Outcomes and complications of ulnar shortening osteotomy: an institutional review

Cutibacterium acnes Infection as a Cause of Nonunion After Ulnar-Shortening Osteotomy

Ulnar-shortening osteotomy is a reliable solution to treat ulnar impaction syndrome, but it has a significant rate of nonunion as a known complication. Generally nonunion after the procedure is attributed to noninfectious causes. When infections happen, they follow the microbiological trends of nonunions elsewhere in the body. We present a case of ulnar-shortening osteotomy using an oblique-cut osteotomy system that resulted in septic nonunion. At the time of revision surgery, Cutibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus hominis were isolated from the osteotomy site. The patient was successfully treated using intravenous antibiotics and the two-stage Masquelet technique and eventually went on to bony union. As C acnes is rarely encountered in this context, this report highlights the need to consider all possible pathogens in the workup of a potentially septic nonunion. Surgeons should consider bacteria such as C acnes that require prolonged incubation for isolation from cultures, which may not be part of many institutions' usual protocol. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(4):e211-e213.].

Enabling the design of surgical instruments for under-resourced patients through metal additive manufacturing: ulnar shortening osteotomy as an example

BACKGROUND

Ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) has demonstrated good outcomes for patients with ulnar impaction syndrome. To minimize complications such as non-union, precise osteotomy and firm fixation are warranted. Despite various ulnar shortening systems have been developed, current technology does not meet all needs. A considerable portion of patients could not afford those designated USO systems. To tackle this challenge, our team reported successful results in standardized free-hand predrilled USO technique. However, it is still technical demanding and requires sufficient experience and confidence to excel. Therefore, our team designed an ulnar shortening system based on our free-hand technique principle, using metal additive manufacturing technology. The goal of this study is to describe the development process and report the performance of the system.

METHODS

Utilizing metal additive manufacturing technology, our team developed an ulnar shortening system that requires minimal exposure, facilitates precise cutting, and allows for the easy placement of a 3.5 mm dynamic compression plate, available to patients at zero out-of-pocket cost. For performance testing, two surgeons with different levels of experience in ulnar shortening procedures were included: one fellow-trained hand and wrist surgeon and one senior resident. They performed ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) using both the free-hand technique and the USO system-assisted technique on ulna sawbones, repeating each method three times. The recorded parameters included time-to-complete-osteotomy, total procedure time, chip diameter, shortening length, maximum residual gap, and deviation angle.

RESULTS

For the hand and wrist fellow, with the USO system, the time-to-complete osteotomy was significantly reduced. (468.7 ± 63.6 to 260.0 ± 5 s, p < 0.05). Despite the preop goal was shortening 3 mm, the average shortening length was significantly larger in the free-hand group (5 ± 0.1; 3.2 ± 0.2 mm, p < 0.05). Both maximum residual gap and deviation angle reported no statistical difference between the two techniques for the hand surgeon. As for the senior resident, the maximum residual gap was significantly reduced, using the USO system (2.9 ± 0.8; 0.4 ± 0.4 mm, p = 0.02). Between two surgeons, significant larger maximum residual gap and deviation angle were noted on the senior resident doctor, in the free-hand technique group, but not in the USO system group.

CONCLUSION

The developed USO system may serve as a valuable tool, aiding in reliable and precise cutting as well as fixation for patients undergoing ulnar shortening osteotomy with a 3.5 mm dynamic compression plate, even for less experienced surgeons. The entire process, from concept generation and sketching to creating the CAD file and final production, serves as a translatable reference for other surgical scenarios.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Early versus Late Debridement of Superficial Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears

Background

While initial nonoperative management is the conventional approach for superficial triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears, a substantial portion of these cases go on to require surgery, and the optimal duration of nonoperative treatment is unknown. In this study, we evaluate the cost-effectiveness of early versus late arthroscopic debridement for the treatment of superficial TFCC tears without distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability.

Methods

We created a decision tree to compare the following strategies from a healthcare payer perspective: immediate arthroscopic debridement versus immobilization for 4 or 6 weeks with late debridement as needed. Costs were obtained from the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services and a national administrative claims database. Probabilities and health-related quality-of-life measures were obtained from published sources. We conducted sensitivity analyses on model inputs, including a probabilistic sensitivity analysis consisting of 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations.

Results

Immobilization for 6 weeks while reserving arthroscopic debridement for refractory cases was both the least costly and most effective strategy. Immediate arthroscopic debridement became cost-effective when success rates of immobilization for 4 or 6 weeks were less than 7.7 or 10.5%, respectively. Our probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that immobilization for 6 weeks was preferred 97.6% of the time, and immobilization for 4 weeks was preferred 2.4% of the time.

Conclusion

Although various early and late debridement strategies can be used to treat superficial TFCC tears without DRUJ instability, immobilization for 6 weeks while reserving arthroscopic debridement for refractory cases is the optimal strategy from a cost-effectiveness standpoint.

Ulnar Resection Length: A Risk Factor for Nonunion in Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy

BACKGROUND

Nonunion rates following ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) are reported up to 18% with few known risk factors. While resection length is variable in practice, little is known about the prognostic implications on healing. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether longer resection lengths increased the odds of nonunion.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent an elective USO at a single institution over a 6-year period. Demographic, social, comorbidity, and surgical data were reviewed. Ulnar resection length was obtained from operative notes and dichotomized into smaller (<5.5 mm) and larger (≥5.5 mm) groups. The primary outcome was the rate of nonunion. Univariate analyses and a multivariable logistic regression model were used to assess for significant predictors of nonunion.

RESULTS

A total of 87 patients were included with a mean age of 45 years. Patient comorbidities included 12.6% with diabetes, 29.9% with an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of ≥ 3, 5.8% reporting current tobacco use, and 29.9% reporting former tobacco use. There were 55 patients (63.2%) with resection lengths < 5.5 mm and 32 patients (36.8%) with ≥ 5.5 mm resections. Multivariable analysis identified longer resection length (≥5.5 mm) and current tobacco use as independent risk factors for nonunion. Patients with a resection length of ≥ 5.5 mm had 20.2 times greater odds of nonunion compared with patients with smaller resections, and current smokers had 72.2 times greater odds of nonunion compared with nonsmokers.

CONCLUSION

Longer ulnar resection length (≥5.5 mm) significantly increases the risk of nonunion following USO.

Is metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy superior to diaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy in the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy (MUSO) is safer for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) than diaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy (DUSO), DUSO is widely used for UIS treatment.

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness of DUSO and MUSO for UIS treatment and determine the factors that should be considered when choosing surgical treatment for UIS.

METHODS

Articles comparing the effectiveness of DUSO and MUSO for UIS treatment were systematically retrieved from MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. The demography, incidence of complications, secondary operation rate, postoperative DASH score, wrist pain on the visual analogue scale, and grip strength improvement were also evaluated. In addition, the correlation between the improvement of grip strength and the shortening of osteotomy length of ulna was analyzed. The outcome of the patient was discontinuous, and the odds ratio, risk ratio (RR), and 95%CI were calculated and analyzed via RevMan5.3 software.

RESULTS

Six studies, including 83 patients receiving MUSO (experimental group) and 112 patients receiving DUSO (control group), were included in the meta-analysis. The second operation rate was significantly higher after DUSO than after MUSO. The DASH scores were slightly lower in the MUSO group than in the DUSO group. The patients receiving MUSO had slightly better pain relief effect than patients receiving DUSO. However, the incidence of complications and improvement of grip strength were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Although DUSO and MUSO provide similar effects for UIS, MUSO is associated with a lower secondary operation rate, slightly lower postoperative DASH scores and slightly better pain relief effect than DUSO, indicating that MUSO can effectively be used for UIS treatment.

Results of isolated ulnar shaft shortening osteotomy in the treatment of idiopathic ulnocarpal impaction syndrome

The objective of this study was to evaluate the results of isolated ulnar shaft shortening osteotomy (USSO) in the treatment of idiopathic ulnocarpal impingement syndrome. This was a two-center retrospective study. All patients older than 18 years who underwent isolated USSO for idiopathic ulnocarpal impingement syndrome between 2006 and 2016 were included. The outcome measures were: patient satisfaction, decrease in pain intensity, change in occupation, QuickDASH and PRWE functional scores, secondary palliative surgery suggesting failure of the ulnar shaft shortening osteotomy, and postoperative ulnar variance. The main complications were analyzed. Thirty-one patients were included. Twenty-six (84%) were satisfied with the procedure. At an average follow-up of 62 months, there was no secondary palliative surgery. Mean pain intensity on VAS was 7/10 (range, 2-10) and 1.7/10 (range, 0-6) preoperatively and postoperatively, respectively, for a mean decrease of 5.3 ± 2.6 points; this decrease was statistically significant (p &lt; 0.001). None of the manual workers had to alter their work. Mean postoperative QuickDASH score was 19.6/100 (range, 0-79.55) and mean postoperative PRWE score was 23/100 (range, 1-85). Mean postoperative ulnar variance was -0.5 mm. As for complications, 61% of patients (n = 19/31) had discomfort related to the plate; 9.7% (n = 3/31) had distal radioulnar osteoarthritis; 4% (n = 1/19) had a fracture after hardware removal; 13% (n = 4/31) had non-union. Despite a high rate of complications, the study confirmed the effectiveness, in terms of pain, of isolated USSO in the treatment of idiopathic ulnocarpal impingement syndrome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective cohort.

[Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy - Two Weeks of Immobilization Sufficient]

BACKGROUND

Diaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) as surgical treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome is standardized nowadays with good to very good results. In contrast, a wide spectrum of different postoperative treatment regimens can be found in the current literature. The results after USO with modern, angular stable implants with immobilization for 2 weeks are presented.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective database analysis identified 49 patients (31 women, 18 men, mean age 37.6 years) with a total of 51 USO over a 13-year period and were followed up for 73.5 (15.9-192.9). All USO were obliquely sawed and stabilized with palmar locking implants. The wrist was immobilized postoperatively in 30° extension in a dorsal forearm splint for 2 weeks.

RESULTS

All USO showed load-stable consolidation signs after an average of 7.0 (SD 1.9; 4.9-14.1) weeks. Wrist range of motion was significantly improved in extension/flexion from 107.6° (60-155) preoperatively to 123.7° (80-160) postoperatively and in ulnar/radial deviation from 55.1° (25-90) to 60.8° (30-90) (p<0.05). Pain level was significantly reduced from 3.2 (0-8) to 0.1 (0-2) at rest and from 7.3 (4-10) to 1.2 (0-9) under weight bearing (p<0.01). A total of 5 complications (9.8%) were noted. Nonunion was not found.

CONCLUSION

By using angular stable implants to stabilize a USO, the duration of immobilization can be reduced to 2 weeks without compromising bone healing.

Long-term outcome after arthroscopic debridement of Palmer type 2C central degenerative lesions of the triangular fibrocartilage complex

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to report long-term objective and patient-reported outcome after arthroscopic debridement of central degenerative triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) lesions.

METHODS

A total of 17 patients with central degenerative TFCC (Palmer type 2C) lesions and ulnar positive variance who were treated by arthroscopic debridement were retrospectively reviewed. Mean follow-up was 8.8 years. Assessment facilitating the Modified Mayo Wrist score (MMWS), the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH score), recording of pain level and of patient satisfaction, and radiological examination were done.

RESULTS

Patients reached a pain level of 1.7 VAS, MMW score of 92, and DASH score of 22. No significant differences could be detected between the operated and the contralateral extremity regarding range of motion and grip strength for all patients. No perioperative complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic debridement of central degenerative TFCC lesions is safe, reliable, and efficacious even for ulnar positive variance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Refracture after plate removal following ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome - a retrospective case-control study

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, case-control study.

Inevitable nonunion after ulnar shortening osteotomy in patients with ulnar impaction syndrome and breast cancer under bisphosphonate treatment

BACKGROUND

Nonunion after ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) was observed at a high rate in patients undergoing long-term bisphosphonate (BP) maintenance treatment after breast cancer surgery. Here, we report the unique features of these nonunions.

METHODS

In total, 485 patients who had undergone USO between March 2008 and September 2017 were screened for inclusion based on the following criteria: (1) definitive nonunion after USO; (2) prior history of or ongoing BP therapy after the diagnosis of breast cancer; and (3) no evidence of metastasis in the ulna treated with USO, as determined based on the radiological evaluation.

RESULTS

Five patients with histories of breast cancer and subsequent BP treatment were identified; all (100%) of these patients showed definitive nonunion after USO. The mean age was 56.2 years, and all ulnae were on the contralateral side to that of the original breast cancer. Intravenous Ibandronate^® and Zolendronate^® were administrated to one and four patients, respectively. The mean period of administration was 67.8 months. Three patients exhibited suspicious lesions impending atypical fracture on their femurs, and the other two patients were treated by intramedullary nailing after the occurrence of atypical fractures. Radiological evaluation revealed no evidence of a metastatic lesion, including in the musculoskeletal system, in any patient. Osteosynthesis was performed with cancellous iliac bone graft and mean of 4.3 months after osteosynthesis, union in all cases was achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

Problems associated with BP treatment are well known. Even in cases in which the agent is essential for preventing bony metastasis of breast cancer, the normal bony physiology, including bone turnover and healing, is likely to be compromised. In addition to atypical fractures of the femur and ulna, procedures such as USO are likely to be affected by BP. Furthermore, not only a primary iliac bone graft but also other method (oblique osteotomy) should be needed to avoid nonunion during plating in USO.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, Retrospective case series.

Nonunion and Reoperation After Ulna Shortening Osteotomy

Background: The primary purpose of our study was to identify factors associated with reoperation after ulna shortening osteotomy. Our secondary aims were to determine the rate and type of reoperation procedures. Methods: In this retrospective study, we included patients older than 18 years of age who underwent an ulna shortening osteotomy between January 2003 and December 2015. Medical records of patients were assessed for our explanatory variables, reoperations, and reporting of symptoms. We used bivariate and multivariable analyses to identify factors associated with reoperation after ulna shortening osteotomy. Results: Among 94 patients who underwent 98 ulna shortening osteotomies, there were 34 reoperations (35%). Nineteen patients (19%) underwent removal of hardware, 6 (6.1%) had a nonunion, and 9 (9.2%) underwent additional surgeries. Surgery on their dominant limb, trauma, and prior surgery to the ipsilateral wrist were associated with reoperation. In multivariable analysis, factors independently associated with reoperation were the dominant side being affected (odds ratio = 3.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.36-11) and traumatic origin (odds ratio = 3.4; 95% CI = 1.1-11). Bivariate analysis identified younger age and prior surgery of the affected wrist as factors associated with hardware removal. More operations for refixation due to nonunion of osteotomy were performed in patients with a transverse osteotomy compared with patients with an oblique osteotomy. Conclusions: One in 3 patients will undergo a reoperation after ulna shortening osteotomy, most often due to hardware irritation or nonunion of osteotomy. Awareness of these rates and predictive factors may be helpful for preoperative discussions and surgical decision making.

Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy: Our Experience

Objective  The objective of the present study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results of our series regarding ulnar shortening osteotomy, as well as to briefly review the pathology, indications and surgical options of ulnocarpal conflict. Methods  We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who were treated with ulnar shortening osteotomy between January 2012 and June 2017 at our hospital. We clinically evaluated pain, articular range of motion, grip strength and functional outcomes using the quick-DASH questionnaire. We radiographically measured the pre- and postoperative ulnar variance and the shortening performed. Results  We identified eight operated patients, and it was possible to evaluate seven of them. Pain decreased in this population (visual analogue scale [VAS] score changed from 7 to 2.6, p  < 0.05), there was a decrease in quick-DASH (64 to 28, p  < 0.05) and we found a decrease in the articular amplitude ∼ 7° for flexion ( p  = 0.2), and of 5.5° for supination ( p  = 0.3), as well as decreasing grip strength to about 86% on the contralateral side ( p  = 0.07). The ulnar variance changed from a mean of + 5.5 mm to - 1.1 mm ( p  < 0.05). Two out of 8 patients (25%) presented plaque-related symptoms and one of them underwent a new intervention to extract the material. Conclusions  Ulnar shortening osteotomy is an effective surgical procedure both in the treatment of ulnocarpal conflict and in the discharge of the ulna. The results presented agreement with other results published in the literature, with good clinical and radiographic results.

Distal Metaphyseal Osteotomy Allows for Greater Ulnar Shortening Compared to Diaphyseal Osteotomy for Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: A Biomechanical Study

Purpose  To compare the biomechanical characteristics between diaphyseal and metaphyseal ulnar-shortening osteotomy with respect to (1) maximal shortening achieved at each osteotomy site and (2) force required to achieve shortening at each site. Methods  Nine fresh frozen cadaveric upper extremities were affixed through the proximal ulna to a wooden surgical board. A metaphyseal 20-mm bone wedge was resected from the distal ulna and sequential shortening was performed. A load cell was attached to a distal post that was clamped to the surgical board and used to measure the force required for each sequential 5-mm of shortening until maximal shortening was achieved. The resected bone was reinserted, and plate fixation was used to restore normal anatomy. A 20-mm diaphyseal osteotomy was performed, and force measurements were recorded in the same manner with (1) interosseous membrane intact, (2) central band released, and (3) extensive interosseous membrane and muscular attachments released. Results  Metaphyseal osteotomy allowed greater maximal shortening than diaphyseal osteotomy with the interosseous membrane intact and with central band release but similar shortening when extensive interosseous membrane and muscle release was performed. Force at maximal shortening was similar between metaphyseal and diaphyseal osteotomy. Sequential soft tissue release at the diaphysis allowed for increased shortening with slightly decreased shortening force with sequential release. Conclusion  Metaphyseal ulnar osteotomy allows greater maximal shortening but requires similar force compared with diaphyseal osteotomy. Sequential release of the interosseous membrane permits increased shortening at the diaphysis but requires extensive soft tissue release. Clinical Relevance  Both sites of osteotomy can achieve sufficient shortening to decompress the ulnocarpal joint for most cases of ulnar impaction syndrome. The greater shortening from metaphyseal ulnar osteotomy may be reserved for severe cases of shortening, especially after distal radius malunion or in the setting of distal radius growth arrest in the pediatric population. Level of Evidence  This is a Level V, basic science study.

Nonunion Rates Among Ulnar-Shortening Osteotomy for Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to systematically review all available literature reporting nonunion rates of ulnar-shortening osteotomies (USO) used for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) and to compare those rates among transverse versus oblique cuts for the osteotomy.

METHODS

Electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies that evaluated outcomes of both transverse and oblique USO for UIS. Level of evidence was determined by 2 independent reviewers. Studies were screened based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. A total of 37 studies (1,423 patients) were included in final analysis. The average rate of nonunion and delayed union for each group (transverse and oblique osteotomy) was calculated.

RESULTS

The average rate of nonunion among all osteotomies was 4.0%. The average rate of nonunion was 4.16% and 3.86% in transverse osteotomies and oblique osteotomies, respectively. This difference was not statistically significant. The average rate of delayed union, in those studies that reported delayed union, was 5.7%. The average rate of delayed union was 7.41% and 4.1% in transverse osteotomies and oblique osteotomies, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our review of the literature, there is no difference in the rate of nonunion between transverse and oblique osteotomies. Therefore, the decision of which of the 2 surgical techniques should not be based on rate of nonunion.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Arthroscopic treatment of triangular fibrocartilage complex injuries in paediatric and adolescent patients

We assessed outcomes of 43 paediatric and adolescent patients (44 wrists) undergoing arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex surgery by a single surgeon between 2003 and 2016. Medical records were reviewed for clinical, imaging, and operative data. Preoperatively, 49% of patients had additional diagnoses and mean QuickDASH was 47. Patients were telephoned to assess current wrist pain, subsequent treatment(s), satisfaction, and to complete QuickDASH and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation questionnaires. Twenty-five patients responded with mean follow-up of 70 months (minimum 13 months). In those patients not reached by telephone, mean clinical follow-up was 21 months. Seven patients had subsequent surgery (most commonly ulnar shortening osteotomy); this was associated with lower satisfaction scores. At final follow-up, mean QuickDASH was 4, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation 8 and patient and parent satisfaction scores were 9 and 9 out of 10, respectively. In conclusion, arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex treatment in paediatric patients yielded favourable outcomes and patient/parent satisfaction. Level of evidence: IV.

The Effect of Early Active Mobilization on Union Rate after Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy

Background  Ulnocarpal impaction occurs when there is excessive loading between the ulnar carpus and the distal ulna. Ulnar shortening osteotomies (USOs) decompress the ulnocarpal joint. Many studies have evaluated USO but none have considered the effect of early active mobilization on union rate. Questions  Does early active mobilization affect rate of union following USO? Does early active mobilization affect rate of complications following USO? Patients and Methods  We performed a retrospective review of 15 consecutive patients that underwent 16 USOs between 2011 and 2015. There were seven males and eight females. Median age at time of shortening osteotomy was 47 years (range: 11-63 years). The median time of the procedure was 62 minutes (range: 45-105 minutes) and the median change in ulnar variance was 5.5 mm (range: 0-10.5 mm). Six patients were initially immobilized in incomplete plaster casts postoperatively, while the remainder had only wool and crepe dressings. Early active mobilization commenced after the first postoperative visit at 12 days. Results  There was a 100% union rate in our series and 12 patients were pain-free at final follow-up. However, three of the patients with the longest times to union were smokers. Additionally, some patients may have achieved union between follow-up clinic visits. Conclusion  Early active mobilization after USO does not affect union rate. Prospective, randomized studies are required to investigate the effect of early active mobilization in light of factors known to increase time to union, such as smoking. Level of Evidence  This is a Level IV, case series.

Solitary ulnar shortening osteotomy for malunion of distal radius fractures: experience of a centre in the UK and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Isolated ulnar shortening osteotomies can be used to treat ulnocarpal abutment secondary to radial shortening following distal radius fractures. Given the increase of fragility distal radius fractures awareness of treating the sequelae of distal radius fractures is important. We present the largest reported case series in the UK of ulnar shortening osteotomies for this indication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty patients with previous distal radial fractures were included, who presented with wrist pain and radiologically evident positive ulnar variance secondary to malunion of the distal radius with no significant intercalated instability. Patients were treated with a short oblique ulnar shortening osteotomy, using a Stanley jig and small AO compression plate system. Pre- and postoperative radiographical measurements of inclination, dorsal/volar angulation and ulnar variance were made. Patients were scored pre- and postoperatively using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation scores by two orthopaedic surgeons. Mean follow-up was 24 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Radiographical analysis revealed a change in the ulnar variance with an average reduction of 5.74 mm. Mean preoperative scores were 61.1 (range 25-95.5) for QuickDASH and 70.4 (range 33-92) for Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation. At the latest follow-up, mean postoperative QuickDASH scores were 10.6 (range 0-43.2) and 17.2 (range 0-44) for Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation. Differences in scores after surgery for both QuickDASH and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation were statistically significant (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The ulnar shortening osteotomy is a relatively simple procedure compared with corrective radial osteotomy, with a lower complication profile. In our series, patients showed significant improvement in pain and function by correcting the ulnar variance thus preventing ulna-carpal impaction.

A Dorsal Approach for Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy

Aim  This study aims to evaluate the long-term complications, results, and patient satisfaction rates of a dorsally approached ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome. Methods  A retrospective chart review of 20 patients was performed. Primary outcomes of interest were subjective, measured using the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and the third questionnaire about patient satisfaction, composed by the authors. Secondary outcomes included hardware removal due to irritation and other complications. Results  Mean postoperative functional score of PRWE was 28 (standard deviation [SD], 30) and DASH 20 (SD, 26), respectively. Fifteen patients were satisfied with the operation. Removal of hardware was noted in six patients. In one patient plate breakage occurred. Conclusion  Similar postoperative functional scores and complications were seen in patients undergoing an ulnar shortening osteotomy with a dorsally placed plate for ulnar impaction syndrome, compared with other plate placement localizations. The incidence of plate removal is also comparable to previously described results. As the dorsally placed plate and freehand technique, are relatively easy, we feel that it has a place in the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome. Level of Evidence  Level IV, retrospective cohort study.

Arthroscopic Wafer Procedure Versus Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy as a Surgical Treatment for Idiopathic Ulnar Impaction Syndrome

PURPOSE

To compare clinical and radiologic outcomes and complication rates of the arthroscopic wafer procedure (AWP) and ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) for idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS).

METHODS

From May 2009 to June 2014, 42 patients who were aged 45 years or older with idiopathic UIS underwent either the AWP or USO under the following identical surgical indications: (1) less than 4 mm of positive ulnar variance, (2) Palmer classification 2C or 2D lesion of the triangular fibrocartilage complex, (3) stable distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) and/or lunotriquetral joint, and (4) no evidence of osteoarthritis of the DRUJ or ulnocarpal joint. The patient assignment was not randomized. Were used a visual analog scale for ulnar wrist pain; grip strength; range of motion; the Mayo Wrist Score (MWS); and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery to compare clinical outcomes. Ulnar variance, cystic changes of the lunate and triquetrum, and DRUJ arthritis on radiographs and operation-related complications were compared.

RESULTS

This study evaluated 19 patients after the AWP and 23 patients after USO. At 3 months, the AWP produced significantly better outcomes than USO regarding grip strength (79.6% ± 14.3% vs 62.7% ± 12.6%, P < .001), MWS (81.8 ± 7.9 points vs 71.3 ± 14.2 points, P = .005), and DASH score (19.4 ± 8.4 vs 31.5 ± 14.0, P = .001); clinical outcomes were similar at 6, 12, and 24 months. The complication rates were 34.8% for USO and 10.5% for the AWP; complications included DRUJ arthritis (n = 4), implant irritation (n = 6), and refracture after implant removal (n = 2) in the USO group and secondary surgery (n = 1) and tendinopathy (n = 1) in the AWP group.

CONCLUSIONS

The AWP and USO for idiopathic UIS with subtle positive ulnar variance achieved similar clinical and radiologic outcomes at 2 years after surgery. However, compared with USO, the AWP showed lower complication rates and better grip strength, MWS values, and DASH scores at 3 months after surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, comparative trial.

A Systematic Review of Outcomes after Arthroscopic Débridement for Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tear

BACKGROUND

Evidence regarding the effectiveness of arthroscopic débridement for a triangular fibrocartilage complex tear is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of outcomes to evaluate the effectiveness of débridement for triangular fibrocartilage complex tears.

METHODS

The authors searched all available literature in the PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE (Ovid) databases for articles reporting on triangular fibrocartilage complex tear débridement. Data collection included arc of motion, grip strength, patient-reported outcomes, and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 1723 unique studies were identified, of which 18 studies met the authors' criteria. The mean before and after arc of wrist extension/flexion motion values were 120 and 146 degrees (six studies). The mean before and after grip strength values were 65 percent and 91 percent of the contralateral side (10 studies). Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores (six studies) and pain visual analogue scale scores (seven studies) improved from 39 to 18, and from 7 to 3, respectively. The mean pain visual analogue scale score after débridement was 1.9 in the ulnar-positive group and 2.4 in the ulnar-neutral and ulnar-negative groups. Eighty-seven percent of patients returned to their original work.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients reported reduced pain and improved functional and patient-reported outcomes after débridement of triangular fibrocartilage complex tears. Most patients after débridement returned to previous work, with few complications. Although some of these cases may require secondary procedures, simple débridement can be performed with suitable satisfactory outcomes for cases with any type of ulnar variance.

Metaphyseal Versus Diaphyseal Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy for Treatment of Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: A Comparative Study

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes and complication rates of diaphyseal and metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomies for the treatment of ulnar abutment syndrome.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study comparing 35 patients who underwent either a metaphyseal (n = 14) or diaphyseal (n = 21) osteotomy. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared. Complication rates including infection, hardware removal, and reoperations were also assessed.

RESULTS

There were no differences in patient characteristics, ulnar variance, or pain and functional scores between groups. Metaphyseal osteotomy surgery time was shorter (45.5 vs 71.7 minutes) and resulted in greater ulnar shortening (4.8 vs 3.4 mm) compared with diaphyseal osteotomies. At an average 19.2-month follow-up, metaphyseal osteotomies were associated with greater improvement in pain and Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire scores. The need for implant removal was the same in both groups. There were no complications in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this study suggest that metaphyseal osteotomies are a safe and effective alternative to diaphyseal osteotomies for the management of ulnar abutment syndrome. Although improved surgical time and postoperative outcomes are encouraging, further large-scale and properly powered studies with long-term outcomes will help characterize the benefit of one technique over another. Ultimately, the decision between a metaphyseal and diaphyseal osteotomy may be surgeon preference.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.