Comparison of 4 MV photon surface dose among Varian, Siemens, and Elekta linear accelerators for tangential breast treatment: a phantom study

Surface and build‐up dose comparison between Elekta 6 MV flattening filter and flattening‐filter‐free beams using an advanced Markus ionization chamber and a solid water‐equivalent phantom

Using a plane‐parallel advanced Markus ionization chamber and a stack of water‐equivalent solid phantom blocks, percentage surface and build‐up doses of Elekta 6 MV flattening filter (FF) and flattening‐filter‐free (FFF) beams were measured as a function of the phantom depth for field sizes ranging from 2 × 2 to 10 × 10 cm². It was found that the dose difference between the FF and the FFF beams was relatively small. The maximum dose difference between the FF and the FFF beams was 4.4% at a depth of 1 mm for a field size of 2 × 2 cm². The dose difference was gradually decreased while the field size was increased up to 10 × 10 cm². The measured data were also compared to published Varian FF and FFF data, suggesting that the percentage surface and build‐up doses as well as the percentage dose difference between FF and FFF beams by our Elekta linac were smaller than those by the Varian linac.

Superficial doses in breast cancer radiotherapy using conventional and IMRT techniques: a film-based phantom study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Superficial doses in radiotherapy are affected by the treatment technique. The implications for breast cancer treatments were evaluated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Four treatment techniques relevant for breast cancer irradiation were evaluated; tangential standard, tangential IMRT, 7-field IMRT (arc-like field arrangement) and hybrid IMRT (an IMRT plan mixed with non-modulated fields). Only 6MV photons were used. GafChromic EBT film was used for dose measurements at the surface, in the skin (0-5mm depth) and in the superficial parts of CTV (5-10mm depth) of an anthropomorphic thorax phantom.

RESULTS

Only small differences in superficial doses were observed between tangential standard and tangential IMRT. Compared to the tangential standard plan, the surface and skin doses were reduced with the 7-field IMRT plan, on average by 20% and 5%, respectively, while hybrid IMRT reduced the surface and skin doses medially (by 44% and 8%, respectively) and increased the surface and skin dose laterally (by 40% and 15%, respectively). Minimum superficial CTV doses varied between regions, but were mainly between 90% and 95% of the target dose for all plans, only the hybrid IMRT plan resulted in a region with minimum dose below 90%.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to tangential irradiation, skin sparing was achieved by the 7-field IMRT plan. The minimum dose in the superficial parts of the CTV was below 95% of the target dose for all plans investigated.