Adherence to therapy after flexor tendon surgery at a level 1 trauma center

Telerehabilitation Technology Used for Remote Wrist/Finger Range of Motion Evaluation: A Scoping Review

Background

Monitoring finger/wrist range of motion (ROM) is an important component of routine hand therapy after surgery. Telerehabilitation is a field that may potentially address various barriers of in-person hand therapy appointments. Therefore, the purpose of this scoping review is to identify telerehabilitation technologies that can be feasibly used in a patient's home to objectively measure finger/wrist ROM.

Methods

Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines for scoping reviews, we systematically searched MEDLINE and Embase electronic databases using alternative word spellings for the following core concepts: "wrist/hand," "rehabilitation," and "telemedicine." Studies were imported into Covidence, and systematic two-level screening was done by two independent reviewers. Patient demographics and telerehabilitation information were extracted from the selected articles, and a narrative synthesis of the findings was done.

Results

There were 28 studies included in this review, of which the telerehabilitation strategies included smartphone angle measurement applications, smartphone photography, videoconference, and wearable or external sensors. Most studies measured wrist ROM with the most accurate technologies being wearable and external sensors. For finger ROM, the smartphone angle application and photography had higher accuracy than sensor systems. The telerehabilitation strategies that had the highest level of usability in a remote setting were smartphone photographs and estimation during virtual appointments.

Conclusions

Telerehabilitation can be used as a reliable substitute to in-person goniometer measurements, particularly the smartphone photography and motion sensor ROM measurement technologies. Future research should investigate how to improve the accuracy of motion sensor applications that are available on easy-to-access devices.

Autonomous Patient-Controlled Mobilization Protocol After Flexor Tendon Repair: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Despite many publications on rehabilitation after repair of flexor tendon injuries of the hand, there is no consensus as to which method is superior. It is clear that nonadherence to postoperative therapy adversely affects the outcome after flexor tendon surgery. In the context of a developing country, the most important factor associated with poor outcome is late onset of rehabilitation therapy. An autonomous rehabilitation program is proposed, with the use of a low-cost splint and based on an online illustrative video with the expectation to improve adherence and patient compliance, thus ensuring satisfactory outcome.

METHODS

Twenty-two consecutive digits of 14 patients after flexor tendon repair in zone II were included. Autonomous early passive mobilization physical therapy and splinting started shortly after surgery, supported by an online available video depicting prescribed exercises; follow-up was continued until postoperative week 20. Patients were evaluated regarding range of motion, grip strength, and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) disability scale.

RESULTS

Range of motion after 20 weeks according to the scoring system of the American Society of Surgery of Hand was excellent in 4, good in 11, and fair in 4 fingers. The mean total active motion score was 86% (95% confidence interval, 78%-93%). The mean grip strength at final follow-up was 86% of the contralateral hand. The mean QuickDASH score was 12.5 (2.3-31.8).

CONCLUSION

This protocol achieves good results in range of motion and early return of function of the hand. We propose this simple, nonexpensive method to developing countries with less than optimal availability of health care.

The Impact of Social Deprivation and Hand Therapy Attendance on Range of Motion After Flexor Tendon Repair

PURPOSE

To examine the influence of social deprivation and hand therapy attendance on active range of motion (AROM) outcomes following flexor tendon repair.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent primary zone I-III flexor tendon repair between November 2016 and November 2020. Area deprivation index (ADI) was used to quantify social deprivation. Medical record review determined each patient's demographic characteristics, injury details, total hand therapy visits, and final AROM outcome. Active range of motion was converted to Strickland's percentage for analysis. Spearman correlation and simple and multivariable linear regression models were used to assess relationships between explanatory variables and outcomes.

RESULTS

There were a total of 109 patients, with a mean ADI of 53 and mean therapy attendance of 13 visits. Higher ADI and lower therapy attendance were correlated, and each was associated with significantly decreased Strickland's percentage. In the multivariable model, therapy attendance, ADI, zone 2 injury, and age maintained significant associations with Strickland's percentage.

CONCLUSIONS

Socially deprived patients attend fewer therapy sessions and obtain poorer AROM after flexor tendon repair. Social deprivation is likely to contribute to poor outcomes both by its association with decreased therapy attendance and by other potential pathways that make it difficult for deprived patients to achieve good surgical outcomes.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic IV.

Patient outcomes and costs after isolated flexor tendon repairs of the hand

BACKGROUND

Acute flexor tendon injuries are challenging injuries for patients, surgeons, and therapists alike. There is ongoing debate about the optimal timing and amount of therapy after these injuries.

PURPOSE

We sought to investigate the relationship between hand therapy utilization and reoperation rates after flexor tendon repair and quantify reoperation rates and costs associated with flexor tendon repair. We hypothesize there will be an inverse relationship between the number of hand therapy visits and later reoperation rates and a positive correlation between reoperation rates and total cost of care.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing primary flexor tendon repair was pursued.

METHODS

A commercially available database was utilized to access insurance claims data for 20.9 million patients in the US from 2007 to 2015. Patients undergoing primary flexor tendon repair were included and followed for one year. Patients with fractures, vascular injuries, or digit replantation were excluded. We studied post-operative rehabilitation utilization, reoperation rates, and costs. Chi-Square tests and multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess the relationship between therapy utilization and reoperation rates and costs.

RESULTS

The one-year reoperation rate was 11.4 percent at a median time of 100.0 days amongst 1,129 patients undergoing primary tendon repair. In multivariable analysis, age between 30 and 59, male sex, and utilization of over 21 therapy sessions were associated with increased odds of reoperation. Mean insurance reimbursement one year following primary flexor repair was $14,533 per patient but $27,870 if patients went on to reoperation.

CONCLUSION

Continued therapy utilization after primary flexor tendon repair is an independent predictor of reoperation need. These findings may help surgeons counsel patients who require a large number of visits after flexor tendon repair on when to revisit surgical options.

Effect of Time to Hand Therapy following Zone II Flexor Tendon Repair

This population-based study aimed to define how time to hand therapy following isolated zone II flexor tendon repairs impacts complications and secondary procedures.

METHODS

Insurance claims from the Truven MarketScan Databases were used to evaluate outcomes after isolated zone II flexor tendon repairs between January 2009 and October 2015. Cohorts differing in time to hand therapy were compared to evaluate the impact on complications, reoperation, and number of therapy sessions. Secondary outcomes analyzed how the number of therapy sessions affected rates of reoperation.

RESULTS

Hand therapy was identified in 82% of patients (N = 2867) following tendon reconstruction. Therapy initiation occurred within 1 week, 1-4 weeks, and after 4 weeks in 56%, 35%, and 9% of patients, respectively. Univariate analysis showed no difference in non-tendinous complications (27%, 30%, 29%; P = 0.29) or tendon rupture rates (13%, 13%, 10%; P = 0.42) within 90 days between cohorts. Multivariable analysis showed no difference in rates of tenolysis (6.3%, 6%, 4.4%; P > 0.01). In the early initiation cohort, >23 hand therapy sessions were associated with the highest rates of tenolysis (19%).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite being a common fear of hand surgeons, early initiation of hand therapy was not associated with increased tendon rupture rates. Although delayed therapy is a concern for tendon scarring, it did not confer a higher risk of tenolysis. Complication rates do not appear to correlate with timing of hand therapy. Therefore, hand surgeons should promote early mobility following isolated flexor tendon injuries given the known functional outcome benefits.

Access to Hand Therapy Following Surgery in the United States: Barriers and Facilitators

Hand therapy is a time-sensitive and essential postoperative service for patients undergoing reparative or corrective procedures in the hand and plays an important role in achieving best functional outcomes. In the United States, therapy is an independent service from a payer's standpoint. Access is affected by global and distinct factors in health care. This article presents views on certain aspects of health care that aide in and those that impede access to hand therapy for patients in the United States, and concludes with a brief glimpse into some ongoing efforts to improve access for patients.

[Early functional passive mobilization of flexor tendon injuries of the hand (zone 2) : Exercise with an exoskeleton compared to physical therapy]

BACKGROUND

These days there are different types of aftercare following flexor tendon injury. Patients in this study received a dynamic Kleinert protocol and additionally two different postoperative treatments. Both treatment groups were compared to each other and results were put into perspective when compared to other treatment options.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients presenting with clean lesions of the two flexor tendons in zone 2 received postoperative treatment with a dynamic Kleinert protocol. Patients were randomly divided into either Group I (physical therapy) or Group II (exoskeleton). Range of motion was assessed after 6, 12 and 18 weeks. In addition, we measured the Strickland score and grip strength at the 18-week follow-up. DASH scores were obtained at weeks 12 and 18.

RESULTS

Regardless of the received postoperative treatment, range of motion was predominantly limited in the proximal interphalangeal and distal interphalangeal joints after 6 weeks. This deficit decreased with time and almost full range of motion was achieved after 18 weeks. Grip strength measured 75% (Group I) and 78% (Group II) of the healthy hand's level. Good functional outcome was observed in the DASH scores after 12 weeks, which improved further, measuring 7.5 (Group I) and 6.8 (Group II) at the 18-week follow-up. We did not see any clinically relevant differences between the two patient groups.

CONCLUSION

Regarding possible reruptures, the Kleinert protocol delivers a safe treatment regime. The possible disadvantage of flexion contractures with the Kleinert protocol was not seen in our measurements. Additional motion exercises using an exoskeleton delivered comparable results to classic physical therapy.

Rehabilitation exercise program after surgical treatment of quadriceps tendon rupture: A case report

OBJECTIVES

This case report describes in detail the rehabilitation exercise program, provide post-operative therapeutic objectives/recommendations and to facilitate the return to a possible schedule of ADL and participation in sports after the surgical treatment of quadriceps tendon rupture. Also, the exact surgical technique is described.

DESIGN

A single case report.

PARTICIPANT

The patient was an active 53-year-old man who sustained this injury as a result of a sudden misstep with his left foot into a hole, while he was trekking across muddy countryside. Clinical examination of the knee revealed skin ecchymosis, swelling and tenderness over the distal thigh. Plain radiographs showed patella baja, and the scheduled magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed interrupted continuity of the quadriceps tendon and the patella. A diagnosis of quadriceps tendon rupture was made and the patient was scheduled to undergo surgical intervention the following day.

REHABILITATION EXERCISE PROGRAM

A well-structured rehabilitation exercise program was followed in order to ensure rapid recovery and good functional outcomes. His postoperative course progressed normally, demonstrating a return to the normal activities of daily living at 6 weeks, full active range of motion at 16 weeks, and return to sports recreational activities at 5 months.

CONCLUSIONS

An early surgical treatment and subsequently a well-structured rehabilitation exercise program have contributed to maximize the functional outcomes of the patient and provide a rapid and safe return to the activities of daily living (7th week) with participation in non-contact sports after the 18th week.

Therapy Concepts for the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint

The principles of hand therapy for proximal interphalangeal joint disorders include protecting injured structures, minimizing patient discomfort, and optimizing patient recovery. Comprehension of hand anatomy, the nature of the injury being treated, and the phases of healing are critical when designing a safe and effective hand therapy program. Hand therapists use a combination of orthoses, guided exercises, and modalities to improve edema, sensitivity, range of motion, and function.

The optimal orthosis and motion protocol for extensor tendon injury in zones IV-VIII: A systematic review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review INTRODUCTION: There exist numerous combinations of orthoses and motion protocols for the treatment of proximal extensor tendon injuries.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal combination of motion protocol and orthotic treatment for the rehabilitation of proximal extensor tendon injuries (zones IV-VIII).

METHODS

A systematic review of English language randomized clinical trials and cohort studies investigating extensor tendon rehabilitation from 1960 to 2016 was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, PEDro, and OTseeker. Outcomes of total active motion, grip strength, return to work, patient attrition, and patient-reported outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Eleven studies of predominantly average quality (1, low; 8, average; and 2, high) were included in the final review. Results were difficult to compare due to differences in reporting. Early total active motion and final grip strength were greater with dynamic extension orthoses (191°-214°; 35-38 kg/89% contralateral side) and relative motion orthoses (205°-236°; 85%-95% contralateral side) compared to static orthoses (79°-202°; 23-34 kg/59% contralateral side). Four studies excluded patients who did not follow up, and loss to follow-up was 12%-33% in the other studies. Patient-reported outcomes were not comparable, as they were only included in 3 studies, and each used a different assessment tool.

CONCLUSION

Average quality evidence supports the use of early active motion (EAM) as the superior motion protocol, but optimal orthosis to deliver EAM could not be determined. Prospective research should focus on patient-reported outcomes and the design of orthoses that facilitate the use of the EAM.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2a.

Perspectives of US and Australian Hand Therapists About Pediatric Hand Transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Pediatric hand transplantation (PHT), an investigational therapy, was recently performed in the United States.

RESEARCH QUESTIONS

Perspectives of hand therapists about PHT patient selection (inclusion and exclusion criteria), team configuration, patient assent, and patient compliance were explored.

DESIGN

Quantitative survey. We used a research ethics committee-approved 18-question e-link anonymous questionnaire to survey members of the American Society of Hand Therapists and the Australian (AU) Hand Therapy Association for their perspectives on PHT.

RESULTS

All surveyed hand therapists work with children (n = 18 Australia [AU], n = 85 United States) and some had been involved in adult hand transplant rehabilitation (28% AU, 21% United States; P = .543, not significant (NS)). The US and AU therapists differ regarding their opinions on multidisciplinary team membership, smoking as an exclusion criterion, and risk of posttransplant rehabilitation noncompliance.

DISCUSSION

This research opens a dialogue on the clinical and ethical complexity of PHT, including team configuration, inclusion/exclusion criteria, the assent process, and rehabilitation access/compliance. Furthermore, international perspectives are informative as they highlight funding and access issues and can potentially guide global professional society policy.

Utilization and Costs of Postoperative Physical Therapy After Rotator Cuff Repair: A Comparison of Privately Insured and Medicare Patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the utilization and charges related to physical therapy (PT) after rotator cuff repair in privately insured and Medicare patients and between arthroscopic and open/mini-open repair techniques.

METHODS

The PearlDiver insurance database was queried for patients receiving postoperative PT using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Data were available from 2007 to 2011 for United Healthcare and from 2005 to 2011 for Medicare patients. Patients undergoing arthroscopic (CPT 29827) or open/mini-open approaches (CPT 23410, 23412, 23420) were identified in both populations. Utilization was determined by both the percentage of patients with at least one postoperative PT-related code and the average number of encounters per patient. Per-patient average charge was determined by dividing total charges within the billing period by the patient total.

RESULTS

A total of 365,891 patients undergoing rotator cuff repair were identified. There was an increase in the number of arthroscopic repairs (+29.1%, P = .027, United Healthcare; +78.9%, P < .001, Medicare) and a decrease in the number of open/mini-open repairs (-18.2%, P = .038, United Healthcare; -18.2%, P < .001, Medicare) across the study period. At 6 months postoperatively, PT utilization was greater in the United Healthcare groups (82.9% arthroscopic, 81.0% open/mini-open) than in the Medicare groups (41.8% arthroscopic, 43.2% open/mini-open). Utilization-weighted per-patient average charge was comparable among all 4 groups, with slightly higher charges in the United Healthcare groups ($3,376 arthroscopic, $3,251 open/mini-open) compared with the Medicare groups ($2,940 arthroscopic, $2,807 open/mini-open). The United Healthcare groups had a greater number of utilization-weighted billed encounters (36.1 for open/mini-open, 9.5 for arthroscopic) than their Medicare counterparts (12.8 open/mini-open, 16.7 arthroscopic).

CONCLUSIONS

Utilization of PT after rotator cuff repair is substantially higher in privately insured than in Medicare patients. Utilization rates appear to be comparable between surgical approaches. Per-patient costs were comparable irrespective of surgical approach and insurance modality.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, economic.

Rehabilitation following zone II flexor tendon repairs

Ongoing clinical and basic research has improved understanding of flexor tendon mechanics and physiology for surgical repair and rehabilitation after a zone II flexor tendon repair. Yet, the ideal surgical repair technique that includes sufficient strength to allow safe immediate active motion of the finger, without excessive repair stiffness, bulk or rough surfaces resulting in excessive resistance to flexion, does not exist. After optimizing the repair, the surgeon and therapist team must select a rehabilitation plan that protects the repair but helps to maintain tendon gliding. There are 3 types of rehabilitation programs for flexor tendon repairs: delayed mobilization, early passive mobilization, or an early active mobilization. No guideline for rehabilitation should be followed exactly. Many factors influence therapy decisions, including repair technique, associated tendon healing, passive versus active range of motion, edema, and tendon adhesions. These factors can assist in guiding rehabilitation progression and promote functional range of motion, safely mobilize the repaired tendon(s) and prevent gapping, rupture, and adhesions.