Large-scale surgical workflow segmentation for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy

Surgical phase and instrument recognition: how to identify appropriate dataset splits

PURPOSE

Machine learning approaches can only be reliably evaluated if training, validation, and test data splits are representative and not affected by the absence of classes. Surgical workflow and instrument recognition are two tasks that are complicated in this manner, because of heavy data imbalances resulting from different length of phases and their potential erratic occurrences. Furthermore, sub-properties like instrument (co-)occurrence are usually not particularly considered when defining the split.

METHODS

We present a publicly available data visualization tool that enables interactive exploration of dataset partitions for surgical phase and instrument recognition. The application focuses on the visualization of the occurrence of phases, phase transitions, instruments, and instrument combinations across sets. Particularly, it facilitates assessment of dataset splits, especially regarding identification of sub-optimal dataset splits.

RESULTS

We performed analysis of the datasets Cholec80, CATARACTS, CaDIS, M2CAI-workflow, and M2CAI-tool using the proposed application. We were able to uncover phase transitions, individual instruments, and combinations of surgical instruments that were not represented in one of the sets. Addressing these issues, we identify possible improvements in the splits using our tool. A user study with ten participants demonstrated that the participants were able to successfully solve a selection of data exploration tasks.

CONCLUSION

In highly unbalanced class distributions, special care should be taken with respect to the selection of an appropriate dataset split because it can greatly influence the assessments of machine learning approaches. Our interactive tool allows for determination of better splits to improve current practices in the field. The live application is available at https://cardio-ai.github.io/endovis-ml/ .

CatStep: Automated Cataract Surgical Phase Classification and Boundary Segmentation Leveraging Inflated 3D-Convolutional Neural Network Architectures and BigCat

Objective

Accurate identification of surgical phases during cataract surgery is essential for improving surgical feedback and performance analysis. Time spent in each surgical phase is an indicator of performance, and segmenting out specific phases for further analysis can simplify providing both qualitative and quantitative feedback on surgical maneuvers.

Study Design

Retrospective surgical video analysis.

Subjects

One hundred ninety cataract surgical videos from the BigCat dataset (comprising nearly 4 million frames, each labeled with 1 of 11 nonoverlapping surgical phases).

Methods

Four machine learning architectures were developed for segmentation of surgical phases. Models were trained using cataract surgical videos from the BigCat dataset.

Main Outcome Measures

Models were evaluated using metrics applied to frame-by-frame output and, uniquely in this work, metrics applied to phase output.

Results

The final model, CatStep, a combination of a temporally sensitive model (Inflated 3D Densenet) and a spatially sensitive model (Densenet169), achieved an F1-score of 0.91 and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.95. Phase-level metrics showed considerable boundary segmentation performance with a median absolute error of phase start and end time of just 0.3 seconds and 0.1 seconds, respectively, a segmental F1-score @70 of 0.94, an oversegmentation score of 0.89, and a segmental edit score of 0.92.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the feasibility of high-performance automated surgical phase identification for cataract surgery and highlights the potential for improved surgical feedback and performance analysis.

Financial Disclosures

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Deep Learning in Surgical Workflow Analysis: A Review of Phase and Step Recognition

OBJECTIVE

In the last two decades, there has been a growing interest in exploring surgical procedures with statistical models to analyze operations at different semantic levels. This information is necessary for developing context-aware intelligent systems, which can assist the physicians during operations, evaluate procedures afterward or help the management team to effectively utilize the operating room. The objective is to extract reliable patterns from surgical data for the robust estimation of surgical activities performed during operations. The purpose of this article is to review the state-of-the-art deep learning methods that have been published after 2018 for analyzing surgical workflows, with a focus on phase and step recognition.

METHODS

Three databases, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, and PubMed were searched, and additional studies are added through a manual search. After the database search, 343 studies were screened and a total of 44 studies are selected for this review.

CONCLUSION

The use of temporal information is essential for identifying the next surgical action. Contemporary methods used mainly RNNs, hierarchical CNNs, and Transformers to preserve long-distance temporal relations. The lack of large publicly available datasets for various procedures is a great challenge for the development of new and robust models. As supervised learning strategies are used to show proof-of-concept, self-supervised, semi-supervised, or active learning methods are used to mitigate dependency on annotated data.

SIGNIFICANCE

The present study provides a comprehensive review of recent methods in surgical workflow analysis, summarizes commonly used architectures, datasets, and discusses challenges.

A systematic review of annotation for surgical process model analysis in minimally invasive surgery based on video

BACKGROUND

Annotated data are foundational to applications of supervised machine learning. However, there seems to be a lack of common language used in the field of surgical data science. The aim of this study is to review the process of annotation and semantics used in the creation of SPM for minimally invasive surgery videos.

METHODS

For this systematic review, we reviewed articles indexed in the MEDLINE database from January 2000 until March 2022. We selected articles using surgical video annotations to describe a surgical process model in the field of minimally invasive surgery. We excluded studies focusing on instrument detection or recognition of anatomical areas only. The risk of bias was evaluated with the Newcastle Ottawa Quality assessment tool. Data from the studies were visually presented in table using the SPIDER tool.

RESULTS

Of the 2806 articles identified, 34 were selected for review. Twenty-two were in the field of digestive surgery, six in ophthalmologic surgery only, one in neurosurgery, three in gynecologic surgery, and two in mixed fields. Thirty-one studies (88.2%) were dedicated to phase, step, or action recognition and mainly relied on a very simple formalization (29, 85.2%). Clinical information in the datasets was lacking for studies using available public datasets. The process of annotation for surgical process model was lacking and poorly described, and description of the surgical procedures was highly variable between studies.

CONCLUSION

Surgical video annotation lacks a rigorous and reproducible framework. This leads to difficulties in sharing videos between institutions and hospitals because of the different languages used. There is a need to develop and use common ontology to improve libraries of annotated surgical videos.