Patellofemoral MRI Alterations Following Single Bundle ACL Reconstruction with Hamstring Autografts Are Associated with Quadriceps Femoris Atrophy

Mobile health-based home rehabilitation education improving early outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Objective

This study aimed to assess changes in joint range of motion (ROM) and knee joint function between patients who received the mobile health-based intervention and those who received regular care at 2 and 6 weeks after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction to provide better interventions in the future.

Methods

Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were randomized into the experimental [Mobile health-based intervention (MHI); n = 62] and control (CON) groups (n = 63). The CON group underwent home-based rehabilitation exercise following the paper rehabilitation schedule, while the intervention group received additional mobile health-based education at weeks 1-6 after surgery. ROM, thigh circumference difference, and flexion pain were the primary outcomes. The secondary outcomes were the international knee documentation committee knee evaluation form (IKDC) scores and rehabilitation compliance scores. All the outcomes were measured 1 day before surgery as references and at 2 and 6 weeks after surgery.

Results

There was no statistical difference in the patients' ROM, thigh circumference difference, and VAS scores at the 2-week follow-up. At the 6-week follow-up, the ROM of the affected leg was (118.1 ± 20.5)° in the CON group and (126.6 ± 20.5)° in the MHI group, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.011). The difference in thigh circumference was 3.0 (2.0, 3.5) cm in the CON group and 2.5 (1.0, 3.0) cm in the MHI group. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The VAS score in the CON group was 3.0 (2.0, 4.0), and the MHI group was 2.5 (1.0, 3.0). The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). At the 6-week follow-up, the compliance score of patients in the MHI group was significantly higher than that in the CON group (P = 0.047, β = 2.243, 95%CI: 0.026-4.459). There is no statistically significant difference in IKDC scores.

Conclusion

Mobile health-based intervention positively affected patients undergoing ACL reconstruction surgery, particularly in improving the clinical outcome indicators of the knee joint.

Joint effusion at 3 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with reinjury

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether joint effusion at 3 months after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is associated with ACL reinjury.

METHODS

The medical records of 227 consecutive patients who underwent single-bundle ACL reconstruction between 2015 and 2018 were reviewed in this retrospective single-center study. Demographic data such as sex and age at surgery, as well as data on preinjury Tegner activity scale score, time from injury to surgery, presence of meniscus and cartilage injuries, and the occurrence of ACL reinjury within 2 years, were collected. Joint effusion was defined as grade 3 (range 0-3) according to the ACL Osteoarthritis Score by magnetic resonance imaging at 3 months postoperatively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to control for potential confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 176 patients (mean age 22.5 ± 9.9 years) were included. Among these patients, 18 (10.2%) had ACL reinjury. At the multivariate logistic regression analysis, higher Tegner activity scale (odds ratio [OR] 3.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.61-6.04; p < 0.001) and presence of joint effusion (OR 34.5; 95% CI 6.63-179.7; p < 0.001) increased the odds of ACL reinjury, and older age (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.51-0.92; p = 0.012) decreased the odds of ACL reinjury.

CONCLUSIONS

Joint effusion with a larger fluid volume at 3 months postoperatively was one of the risk factors for ACL reinjury independent of confounders, such as age and activity level. This result suggests the possibility of postoperative intervention for ACL reinjury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.