1
|
Costa AF, Peet K. Contrast media injection protocol for portovenous phase abdominal CT: does a fixed injection duration improve hepatic enhancement over a fixed injection rate? Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:2968-2975. [PMID: 33386915 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02919-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess whether a fixed contrast media (CM) injection duration improves the magnitude and inter-patient variability in hepatic enhancement over a fixed injection rate. METHODS Outpatients who underwent portovenous phase abdominal CT (fixed duration, February-November 2018; fixed rate, January-July 2020) with 1.22 mL/kg iohexol 350 were included. Subjects with liver, kidney or heart disease were excluded. The number of subjects and injection protocols were as follows: fixed duration arm, 56 women, 60 men, 35 s injection duration; fixed rate arm, 66 women, 62 men, 3 mL/s injection rate. Liver attenuation measurements were obtained from regions of interest on pre- and post-contrast images. Mean hepatic enhancement (MHE) and MHE normalized to iodine dose (MHE/I) were compared (unpaired t-tests and F-tests). RESULTS There was no statistically significant difference in age, weight, body mass index or CM dosing (p > 0.05). Enhancement indices were significantly lower in the fixed rate group as compared to the fixed duration group, as follows: MHE, 50.0 ± 12 vs. 54.8 ± 11 HU (p = 0.001); and MHE/I, 1.53 ± 0.43 vs. 1.66 ± 0.51 HU/g, (p = 0.04). However, there was no significant difference in the variances of MHE (p = 0.51) and MHE/I (p = 0.08). CONCLUSION A fixed CM injection duration yields a greater magnitude in hepatic enhancement indices than a fixed injection rate. Inter-patient variability in hepatic enhancement indices do not significantly differ between the two injection protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreu F Costa
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd floor, 1276 South Park Street, Halifax, NS, B3H 2Y9, Canada.
| | - Kris Peet
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd floor, 1276 South Park Street, Halifax, NS, B3H 2Y9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Caruso D, Rosati E, Panvini N, Rengo M, Bellini D, Moltoni G, Bracci B, Lucertini E, Zerunian M, Polici M, De Santis D, Iannicelli E, Anibaldi P, Carbone I, Laghi A. Optimization of contrast medium volume for abdominal CT in oncologic patients: prospective comparison between fixed and lean body weight-adapted dosing protocols. Insights Imaging 2021; 12:40. [PMID: 33743100 PMCID: PMC7981367 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-021-00980-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patient body size represents the main determinant of parenchymal enhancement and by adjusting the contrast media (CM) dose to patient weight may be a more appropriate approach to avoid a patient over dosage of CM. To compare the performance of fixed-dose and lean body weight (LBW)-adapted contrast media dosing protocols, in terms of image quality and parenchymal enhancement. Results One-hundred cancer patients undergoing multiphasic abdominal CT were prospectively enrolled in this multicentric study and randomly divided in two groups: patients in fixed-dose group (n = 50) received 120 mL of CM while in LBW group (n = 50) the amount of CM was computed according to the patient’s LBW. LBW protocol group received a significantly lower amount of CM (103.47 ± 17.65 mL vs. 120.00 ± 0.00 mL, p < 0.001). Arterial kidney signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and pancreatic CNR were significantly higher in LBW group (all p ≤ 0.004). LBW group provided significantly higher arterial liver, kidney, and pancreatic contrast enhancement index (CEI) and portal venous phase kidney CEI (all p ≤ 0.002). Significantly lower portal vein SNR and CNR were observed in LBW-Group (all p ≤ 0.020). Conclusions LBW-adapted CM administration for abdominal CT reduces the volume of injected CM and improves both image quality and parenchymal enhancement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damiano Caruso
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome - Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Elisa Rosati
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome - Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicola Panvini
- Diagnostic Imaging Unit, Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, ICOT Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via Franco Faggiana, 1668, 04100, Latina, Italy
| | - Marco Rengo
- Diagnostic Imaging Unit, Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, ICOT Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via Franco Faggiana, 1668, 04100, Latina, Italy
| | - Davide Bellini
- Diagnostic Imaging Unit, Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, ICOT Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via Franco Faggiana, 1668, 04100, Latina, Italy
| | - Giulia Moltoni
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome - Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Benedetta Bracci
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome - Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Lucertini
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome - Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Marta Zerunian
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome - Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Michela Polici
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome - Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Domenico De Santis
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome - Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Elsa Iannicelli
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome - Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Anibaldi
- Hospital Direction and Clinical Departments, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Iacopo Carbone
- Diagnostic Imaging Unit, Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, ICOT Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via Franco Faggiana, 1668, 04100, Latina, Italy
| | - Andrea Laghi
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome - Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Costa AF, Peet K, Abdolell M. Dosing Iodinated Contrast Media According to Lean Versus Total Body Weight at Abdominal CT: A Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial. Acad Radiol 2020; 27:833-840. [PMID: 31439467 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2019] [Revised: 07/05/2019] [Accepted: 07/10/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To compare the magnitude and interpatient variability in normalized mean hepatic enhancement (MHE) indices when dosing contrast media (CM) according to total body weight (TBW) and lean body weight (LBW). MATERIALS AND METHODS This ethics-approved stratified randomized controlled study allocated 280 outpatients for abdominal Computed Tomography (CT) between February-November 2018 to TBW- or LBW-dosing using computer-generated tables. CTs were acquired in portal venous phase after fixed 35-second injection of Iohexol 350. Patients with missing precontrast image, incorrect dose, or chronic kidney, liver or heart disease were excluded. The number of included patients and CM doses were: TBW arm, 51 women and 60 men, 1.22 mL/kg; LBW arm, 59 women, 1.66 mL/kg LBW, and 59 men, 1.52 mL/kg LBW. Liver attenuations were obtained from regions of interest. Values and standard deviations in MHE indices normalized to iodine dose (MHE/I) and iodine dose per kg TBW (aMHE = MHE/[I/TBW]) were compared (unpaired t tests and F-tests). RESULTS Cohorts were similar in age, sex, TBW, and LBW. TBW groups received more CM than LBW groups: men, 106.5 ± 20 versus 98.4 ± 11 mL, p = 0.007; women, 93.7 ± 20 versus 77.5 ± 11 mL, p < 0.0001. TBW and LBW groups showed no significant difference in MHE/I (women, 1.75 ± 0.5 versus 1.86 ± 0.6 HU/g, p = 0.31; men, 1.53 ± 0.4 versus 1.52 ± 0.4 HU/g, p = 0.90) or aMHE (women, 0.03 ± 0.01 versus 0.03 ± 0.01 HU/g/kg, p = 0.25; men, 0.02 ± 0.01 versus 0.02 ± 0.01 HU/g/kg, p = 0.52). Variances in MHE/I and aMHE were not significantly different for all groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION TBW- and LBW-based CM dosing yield a similar magnitude and interpatient variability in normalized MHE indices at routine abdominal CT.
Collapse
|
4
|
Peet K, Clarke SE, Costa AF. Hepatic enhancement differences when dosing iodinated contrast media according to total versus lean body weight. Acta Radiol 2019; 60:807-814. [PMID: 30227724 DOI: 10.1177/0284185118801137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kris Peet
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Sharon E Clarke
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Andreu F Costa
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Eddy K, Costa AF. Assessment of Cirrhotic Liver Enhancement With Multiphasic Computed Tomography Using a Faster Injection Rate, Late Arterial Phase, and Weight-Based Contrast Dosing. Can Assoc Radiol J 2017; 68:371-378. [PMID: 28720415 DOI: 10.1016/j.carj.2017.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2016] [Revised: 12/11/2016] [Accepted: 01/03/2017] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to update our liver computed tomography (CT) protocol according to published guidelines, and to quantitatively evaluate the effect of these modifications. METHODS The modified liver CT protocol employed a faster injection rate (5 vs 3 mL/s), later arterial phase (20-second vs 10-second postbolus trigger), and weight-based dosing of iodinated contrast (1.7 mL/kg vs 100 mL fixed dose). Liver and vascular attenuation values were measured on CTs of patients with cirrhosis from January to September 2015 (old protocol, n = 49) and from October to December 2015 (modified protocol, n = 31). CTs were considered adequate if liver enhancement exceeded 50 Hounsfield units (HU) in portal venous phase, or when the unenhanced phase was unavailable, if a minimum iodine concentration of 500 mg I/kg was achieved. Attenuations and iodine concentrations were compared using the t test and the number of suboptimal studies was compared with Fisher's exact test. RESULTS CTs acquired with the modified protocol demonstrated higher aortic (P = .001) and portal vein (P < .0001) attenuations in the arterial phase as well as greater hepatic attenuation on all postcontrast phases (P = .0006, .002, and .003 for arterial, venous, and equilibrium phases, respectively). Hepatic enhancement in the portal venous phase (61 ± 15 HU vs 51 ± 16 HU; P = .0282) and iodine concentrations (595 ± 88 mg I/kg vs 456 ± 112 mg I/kg; P < .0001) were improved, and the number of suboptimal studies was reduced from 57% to 23% (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS A liver CT protocol with later arterial phase, faster injection rate, and weight-based dosing of intravenous contrast significantly improves liver enhancement and iodine concentrations in patients with cirrhosis, resulting in significantly fewer suboptimal studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen Eddy
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, QE II Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Andreu F Costa
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, QE II Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aortic and Hepatic Contrast Enhancement During Hepatic-Arterial and Portal Venous Phase Computed Tomography Scanning: Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis Using Age, Sex, Total Body Weight, Height, and Cardiac Output. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2017; 41:309-314. [PMID: 27759599 DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000000513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We evaluated the effect of the age, sex, total body weight (TBW), height (HT) and cardiac output (CO) of patients on aortic and hepatic contrast enhancement during hepatic-arterial phase (HAP) and portal venous phase (PVP) computed tomography (CT) scanning. METHODS This prospective study received institutional review board approval; prior informed consent to participate was obtained from all 168 patients. All were examined using our routine protocol; the contrast material was 600 mg/kg iodine. Cardiac output was measured with a portable electrical velocimeter within 5 minutes of starting the CT scan. We calculated contrast enhancement (per gram of iodine: [INCREMENT]HU/gI) of the abdominal aorta during the HAP and of the liver parenchyma during the PVP. We performed univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis between all patient characteristics and the [INCREMENT]HU/gI of aortic- and liver parenchymal enhancement. RESULTS Univariate linear regression analysis demonstrated statistically significant correlations between the [INCREMENT]HU/gI and the age, sex, TBW, HT, and CO (all P < 0.001). However, multivariate linear regression analysis showed that only the TBW and CO were of independent predictive value (P < 0.001). Also, only the CO was independently and negatively related to aortic enhancement during HAP and to liver parenchymal enhancement when the contrast material injection protocol was adjusted for the TBW (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION By multivariate linear regression analysis only the TBW and CO were significantly correlated with aortic and liver parenchymal enhancement; the age, sex, and HT were not. The CO was the only independent factor affecting aortic and liver parenchymal enhancement at hepatic CT when the protocol was adjusted for the TBW.
Collapse
|
7
|
Konno M, Hosokai Y, Usui A, Abe M, Tateishi T, Kawasumi Y, Tsuda M, Ota H, Takase K, Saito H. Cardiac output obtained from test bolus injections as a factor in contrast injection rate revision of following coronary CT angiography. Acta Radiol 2012; 53:1107-11. [PMID: 22993270 DOI: 10.1258/ar.2012.120276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimal contrast enhancement is crucial for the detection of coronary artery stenoses and atherosclerotic changes in coronary CT angiography (CTA). PURPOSE To demonstrate the feasibility of using the cardiac output (CO) obtained from the test bolus injection data-set (COtest) as a factor in contrast injection rate revision of the following coronary CTA. MATERIAL AND METHODS The test bolus injection data-sets of 52 consecutive coronary CTAs were examined. COtest was calculated from the test bolus data-set. Aortic peak enhancement (APE) was measured on the following coronary CTA. We simulated the APE at a fixed contrast injection rate of 4 mL/s (simAPE) in each patient. RESULTS The ranges of COtest and simAPE were 2.82-7.56 L/min and 194-527 Hounsfield Units, respectively. There was a significant negative correlation (R = -0.802, P < 0.001) between simAPE and COtest. CONCLUSION COtest can be used for injection rate revision on coronary CTA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahiko Konno
- Division of Diagnostic Image Analysis, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Miyagi
- Yamagata Prefecture Comprehensive Rehabilitation and Education Center, Yamagata
| | - Yoshiyuki Hosokai
- Division of Diagnostic Image Analysis, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Miyagi
| | - Akihito Usui
- Division of Diagnostic Image Analysis, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Miyagi
| | - Mitsuya Abe
- Division of Diagnostic Image Analysis, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Miyagi
| | - Toshiki Tateishi
- Division of Diagnostic Image Analysis, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Miyagi
| | - Yusuke Kawasumi
- Division of Diagnostic Image Analysis, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Miyagi
| | - Masashi Tsuda
- Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Hideki Ota
- Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Kei Takase
- Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Haruo Saito
- Division of Diagnostic Image Analysis, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Miyagi
| |
Collapse
|