Bifurcation dynamics and determination of alternate cell fates in bipotent progenitor cells

Limit-cycle oscillatory coexpression of cross-inhibitory transcription factors: a model mechanism for lineage promiscuity

Lineage switches are genetic regulatory motifs that govern and maintain the commitment of a developing cell to a particular cell fate. A canonical example of a lineage switch is the pair of transcription factors PU.1 and GATA-1, of which the former is affiliated with the myeloid and the latter with the erythroid lineage within the haematopoietic system. On a molecular level, PU.1 and GATA-1 positively regulate themselves and antagonize each other via direct protein-protein interactions. Here we use mathematical modelling to identify a novel type of dynamic behaviour that can be supported by such a regulatory architecture. Guided by the specifics of the PU.1-GATA-1 interaction, we formulate, using the law of mass action, a system of differential equations for the key molecular concentrations. After a series of systematic approximations, the system is reduced to a simpler one, which is tractable to phase-plane and linearization methods. The reduced system formally resembles, and generalizes, a well-known model for competitive species from mathematical ecology. However, in addition to the qualitative regimes exhibited by a pair of competitive species (exclusivity, bistable exclusivity, stable-node coexpression) it also allows for oscillatory limit-cycle coexpression. A key outcome of the model is that, in the context of cell-fate choice, such oscillations could be harnessed by a differentiating cell to prime alternately for opposite outcomes; a bifurcation-theory approach is adopted to characterize this possibility.

Reprogramming of human peripheral blood monocytes to erythroid lineage by blocking of the PU-1 gene expression

In hematopoietic system development, PU.1 and GATA-1 as lineage-specific transcription factors (TF) are expressed in common myeloid progenitors. The cross antagonism between them ascertains gene expression programs of monocytic and erythroid cells, respectively. This concept in transdifferentiation approaches has not been well considered yet, especially in intralineage conversion systems. To demonstrate whether PU.1 suppression induces monocyte lineage conversion into red blood cells, a combination of three PU.1-specific siRNAs was implemented to knock down PU.1 gene expression and generate the balance in favor of GATA-1 expression to induce erythroid differentiation. For this purpose, monocytes were isolated from human peripheral blood and transfected by PU.1 siRNAs. In transfected monocytes, the rate of PU.1 expression in mRNA level was significantly decreased until 0.38 ± 0.118 when compared to untreated monocytes at 72 h (p value ≤0.05) which resulted in significant overexpression of GATA1 of 16.1 ± 0.343-fold compared to the untreated group (p value ≤0.01). Subsequently, overexpression of hemoglobin (α 13.26 ± 1.34-fold; p value≤0.0001) and β-globin (37.55 ± 16.56-fold; p value≤0.0001) was observed when compared to control groups. The results of western immunoblotting confirm those findings too. While, reduced expression of monocyte, CD14 gene, was observed in qRT-PCR and flow cytometry results. Our results suggest that manipulating the ratio of the two TFs in bifurcation differentiation pathways via applying siRNA technology can possibly change the cells' fate as a safe way for therapeutics application.