Quantitative analysis of myocardial perfusion in rabbits by transthoracic real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography

Establishment of nonobstructive coronary microcirculatory disorders in rabbits using three established methods and a comparative study

To compare the merits and drawbacks of three approaches for establishing a rabbit model of nonobstructive coronary microcirculatory disease, namely, open thoracic subtotal ligation of coronary arteries, ultrasound-guided cardiac microsphere injection, and sodium laurate injection. New Zealand rabbits were allocated to four groups: a normal group (Blank group), an Open-chest group (Open-chest), a microsphere group (Echo-M), and a sodium laurate group (Echo-SL), each comprising 10 rabbits. The rabbits were sacrificed 24 h after the procedures, and their echocardiography, stress myocardial contrast echocardiography, pathology, and surgical times were compared. The results demonstrated varying degrees of reduced cardiac function in all three experimental groups, the Open-chest group exhibiting the most significant decline. The myocardial filling in the affected areas was visually analyzed by myocardial contrast echocardiography, revealing sparse filling at rest but more after stress. Quantitative analysis of perfusion parameters (β, A, MBF) in the affected myocardium showed reduced values, the Open-chest group having the most severe reductions. No differences were observed in stress myocardial acoustic imaging parameters between the Echo-M and Echo-SL groups. Among the pathological presentations, the Open-chest model predominantly exhibited localized ischemia, while the Echo-M model was characterized by mechanical physical embolism, and the Echo-SL model displayed in situ thrombosis as the primary pathological feature. Inflammatory responses and collagen deposition were observed in all groups, with the severity ranking of Open-chest > Echo-SL > Echo-M. The ultrasound-guided intracardiac injection method used in this experiment outperformed open-chest surgery in terms of procedural efficiency, invasiveness, and maneuverability. This study not only optimizes established cardiac injection techniques but also offers valuable evidence to support clinical investigations through a comparison of various modeling methods.