treatment-related changes. We review the utility and various applications of radiomics in identifying and distinguishing atypical responses to treatments, as well as in predicting adverse effects. Although artificial intelligence tools show promise, several challenges-including multi-institutional clinical validation, deployment in health care settings, and artificial-intelligence bias-must be addressed for seamless clinical translation of these tools.